Emergence of quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli at a comprehensive cancer center

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 19623-19623
Author(s):  
K. V. Rolston ◽  
E. Coyle ◽  
R. Prince

19623 Background: Quinolone prophylaxis is recommended in high-risk neutropenic patients. Although effective in reducing the frequency of febrile episodes and documented gram-negative infections, this approach can lead to the emergence of resistant organisms. Surveillance studies looking for changes in resistance patterns at institutions that care for high-risk patients are also recommended. Methods: Our institution has participated in the meropenem yearly susceptibility test information collection (MYSTIC) program since 2000. The susceptibility of E. coli isolates from our cancer patients to quinolones (ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin) and broad-spectrum agents often used in empiric antimicrobial regimens in such patients, was determined. These studies were conducted by JMI Laboratories, Iowa, USA, and combined results as well as results of each participating institution were provided. CLSI designated breakpoints for susceptibility were used. Ribotyping and PFGE studies were performed on recent isolates. Results: Table 1 documents the declining susceptibility of E. coli isolates to the quinolones. In 2006 only 40.7% were quinolone susceptible compared to 84.2% in 2000 (p = 0.0032). All E. coli isolates remain susceptible to the carbapenems (meropenem, imipenem, ertapenem) and 95.5% remain susceptible to cefepime, ceftazidime, piperacillin-tazobactam, and the aminoglycosides. Twenty-one resistant E. coli isolates underwent ribotyping. Fourteen isolates showed identical ribotype and similar PFGE patterns suggesting the presence of an endemic clone. The other 7 isolates showed variability in their molecular patterns. Conclusions: Quinolone resistance among E. coli strains isolated from cancer patients has increased substantially. Fortunately these isolates remain susceptible to most broad-spectrum beta-lactams and aminoglycosides. Effective infection control methods need to be implemented and enforced in order to reduce the spread of these organisms in high risk patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose. [Table: see text]

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 1359-1367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renato Costi ◽  
Matteo De Pastena ◽  
Giuseppe Malleo ◽  
Giovanni Marchegiani ◽  
Giovanni Butturini ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 393
Author(s):  
Alexander Hendricks ◽  
Anu Amallraja ◽  
Tobias Meißner ◽  
Peter Forster ◽  
Philip Rosenstiel ◽  
...  

Personalized treatment vs. standard of care is much debated, especially in clinical practice. Here we investigated whether overall survival differences in metastatic colorectal cancer patients are explained by tumor mutation profiles or by treatment differences in real clinical practice. Our retrospective study of metastatic colorectal cancer patients of confirmed European ancestry comprised 54 Americans and 54 gender-matched Germans. The Americans received standard of care, and on treatment failure, 35 patients received individualized treatments. The German patients received standard of care only. Tumor mutations, tumor mutation burden and microsatellite status were identified by using the FoundationOne assay or the IDT Pan-Cancer assay. High-risk patients were identified according to the mutational classification by Schell and colleagues. Results: Kaplan–Meier estimates show the high-risk patients to survive 16 months longer under individualized treatments than those under only standard of care, in the median (p < 0.001). Tumor mutation profiles stratify patients by risk groups but not by country. Conclusions: High-risk patients appear to survive significantly longer (p < 0.001) if they receive individualized treatments after the exhaustion of standard of care treatments. Secondly, the tumor mutation landscape in Americans and Germans is congruent and thus warrants the transatlantic exchange of successful treatment protocols and the harmonization of guidelines.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1577-1577
Author(s):  
Deesha Sarma ◽  
So Yeon Kim ◽  
David H. Henry

1577 Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) poses a significant health risk to cancer patients and is one of the leading causes of death among this population. The most effective way to prevent VTE and reduce its prominence as a public health burden is by identifying high-risk patients and administering prophylactic measures. In 2008, Khorana et al. developed a model that classified patients by risk based on clinical factors. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study to test this model’s efficacy, on 150 patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy at an outpatient oncology clinic between January 1 and August 1, 2011. We aggregated data and assigned points based on the five factors in the Khorana model: site of cancer with 2 points for very high-risk site and 1 point for high-risk site, 1 point each for leukocyte counts more than 11 x 109/L, platelet counts greater than 350 X 109/L, hemoglobin levels less than 100 g/L and/or the use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, and BMI greater than 35 kg/m2 (Khorana et al., Blood 2008). Based on this scoring system, patients with 0 points were grouped into the low-risk category, those with 1-2 points were considered intermediate-risk, and those with 3-4 points were classified as high-risk. Results: As shown in the table, VTE incidence for the low-risk group was 1.9%, intermediate-risk group was 3.9%, and high-risk group was 9.1%. Conclusions: High-risk patients were about 4.5 times more likely to develop a VTE than low risk patients. These results provide valuable insight in determining which patients might benefit from prophylaxis and in motivating the design of prospective clinical trials that assess the VTE predictive model in various ambulatory cancer settings. [Table: see text]


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 378-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Kopetz ◽  
Zhi-Qin Jiang ◽  
Michael J. Overman ◽  
Christa Dreezen ◽  
Sun Tian ◽  
...  

