scholarly journals React and act: a qualitative study of how nursing home leaders follow up on staff-to-resident abuse

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Janne Myhre ◽  
Susan Saga ◽  
Wenche Malmedal ◽  
Joan Ostaszkiewicz ◽  
Sigrid Nakrem
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Elder Abuse ◽  
Comparative Method ◽  
Individual Level ◽  
Staff Members ◽  
Individual Interviews ◽  
Group Interviews ◽  
Different Levels

Abstract Background Elder abuse in nursing homes is a complex multifactorial problem and entails various associations across personal, social, and organisational factors. One way leaders can prevent abuse and promote quality and safety for residents is to follow up on any problems that may arise in clinical practice in a way that facilitates learning. How nursing home leaders follow up and what they follow up on might reflect their perceptions of abuse, its causal factors, and the prevention strategies used in the nursing home. The aim of this study was to explore how nursing home leaders follow up on reports and information regarding staff-to-resident abuse. Methods A qualitative explorative design was used. The sample comprised 43 participants from two levels of nursing home leadership representing six municipalities and 21 nursing homes in Norway. Focus group interviews were conducted with 28 care managers, and individual interviews took place with 15 nursing home directors. The constant comparative method was used for the analyses. Results Nursing home leaders followed up incidents of staff-to-resident abuse on three different levels as follows: 1) on an individual level, leaders performed investigations and meetings, guidance, supervision, and occasionally relocated staff members; 2) on a group level, feedback, openness, and reflection for shared understanding were strategies leaders used; and 3) on an organisational level, the main solutions were to adjust to available resources, training, and education. We found that leaders had difficulties defining harm and a perceived lack of power to follow up on all levels. In addition, they did not have adequate tools for evaluating the effect of the measures that were taken. Conclusions Nursing home leaders need to be clear about how they should follow up incidents of elder abuse on different levels in the organisation and about their role in preventing elder abuse. Evaluation tools that facilitate systematic organisational learning are needed. Nursing homes must operate as open, blame-free cultures that acknowledge that incidents of elder abuse in patient care arise not only from the actions of individuals but also from the complex everyday life of which they are a part and in which they operate.

Coercion in nursing homes

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Gjerberg ◽  
Lillian Lillemoen ◽  
Reidar Pedersen ◽  
Reidun Førde
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Next Of Kin ◽  
Best Interest ◽  
Focus Group Interviews ◽  
Ethical Considerations ◽  
Individual Interviews ◽  
Nursing Home Patients ◽  
Legal Challenges ◽  
Group Interviews

Background: Studies have demonstrated the extensive use of coercion in Norwegian nursing homes, which represents ethical, professional as well as legal challenges to the staff. We have, however, limited knowledge of the experiences and views of nursing home patients and their relatives. Objectives: The aim of this study is to explore the perspectives of nursing home patients and next of kin on the use of coercion; are there situations where the use of coercion can be defended, and if so, under which circumstances? Methods: The data are based on individual interviews with 35 patients living in six nursing homes and seven focus group interviews with 60 relatives. Ethical considerations: Participation was based on written informed consent, and the study was approved by the Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics. Results: More than half of the patients and the majority of the relatives accepted the use of coercion, trusting the staff to act in the patient’s best interest. However, the acceptance of coercion is strongly related to the patients’ lack of understanding, to prevent health risks and to preserve the patient’s dignity. Conclusion: The majority of nursing home patients and relatives accepted the use of coercion in specific situations, while at the same time they emphasised the need to try alternative strategies first. There is still a need for good qualitative research on the use of coercion in nursing homes, especially with a closer focus on the perspectives and experiences of nursing home patients.

Nursing home leaders' perception of factors influencing the reporting of elder abuse and neglect: a qualitative study

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 655-671
Author(s):  
Janne Myhre ◽  
Wenche Karin Malmedal ◽  
Susan Saga ◽  
Joan Ostaszkiewicz ◽  
Sigrid Nakrem
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Elder Abuse ◽  
Comparative Method ◽  
Adverse Event Reporting System ◽  
Adverse Event Reporting ◽  
Structural Factors ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Elder Abuse And Neglect ◽  
Abuse And Neglect

