scholarly journals COVID-19 Vaccine Safety in Cancer Patients: A Single Centre Experience

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 3573
Author(s):  
Alfred Chung Pui So ◽  
Harriet McGrath ◽  
Jonathan Ting ◽  
Krishnie Srikandarajah ◽  
Styliani Germanou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Vaccine Safety ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Solid Malignancy ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Oncology Care ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Oncology Centre

Emergency approval of vaccines against COVID-19 provides an opportunity for us to return to pre-pandemic oncology care. However, safety data in cancer patients is lacking due to their exclusion from most phase III trials. We included all patients aged less than 65 years who received a COVID-19 vaccine from 8 December 2020 to 28 February 2021 at our London tertiary oncology centre. Solicited and unsolicited vaccine-related adverse events (VRAEs) were collected using telephone or face-to-face consultation. Within the study period, 373 patients received their first dose of vaccine: Pfizer/BioNTech (75.1%), Oxford/AstraZeneca (23.6%), Moderna (0.3%), and unknown (1.1%). Median follow-up was 25 days (5–85). Median age was 56 years (19–65). Of the patients, 94.9% had a solid malignancy and 76.7% were stage 3–4. The most common cancers were breast (34.0%), lung (13.4%), colorectal (10.2%), and gynaecological (10.2%). Of the patients, 88.5% were receiving anti-cancer treatment (36.2% parenteral chemotherapy and 15.3% immunotherapy), 76.1% developed any grade VRAE of which 2.1% were grade 3. No grade 4/5 or anaphylaxis were observed. The most common VRAEs within 7 days post-vaccination were sore arm (61.7%), fatigue (18.2%), and headaches (12.1%). Most common grade 3 VRAE was fatigue (1.1%). Our results demonstrate that COVID-19 vaccines in oncology patients have mild reactogenicity.

Up-Front Window Trial of Topotecan in Previously Untreated Children and Adolescents With Metastatic Rhabdomyosarcoma: An Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 213-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto S. Pappo ◽  
Elizabeth Lyden ◽  
John Breneman ◽  
Eugene Wiener ◽  
Lisa Teot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
High Response Rate ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Continuation Therapy ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Front Window ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE: To investigate the antitumor activity and toxicity of topotecan, used alone and in combination with conventional therapy, in patients with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients younger than 21 years of age with newly diagnosed metastatic RMS received 2.0 to 2.4 mg/m2 of topotecan intravenously daily for 5 days every 21 days before standard therapy. Two courses were given in the absence of progressive disease or excessive toxicity and response was assessed. Patients with at least a partial response (PR) to topotecan proceeded to therapy with alternating courses of vincristine 1.5 mg/m2, dactinomycin 1.5 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 2.2 g/m2 (VAC) and vincristine 1.5 mg/m2, topotecan 0.75 mg/m2 daily × 5, and cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2 daily × 5. Patients who did not respond to topotecan received continuation therapy with VAC alone. RESULTS: The overall response rate to topotecan was 46% (complete response, 4%; partial response 42%). Unexpectedly, patients with alveolar RMS had a higher rate of response (65%) than those with embryonal RMS (28%; P = .08). The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia (67%), anemia (33%), thrombocytopenia (25%), and infection (21%). Two-year failure-free survival and survival estimates were 24% and 46%, respectively. Response to window therapy did not correlate with survival. CONCLUSION: The high response rate and acceptable toxicity profile of topotecan in children with advanced RMS support further evaluation of this agent in phase III trials. The superior responses in alveolar RMS are of interest.

Initial safety results from a randomized, phase II study of high-risk colorectal cancer patients (stage IIIC) treated with either regorafenib or standard of care (no treatment) after adjuvant FOLFOX.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15152-e15152
Author(s):  
Thomas H. Cartwright ◽  
Thu-Cuc Nguyen ◽  
Allen Lee Cohn ◽  
Donald A. Richards
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iiic ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

