scholarly journals Gender inequalities in diet quality and their socioeconomic patterning in a nutrition transition context in the Middle East and North Africa: a cross-sectional study in Tunisia

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Mehdi Abassi ◽  
Sonia Sassi ◽  
Jalila El Ati ◽  
Houda Ben Gharbia ◽  
Francis Delpeuch ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (OCE2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Mehdi Abassi ◽  
Jalila El Ati ◽  
Sonia Sassi ◽  
Houda Ben Gharbia ◽  
Francis Delpeuch ◽  
...  

AbstractIntroduction: The Middle East and North Africa region features marked gender excess adiposity inequalities detrimental to women in a context of nutrition transition with major shifts in lifestyle and diet. We assessed gender inequalities in dietary intake with a focus on diet quality. Sociodemographic patterning of these gender dietary inequalities was explored.Methods: A cross-sectional study in the Greater Tunis region (Tunisia) in 2009–2010 surveyed 20–49 y old adults of both genders (women n = 1689, men n = 930) using a stratified, two-stage cluster sample. Dietary intake was assessed using a 3-day food record. We assessed diet quality by the Diet Quality Index-International (DQI-I) /100 and sub-components (variety, adequacy, moderation, balance); DQI-I > 60 defined good diet quality. Gender inequalities measures were women vs. men differences of means for interval variables and odds-ratios (OR) for DQI-I > 60. Their variation with sociodemographic characteristics were estimated by models featuring gender x covariate interactions.Results: Mean energy intake in kcal was 2300 ± 15 for women vs. 2859 ± 32 for men. By 1000 g/kcal/day women consumed more fruits and sweets but less red meat and soft drinks than men. Mean DQI-I was lower among women vs. men (58.6 ± 0.3 vs. 60.4 ± 0.3, diff = -1.8[-2.6;-1.0], P < 0.0001) as well as proportion of DQI-I > 60 (45.2% vs. 55.7%, OR = 0.7[0.5;0.8], P < 0.0001). Gender differences varied with the 4 sub-components: women vs. men had lower mean variety (10.1 ± 0.1 vs. 12.1 ± 0.2, diff = -2.0[-2.3;-1.6], P < 0.0001) and adequacy scores (30.8 ± 0.1 vs. 32.5 ± 0.1, diff = -1.8[-2.0;-1.5], P < 0.0001) (for the latter they scored a little better than men for the fruit item, but had much lower scores than men for iron and also calcium). But women scored better than men on the moderation score (14.2 ± 0.2 vs. 12.3 ± 0.2, diff = + 1.8[1.4;2.2], P < 0.0001), mostly due to their better score on the cholesterol and sodium items. There was no difference for the balance subcomponent. Adjusted gender inequalities in DQI-I decreased with age, were higher in larger households and were also higher in the extreme categories of education i.e. no-schooling and university vs. the middle categories.Conclusions: Diet quality was overall average. It was lower for women than men. Women vs. men differences in diet quality varied somewhat according to sociodemographic indicators linked to different gender roles. We also showed that gender contrasts depend on which dimension of diet quality is considered (better moderation but worse adequacy and variety for women). That maybe a pathway for gender specific prevention.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Leila Cheikh Ismail ◽  
Tareq M. Osaili ◽  
Maysm N. Mohamad ◽  
Amina Al Marzouqi ◽  
Amjad H. Jarrar ◽  
...  

Abstract Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has rapidly spread globally, forcing countries to apply lockdowns and strict social distancing measures. The aim of this study was to assess eating habits and lifestyle behaviours among residents of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region during the lockdown. A cross-sectional study among adult residents of the MENA region was conducted using an online questionnaire designed on Google Forms during April 2020. A total of 2970 participants from eighteen countries participated in the present study. During the pandemic, over 30 % reported weight gain, 6·2 % consumed five or more meals per d compared with 2·2 % before the pandemic (P < 0·001) and 48·8 % did not consume fruits on a daily basis. Moreover, 39·1 % did not engage in physical activity, and over 35 % spent more than 5 h/d on screens. A significant association between the frequency of training during the pandemic and the reported change in weight was found (P < 0·001). A significantly higher percentage of participants reported physical and emotional exhaustion, irritability and tension either all the time or a large part of the time during the pandemic (P < 0·001). Although a high percentage of participants reported sleeping more hours per night during the pandemic, 63 % had sleep disturbances. The study highlights that the lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic caused a variety of lifestyle changes, physical inactivity and psychological problems among adults in the MENA region.