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to explore the factors that influence the reporting of adverse events related to elder abuse and neglect in nursing homes from nursing home leaders' perspectives. Good leadership requires in-depth knowledge of the care and service provided and the ability to identify and address problems that can arise in clinical practice.Design/methodology/approachA qualitative explorative design with data triangulation was used. The sample consisted of 43 participants from two levels of nursing home leadership, representing six municipalities and 21 nursing homes in Norway. Focus group interviews were undertaken with 28 ward leaders and individual interviews with 15 nursing home directors. The constant comparative method was used for the analyses.FindingsBoth ward leaders and nursing home directors described formal and informal ways of obtaining information related to elder abuse and neglect. There were differences between their perceptions of the feasibility of obtaining formal reports about abuse in the nursing home. Three main categories of influencing factors emerged: (1) organisation structural factors, (2) cultural factors and (3) abuse severity factors. A main finding is that in its present form, the Norwegian adverse event reporting system is not designed to detect abuse and neglect.Originality/valueThis paper provides an in-depth understanding of patient safety and factors related to reporting elder abuse in nursing homes in Norway.

scholarly journals Nothing to complain about? Residents’ and relatives’ views on a “good life” and ethical challenges in nursing homes

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georg Bollig ◽  
Eva Gjengedal ◽  
Jan Henrik Rosland
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Good Life ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Ethical Challenges ◽  
Staff Members ◽  
Group Interviews ◽  
The Relationship

Background: Nursing home residents are a vulnerable population. Most of them suffer from multi-morbidity, while many have cognitive impairment or dementia and need care around the clock. Several ethical challenges in nursing homes have been described in the scientific literature. Most studies have used staff members as informants, some have focused on the relatives’ view, but substantial knowledge about the residents’ perspective is lacking. Objective: To study what nursing home residents and their relatives perceive as ethical challenges in Norwegian nursing homes. Research design: A qualitative design with in-depth interviews with nursing home residents, and focus-group interviews with relatives of nursing home residents. The digitally recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim. Analysis was based on Interpretive Description. Participants and research context: A total of 25 nursing home residents from nine nursing homes in Norway, and 18 relatives of nursing home residents from three of these nursing homes. Ethical considerations: This study was reported to and approved by the Regional Ethics Committee in Oslo, Norway. Findings and discussion: The main ethical challenges in Norwegian nursing homes from the residents’ and relatives’ perspective were as follows: (a) acceptance and adaptation, (b) well-being and a good life, (c) autonomy and self-determination, and (d) lack of resources. The relationship with the staff was of outmost importance and was experienced as both rewarding and problematic. None of the residents in our study mentioned ethical challenges connected to end-of-life care. Conclusion: Residents and relatives experience ethical challenges in Norwegian nursing homes, mostly connected to “everyday ethical issues.”

Families, Alzheimer's Disease, and Nursing Homes

1988 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 331-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan L. Linsk ◽  
Baila Miller ◽  
Roberta Pflaum ◽  
Anna Ortigara-Vicik
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Nursing Home Care ◽  
Demonstration Program ◽  
Home Setting

The Alzheimer's Disease Family Care Center program was established within an intermediate care teaching nursing home as a demonstration program to investigate ways to involve families in care of their relatives. In total, 45 family members participated in a program including an orientation session; a preliminary family involvement interview; contracts with family members, in which they chose specific tasks to engage in during visits; a five-session course on Alzheimer's disease and how families may be partners in care within the facility; and an ongoing family support group. Evaluation data sources include a baseline and 9-month follow-up questionnaire completed by families, preliminary and follow-up family interviews conducted by project codirectors, records of family visits, and family choices on contracts. Findings from the 23 family members who contracted for tasks during their visits and from the follow-up questionnaire completed by 25 family members showed that most sought social and emotional interactions with relatives, some maintained direct personal care activities, and only a few identified interest in extensive involvement with staff and facility. At follow-up, family members involved in the program reported they continued to feel close to their relatives. Many felt that their relatives were generally stable or improved with regard to cognitive function, but over a third noted difficulties in communicating. Participating family members reported that the program of staff supports helped them to feel more integral to the unit. They expressed a need for more education and support for their involvement in the nursing home setting. Project findings confirm previous studies recommending that programming at nursing homes needs to include specific institutional and staff supports to maintain and enhance family contributions to the long-term nursing home care of their relatives.