e15152 Background: Standard adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer (CRC) is fluoropyrimidine or FOLFOX. The stage IIIC relapse rate is high with a median 5 year survival of only 28%. The multi-kinase inhibitor regorafenib has shown significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus placebo in 3rd-line+ metastatic CRC patients (pts) in 2 phase III trials. We explore whether adding regorafenib to standard adjuvant therapy is able to reduce the high relapse rates in stage IIIC CRC pts. Methods: This study compares efficacy and safety of adjuvant FOLFOX +/- 6 cycles of regorafenib in IIIC CRC pts. Study endpoints include: finding the starting dose of regorafenib that allows ≥75% pts to complete therapy after adjuvant FOLFOX. The first 50 pts are being randomly assigned to either 120 or 160 mg of regorafenib daily for 3 weeks followed by 1 week of rest for a total of 6 cycles. We report the initial safety results on the first 24 pts treated. 6 pts discontinued treatment; 2 received 120 mg and 4 received 160 mg Results: Of the pts completing 6 cycles of regorafenib 120 mg vs 160 mg, the most common grade 3 toxicities were hypertension (0 vs. 30%), rash (10 vs.30%), and lipase elevation (0 vs 10%). No grade 4 or 5 toxicities were observed. Conclusions: The interim analysis reveals no increased toxicities from the addition of regorafenib at either 120 mg or the approved dose (160 mg), to adjuvant FOLFOX. Toxicities observed were mostly grade 1 or 2 and medically manageable. No safety signals have been identified. This study continues to enroll pts. Clinical trial information: NCT02425683.

scholarly journals Phase III Randomized Trial of Induction Chemotherapy in Patients With N2 or N3 Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (25) ◽  
pp. 2735-2743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ezra E.W. Cohen ◽  
Theodore G. Karrison ◽  
Masha Kocherginsky ◽  
Jeffrey Mueller ◽  
Robyn Egan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Distant Failure ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose Induction chemotherapy (IC) before radiotherapy lowers distant failure (DF) rates in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). The goal of this phase III trial was to determine whether IC before chemoradiotherapy (CRT) further improves survival compared with CRT alone in patients with N2 or N3 disease. Patients and Methods Treatment-naive patients with nonmetastatic N2 or N3 SCCHN were randomly assigned to CRT alone (CRT arm; docetaxel, fluorouracil, and hydroxyurea plus radiotherapy 0.15 Gy twice per day every other week) versus two 21-day cycles of IC (docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1, cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1, and fluorouracil 750 mg/m2 on days 1 to 5) followed by the same CRT regimen (IC + CRT arm). The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included DF-free survival, failure pattern, and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Results A total of 285 patients were randomly assigned. The most common grade 3 to 4 toxicities during IC were febrile neutropenia (11%) and mucositis (9%); during CRT (both arms combined), they were mucositis (49%), dermatitis (21%), and leukopenia (18%). Serious adverse events were more common in the IC arm (47% v 28%; P = .002). With a minimum follow-up of 30 months, there were no statistically significant differences in OS (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.41), RFS, or DF-free survival. Conclusion IC did not translate into improved OS compared with CRT alone. However, the study was underpowered because it did not meet the planned accrual target, and OS was higher than predicted in both arms. IC cannot be recommended routinely in patients with N2 or N3 locally advanced SCCHN.

scholarly journals Adjuvant Capecitabine With Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide Plus Epirubicin for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (CBCSG010): An Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (16) ◽  
pp. 1774-1784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junjie Li ◽  
Keda Yu ◽  
Da Pang ◽  
Changqin Wang ◽  
Jun Jiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Control Treatment ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE Standard adjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) includes a taxane and an anthracycline. Concomitant capecitabine may be beneficial, but robust data to support this are lacking. The efficacy and safety of the addition of capecitabine into the TNBC adjuvant treatment regimen was evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS This randomized, open-label, phase III trial was conducted in China. Eligible female patients with early TNBC after definitive surgery were randomly assigned (1:1) to either capecitabine (3 cycles of capecitabine and docetaxel followed by 3 cycles of capecitabine, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide) or control treatment (3 cycles of docetaxel followed by 3 cycles of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide). Randomization was centralized without stratification. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS Between June 2012 and December 2013, 636 patients with TNBC were screened, and 585 were randomly assigned to treatment (control, 288; capecitabine, 297). Median follow-up was 67 months. The 5-year DFS rate was higher for capecitabine than for control treatment (86.3% v 80.4%; hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.99; P = .044). Five-year overall survival rates were numerically higher but not significantly improved (capecitabine, 93.3%; control, 90.7%). Overall, 39.1% of patients had capecitabine dose reductions, and 8.4% reported grade ≥ 3 hand-foot syndrome. The most common grade ≥ 3 hematologic toxicities were neutropenia (capecitabine, 136 [45.8%]; control, 118 [41.0%]) and febrile neutropenia (capecitabine, 50 [16.8%]; control, 46 [16.0%]). Safety data were similar to the known capecitabine safety profile and generally comparable between arms. CONCLUSION Capecitabine when added to 3 cycles of docetaxel followed by 3 cycles of a 3-drug anthracycline combination containing capecitabine instead of fluorouracil significantly improved DFS in TNBC without new safety concerns.

