scholarly journals Oncolytic virotherapy reverses the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and its potential in combination with immunotherapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yalei Zhang ◽  
Ye Li ◽  
Kun Chen ◽  
Ling Qian ◽  
Peng Wang
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Microenvironment ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Oncolytic Viruses ◽  
Tumor Resistance ◽  
Systemic Delivery ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Immunosuppressive Tumor Microenvironment ◽  
Proinflammatory Factors

AbstractIt has been intensively reported that the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) results in tumor resistance to immunotherapy, especially immune checkpoint blockade and chimeric T cell antigen therapy. As an emerging therapeutic agent, oncolytic viruses (OVs) can specifically kill malignant cells and modify immune and non-immune TME components through their intrinsic properties or genetically incorporated with TME regulators. Strategies of manipulating OVs against the immunosuppressive TME include serving as a cancer vaccine, expressing proinflammatory factors and immune checkpoint inhibitors, and regulating nonimmune stromal constituents. In this review, we summarized the mechanisms and applications of OVs against the immunosuppressive TME, and strategies of OVs in combination with immunotherapy. We also introduced future directions to achieve efficient clinical translation including optimization of preclinical models that simulate the human TME and achieving systemic delivery of OVs.

Engineering nanoparticles to locally activate T cells in the tumor microenvironment

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (37) ◽  
pp. eaau6584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dangge Wang ◽  
Tingting Wang ◽  
Haijun Yu ◽  
Bing Feng ◽  
Lei Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Microenvironment ◽  
Laser Irradiation ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Near Infrared ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Immunological Tolerance ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Tumor Resistance ◽  
Nir Laser

Immunological tolerance of tumors is characterized by insufficient infiltration of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and immunosuppressive microenvironment of tumor. Tumor resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors due to immunological tolerance is an ongoing challenge for current immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy. Here, we report the development of tumor microenvironment–activatable anti-PDL1 antibody (αPDL1) nanoparticles for combination immunotherapy designed to overcome immunological tolerance of tumors. Combination of αPDL1 nanoparticle treatment with near-infrared (NIR) laser irradiation–triggered activation of photosensitizer indocyanine green induces the generation of reactive oxygen species, which promotes the intratumoral infiltration of CTLs and sensitizes the tumors to PDL1 blockade therapy. We showed that the combination of antibody nanoparticles and NIR laser irradiation effectively suppressed tumor growth and metastasis to the lung and lymph nodes in mouse models. The nanoplatform that uses the antibody nanoparticle alone both for immune stimulation and PDL1 inhibition could be readily adapted to other immune checkpoint inhibitors for improved ICB therapy.

scholarly journals Prospects of immune checkpoint blockade and vaccine-based immunotherapy for glioblastoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefanie Tietze ◽  
Susanne Michen ◽  
Gabriele Schackert ◽  
Achim Temme
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Primary Brain Tumor ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Oncolytic Viruses ◽  
Therapeutic Vaccines ◽  
Dismal Prognosis ◽  
Tumor Parenchyma ◽  
Immunosuppressive Microenvironment

Abstract Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most prevalent primary brain tumor endowed with a dismal prognosis. Nowadays, immunotherapy in a particular immune checkpoint blockade and therapeutic vaccines are being extensively pursued. Yet, several characteristics of GBM may impact such immunotherapeutic approaches. This includes tumor heterogeneity, the relatively low mutational load of primary GBM, insufficient delivery of antibodies to tumor parenchyma and the unique immunosuppressive microenvironment of GBM. Moreover, standard treatment of GBM, comprising temozolomide chemotherapy, radiotherapy and in most instances the application of glucocorticoids for management of brain edema, results in a further increased immunosuppression. This review will provide a brief introduction to the principles of vaccine-based immunotherapy and give an overview of the current clinical studies, which employed immune checkpoint inhibitors, oncolytic viruses-based vaccination, cell-based and peptide-based vaccines. Recent experiences as well as the latest developments are reviewed. Overcoming obstacles, which limit the induction and long-term immune response against GBM when using vaccination approaches, are necessary for the implementation of effective immunotherapy of GBM.

scholarly journals Agonistic CD40 antibody therapy induces tertiary lymphoid structures but impairs the response to immune checkpoint blockade in glioma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luuk van Hooren ◽  
Alessandra Vaccaro ◽  
Mohanraj Ramachandran ◽  
Konstantinos Vazaios ◽  
Sylwia Libard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Antibody Therapy ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Cytotoxic T Cell ◽  
Systemic Delivery ◽  
T Cell Infiltration ◽  
Tertiary Lymphoid Structures ◽  
Lymphoid Structures