Covid-19-vaccinatie en antistofbepaling bij bewoners en personeel van 2 Lanakense woonzorgcentra in de lente van 2021

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. BUNTINX ◽  
I. ASNONG ◽  
M. GULIKERS ◽  
G. VAES ◽  
H. DEWITTE ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Vaccination Campaign ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Young Female ◽  
Negative Association ◽  
Antibody Testing ◽  
Post Vaccination ◽  
Staff Members ◽  
Antibody Titres

Uptake and results of Covid-19 vaccination during a pandemic in nursing home residents and staff This study involves the participation of residents and staff of 2 Flemish nursing homes in the Covid-19 vaccination program, as well as the subsequent presence and titres of Covid-19 antibodies. With 1 exception, all 259 residents and 94% of the eligible staff members (n = 237) were vaccinated, 16 young female staff members were vaccinated with some delay because of pregnancy and fertility related fears. Post-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing was performed in 214 (83%) residents and 201 (85%) staff members. Of these, respectively 98% and 100% had SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. A clear negative association was found between antibody titres and age. Within these nursing homes (and a number of surrounding nursing homes) the vaccination campaign was successful as well as effective.

Geriatric Health Experts Validate Oral Neglect Timelines for the Institutionalized Elderly

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (11) ◽  
pp. 1250-1257
Author(s):  
Sharon M. Casey ◽  
Ralph V. Katz ◽  
Shulamite Huang ◽  
Barbara J. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Delphi Survey ◽  
Oral Disease ◽  
Oral Diseases ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Institutionalized Elderly

The purpose of this follow-up Delphi survey was to have an expert panel of 31 academic geriatric physicians, geriatric nurses, and medical directors of nursing homes evaluate the original timeline set to avoid oral neglect of nursing home residents. The Oral Neglect in Institutionalized Elderly (ONiIE) timelines defined oral neglect as having occurred when >7 days for acute oral diseases/conditions or >34 days for chronic oral disease/conditions had passed between initial diagnosis and offering access to dental care to the long-term care (LTC) nursing home resident. The results of this follow-up Delphi survey validated those originally defined ONiIE timelines as 90% of this panel agreed with the original timelines. This ONiIE definition adds a broad-based validation for the ONiIE timelines for setting an oral health standard of care for institutionalized elderly residents of nursing homes and should now be used to protect the vulnerable elderly residing in LTC nursing homes.

scholarly journals Staff exchange within and between nursing homes in The Netherlands and potential implications for MRSA transmission

2016 ◽  
Vol 145 (4) ◽  
pp. 739-745 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. D. VAN GAALEN ◽  
H. A. HOPMAN ◽  
A. HAENEN ◽  
C. VAN DEN DOOL
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Exploratory Study ◽  
Large Network ◽  
Nursing Home Staff ◽  
Staff Members ◽  
Study Participants ◽  
Staff Exchange ◽  
National Prevalence

SUMMARYA recent countrywide MRSA spa-type 1081 outbreak in The Netherlands predominantly affected nursing homes, generating questions on how infection spreads within and between nursing homes despite a low national prevalence. Since the transfer of residents between nursing homes is uncommon in The Netherlands, we hypothesized that staff exchange plays an important role in transmission. This exploratory study investigated the extent of former (last 2 years) and current staff exchange within and between nursing homes in The Netherlands. We relied on a questionnaire that was targeted towards nursing-home staff members who had contact with residents. We found that 17·9% and 12·4% of the nursing-home staff formerly (last 2 years) or currently worked in other healthcare institutes besides their job in the nursing home through which they were selected to participate in this study. Moreover, 39·7% of study participants worked on more than one ward. Our study shows that, in The Netherlands, nursing-home staff form a substantial number of links between wards within nursing homes and nursing homes are linked to a large network of healthcare institutes through their staff members potentially providing a pathway for MRSA transmission between nursing homes and throughout the country.

Choosing to live in a nursing home: a culturally and linguistically diverse perspective

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 239
Author(s):  
Cecilia A. Yeboah
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Older People ◽  
Cultural History ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Linguistically Diverse ◽  
Culturally And Linguistically Diverse ◽  
Individual Interviews ◽  
Cultural Origins ◽  
Diverse Perspective

As part of the findings of a study on culturally and linguistically diverse older people relocating to a nursing home, this paper contributes to our understanding of how older people draw on their cultural history to explain their decisions to relocate. Family reciprocity was identified by most participants as central to their decisions, regardless of their specific cultural origins. Using the grounded theory methodology, data were collected through progressive, semi-structured, repeated, in-person, individual interviews with 20 residents of four nursing homes in the northern suburbs of Melbourne, Australia. Culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) older people, regardless of specific cultural origin, make relocation decisions based on the importance and meaning of reciprocity within families. Understanding their decisions as reflecting a culturally valued reciprocity offered a sense of cultural continuity to the relocation and was comforting to the older adults involved in the study. This study also suggests that culturally and linguistically diverse older people are much more active participants in the decision to relocate to a nursing home than is commonly recognised. The four nursing homes in the northern suburbs of Melbourne and the 20 participants studied constitute only a small proportion of all culturally and linguistically diverse older nursing home residents in Australia. Therefore, the findings may not be pertinent to other culturally and linguistically diverse elderly. Nonetheless, this study makes an important contribution to future discussions regarding cultural diversity in the nursing home relocation of culturally and linguistically diverse older Australians. The study findings provide some insight into the conditions and contexts that impact nursing home relocation.