Comparison of the Efficacy and Toxicity of Fludarabine (F) in First Line Therapy of Younger Versus Elderly Patients (Pts) with Advanced Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): Results of a Meta-Analysis of Two Phase III Trials of the German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG).

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 717-717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara F. Eichhorst ◽  
Raymonde Busch ◽  
Clemens M. Wendtner ◽  
Michael Hallek ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Age Groups ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Binet Stage ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: F based regimen have become the standard treatment in CLL at least in younger pts. However, in elderly pts chlorambucil is still frequently used since it is easy to administer and has less side effects. Here we compare the efficacy and toxicity of F administered to younger pts and elderly pts treated between 1999 and 2004 within two phase III trials of GCLLSG. Patients: 362 pts (median age 59 [range 37–65] years) were randomized to F (n=182) or F plus cyclophosphamide (n=180) within the CLL4 trial. 191 elderly pts (median age 71 [range 65–79] years) were treated with F (92 pts) or chlorambucil (99 pts) within the CLL5 protocol. Inclusion criteria were identical in both trials except for age limits. All pts were previously untreated and in advanced stage Binet C or Binet B with symptoms which require therapy or Binet A with severe B-symptoms. In both studies the F regimen consisted of 30 mg/m2/day (d) IV for 5 consecutive days, every 28 d for up to 6 cycles. Anti-infective prophylaxis and growth factors were not given routinely in both trials. Results: Most of patients in both age groups were in Binet stage B (54% of the younger pts and 52% of the elderly), 35% in each age group were in Binet stage C, 11% and 13% respectively in Binet stage A. No significant difference in the main clinical features was observed except for a higher incidence of concomitant disease in the elderly (61% versus 36%, p=0.001). A mean number of 5.2 F courses was administered in the CLL4 trial and 4.9 courses in the CLL5 trial. The mean administered cumulative dose of F per pt was lower in the elderly pts (1076 mg vs. 1194 mg, p= 0.05). Overall response rates were similar in both arms, with 82.9% in the younger group and 85.7% in the elderly. The complete remission rate was 6.7% in the younger patients and 10.4% in the elderly (p= 0.3). After a follow up time of 24 months (mo) the progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly shorter in the elderly group with 18.7 mo compared to 19.8 mo in the younger group after 22 mo observation time (p=0.03). The overall survival (OS) was significantly impaired in elderly pts as well (29 mo versus median not reached, p<0.001). Progressive disease was the main cause of death in both age groups. In each group 3 treatment related deaths occurred due to infection or hemolysis. The incidence of side effects was similar in both age groups. Severe, CTC grade 3 and 4, myelosuppression occurred in 39% of the younger and 41% of the elderly pts. No difference in the rate of leukocytopenia, thrombocytopenia or anemia was oberved as well. The incidence rate and severity of infections was similar in both groups (24% vs. 32% all and 8.7% vs. 6.9% CTC grade 3 and 4). The incidence of second neoplasia was significantly higher in the elderly pts (2.2% vs. 12.2%, p=0.001). In comparison the prevalence rate of neoplasia in the U.S. population peaks at 11% in the age group of 70–79 (SEER cancer statistic review: 1972–2002). Conclusion: F is a well tolerated treatment regimen in first line therapy of elderly pts with CLL. Response rates were similar in both age groups. PFS and OS were significantly shorter in the elderly population. The incidence of second neoplasia was significantly higher in the elderly pts, but is only slightly increased in comparison to the normal population.

Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) in androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC) patients receiving ATTP (bevacizumab, docetaxel, thalidomide, and prednisone)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 19594-19594 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. B. Aragon-Ching ◽  
Y. M. Ning ◽  
L. Latham ◽  
J. Guadagnini ◽  
P. M. Arlen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Oral Surgery ◽  
Osteonecrosis Of The Jaw ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Additional Risk Factor ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Vascular Insufficiency ◽  
Phase Iii Trials

19594 Background: ONJ has been associated with IV bisphosphonate use in cancer patients (pts) and chemotherapy may be an additional risk factor. ONJ is believed to result from localized vascular insufficiency due to faulty bone remodeling. ONJ incidence in pts not receiving chemotherapy (e.g. Paget's disease) is reportedly only 0.8%; prostate cancer pts have an incidence of 6.5%. Methods: We reviewed data from pts with advanced AIPC who developed ONJ while being treated on a Phase II study of ATTP. Results: Six of 36 (17%) pts treated with ATTP had ONJ confirmed by oral surgery. Four of the 6 pts presented with pain and, in five, the ONJ was mandibular in location. All pts were treated conservatively with either sequestrectomy or oral cleansing with chlorhexidine. All pts had been treated monthly with IV zoledronic acid (ZA). The mean duration of ZA use before diagnosis of ONJ was 20 months (mos). One patient had been treated with oral alendronate for 3 years and then developed ONJ after 5 mos of ZA. Of the 36 pts on-study, previous dental history could be verified in 24 pts. ONJ was diagnosed in 4 of the 5 pts with a prior dental infection or invasive dental procedure. Pts received an average of 11 cycles of ATTP before ONJ was diagnosed. All pts with ONJ had received full doses of bevacizumab and most had received full doses of all medications for all cycles. Conclusions: The possibility exists that the risk for ONJ may be higher with specific chemotherapy regimens, particularly those that include steroids or anti-angiogenic agents. However, at this time prior dental infections or procedures remain the greatest known risk factor. It is also possible that the relatively high incidence of ONJ in prostate cancer patients may reflect increased awareness in this population. Randomized phase III trials in AIPC, specifically addressing the incidence of ONJ, are needed to determine whether specific chemotherapy regimens are associated with an increased risk of this complication. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

International randomized phase III study of capecitabine (Cap), bevacizumab (Bev), and mitomycin C (MMC) in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Final results of the AGITG MAX trial

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4023-4023
Author(s):  
N. C. Tebbutt ◽  
V. Gebski ◽  
K. Wilson ◽  
M. Cummins ◽  
Y. Chua ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Low Toxicity ◽  
Grade 3

4023 Background: The addition of Bev to oxaliplatin or irinotecan based doublet chemotherapy has shown benefit in mCRC. Cap± MMC are alternate chemotherapy regimens suitable for patients (pts) who are either unfit for or who do not require initial oxaliplatin/irinotecan. This phase III study compared Cap with Cap Bev and Cap Bev MMC. The aim was to develop a low toxicity regimen suitable for a broad population of pts with mCRC. Methods: Previously untreated pts with unresectable mCRC considered suitable for Cap monotherapy were randomised to arm A Cap (Cap 2000mg/m2/d or 2500mg/m2 d1–14 q21d), arm B Cap Bev (Bev 7.5mg/kg q3w) or arm C Cap Bev MMC (MMC 7mg/m2 q6w). Primary endpoint: PFS, secondary endpoints: RR, toxicity, OS, QoL . Randomisation was stratified by age, PS, centre and Cap dose. Response was assessed every 6w. The study was designed to detect an increase in the median PFS from 5.5m (arm A) to 8m (arm B or C) at p<0.025 with 80% power. Results: A total of 471 pts were randomised from July 2005-June 2007. Outcomes were evaluated on an intention to treat basis and included 15 ineligible pts. Baseline demographics were well balanced between arms with median age 67y (range 31–86y). Toxicity was reported: ASCO 2008 abstr 4029. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were PPE (16%, 26%, 28%) and diarrhoea (11%, 17%, 16%) for arms (A,B,C). However, adjusted rates per cycle were similar as arms B & C received more cycles of Cap (A8.3, B10.8, C10.5). Other toxicity rates were generally <10%. The study achieved its primary endpoint with a highly significant improvement in PFS for arms B & C. RR and OS are summarized ( Table ). Conclusions: All treatment regimens were well tolerated in a relatively elderly patient cohort. The addition of Bev±MMC to Cap significantly improved PFS without significant additional toxicity. OS was similar for all arms. Cap Bev±MMC is an active, low toxicity regimen that may be considered as a treatment option for pts with mCRC. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Capecitabine and irinotecan (XELIRI) in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): A systematic review of controlled clinical trials

