scholarly journals Metastatic colo-rectal cancer: real life experience from an Indian tertiary care center

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinod Sharma ◽  
Atul Sharma ◽  
Vinod Raina ◽  
Deepak Dabkara ◽  
Bidhu Kalyan Mohanti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tertiary Care Center ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Mucinous Histology

Abstract Background No data exist for the long-term outcome of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) from the Southern part of Asia. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the survival outcome of mCRC from an Indian tertiary care center. The study also aims to highlight the treatment pattern practiced and the unique clinico-pathologic characteristics. Methods This is a single-center retrospective observational study done at a large referral tertiary care center in North India. All patients with synchronous or metachronous mCRC who received at least one dose of chemotherapy for metastatic disease, registered between 2003 to 2017 were included. Primary outcome measures were overall survival and progression-free survival and prognostic factors of overall survival. Descriptive analysis was done for the clinicopathological characteristics and treatment patterns. Kaplan Meier method for overall survival and progression-free survival. Cox regression analysis was performed for the determination of the prognostic factors for overall survival. Result Out of 377 eligible patients, 256 patients (68%) had de novo metastatic disease and the remaining 121 (32%) progressed to metastatic disease after initial treatment. The cohort was young (median age, 46 years) with the most common primary site being the rectum. A higher proportion of signet (9%) and mucinous histology (24%). The three common sites of metastasis were the liver, peritoneum, and lung. In the first line, most patients received oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (70%). Only 12.5% of patients received biologicals in the first-line setting. The median follow-up and median overall survival of study cohort were 17 months and 18.5 months. The factors associated with poor outcome for overall survival on multivariate analysis were ECOG performance status of > 1, high CEA, low albumin, and the number of lines of chemotherapy received (< 2). Conclusion The outcome of mCRC is inferior to the published literature. We found a relatively higher proportion of patients with the following characteristics; younger, rectum as primary tumor location, the signet, and mucinous histology, higher incidence of peritoneum involvement. The routine use of targeted therapies is limited. Government schemes (inclusion of targeted therapies in the Ayushman scheme), NGO assistance, and availability of generic low-cost targeted drugs may increase the availability.

scholarly journals Comparison of bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone versus bortezomib-dexamethasone based regimens in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafiye Ciftciler ◽  
Hakan Goker ◽  
Yahya Buyukasik ◽  
Nilgun Sayınalp ◽  
Ibrahim C. Haznedaroglu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tertiary Care Center ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference

The treatment landscape and clinical outcome of multiple myeloma (MM) patients have changed in the last decades, with an improved median survival of 8-10 years. This study aimed to evaluate the bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (VCD) regimen versus bortezomib and dexamethasone (VD) regimen in patients with newly diagnosed MM. This study has been performed in a retrospective manner. One hundred and three patients with newly diagnosed MM who received chemotherapy at our tertiary care center between the years of 2009 and 2018 were evaluated. A total of 103 patients were included. The 5-year overall survival (OS) for patients who received VD regimen and patients who received VCD regimen were 75% and 83%, respectively. The OS for VD patients was 113.1±12.5 versus 122.2±9.5 months for VCD patients with no statistically significant difference (P=0.47). The 5- year PFS (progression free survival) for patients who received VD regimen and patients who received VCD regimen were 66% and 75%, respectively. The PFS for VCD patients was higher than the PFS for VD patients (67.1±7.4 versus 97.7±13.4 months), but no statistically significant difference was observed (P=0.59). Relapse rate (P=0.002) and mortality rate (P=0.01) were higher in VD group than VCD group and they were statistically significant. The OS and PFS were clinically longer in patients receiving VCD regimen than in patients receiving VD regimen, although not statistically significant. Cyclophosphamide should be given to patients at physician discretion and depending on patient’s frailty function.

Efficacy and prognostic significance of triflurodine/tipiracil beyond oxaliplatin and irinotecan based chemotherapy in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: An observational multicenter study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15586-e15586
Author(s):  
Mohamed Alghamdi ◽  
Shouki Bazarbashi ◽  
Elsamany Shereef ◽  
Mervat Mahrous ◽  
Omar Al shaer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Neutrophil Count ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
P Value ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival

e15586 Background: In Saudi Arabia, the incidence of colorectal cancer has been increased over the past few years. The optimal treatment beyond the second line is not fully understood. To the best of our knowledge, the efficacy and disease outcomes of triflurodine/tipiracil in Saudi patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC) has not been studied yet. Our study is a real-life practice evaluation of the efficacy of triflurodine/tipiracil in patients with refractory mCRC. Moreover, the prognosis and the prognostic significance of the different clinical variables have been analyzed. Methods: A retrospective, multi-centers ( 5 centers representative of Saudi Arabia )observational study in patients with mCRC who have received triflurodine/tipiracil beyond oxaliplatin & Irinotecan-based chemotherapy between December 2018-December 2020.We aimed to assess the response to triflurodine/tipiracil, to evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS ), the overall survival (OS), and the associated factors of prognostic significance. Results:The data of 100 patients with refractory mCRC who has received triflurodine/tipiracil have been analyzed. The mean age was 55.2 +11.8 years. Forty-two patients were (42%) females and 58 (58%) were male patients. Sigmoid was the most common primary site of cancer in 35 (35%) patients, followed by rectum 29 (29%). Peritoneal metastasis was present in 17 (23.3%) patients ,liver in 51(56.6%) and lung in 39 (50.7%). Metastatic sites were ≥ 2 in 45 (45%) patients. Metastatic lesions were ≥ 5 in 65 (65%) patients. Xelox chemotherapy regimen was the most commonly used first-line chemotherapy which represents 43%, while Folfiri or Xeliri combination was the most used second line in 57 (60%). For the third line, Folfox or Xelox was used in 81 (83.5%) patients. The fourth line was given to 49 (67.1%). For first-line biological agents, Cetuximab was used most frequently 31 (46.3%).Evaluation of the response to treatment with triflurodine/tipiracil revealed one patient (1%) with a complete response,3 patients (3%) with partial response, 28 (28%) patients with stable disease, and 66 (66%) showed progressive disease. The estimated median progression-free survival was 5 months ( 3.839 - 6.161) and the median overall survival was 12 months (9.732-14.268). The log-rank analysis showed that the baseline neutrophils ≤ 75 % ( P-value= 0.0092) and low hemoglobin level (P-value= 0.0245) were strongly associated with a higher survival. By multivariate Cox regression analysis, the neutrophil count ≤ 75 % was the only independent predictor for survival. Conclusions: Trifluridine/tipiracil is effective in patients with refractory mCRC. The low neutrophil count might predict a better overall survival.

A retrospective study of primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) of the kidney in a tertiary cancer center in India.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 361-361
Author(s):  
Nandini Sharrel Menon ◽  
Devanshi Kalra ◽  
Kumar Prabhash ◽  
Vanita Noronha ◽  
Santosh Menon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Adjuvant Radiation ◽  
Pathological Feature ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Rare Tumours ◽  
Multimodality Approach

361 Background: Primitive neuroectodermal tumours (PNET) of the kidney are rare tumours with aggressive behaviour. This study was conducted to review the diagnosis and management of patients with renal PNET at our centre. Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted at a tertiary cancer care centre in Mumbai, India. The demographic and clinical data of 17 patients treated by the uro-oncology services were retrieved from electronic medical records. Descriptive analysis was performed for baseline characteristics.Overall & progression-free survival was determined using the Kaplan Meier method. Cox regression was used for multivariate analysis. Results: There were 12 male and 5 female patients in this cohort with a median age of 27 years. At diagnosis 2 patients had metastatic disease and 15 patients had non-metastatic disease. Median follow up in this cohort was 22 months (range 2-30 months). Presenting complaints were hematuria, abdominal pain, flank pain, fever, bone pain, and incidentally detected renal mass. All patients were Mic -2 positive and 13 were FLI-1 positive on immunohistochemistry. Fourteen patients underwent radical nephrectomy. One (5.9%) patient received both neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy, 8 (47.1%) received adjuvant and 2 (11.8%) received palliative chemotherapy upfront. Eight patients received adjuvant radiation to the renal bed.There was disease progression in12 patients,10 of 15 patients with non metastatic disease at diagnosis eventually developed metastasis.The median progression free survival (PFS) was 10.55 months.The pathological feature that was associated with a shorter PFS was tumor size ⩾10 cm(p = 0.044).The median overall survival was 20.04 months (95% CI 9.49 -not reached). The presence of metastasis and treatment received significantly impacted overall survival (OS). Median OS in patients with non-metastatic disease was not reached versus 14.1 months in those with metastatic disease (p = .019).The median OS in patients treated with multimodality approach was 20.11 months. Patients did not undergo surgery had a median OS of 5.45 months (p < .001) and those who did not receive any chemotherapy had a median OS of 4.57 months (p = .024).Thus, patients who received multimodality treatment had better outcomes. Conclusions: PNET kidney is an aggressive tumor which should be treated with a multimodality approach. Tumor size ⩾10 cm was an adverse prognostic factor.

