Phase III trial comparing two dose levels of epirubicin combined with cyclophosphamide (EC or HEC) with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) in 777 women with node-positive (N+) breast cancer (BC): 10-year follow-up results
568 Background: The purpose of this presentation is to provide an update, with longer follow up data, of the results of this Belgian multicentric trial, which had shown a dose response curve for epirubicin at a median follow up of 4 years (Piccart et al, J Clin Oncol 2001; 19:3103–3110) Methods: In this prospective, open label, randomized trial of the 1990’s, patients aged from 18 to 70 years were stratified by center, 1–3 vs 4 or more nodes, and menopausal status (pre- vs postmenopausal). The primary hypothesis was that HEC could be associated with an increase in event-free survival (EFS) compared with CMF. Patients received CMF (oral cyclophosphamide days 1–14) for six cycles, EC (epirubicin 60 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 day 1 every 3 weeks) for eight cycles or HEC (epirubicin 100 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 830 mg/m2 day 1 every 3 weeks) for eight cycles. Tamoxifen followed chemotherapy in postmenopausal women with positive or unknown hormone receptor (HR). Two hundred fifty-five, 267, and 255 eligible patients were treated with CMF, EC, and HEC, respectively. Results: The trial results are now updated, with an actuarial median follow-up of 12.2 years. Using Kaplan-Meier estimation, the 10-year EFS is 55% for patients who received CMF, 48% for EC patients, and 58% for HEC patients. The hazard ratios obtained from Cox regression models (HR) are, for EC vs HEC, 1.30 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02 to 1.67, P = .03); for CMF vs HEC, 1.12 (95% CI, 0.87 to 1.44, P = .39); and for CMF vs EC, 1.17 (95% CI, 0.92 to 1.48, P = .21). Kaplan-Meier estimates of the 10-year overall survival rates are 65% for patients who received CMF, 65% for EC patients, and 70% for HEC patients, with no significant differences among the three arms. Conclusions: The short term results of this trial are nicely confirmed at 10 years: in patients unselected for HR or HER-2 status, the dose intensity of epirubicin matters. Analysis in subsets of patients is ongoing, but will be only hypothesis-generating. [Table: see text]