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15100-e15100
Author(s):  
S. Sukumaran ◽  
N. Pavlakis ◽  
K. B. Pittman ◽  
K. Patterson ◽  
T. J. Price
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
First Line ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Phase Ii And Iii ◽  
First Line Treatment

e15100 Background: Irinotecan and 5-Fluorouracil based combination is an effective regimen for mCRC. Capecitabine, an oral fluoropyrimidine, is a convenient alternative to intravenous 5- Fluorouracil. This study aims to systematically review all published and unpublished controlled phase II and III trials of XELIRI combination, used in first line treatment of mCRC, reported from 2000–2008, to describe its efficacy and safety. Methods: A literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and proceedings from ASCO, ESMO and WGIC was conducted. The primary end point was response rate (RR), secondary endpoints include: time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. Results: Thirty non-randomised phase II trials (n = 1380) along with 6 randomised phase II and 3 phase III trials, were included (pooled n = 1478). The daily dose of capecitabine ranged from 1,800 mg/m2 to 2,500 mg/m2 for 7 to 14 days per cycle and the dose of irinotecan varied from 180mg/m2 to 350 mg/m2, over a 3 week period per cycle. Amongst the non-randomised studies, the median patient age was 61 years (53–72).The median RR was 46.75% (25–78%). The median reported TTP was 7.9 months (mo) (5- 9.9 mo) and the median OS was 15.6 months (7–24.8 mo). Grade 3–4 toxicity incidence was: diarrhoea (21.5%), neutropenia (12%), vomiting (12.5%), fatigue (6%) and Hand-foot syndrome (6%). The pooled incidence of febrile neutropenia was 2.5%. Amongst the randomised trials, the comparator regimens were XELOX or FOLFIRI. Median age was 65 years (61–74). RR for XELIRI was 39% (34–56%) compared to 47% (27–61.8%) for the non XELIRI comparator arms. Median reported TTP was 8.2 mo (5.7–12.5 mo) for the XELIRI arms and 9.2 mo for the comparator arms. Conclusions: XELIRI is an effective and feasible regime in the first line management of mCRC. However the optimal role of this combination remains to be established. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Safety of ipilimumab in patients (pts) with untreated, advanced melanoma alive beyond 2 years: Results from a phase III study.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8512-8512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luc Thomas ◽  
Jedd D. Wolchok ◽  
Claus Garbe ◽  
Celeste Lebbe ◽  
Igor Bondarenko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Safety Profile ◽  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
T Cell Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Impact

8512 Background: Ipilimumab (IPI), a fully human monoclonal antibody, blocks cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 to potentiate an antitumor T-cell response. In a phase 3 study (CA184-024) of previously untreated pts with stage III or IV melanoma, IPI + dacarbazine (DTIC) significantly improved overall survival (OS) vs. DTIC alone (Robert et al. NEJM 2011). We now report safety data of IPI in pts from this study alive > 2 yrs from study initiation. Methods: Pts with untreated advanced melanoma, were randomized to IPI (10 mg/kg) + DTIC (850 mg/m2) or placebo + DTIC (850 mg/m2) given at Wks 1, 4, 7, 10 followed by DTIC q 3 wks through Wk 22. Eligible pts (stable disease or better) received IPI or placebo q 12 wks as maintenance. In the population of subjects alive >2 yrs, the appearance of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occurring after 2 yrs was evaluated. Within this group was a subset of subjects still receiving IPI dosing after 2 yrs; safety for these pts was evaluated to assess the impact of prolonged IPI exposure. Results: In the IPI + DTIC group 68 (28%) pts survived > 2 yrs compared to 44 (18%) in the DTIC alone group; 11 of the 68 continued IPI dosing for ≥ 2 yrs. Safety assessment beyond 2 yrs showed 3 of the 11 pts had any grade irAEs; 1 pt had grade 3/4 rash, pruritus while low grade events included rash, pruritus (n=2) and elevated ALT / AST (n=1). Overall among all 68 pts in the Ipi + DTIC group, there were 5 pts (7.4%) with any grade irAEs including grade 3/4 rash, pruritus (n=1) and low grade rash (n=3), pruritus (n=2), skin hypopigmentation, and elevated ALT / AST (n=1). No gastrointestinal or endocrine events (any grade) were observed. Conclusions: In Study 024, IPI + DTIC treatment improved OS pts with untreated, advanced melanoma with higher survival rates in the IPI + DTIC group at 1 yr (47.3% vs. 36.3%), 2 yrs (28.5% vs. 17.9%), and 3 yrs (20.8% vs. 12.2%) (HR 0.72, p<0.001). The safety profile of pts alive after 2 yrs suggests that treatment with IPI + DTIC is associated with low rates of irAEs in these pts. Furthermore, in pts still receiving active IPI treatment beyond ≥ 2 yrs, the safety profile appears to be consistent and medically manageable using established safety guidelines (Weber, Oncologist 2007).