scholarly journals OTHR-04. Gynecological Malignancies With Metastasis To The Central Nervous System: A Case Series and Systematic Review of the Literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii15-iii15
Author(s):  
Azeem Sajjad ◽  
Adeleso Adesina ◽  
Penelope Halkiadakis ◽  
Kelsey Murphy ◽  
Kathleen Mulligan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Central Nervous System ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Nervous System ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Gynecologic Malignancies ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Cns Metastasis

Abstract Introduction Gynecologic malignancies are an increasingly common proportion of central nervous system metastatic disease. As genetic sequencing technology improves and becomes more accessible, mutations associated with CNS metastasis are easier to elucidate. The aims of this case series and systematic literature review are to describe the patient population with CNS metastatic disease from a gynecologic primary, and to investigate why the proportion of CNS metastasis from gynecologic malignancies is increasing. Ultimately, we hope to improve understanding of this subset of metastatic CNS malignancies and improve management strategies. Methods A literature review of articles describing patients from 1990–2020 who were diagnosed with CNS metastasis from a known gynecologic primary malignancy was performed. Demographics, cancer type, mutation characteristics, management for metastatic disease, progression free survival, number of CNS metastases, and location of metastatic disease were assessed. Inclusion criteria were age&gt;18 years, diagnosis of primary ovarian, uterine, or cervical cancer with confirmed metastatic disease to the CNS, including brain parenchyma, leptomeninges, or intradural spinal cord or dural metastases. Exclusion criteria included pediatric population and bony metastases (e.g., bony spine metastases without evidence of meningeal/parenchymal invasion). Results Our review showed that patients with gynecological metastasis to the CNS generally have worse outcomes regarding overall survival, progression free survival, and quality of life than patients without CNS metastasis. Discussion Our results infer that the reported increase in incidence of CNS metastasis from gynecologic malignancies is a reflection of improvement of detection given advances in technology, improved patient follow up, and increased overall survival of patients with gynecologic malignancies. Further characterization of mutations from gynecologic malignancies associated with brain metastasis could result in development of more treatment options for patients in the future and help determine factors that contribute to developing metastasis to the CNS of various degrees, thus, potentially inform treatment strategies.

Phase III Trial of Epirubicin Plus Paclitaxel Compared With Epirubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide As First-Line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer: United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute Trial AB01

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (33) ◽  
pp. 8322-8330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth E. Langley ◽  
James Carmichael ◽  
Alison L. Jones ◽  
David A. Cameron ◽  
Wendi Qian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

Purpose To compare the effectiveness and tolerability of epirubicin and paclitaxel (EP) with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Patients and Methods Patients previously untreated with chemotherapy (except for adjuvant therapy) were randomly assigned to receive either EP (epirubicin 75 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 200 mg/m2) or EC (epirubicin 75 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2) administered intravenously every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. The primary outcome was progression-free survival; secondary outcome measures were overall survival, response rates, and toxicity. Results Between 1996 and 1999, 705 patients (353 EP patients and 352 EC patients) underwent random assignment. Patient characteristics were well matched between the two groups, and 71% of patients received six cycles of treatment. Objective response rates were 65% for the EP group and 55% for the EC group (P = .015). At the time of analysis, 641 patients (91%) had died. Median progression-free survival time was 7.0 months for the EP group and 7.1 months for the EC group (hazard ratio = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.24; P = .41), and median overall survival time was 13 months for the EP group and 14 months for the EC group (hazard ratio = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.19; P = .8). EP patients, compared with EC patients, had more grade 3 and 4 mucositis (6% v 2%, respectively; P = .0006) and grade 3 and 4 neurotoxicity (5% v 1%, respectively; P < .0001). Conclusion In terms of progression-free survival and overall survival, there was no evidence of a difference between EP and EC. The data demonstrate no additional advantage to using EP instead of EC as first-line chemotherapy for MBC in taxane-naïve patients.

scholarly journals Paclitaxel, Ifosfamide, and Cisplatin Efficacy for First-Line Treatment of Patients With Intermediate- or Poor-Risk Germ Cell Tumors

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (21) ◽  
pp. 2478-2483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darren R. Feldman ◽  
James Hu ◽  
Tanya B. Dorff ◽  
Kristina Lim ◽  
Sujata Patil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Germ Cell ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Collaborative Group ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Poor Risk ◽  
End Point

