scholarly journals Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic sequence variants in ovarian cancer patients in the Gulf region: the PREDICT study

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fathi Azribi ◽  
Ehab Abdou ◽  
Emad Dawoud ◽  
Mohamed Ashour ◽  
Amgad Kamal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Family History ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
Sequence Variants ◽  
Gulf Region ◽  
Gulf Countries ◽  
History Of ◽  
Brca1 Brca2 ◽  
Predict Study

Abstract Background Patients with pathogenic sequence variants (PSVs) in BRCA1/BRCA2 are at high risk of developing ovarian cancer (OC). However, genetic testing for BRCA1/BRCA2 PSVs is still not a routine practice in the Middle East. With the lack of epidemiological studies in the region, we aim to describe the prevalence of BRCA1/BRCA2 PSVs in patients with OC across different countries in the Gulf region. Methods The PREDICT study was an observational, prospective, epidemiological study, which consecutively recruited women with ovarian, primary peritoneal, and fallopian tube cancers from the following Gulf countries over the period from July 2017 to July 2019; United Arab Emirates (UAE), Kuwait, and Oman. The study was approved by the local ethics committee of participating centers. The BRCA1/BRCA2 PSVs were assessed by tissue genetic testing using next-generation sequencing (NGS). Results A total of 105 women were included with a median age at diagnosis of 52 years (IQR 44.5 – 61.0). Nearly 11.4% of patients reported a family history of ovarian or breast cancer, while 4.7% of patients reported a family history of other cancers. Most of the patients (70.3%) had advanced disease (FIGO stage III/IV) at presentation. Eighty-eight patients (84%) were successfully tested for somatic BRCA1/BRCA2 PSVs. Fifteen patients (17%) were found to have PSVs in either BRCA1, BRCA2, or both genes; of them, 10 patients (11.2%) had BRCA1 somatic PSVs alone, eight patients (9.1%) had BRCA2 somatic PSVs, while three patients (2.9%) had both PSVs. Five patients with BRCA1/BRCA2 somatic PSVs had germline PSVs tests, and three of them tested positive. Concerning treatment, 87.6% of patients received perioperative chemotherapy and 6.6% as first-line palliative chemotherapy. Eighty-seven (82.9%) patients underwent debulking surgery, with no residual disease in 42.5% of patients. Conclusion Our study showed that the prevalence of BRCA1/BRCA2 somatic PSVs in patients with OC is higher than the reported global figures (2-8%). However, more studies are warranted to further elucidate the prevalence of BRCA1/BRCA2 somatic and germline PSVs, as well as other relevant genetic alterations, to better understand their impact on OC patient outcomes in Gulf countries. Trial registration NCT03082976.

Genetic testing in young women with breast cancer: Results from a web-based survey

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 21093-21093
Author(s):  
J. A. Shin ◽  
S. Gelber ◽  
J. Garber ◽  
R. Rosenberg ◽  
M. Przypyszny ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Family History ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Young Women ◽  
College Education ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of

21093 Background: Young women with breast cancer have an increased risk of harboring a BRCA1/2 mutation. The frequency of genetic testing in this population is not well described. We evaluated the reported frequency and factors associated with genetic testing among young breast cancer survivors identified through the Young Survival Coalition (YSC), an international advocacy group for young women with breast cancer. Methods: Items regarding family history and genetic testing were included in a large web-based survey addressing quality of life and fertility issues for young women with breast cancer. All YSC members were invited by email in March 2003 (N= 1,703 women) to participate in this cross-sectional survey. Results: 657 women completed the on-line survey; 622 were eligible for this analysis (age <40, no metastatic or recurrent disease). Mean age at breast cancer diagnosis was 33 years; mean age when surveyed 35.5 years. Stages included: 0 (10%), I (27%), II (49%), III (12%), missing (3%). 90% of women were white; 64% married; 49% with children; 78% had at least a college education; 42% of women reported a 1st or 2nd degree relative with breast or ovarian cancer, and 13% considered themselves high-risk for harboring a genetic mutation at the time of diagnosis. At the time of the survey, 23% of women had undergone genetic testing, and 26% of those tested reported that a mutation was found. In a multivariate model, women who were younger (age 36–40 vs. age =30, O.R. 2.26, p=0.004), more educated (< college vs. > college education, O.R. 2.62, p=0.0009), had a family history of breast or ovarian cancer (O.R. 3.15, p<0.0001), and had had a mastectomy (O.R. 1.99, p=0.001) were more likely to have undergone genetic testing. Non-significant covariates included: age at survey, stage, time since diagnosis, race, marital status, employment, finances, insurance, number of children, comorbidities, baseline anxiety and depression, and fear of recurrence. Conclusion: The majority of women diagnosed with breast cancer age 40 and younger do not undergo genetic testing. Younger, more educated women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer are more likely to get tested. Further research to define the appropriateness of genetic testing in this relatively high-risk population is warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