378 Background: Although the benefit of chemotherapy in stage II and III colon cancer patients is significant, many patients might not need adjuvant chemotherapy because they have a good prognosis even without additional treatment. ColoPrint is a gene expression classifier that distinguish patients with low or high risk of disease relapse. It was developed using whole genome expression data and has been validated in public datasets, independent European patient cohorts and technical studies (Salazar 2011 JCO, Maak 2012 Ann Surg). Methods: In this study, the commercial ColoPrint test was validated in stage II (n=96) and III patients (n=95) treated at the MD Anderson Cancer Center from 2003 to 2009. Frozen tissue specimen, clinical parameters, MSI-status and follow-up data (median follow-up 64 months) were available. The 64-gene MSI-signature developed to identify patients with deficient mismatch repair system (Tian 2012 J Path) was evaluated for its accuracy to identify MSI patients and also for prognosis. Results: In this cohort, ColoPrint classified 56% of stage II and III patients as being at low risk. The 3-year Relapse-Free-Survival (RFS) was 90.6% for Low Risk and 78.4% for High Risk patients with a HR of 2.33 (p=0.025). In uni-and multivariate analysis ColoPrint and stage were the only significant factors to predict outcome. The MSI-signature classified 47 patients (24.6%) as MSI-H and most MSI-H patients were ColoPrint low risk (81%). Patients who were ColoPrint low risk and MSI-H by signature had the best outcome with a 3-year RFS of 95% while patients with ColoPrint high risk had a worse outcome independently of the MSI-status. Low risk ColoPrint patients had a good outcome independent of stage or chemotherapy treatment (90.1% 3-year RFS for treated patients, 91.4% for untreated patients) while ColoPrint high risk patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy had 3-year RFS of 84%, compared to 70.1% 3-year RFS in untreated patients (p=0.026). Conclusions: The combination of ColoPrint and MSI-Print improves the prognostic accuracy in stage II and stage III patients and may help the identification of patients at higher risk who are more likely to benefit from additional treatment


2003 ◽  
Vol 47 (8) ◽  
pp. 2492-2498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander A. Padiglione ◽  
Rory Wolfe ◽  
Elizabeth A. Grabsch ◽  
Di Olden ◽  
Stephen Pearson ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Accurate assessment of the risk factors for colonization with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) among high-risk patients is often confounded by nosocomial VRE transmission. We undertook a 15-month prospective cohort study of adults admitted to high-risk units (hematology, renal, transplant, and intensive care) in three teaching hospitals that used identical strict infection control and isolation procedures for VRE to minimize nosocomial spread. Rectal swab specimens for culture were regularly obtained, and the results were compared with patient demographic factors and antibiotic exposure data. Compliance with screening was defined as “optimal” (100% compliance) or “acceptable” (minor protocol violations were allowed, but a negative rectal swab specimen culture was required within 1 week of becoming colonized with VRE). Colonization with VRE was detected in 1.56% (66 of 4,215) of admissions (0.45% at admission and 0.83% after admission; the acquisition time was uncertain for 0.28%), representing 1.91% of patients. No patients developed infection with VRE. The subsequent rate of new acquisition of VRE was 1.4/1,000 patient days. Renal units had the highest rate (3.23/1,000 patient days; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.54 to 6.77/1,000 patient days). vanB Enterococcus faecium was the most common species (71%), but other species included vanB Enterococcus faecalis (21%), vanA E. faecium (6%), and vanA E. faecalis (2%). The majority of isolates were nonclonal by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis. Multivariate analysis of risk factors in patients with an acceptable screening suggested that being managed by a renal unit (hazard ratio [HR] compared to the results for patients managed in an intensive care unit, 4.6; 95% CI, 1.2 to 17.0 [P = 0.02]) and recent administration of either ticarcillin-clavulanic acid (HR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.1 to 11.6 [P = 0.03]) or carbapenems (HR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.0, 8.0 [P = 0.05]), but not vancomycin or broad-spectrum cephalosporins, were associated with acquisition of VRE. The relatively low rates of colonization with VRE, the polyclonal nature of most isolates, and the possible association with the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics are consistent with either the endogenous emergence of VRE or the amplification of previously undetectable colonization with VRE among high-risk patients managed under conditions in which the risk of nosocomial acquisition was minimized.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1535-1535
Author(s):  
Samuel Guan Wei Ow ◽  
Yvonne Fong Ling Yong ◽  
Wei Shieng Chieng ◽  
Pyar Soe Phyu ◽  
Soo-Chin Lee

