Tolerability and efficacy of first-line bevacizumab (B) plus chemotherapy (CT) in elderly patients with advanced breast cancer (aBC): Subpopulation analysis of the MO19391 study

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1032-1032
Author(s):  
L. Biganzoli ◽  
H. Cortes-Funes ◽  
C. Thomssen ◽  
K. I. Pritchard ◽  
J. Pierga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Therapeutic Index ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Limited Data ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Impact

1032 Background: Limited data exist on the efficacy and safety of biological agents in elderly patients with aBC. This is essentially due to the lack of studies specifically targeting the older population and to strict inclusion criteria in clinical trials. B significantly improved the efficacy of 1st-line taxane therapy in two large, randomized phase III trials, E2100 and AVADO. Methods: In study MO19391, 1st-line B 10mg/kg q2w or 15mg/kg q3w + CT (primarily but not exclusively taxane monotherapy) was investigated in a broader, large aBC patient population, with the aim of understanding safety and efficacy in patients seen in routine clinical practice, including elderly patients. Results: A total of 2,027 patients were enrolled. Median age was 54 years (range 21–93); 359 patients (17.7%) were aged ≥65 years and 169 (8.3%) were ≥70 years. Baseline characteristics and safety and efficacy results according to age are shown below (Table). Conclusions: Treatment with B is feasible in elderly patients. Hypertension was the only grade 3 B-related side effect reported more frequently in the older than in the younger cohort. Efficacy was similar in the two subgroups. These results suggest that the combination of B with 1st-line CT shows a similar therapeutic index regardless of age. Data on compliance according to the different CT regimens, the impact of comorbidities on safety, and analyses in the subgroup of patients ≥70 years will be presented. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Impact of single agent daily prednisone on survival and toxicities in post-docetaxel men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): An analysis of 2 phase III trials.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 213-213
Author(s):  
Guru Sonpavde ◽  
Gregory Russell Pond ◽  
Arnoud J. Templeton ◽  
Eugene D. Kwon ◽  
Johann S. De Bono
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Oral Prednisone ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Combination Regimens ◽  
The Impact

213 Background: Daily oral prednisone (P) has been employed for the therapy of mCRPC, alone or in combination regimens. Despite palliative benefits and PSA responses, the overall clinical impact of P is unknown and it may foster resistance mechanisms. We performed a pooled analysis of control arms of randomized trials which either did or did not administer single agent P to evaluate its impact on overall survival (OS) and toxicities. Methods: Individual patient data from control arms ofrandomized trials of post-docetaxel men receiving placebo or P + placebo were eligible for analysis. Patient demographics, survival, and toxicity data were collected. The impact of P on OS and toxicities was investigated in Cox regression models adjusted for known clinical and laboratory prognostic factors. Statistical significance was defined as a p-value < 0.05 and all tests were two-sided. Results: The control arms of 2 randomized phase III trials were available totaling 794 men: the COU-AA-301 trial (n = 394) administered P plus placebo and the CA184-043 trial (n = 400) administered placebo alone. P plus placebo was not significantly associated with OS compared to placebo alone in a multivariable analysis (HR = 0.89 [95% CI 0.72-1.10], p = 0.27). Other factors associated with poor OS were Eastern Cooperative Oncology group (ECOG)-performance status (PS) ≥ 1, Gleason Score ≥ 8, liver metastasis, high PSA, hypoalbuminemia, and elevated LDH.In contrast, CTCAE grade ≥ 3 therapy-related toxicities were significantly increased with P plus placebo compared to placebo alone (HR = 1.48 (1.03-2.13), p = 0.034) in a multivariable analysis. Other baseline factors significantly associated with a higher risk of grade ≥ 3 toxicities were ECOG-PS ≥ 1, hypoalbuminemia and elevated LDH. Conclusions: P plus placebo compared with placebo alone for post-docetaxel men with mCRPC was not associated with extension of OS, but was associated with higher grade ≥ 3 toxicities. With the exception of the use of P in combination with abiraterone, P alone or in combination regimens should be questioned given its unclear palliative benefits and association with increased toxicities.