AbstractGliomas are brain tumors characterized by immunosuppression. Immunostimulatory agonistic CD40 antibodies (αCD40) are in clinical development for solid tumors but are yet to be evaluated for glioma. Here, systemic delivery of αCD40 led to cytotoxic T cell dysfunction and impaired the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in preclinical glioma models. This was associated with an accumulation of suppressive CD11b+ B cells. However, αCD40 also induced tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS). In human glioma, TLS correlated with increased T cell infiltration indicating enhanced immune responses. Our work unveils the pleiotropic effects of αCD40 therapy in glioma, which is of high clinical relevance.

scholarly journals Therapeutic Implications of Tumor Microenvironment in Lung Cancer: Focus on Immune Checkpoint Blockade

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo Genova ◽  
Chiara Dellepiane ◽  
Paolo Carrega ◽  
Sara Sommariva ◽  
Guido Ferlazzo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Tumor Microenvironment ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Suppressor Cells ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Therapeutic Implications ◽  
Investigational Agents

In the last decade, the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been revolutionized by the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) directed against programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1), or cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4). In spite of these improvements, some patients do not achieve any benefit from ICI, and inevitably develop resistance to therapy over time. Tumor microenvironment (TME) might influence response to immunotherapy due to its prominent role in the multiple interactions between neoplastic cells and the immune system. Studies investigating lung cancer from the perspective of TME pointed out a complex scenario where tumor angiogenesis, soluble factors, immune suppressive/regulatory elements and cells composing TME itself participate to tumor growth. In this review, we point out the current state of knowledge involving the relationship between tumor cells and the components of TME in NSCLC as well as their interactions with immunotherapy providing an update on novel predictors of benefit from currently employed ICI or new therapeutic targets of investigational agents. In first place, increasing evidence suggests that TME might represent a promising biomarker of sensitivity to ICI, based on the presence of immune-modulating cells, such as Treg, myeloid derived suppressor cells, and tumor associated macrophages, which are known to induce an immunosuppressive environment, poorly responsive to ICI. Consequently, multiple clinical studies have been designed to influence TME towards a pro-immunogenic state and subsequently improve the activity of ICI. Currently, the mostly employed approach relies on the association of “classic” ICI targeting PD-1/PD-L1 and novel agents directed on molecules, such as LAG-3 and TIM-3. To date, some trials have already shown promising results, while a multitude of prospective studies are ongoing, and their results might significantly influence the future approach to cancer immunotherapy.

Therapeutic checkpoint targets: Evaluation of co-expression profiles in individual tumor and immune cells in the tumor microenvironment of FFPE tissue.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 176-176
Author(s):  
Annelies Laeremans ◽  
Na Li ◽  
Jeff Kim ◽  
Xiao-Jun Ma ◽  
Emily Park
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Microenvironment ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Immune Cells ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Durable Response

176 Background: Interactions between tumor and immune cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME) play a key role in tumor progression and treatment response with accumulating evidence indicating a crucial role for tumor infiltrating immune cells. Although infiltrating cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) have been correlated with improved clinical outcome, they are ineffective in eradicating tumors due to their inhibition by immune checkpoint molecules. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated therapeutic efficacy and durable response for several tumor types including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the majority of patients are resistant or relapse after initial response. Characterizing the TME for checkpoint expression with single-cell and spatial resolution can provide critical insight into new immunotherapeutic strategies and identify new predictive biomarkers for stratifying and identifying patients most likely to benefit from immunotherapy including PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint blockade. Methods: Using RNAscope in situ hybridization, we evaluated in situ co-expression profiles of therapeutic checkpoint targets at single-cell level in the TME of 56 archived NSCLC FFPE tissues. Results: Checkpoint molecules including PD1, PD-L1, PD-L2, TIM3, LAG3, CTLA-4 and GITR were visualized in a highly specific and sensitive manner in individual cells within tissue morphological context. Multiple checkpoint molecules were detected in the same immune environment, especially in highly inflamed tumors. In addition to PD-L1, tumor cell-intrinsic expression of PD1, TIM3, LAG3, and PD-L2 was observed in a subset of samples. Furthermore, co-expression of therapeutic checkpoint targets including PD1, LAG3, and TIM3 was observed in infiltrating immune cells and tumor cells. Conclusions: Single-cell co-expression profiles of checkpoint molecules could shed light on how cancer cells evade the host immune surveillance and develop resistance against checkpoint blockades. Also, they could reveal valuable insights into combinatorial therapies for checkpoint markers co-expressed by the patient’s immune cells in the TME.

scholarly journals Targeting the Tumor Microenvironment for Improving Therapeutic Effectiveness in Cancer Immunotherapy: Focusing on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Combination Therapies

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1188
Author(s):  
I-Tsu Chyuan ◽  
Ching-Liang Chu ◽  
Ping-Ning Hsu
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Tumor Microenvironment ◽  
Cancer Therapy ◽  
Cancer Immunotherapy ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Cell Activity ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Immune Checkpoints