Author(s):  
Sathyanarayanan Doraiswamy ◽  
Sohaila Cheema ◽  
Patrick Maisonneuve ◽  
Amit Abraham ◽  
Ingmar Weber ◽  
...  

While the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic wreaked havoc across the globe, we have witnessed substantial mis- and disinformation regarding various aspects of the disease. We conducted a cross-sectional study using a self-administered questionnaire for the general public (recruited via social media) and healthcare workers (recruited via email) from the State of Qatar, and the Middle East and North Africa region to understand the knowledge of and anxiety levels around COVID-19 (April–June 2020) during the early stage of the pandemic. The final dataset used for the analysis comprised of 1658 questionnaires (53.0% of 3129 received questionnaires; 1337 [80.6%] from the general public survey and 321 [19.4%] from the healthcare survey). Knowledge about COVID-19 was significantly different across the two survey populations, with a much higher proportion of healthcare workers possessing better COVID-19 knowledge than the general public (62.9% vs. 30.0%, p < 0.0001). A reverse effect was observed for anxiety, with a higher proportion of very anxious (or really frightened) respondents among the general public compared to healthcare workers (27.5% vs. 11.5%, p < 0.0001). A higher proportion of the general public tended to overestimate their chance of dying if they become ill with COVID-19, with 251 (18.7%) reporting the chance of dying (once COVID-19 positive) to be ≥25% versus 19 (5.9%) of healthcare workers (p < 0.0001). Good knowledge about COVID-19 was associated with low levels of anxiety. Panic and unfounded anxiety, as well as casual and carefree attitudes, can propel risk taking and mistake-making, thereby increasing vulnerability. It is important that governments, public health agencies, healthcare workers, and civil society organizations keep themselves updated regarding scientific developments and that they relay messages to the community in an honest, transparent, unbiased, and timely manner.


2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 254-263
Author(s):  
Carmen D Ng

AbstractObjective:Within- and across-country nutritional disparities were examined among older adults in six different countries at varying levels of development.Design:Cross-sectional study.Participants:Older adults (aged 50 years or over) in China, Ghana, India, Mexico, Russia and South Africa using the Study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE).Results:While the distribution of BMI categories varied by country, development-related characteristics were generally related to BMI category in a similar way: urban-living, educated and wealthier individuals were typically more likely to be in a higher BMI category. However, there were some exceptions that corroborate findings in more developed countries. Indeed, a pooled partial proportional odds model which included gross domestic product per capita interactions made the case for intertwining processes of development and the nutrition transition.Conclusions:Population segments to be targeted by nutrition policy and programme implementation might need to change over the course of development.


2019 ◽  
Vol 73 (7) ◽  
pp. 660-667
Author(s):  
Omar Karlsson ◽  
Rockli Kim ◽  
William Joe ◽  
S V Subramanian

BackgroundIn India, excess female under-5 mortality is well documented. Under-5 mortality is also known to be patterned by socioeconomic factors. This study examines sex differentials and sex-specific wealth gradients in neonatal, postneonatal and child mortality in India.MethodsRepeated cross-sectional study of nationally representative samples of 298 955 children 0–60 months old from the National Family Health Surveys conducted in 2005–2006 and 2015–2016. The study used logistic regression models as well as Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsOverall, boys had greater neonatal mortality than girls and the difference increased between 2005–2006 and 2015–2016. Girls had greater postneonatal and child mortality, but the difference decreased between the surveys and was not statistically significant for child mortality in 2015–2016. A negative wealth gradient was found for all mortality outcomes. Neonatal mortality was persistently greater for boys. Girls had higher child mortality than boys at low levels of wealth and greater postneonatal mortality over much of the wealth distribution. The wealth gradient in neonatal mortality increased between surveys. Females had a stronger wealth gradient than boys for child mortality.ConclusionNot distinguishing between neonatal, postneonatal and child mortality masks important gender-specific and wealth-specific disparities in under-5 mortality in India. Substantial gains towards the Sustainable Development Goals can be made by combating neonatal mortality, especially at low levels of wealth. Although impressive improvements have been made in reducing the female disadvantage in postneonatal and child mortality, concerted engagements are necessary to eliminate the gender gap—especially in poor households and in north India.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. e0235991
Author(s):  
Shila Minari Hargreaves ◽  
Wilma Maria Coelho Araújo ◽  
Eduardo Yoshio Nakano ◽  
Renata Puppin Zandonadi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document