scholarly journals A path analysis on the direct and indirect effects of the unit environment on eating dependence among cognitively impaired nursing home residents

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvisa Palese ◽  
Luca Grassetti ◽  
Valentina Bressan ◽  
Alessandro Decaro ◽  
Tea Kasa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Nursing Care ◽  
Indirect Effects ◽  
Functional Dependence ◽  
Cognitively Impaired ◽  
Direct And Indirect Effects ◽  
Care Level ◽  
Individual Level ◽  
The Individual

Abstract Background This study aims to estimate the direct and indirect effects of the unit environment alongside individual and nursing care variables on eating dependence among residents who are cognitively impaired and living in a nursing home. Method A multicentre observational study was carried out in 2017: 13 Italian nursing homes were involved in data collection. Included residents were aged > 65 at baseline, living in the considered facility for the last 6 months and during the entire study period and having received at least one comprehensive assessment. Data were collected (a) at the individual level: eating dependence using the Edinburgh Feeding Evaluation in Dementia Scale and other clinical variables; (b) at the nursing care level with daily interventions to maintain eating independence assessed with a checklist; and (c) at the nursing home level, using the Therapeutic Environment Screening Survey for Nursing Homes. Results One thousand twenty-seven residents were included with an average age of 85.32 years old (95% CI: 84.74–85.89), mainly female (781; 76%). The path analysis explained the 57.7% variance in eating dependence. Factors preventing eating dependence were: (a) at the individual level, increased functional dependence measured with the Barthel Index (β − 2.374); eating in the dining room surrounded by residents (β − 1.802) as compared to eating alone in bed; and having a close relationship with family relatives (β − 0.854), (b) at the nursing care level, the increased number of interventions aimed at promoting independence (β − 0.524); and (c) at the NH level, high scores in ‘Space setting’ (β − 4.446), ‘Safety’ (β − 3.053), ‘Lighting’ (β − 2.848) and ‘Outdoor access’ (β − 1.225). However, environmental factors at the unit level were found to have also indirect effects by influencing the degree of functional dependence, the occurrence of night restlessness and the number of daily interventions performed by the nursing staff. Conclusion Eating dependence is a complex phenomenon requiring interventions targeting individual, nursing care, and environmental levels. The NH environment had the largest direct and indirect effect on residents’ eating dependence, thus suggesting that at this level appropriate interventions should be designed and implemented.

scholarly journals Outlining the Prior Infection with SARS-CoV-2 study (PICOV) - preliminary findings on symptoms in nursing home residents and staff.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria E. Goossens ◽  
Kristof Y. Neven ◽  
Pieter Pannus ◽  
Cyril Barbezange ◽  
Isabelle Thomas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Acute Respiratory Infection ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Population Characteristics ◽  
Geriatric Population ◽  
Health Concerns ◽  
Staff Members ◽  
Important Health ◽  
Prior Infection

Abstract Background: COVID-19 has presented itself as one of the most important health concerns of 2020. The geriatric population is arguably hit the hardest by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The ”Prior Infection with SARS-COV-2” (PICOV) study investigates both residents and staff members from nursing homes. The primary aim of the study is to compare the time to occurrence of an influenza-like illness (ILI) or acute respiratory infection (ARI) between participants with a confirmed past SARS-CoV-2 infection and those without an infection. This paper details the study design, sampling scheme, biological measurements, and population characteristics at baseline.Methods: In 26 Belgian nursing homes, all eligible residents and staff members with or without a past SARS-CoV-2 infection (ratio 40/60) were invited to participate. Consent was obtained from 1,375 participants and 1,226 completed the baseline questionnaire. Prevalence of symptoms during a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection was compared between residents and staff members with χ2 statistics.Results: Nursing home residents (both with and without a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection) systematically reported fewer symptoms than staff members. Moreover, results from prior nasopharyngeal RT-qPCR and baseline serology show that antibody development after a SARS-CoV-2 infection differs between residents and staff members.Conclusions: We can postulate that disease development and symptoms is different between a geriatric and younger population. Therefore, the occurrence and severity of a future ILI and/or ARI might vary from resident to staff.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document