Purpose Paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (TIP) achieved complete responses (CRs) in two thirds of patients with advanced germ cell tumors (GCTs) who relapsed after first-line chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide with or without bleomycin. We tested the efficacy of first-line TIP in patients with intermediate- or poor-risk disease. Patients and Methods In this prospective, multicenter, single-arm phase II trial, previously untreated patients with International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group poor-risk or modified intermediate-risk GCTs received four cycles of TIP (paclitaxel 240 mg/m2 over 2 days, ifosfamide 6 g/m2 over 5 days with mesna support, and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 over 5 days) once every 3 weeks with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. The primary end point was the CR rate. Results Of the first 41 evaluable patients, 28 (68%) achieved a CR, meeting the primary efficacy end point. After additional accrual on an extension phase, total enrollment was 60 patients, including 40 (67%) with poor risk and 20 (33%) with intermediate risk. Thirty-eight (68%) of 56 evaluable patients achieved a CR and seven (13%) achieved partial responses with negative markers (PR-negative) for a favorable response rate of 80%. Five of seven achieving PR-negative status had seminoma and therefore did not undergo postchemotherapy resection of residual masses. Estimated 3-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 72% (poor risk, 63%; intermediate risk, 90%) and 91% (poor risk, 87%; intermediate risk, 100%), respectively. Grade 3 to 4 toxicities consisted primarily of reversible hematologic or electrolyte abnormalities, including neutropenic fever in 18%. Conclusion TIP demonstrated efficacy as first-line therapy for intermediate- and poor-risk GCTs with an acceptable safety profile. Given higher rates of favorable response, progression-free survival, and overall survival compared with prior first-line studies, TIP warrants further study in this population.

Prognostic impact of prior local therapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikifumi Koura ◽  
Masaki Shiota ◽  
Shohei Ueda ◽  
Takashi Matsumoto ◽  
Satoshi Kobayashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Local Therapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Line Therapy

Abstract Objective This study aimed to reveal the prognostic values of prior local therapy in first-line therapy using androgen receptor-axis targeting agents (abiraterone or enzalutamide) or docetaxel for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Methods The study included 303 patients treated with first-line therapy for non-metastatic and metastatic CRPC. The association between prior local therapy and therapeutic outcome including progression-free survival and overall survival was investigated by univariate and multivariate analyses as well as propensity score-matched analysis. Results In univariate analysis, local prior therapy was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.56, 95% confidence interval, 0.40–0.79; P = 0.0009). Overall survival, but not progression-free survival, was better among patients with prior local therapy compared with patients without prior local therapy even after multivariate analysis and propensity score-matched analysis. Conclusions This study robustly indicated that prior local treatment was prognostic for overall survival among patients with CRPC. This finding is useful to predict patient prognosis in CRPC.

Effects of adding necitumumab to first-line chemotherapy in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: Meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 1331-1342
Author(s):  
Irena Ilic ◽  
Sandra Sipetic ◽  
Jovan Grujicic ◽  
Milena Ilic
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival

Introduction Almost half of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Our aim was to assess the effects of adding necitumumab to chemotherapy in patients with stage IV NSCLC. Material and methods A comprehensive literature search was performed according to pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data on overall survival, progression-free survival, objective response rate and adverse events were extracted. A meta-analysis was performed to obtain pooled hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for time-to-event data and pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI for dichotomous outcomes. Results The meta-analysis included four randomized clinical trials with 2074 patients. The pooled results showed significant improvement for overall survival (HR = 0.87 (95% CI 0.79–0.95), p = 0.004) when necitumumab was added to chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. No statistically significant improvement was noted for progression-free survival and objective response rate (HR = 0.83 (95% CI 0.69–1.01), p = 0.06 and OR = 1.46 (95% CI 0.90–2.38), p = 0.13, respectively). Subgroup analysis showed that in patients with non-squamous NSCLC, there was no benefit in overall survival and objective response rate. Patients with advanced NSCLC who received necitumumab were at the highest odds of developing a skin rash (OR = 14.50 (95% CI 3.16–66.43), p = 0.0006) and hypomagnesaemia (OR = 2.77 (95% CI 2.23–3.45), p < 0.00001), while the OR for any grade ≥3 adverse event was 1.55 (95% CI 1.28–1.87, p < 0.00001). Conclusions The addition of necitumumab to standard chemotherapy in a first-line setting in patients with stage IV NSCLC results in a statistically significant improvement in overall survival, while the results were not significant for progression-free survival and objective response rate.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document