The value of combined modality therapy in elderly patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 19503-19503 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. E. Schild ◽  
S. J. Mandrekar ◽  
A. Jatoi ◽  
W. L. McGinnis ◽  
P. J. Stella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Combined Modality Therapy ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Concurrent Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Combined Modality ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Stage Iii Nsclc ◽  
Grade 3

19503 Background: This study was performed to assess the value of combined modality therapy in elderly patients by comparing the differences in outcome of those who received radiotherapy (RT) alone or RT plus chemotherapy for stage III NSCLC. Methods: North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) performed 2 recent phase III trials for stage III NSCLC. The first trial, 90–24–51, included 3 arms: once-daily radiotherapy (QDRT) alone, twice daily RT (BIDRT) alone, and concurrent chemotherapy plus BIDRT. The second trial, 94–24- 52 included 2 arms and compared concurrent chemotherapy with either QDRT or BIDRT. The chemotherapy arms of both trials included etoposide and cisplatin administered concurrently with RT. Only the patients ≥65 years of age (elderly) who participated in these trials were included in this analysis. Results: Of the 166 elderly patients included in this analysis, 37 received RT alone and 129 received concurrent chemotherapy plus RT. The median and 5-year survival rates were 10.5 months and 5.4% for the RT alone group compared to 13.7 months and 14.7% for the RT plus chemotherapy group (log-rank p=0.05). Patients who received RT plus chemotherapy experienced significantly greater severe (grade ≥3) toxicity than those who received RT alone (89.9% versus 32.4%, p < 0.01). Conclusions: Elderly patients who participated in these trials appear to gain a survival advantage from RT and chemotherapy compared to RT alone. As is the case with younger patients, this benefit comes at the cost of additional toxicity. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Safety and efficacy of modified dose-attenuated FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy in patients over 65 years with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 468-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matheus Bongers Alessandretti ◽  
Raphael Brandao Moreira ◽  
Erika Pereira Brandao ◽  
Jessica Ribeiro Gomes ◽  
Marcus Paulo Fernandes Amarante ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Limited Data ◽  
Pivotal Phase ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

468 Background: There is only limited data regarding efficacy and safety of FOLFIRINOX in elderly patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. We aim to evaluate our experience with dose-reduced FOLFIRINOX in patients > 65 years-old. Methods: All patients > 65 years-old with biopsy-proven advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma who received at least one cycle of modified dose-attenuatedFOLFIRINOX (no bolus FU and reduced dose of oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan) at our institution were identified. Results: Twenty-one consecutive patients (62% males) were reviewed. Median age was 67 (range 65-79). Grade 3/4 toxicities were reported in 7 (33%) patients ; the most common toxicities were anemia (62%), and nausea/vomiting (45%). Elevations in AST and/or ALT above the upper limit of normality were identified in 38%. No deaths due to toxicities were reported. Prophylactic granulocyte colony stimulator factor (G-CSF) was given in 16 (70 %) patients. Dose reductions were substantial with median reductions of 27,8 % (range 15 - 50%) for 5-FU, 27,1% (range 6-50%) for oxaliplatin and 25% (range 12-75%) for irinotecan. Median overall survival (OS) was 11,8 months (95% CI 10,2 - 13,3). Median progression free survival (PFS) was 6,9 months (95% CI 5,3 - 8,5). Conclusions: Modified dose-attenuated FOLFIRINOX is a reasonable option for elderly patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Adverse events were manageable and no deaths due to toxicity were reported. Median OS and PFS were similar to the pivotal phase III trial, demonstrating that dose-attenuated FOLFIRINOX may be beneficial to elderly patients.

scholarly journals Lenalidomide Maintenance with or without Prednisone in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Patients: A Pooled Analysis

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bonello ◽  
Pulini ◽  
Ballanti ◽  
Gentile ◽  
Spada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Impact