1535 Background: Cancer genetics programs have been established in tertiary cancer centers in Asia for more than a decade. However, the proportion of high-risk patients who are referred for genetic evaluation remains low, and may be attributed to physician and patient barriers. Methods: We reviewed 3-generation genograms of 6301 cancer (CA) patients constructed by a trained cancer genetics counselor at our centre between 2001 and 2012, and identified 1092 (17.3%) patients with suspected hereditary cancer syndromes. 618 patients were estimated to have ≥10% chance of carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation. Their case records were reviewed to determine the referral pattern to the cancer genetics clinic. Results: Of the 618 high risk patients, 420 (68%) had young onset CA (age <40), 112 (18.1%) were breast CA families, and 58 (9.4%) were breast and ovarian CA families; only 164 (26.5%) were seen in the cancer genetics clinic. Of the 391 records reviewed so far, 132 cases (33.8%) were referred for genetic evaluation. A good family history (FH), defined by obtaining CA history in 3 consecutive generations, was obtained by the primary oncologist in 52.2%, compared to adequate smoking and drinking history in 64.7% of cases (p<0.001). Taking a good FH increased the likelihood of oncologists suspecting hereditary breast and ovarian CA syndrome (50% vs 32.1%; p<0.001), with 79% (128/162) of physician-suspected cases referred for genetic counseling. Young onset CA was more likely to arouse physician suspicion (46.9%) compared to other indications (30.5%, p=0.002). Of the 259 high-risk cases that were not referred, lack of FH evaluation by the oncologist was the most common reason (41.3 %), followed by lack of suspicion despite taking a FH (34.7 %), patient refusal (8.6%), and planned but no formal action (1.6%). Conclusions: Failure to take a good FH and failure to recognize high-risk CA patients despite taking a FH are important physician barriers that resulted in only a third of high-risk breast or ovarian CA patients being referred for cancer genetics evaluation at a tertiary cancer center in Asia. Systematic FH screening by genetic counselors, clinic-based protocols, and continued physician education may rectify this barrier.


2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 1547-1555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilio Bouza ◽  
María Jesús Pérez Granda ◽  
Javier Hortal ◽  
José M. Barrio ◽  
Emilia Cercenado ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. 184-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salha Mohammed Bujassoum ◽  
HekmetAbubaker Bugrein ◽  
Reem Jawad Al-Sulaiman ◽  
Hafedh Ghazouani

Introduction: Approximately 5%-10% of breast cancer is hereditary and BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are responsible for most of the cases. In the State of Qatar, the cancer genetics program was established at National Center of Cancer Care and Research on 2013 which is considered the first of its kind in the region dedicated exclusively to providing genetic counseling, risk assessment and management of high risk patients and their families. In this study, we aim to describe our experience with the hereditary cancer and high risk clinic from the period of March 2013 until December 2016.Methods: In this retrospective study, a total of 697 patients were evaluated at the high risk clinic between March 2013 to December 2016. High risk patients were either placed under surveillance or offered genetic testing for the BRCA genes. Results: A total of 697 patients were evaluated at the high risk clinic in which 347 patients were considered eligible for high risk screening. 167 patients pursued genetic testing and 64 patients (38%) had BRCA mutations with BRCA1 being the most common, while 72 patients (43%) were BRCA negative. A total of 31 patients (19%) had variants of unknown significance in the BRCA genes. Most of the BRCA positive patients 63% were affected with either breast and/or ovarian cancers and were within younger age group, while 38% were unaffected. 55% of those BRCA positive affected patients had triple negative breast cancer. The prevalence of BRCA mutations among Qatari breast cancer patients reaches up to 10% while it reaches approximately 3.5% among non-Qatari breast cancer patients. Conclusion: Our program is an example of a well-established and multidisciplinary service targeted toward prevention and personalized medicine in high risk patients that goes in line with Qatar’s 2022 vision of achieving excellence in cancer care. From our unique experience, we show that BRCA mutations are prevalent among Qatari breast cancer patients reaching approximately 10% which can partially explain the young onset diagnosis of breast cancer in Qatar. With the higher awareness about our service and the recent establishment of BRCA testing at HMC, it is believed that the prevalence of BRCA is going to increase. In addition, with the introduction of multigene panel at our clinic, we believe that it will provide us with new perspective on all hereditary cancers. Our data registry on hereditary cancer syndromes will open windows for future research on cancer prevention and targeted therapies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document