Immune checkpoints play critical roles in the regulation of T-cell effector function, and the effectiveness of their inhibitors in cancer therapy has been established. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) constitute a paradigm shift in cancer therapy in general and cancer immunotherapy in particular. Immunotherapy has been indicated to reinvigorate antitumor T-cell activity and dynamically modulate anticancer immune responses. However, despite the promising results in the use of immunotherapy in some cancers, numerous patients do not respond to ICIs without the existence of a clear predictive biomarker. Overall, immunotherapy involves a certain degree of uncertainty and complexity. Research on the exploration of cellular and molecular factors within the tumor microenvironment (TME) aims to identify possible mechanisms of immunotherapy resistance, as well as to develop novel combination strategies involving the specific targeting of the TME for cancer immunotherapy. The combination of this approach with other types of treatment, including immune checkpoint blockade therapy involving multiple agents, most of the responses and effects in cancer therapy could be significantly enhanced, but the appropriate combinations have yet to be established. Moreover, the in-depth exploration of complexity within the TME allows for the exploration of pathways of immune dysfunction. It may also aid in the identification of new therapeutic targets. This paper reviews recent advances in the improvement of therapeutic efficacy on the immune context of the TME and highlights its contribution to cancer immunotherapy.

Checkpoint cluster: biomarkers of response

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 501-508
Author(s):  
Sara I. Pai ◽  
Lori J. Wirth
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Clinical Knowledge ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trials ◽  
Programmed Cell Death 1

Current clinical knowledge surrounding one of the most promising immune checkpoint pathways, namely programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and its ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2, is reviewed in the context of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The results of two phase III clinical trials (KEYNOTE 040 and CheckMate 141) are critically examined. The utility of predictive biomarkers of response to immune checkpoint blockade, such as PD-L1/PD-L2 protein expression, interferon-gamma gene expression signatures, and mutational and neoantigen load, is discussed. Finally, we project future directions in the immuno-oncology field by discussing other promising predictive biomarkers as well as areas where the next advances are likely to take place, such as in the implementation of immune checkpoint inhibitors earlier in the course of cancer treatment and/or in combination therapies.

scholarly journals Combinatorial Approaches for Cancer Treatment Using Oncolytic Viruses: Projecting the Perspectives through Clinical Trials Outcomes

Viruses ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 1271
Author(s):  
Alexander Malogolovkin ◽  
Nizami Gasanov ◽  
Alexander Egorov ◽  
Marianna Weener ◽  
Roman Ivanov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Oncolytic Viruses ◽  
Conventional Radiotherapy ◽  
Indispensable Tool

Recent cancer immunotherapy breakthroughs have fundamentally changed oncology and revived the fading hope for a cancer cure. The immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) became an indispensable tool for the treatment of many malignant tumors. Alongside ICI, the application of oncolytic viruses in clinical trials is demonstrating encouraging outcomes. Dozens of combinations of oncolytic viruses with conventional radiotherapy and chemotherapy are widely used or studied, but it seems quite complicated to highlight the most effective combinations. Our review summarizes the results of clinical trials evaluating oncolytic viruses with or without genetic alterations in combination with immune checkpoint blockade, cytokines, antigens and other oncolytic viruses as well. This review is focused on the efficacy and safety of virotherapy and the most promising combinations based on the published clinical data, rather than presenting all oncolytic virus variations, which are discussed in comprehensive literature reviews. We briefly revise the research landscape of oncolytic viruses and discuss future perspectives in virus immunotherapy, in order to provide an insight for novel strategies of cancer treatment.

Neoadjuvant oncolytic virotherapy before surgery sensitizes triple-negative breast cancer to immune checkpoint therapy

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (422) ◽  
pp. eaao1641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Claude Bourgeois-Daigneault ◽  
Dominic Guy Roy ◽  
Amelia Sadie Aitken ◽  
Nader El Sayes ◽  
Nikolas Tim Martin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Oncolytic Viruses

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive disease for which treatment options are limited and associated with severe toxicities. Immunotherapeutic approaches like immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a potential strategy, but clinical trials have demonstrated limited success in this patient cohort. Clinical studies using ICIs have revealed that patients with preexisting anticancer immunity are the most responsive. Given that oncolytic viruses (OVs) induce antitumor immunity, we investigated their use as an ICI-sensitizing approach. Using a therapeutic model that mimics the course of treatment for women with newly diagnosed TNBC, we demonstrate that early OV treatment coupled with surgical resection provides long-term benefits. OV therapy sensitizes otherwise refractory TNBC to immune checkpoint blockade, preventing relapse in most of the treated animals. We suggest that OV therapy in combination with immune checkpoint blockade warrants testing as a neoadjuvant treatment option in the window of opportunity between TNBC diagnosis and surgical resection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document