EMR documentation of genetics evaluations in patients with ovarian cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13156-e13156
Author(s):  
Payal Deepak Shah ◽  
Heather Symecko ◽  
Melissa Batson ◽  
Stacy Pundock ◽  
Neil Rustgi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Family History ◽  
Cancer Genetics ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
University Of Pennsylvania ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Problem List ◽  
Clinical Diagnoses ◽  
History Of

e13156 Background: Genetic testing for hereditary cancer predisposition has become increasingly complex yet impactful. Provider knowledge of test results influences risk management, implications for family members, and therapeutics. Currently, it’s unknown if genetic test (GT) results are appropriately recorded and accessible within the electronic medical record (EMR). Methods: We conducted a single-institution retrospective chart review to examine clinical diagnoses, family history of cancer, genetics referrals, and genetics services received at University of Pennsylvania’s Cancer Risk Evaluation Program (CREP) or elsewhere. The study cohort included new and prevalent cases of ovarian cancer (OC) seen by either a gynecologic or medical oncologist at the University of Pennsylvania in 2016. Analyses were conducted using SAS 9.4. Results: 667 women (83% white, 9% black, 4% Asian; mean age 61) with OC were included. 58% had a documented family history of breast, ovarian, prostate or pancreas cancer. 48% had documentation of referral to genetic testing and an additional 26% had documentation of testing outside of CREP. 26% had no documentation of referral or testing. Of those referred to CREP, 75% had genetic testing: in total 62% of the cohort had documented testing. 94% of those tested had a result documented in a provider note, and 64% had a scanned testing report uploaded into the EMR, including 74.3% of those tested through CREP and 25.7% of those tested outside. Among the 118 pathogenic mutations, 70% were documented on the EMR “problem list.” Conclusions: In this study, most, though not all, OC patients had documentation of a GT referral or testing in the EMR. Although GT results were routinely included in progress notes, these reports were less commonly scanned into the EMR (particularly for those tested outside Penn) or included in the EMR “problem list” which is both searchable and immediately visible. Capturing genetic data in a uniform and easily accessible manner within the EMR is necessary to maximize clinical utility of this information and should be a focus for EMR module development.

scholarly journals Underestimation of Risk of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation in Women With High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer by BRCAPRO: A Multi-Institution Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (12) ◽  
pp. 1249-1255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Molly S. Daniels ◽  
Sheri A. Babb ◽  
Robin H. King ◽  
Diana L. Urbauer ◽  
Brittany A.L. Batte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Family History ◽  
Brca2 Mutation ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Serous Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cancer History ◽  
Family Cancer History ◽  
Brca1 Brca2

Purpose Identification of the 10% to 15% of patients with ovarian cancer who have germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations is important for management of both patients and relatives. The BRCAPRO model, which estimates mutation likelihood based on personal and family cancer history, can inform genetic testing decisions. This study's purpose was to assess the accuracy of BRCAPRO in women with ovarian cancer. Methods BRCAPRO scores were calculated for 589 patients with ovarian cancer referred for genetic counseling at three institutions. Observed mutations were compared with those predicted by BRCAPRO. Analysis of variance was used to assess factors impacting BRCAPRO accuracy. Results One hundred eighty (31%) of 589 patients with ovarian cancer tested positive. At BRCAPRO scores less than 40%, more mutations were observed than expected (93 mutations observed v 34.1 mutations expected; P < .001). If patients with BRCAPRO scores less than 10% had not been tested, 51 (28%) of 180 mutations would have been missed. BRCAPRO underestimated the risk for high-grade serous ovarian cancers but overestimated the risk for other histologies (P < .001), underestimation increased as age at diagnosis decreased (P = .02), and model performance varied by institution (P = .02). Conclusion Patients with ovarian cancer classified as low risk by BRCAPRO are more likely to test positive than predicted. The risk of a mutation in patients with low BRCAPRO scores is high enough to warrant genetic testing. This study demonstrates that assessment of family history by a validated model cannot effectively target testing to a high-risk ovarian cancer patient population, which strongly supports the recommendation to offer BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic testing to all patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer regardless of family history.

Family history and pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variants in prostate cancer patients.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 143-143
Author(s):  
Rachel Sabol ◽  
Elisa Marie Ledet ◽  
Ellen Jaeger ◽  
Marcus W. Moses ◽  
Brian E. Lewis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Family History ◽  
Personal History ◽  
Sample Collection ◽  
First Degree Relatives ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Damage Repair ◽  
History Of