: We conducted a pooled analysis of two phase III trials, RV-MM-EMN-441 and EMN01, to compare maintenance with lenalidomide-prednisone vs. lenalidomide in newly diagnosed transplant-eligible and -ineligible myeloma patients. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival, progression-free survival 2 and overall survival with both regimens. A secondary aim was to evaluate the impact of duration of maintenance on overall survival and on outcome after relapse. A total of 625 patients (lenalidomide-prednisone arm, n = 315; lenalidomide arm, n = 310) were analyzed. The median follow-up was 58 months. Median progression-free survival (25 vs. 19 months; p = 0.08), progression-free survival 2 (56 vs. 49 months; p = 0.9) and overall survival (73 months vs. NR; p = 0.08) were not significantly different between the two arms. Toxicity profiles of lenalidomide-prednisone and lenalidomide were similar, with the exception of neutropenia that was higher in the lenalidomide arm (grade ≥ 3: 9% vs. 19%, p < 0.001), without an increase in the rate of infections. Overall survival (median NR vs. 49 months, p < 0.001), progression-free survival from relapse (median 35 vs. 24 months, p = 0.004) and overall survival from relapse (median not reached vs. 41 months, p = 0.002) were significantly longer in patients continuing maintenance for ≥2 years. We showed that the addition of prednisone at 25 or 50 mg every other day (eod) to lenalidomide maintenance did not induce any significant advantage.

scholarly journals COVID-19 Vaccine Safety in Cancer Patients: A Single Centre Experience

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 3573
Author(s):  
Alfred Chung Pui So ◽  
Harriet McGrath ◽  
Jonathan Ting ◽  
Krishnie Srikandarajah ◽  
Styliani Germanou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Vaccine Safety ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Solid Malignancy ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Oncology Care ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Oncology Centre

Emergency approval of vaccines against COVID-19 provides an opportunity for us to return to pre-pandemic oncology care. However, safety data in cancer patients is lacking due to their exclusion from most phase III trials. We included all patients aged less than 65 years who received a COVID-19 vaccine from 8 December 2020 to 28 February 2021 at our London tertiary oncology centre. Solicited and unsolicited vaccine-related adverse events (VRAEs) were collected using telephone or face-to-face consultation. Within the study period, 373 patients received their first dose of vaccine: Pfizer/BioNTech (75.1%), Oxford/AstraZeneca (23.6%), Moderna (0.3%), and unknown (1.1%). Median follow-up was 25 days (5–85). Median age was 56 years (19–65). Of the patients, 94.9% had a solid malignancy and 76.7% were stage 3–4. The most common cancers were breast (34.0%), lung (13.4%), colorectal (10.2%), and gynaecological (10.2%). Of the patients, 88.5% were receiving anti-cancer treatment (36.2% parenteral chemotherapy and 15.3% immunotherapy), 76.1% developed any grade VRAE of which 2.1% were grade 3. No grade 4/5 or anaphylaxis were observed. The most common VRAEs within 7 days post-vaccination were sore arm (61.7%), fatigue (18.2%), and headaches (12.1%). Most common grade 3 VRAE was fatigue (1.1%). Our results demonstrate that COVID-19 vaccines in oncology patients have mild reactogenicity.

Impact of weight on the efficacy and safety of direct-acting oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis

EP Europace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 361-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaqib H Malik ◽  
Srikanth Yandrapalli ◽  
Suchith Shetty ◽  
Wilbert S Aronow ◽  
Diwakar Jain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Low Bmi ◽  
Direct Acting ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Direct Acting Oral Anticoagulants

Abstract Aims This study sought to determine the impact of weight and body mass index (BMI) on the safety and efficacy of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Methods and results A systematic literature search was employed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane clinical trials with no language or date restrictions. Randomized trials or their substudies were assessed for relevant outcome data for efficacy that included stroke or systemic embolization (SSE), and safety including major bleeding and all-cause mortality. Binary outcome data and odds ratios from the relevant articles were used to calculate the pooled relative risk. For SSE, the data from the four Phase III trials showed that DOACs are better or similarly effective with low BMI 0.73 (0.56–0.97), normal BMI 0.72 (0.58–0.91), overweight 0.87 (0.76–0.99), and obese 0.87 (0.76–1.00). The risk of major bleeding was also better or similar with DOACs in all BMI subgroups with low BMI 0.62 (0.37–1.05), normal BMI 0.72 (0.58–0.90), overweight 0.83 (0.71–0.96), and obese 0.91 (0.81–1.03). There was no impact on mortality in all the subgroups. In a meta-regression analysis, the effect size advantage of DOACs compared with warfarin in terms of safety and efficacy gradually attenuated with increasing weight. Conclusion Our findings suggest that a weight-based dosage adjustment may be necessary to achieve optimal benefits of DOACs for thromboembolic prevention in these patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Further dedicated trials are needed to confirm these findings. PROSPERO 2019 CRD42019140693. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php? ID=CRD42019140693.