Efficacy and safety of front-line bevacizumab (BEV), weekly paclitaxel (wPAC), and q3w carboplatin (C) in elderly patients (pts) with ovarian cancer (OC): Subgroup analysis of OCTAVIA.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5544-5544
Author(s):  
Antonio Gonzalez-Martin ◽  
Laurence Gladieff ◽  
Bengt Tholander ◽  
Daniel Stroyakovsky ◽  
Martin Eric Gore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Residual Disease ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Front Line ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Angiogenic Therapy ◽  
Small Subgroup ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3

5544 Background: Front-line BEV significantly improved PFS when combined with q3w paclitaxel and C in two randomized phase III OC trials. The single-arm OCTAVIA study combined two successful strategies, anti-angiogenic therapy and wPAC administration, demonstrating median PFS of 24 months at the primary analysis [IGCS 2012]. We report exploratory analyses of safety and efficacy in the subgroup of pts aged ≥65 y treated in OCTAVIA. Methods: Pts received 6–8 cycles of BEV (7.5 mg/kg, d1) + wPAC (80 mg/m2 d1, 8, 15) + C (AUC 6, d1) iv q3w, with BEV q3w continued alone for a total of up to 17 cycles (1 y) as front-line therapy for newly diagnosed OC (FIGO stage I–IIa [grade 3/clear cell] or stage IIb–IV [any grade]). The primary endpoint was PFS. Results: Of the189 treated pts, 37 (20%) were aged ≥65 y (11% 65–<70 y; 6% 70–<75 y; 3% ≥75 y). Compared with pts aged <65 y, the subgroup of pts aged ≥65 y included fewer pts with no residual disease after surgery (24% vs 34%) and more pts with grade 3 OC (62% vs 55%) or comorbidities at baseline (hypertension: 38% vs 17%; dyslipidemia: 14% vs 5%). Pts aged ≥65 y received a median of 6 chemotherapy cycles (range 1–8) and 17 BEV cycles (range 0–18). C or wPAC was given for ≥6 cycles to 86% and 68% of pts, respectively. AEs led to early discontinuation of C, wPAC, or BEV in 14%, 38%, and 14% of pts, respectively. After median follow-up of 26.5 months and events in 62%, median PFS was 20.5 mo (95% CI 17.8–29.1 mo) in the elderly subgroup. Seven pts (19%) had died, all from disease progression; the 1-y OS rate was 97.3%. The most common grade ≥3 AEs were hematologic (neutropenia 62%, thrombocytopenia 14%), with no major differences according to age. Overall, there was a numerically higher incidence of grade 3/4 AEs in pts aged ≥65 vs <65 y (86% vs 76%, respectively), driven by non-hematologic AEs. The incidences of grade ≥3 AEs of special interest were similar in older and younger pts, except for hypertension (11% in pts ≥65 y vs 3% in pts <65 y) and bleeding (3% vs 0%, respectively). Conclusions: BEV combined with wPAC and C is a feasible, well-tolerated, active front-line regimen, even in the small subgroup of pts aged ≥65 y, many of whom had comorbidities. Clinical trial information: NCT00937560.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document