143 Background: Recent literature highlights the importance of germline genetic testing in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Surprisingly, a literature review indicates that family history records are incomplete in published studies. Methods: Prospective and complete family history data were gathered from 496 men in a single institution with a personal history of PCa who underwent germline genetic testing using a panel of at least 79 genes (Invitae testing) from 2016-2020. Comprehensive FH were obtained in all PCa patients in this database and analysis of prevalent FH was assessed at the time of sample collection. Age, race, metastastes at any time, and Gleason score were also ascertained. MUTYH heterozygotes were not considered pathogenic. Results: Pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (PV/LPVs) were not associated with age at diagnosis, race, or presence of metastasis. Men with Gleason scores 8-10 at time of diagnosis were more likely to have PV/LPV ( P= 0.004). One or more first degree relatives (FDR) with any cancer with was not predictive for germline PV/LPVs for men with PCa ( P= 0.96). Analysis of patients with one or more FDR with breast, prostate, ovarian, or pancreatic cancer revealed that only FDR with breast cancer ( P = 0.028) or ovarian cancer ( P = 0.015) was predictive for PV/LPVs. Though one or more FDR with prostate cancer did not predict a PV/LPV in the overall panel, further analysis indicate that a history of a FDR with PCa was predictive for PV/LPV in a DNA damage repair (DDR) gene ( P= 0.044). Conclusions: In men with a personal history of PCa, germline PV/LPVs were associated with a FDR with breast or ovarian cancer. A FDR with PCa was predictive for PV/LPV in DDR genes. These data emphasize the contribution of FH to germline genetic testing results in a cohort with complete ascertainment of cancer in first degree relatives.

scholarly journals National Estimates of Genetic Testing in Women With a History of Breast or Ovarian Cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (34) ◽  
pp. 3800-3806 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher P. Childers ◽  
Kimberly K. Childers ◽  
Melinda Maggard-Gibbons ◽  
James Macinko
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Cancer Control ◽  
The United States ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Age Of Diagnosis ◽  
History Of ◽  
Interview Survey

Purpose In the United States, 3.8 million women have a history of breast (BC) or ovarian cancer (OC). Up to 15% of cases are attributable to heritable mutations, which, if identified, provide critical knowledge for treatment and preventive care. It is unknown how many patients who are at high risk for these mutations have not been tested and how rates vary by risk criteria. Methods We used pooled cross-sectional data from three Cancer Control Modules (2005, 2010, 2015) of the National Health Interview Survey, a national in-person household interview survey. Eligible patients were adult females with a history of BC and/or OC meeting select 2017 National Comprehensive Cancer Network eligibility criteria on the basis of age of diagnosis and family history. Outcomes included the proportion of individuals reporting a history of discussing genetic testing with a health professional, being advised to undergo genetic testing, or undergoing genetic testing for BC or OC. Results Of 47,218 women, 2.7% had a BC history and 0.4% had an OC history. For BC, 35.6% met one or more select eligibility criteria; of those, 29.0% discussed, 20.2% were advised to undergo, and 15.3% underwent genetic testing. Testing rates for individual eligibility criteria ranged from 6.2% (relative with OC) to 18.2% (diagnosis ≤ 45 years of age). For OC, 15.1% discussed, 13.1% were advised to undergo, and 10.5% underwent testing. Using only four BC eligibility criteria and all patients with OC, an estimated 1.2 to 1.3 million individuals failed to receive testing. Conclusion Fewer than one in five individuals with a history of BC or OC meeting select National Cancer Comprehensive Network criteria have undergone genetic testing. Most have never discussed testing with a health care provider. Large national efforts are warranted to address this unmet need.

scholarly journals Novel SCN5A p.Val1667Asp Missense Variant Segregation and Characterization in a Family with Severe Brugada Syndrome and Multiple Sudden Deaths

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 4700
Author(s):  
Michelle M. Monasky ◽  
Emanuele Micaglio ◽  
Giuseppe Ciconte ◽  
Ilaria Rivolta ◽  
Valeria Borrelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Family History ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Brugada Syndrome ◽  
Electrophysiological Study ◽  
Functional Characterization ◽  
The Family ◽  
Novel Variant ◽  
History Of ◽  
Scn5a Gene

Genetic testing in Brugada syndrome (BrS) is still not considered to be useful for clinical management of patients in the majority of cases, due to the current lack of understanding about the effect of specific variants. Additionally, family history of sudden death is generally not considered useful for arrhythmic risk stratification. We sought to demonstrate the usefulness of genetic testing and family history in diagnosis and risk stratification. The family history was collected for a proband who presented with a personal history of aborted cardiac arrest and in whom a novel variant in the SCN5A gene was found. Living family members underwent ajmaline testing, electrophysiological study, and genetic testing to determine genotype-phenotype segregation, if any. Patch-clamp experiments on transfected human embryonic kidney 293 cells enabled the functional characterization of the SCN5A novel variant in vitro. In this study, we provide crucial human data on the novel heterozygous variant NM_198056.2:c.5000T>A (p.Val1667Asp) in the SCN5A gene, and demonstrate its segregation with a severe form of BrS and multiple sudden deaths. Functional data revealed a loss of function of the protein affected by the variant. These results provide the first disease association with this variant and demonstrate the usefulness of genetic testing for diagnosis and risk stratification in certain patients. This study also demonstrates the usefulness of collecting the family history, which can assist in understanding the severity of the disease in certain situations and confirm the importance of the functional studies to distinguish between pathogenic mutations and harmless genetic variants.

Screening RAD51C nucleotide alterations in patients with a family history of breast and ovarian cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 124 (3) ◽  
pp. 857-861 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yonglan Zheng ◽  
Jing Zhang ◽  
Kisha Hope ◽  
Qun Niu ◽  
Dezheng Huo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Family History ◽  
Breast And Ovarian Cancer ◽  
History Of
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document