Efficacy of Melphalan and Prednisone Plus Thalidomide in Patients Older Than 75 Years With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: IFM 01/01 Trial

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (22) ◽  
pp. 3664-3670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cyrille Hulin ◽  
Thierry Facon ◽  
Philippe Rodon ◽  
Brigitte Pegourie ◽  
Lotfi Benboubker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive

Purpose Until recently, melphalan and prednisone were the standards of care in elderly patients with multiple myeloma. The addition of thalidomide to this combination demonstrated a survival benefit for patients age 65 to 75 years. This randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III trial investigated the efficacy of melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide in patients older than 75 years with newly diagnosed myeloma. Patients and Methods Between April 2002 and December 2006, 232 previously untreated patients with myeloma, age 75 years or older, were enrolled and 229 were randomly assigned to treatment. All patients received melphalan (0.2 mg/kg/d) plus prednisone (2 mg/kg/d) for 12 courses (day 1 to 4) every 6 weeks. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 100 mg/d of oral thalidomide (n = 113) or placebo (n = 116), continuously for 72 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival. Results After a median follow-up of 47.5 months, overall survival was significantly longer in patients who received melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide compared with those who received melphalan and prednisone plus placebo (median, 44.0 v 29.1 months; P = .028). Progression-free survival was significantly prolonged in the melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide group (median, 24.1 v 18.5 months; P = .001). Two adverse events were significantly increased in the melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide group: grade 2 to 4 peripheral neuropathy (20% v 5% in the melphalan and prednisone plus placebo group; P < .001) and grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (23% v 9%; P = .003). Conclusion This trial confirms the superiority of the combination melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide over melphalan and prednisone alone for prolonging survival in very elderly patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. Toxicity was acceptable.

scholarly journals Cisplatin-Based First-Line Treatment of Elderly Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Joint Analysis of MILES-3 and MILES-4 Phase III Trials

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (25) ◽  
pp. 2585-2592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cesare Gridelli ◽  
Alessandro Morabito ◽  
Luigi Cavanna ◽  
Andrea Luciani ◽  
Paolo Maione ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Health Status Score

Purpose To test the efficacy of adding cisplatin to first-line treatment for elderly patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) within a combined analysis of two parallel phase III trials, MILES-3 and MILES-4. Patients and Methods Patients with advanced NSCLC who were older than age 70 years with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 1 were randomly assigned to gemcitabine or pemetrexed, without or with cisplatin. In each trial, 382 events were required to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of death of 0.75, with 80% power and two-tailed α of .05. Trials were closed prematurely because of slow accrual, but the joint database allowed us to analyze the efficacy of cisplatin on the basis of intention-to-treat and adjusted by trial, histotype, non-platinum companion drug, stage, performance status, sex, age, and size of the study center. Results From March 2011 to August 2016, 531 patients (MILES-3, 299; MILES-4, 232) were assigned to gemcitabine or pemetrexed without (n = 268) or with cisplatin (n = 263). Median age was 75 years, 79% were male, and 70% had nonsquamous histology. At a median 2-year follow-up, 384 deaths and 448 progression-free survival events were recorded. Overall survival was not significantly prolonged with cisplatin (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.05; P = .14) and global health status score of quality of life was not improved, whereas progression-free survival (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.92; P = .005) and objective response rate (15.5% v 8.5%; P = .02) were significantly better. Significantly more severe hematologic toxicity, fatigue, and anorexia were found with cisplatin. Conclusion The addition of cisplatin to single-agent chemotherapy does not significantly prolong overall survival, and it does not improve global health status score of quality of life in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document