Final safety results of BO17704 (AVAiL): A phase III randomized study of first-line bevacizumab (Bv) and cisplatin/gemcitabine (CG) in patients (pts) with advanced or recurrent nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8039-8039
Author(s):  
V. Hirsh ◽  
R. Ramlau ◽  
J. von Pawel ◽  
P. Zatloukal ◽  
G. Vera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Grade 3

8039 Background: AVAiL, an international placebo-controlled phase III trial, showed that Bv-based therapy significantly improved PFS and response rate in patients with advanced/recurrent NSCLC. This report summarizes overall safety findings from AVAiL. Methods: AVAiL randomized 1,043 patients with untreated locally advanced, metastatic or recurrent non-squamous NSCLC to C 80mg/m2 (d1) and G 1,250mg/m2 (d1 and d8) q3w for up to 6 cycles plus either Bv 7.5mg/kg q3w (n=331 with safety data), Bv 15mg/kg q3w (n=329) or placebo (n=326). Bv/placebo was administered until disease progression. Primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints included OS, response rate, and safety. Safety was measured using NCI-CTC version 3.0 criteria for adverse events (AEs). Results: At final analysis, the median/maximum duration of Bv therapy was 4.9/28.5 mo (Bv 7.5) and 4.3/23.4 mo (Bv 15). The most common AEs overall were hematological and gastrointestinal (GI), and occurred in similar proportions of pts in the Bv and placebo arms. Grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 80%, 83%, and 77% of pts in the Bv 7.5, Bv 15 and placebo arms, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were hematological, mainly neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Neutropenia was reported in 43% (Bv 7.5), 40% (Bv 15) and 34% (placebo) of pts. Grade ≥3 AEs of special interest included hypertension (7%, 9% and 2%), proteinuria (2%, 3% and 0%), bleeding (4%, 5% and 2%) and hemoptysis (0.5%, 1.2% and 1.3%). The incidence of grade 5 hemoptysis was low (0.9%, 0.9% and 0% of pts, respectively). The incidence of GI perforations (<1%), thromboembolic events (≤8%), CHF (≤1%) and wound healing complications (<1%) was low and similar between treatment arms. The incidence of serious AEs was 39%, 45% and 36% in the Bv 7.5, Bv 15 and placebo arms, respectively. No new safety signals were reported. Conclusions: After E4599, AVAiL further demonstrated the efficacy of Bv in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Final safety data confirm the well established and manageable safety profile of Bv-based therapy in pts with advanced NSCLC. [Table: see text]

Phase II randomized placebo-controlled neoadjuvant trial of nintedanib or placebo with gemcitabine and cisplatin in locally advanced muscle invasive bladder cancer (NEO-BLADE).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 438-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Syed A. Hussain ◽  
Jason Francis Lester ◽  
Richard Jackson ◽  
Matthew Gornall ◽  
Anthony Elliott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Controlled Study

438 Background: Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy Improves overall survival in patients with MIBC. Nintedanib is an orally available, potent, small molecule, triple kinase inhibitor with the potential to further benefit patient prognosis. Methods: NEO-BLADE was designed as a randomised, placebo controlled phase II study (n=120) to compare the addition of nintedanib (N) (150mg/200mg BD) to a combination of Gemcitabine (G) and Cisplatin (C). The study was powered (80%, alpha=15% [one sided]) to detect an improvement in the histological complete response rate of 20% (OR = 2.37). Results: 120 patients were recruited from 15 sites between 04/Dec/2014 and 03/Sep/2018 (22% Female) with 109 patients evaluable. Complete response (CR) rates ( by ITT) were 22/57 (38.6%) and 25/63 (39.7%) for patients treated with/without N. Pathological CR on ITT was 21/57 (36.8%) and 20/63 (31.74%); For pathological evaluable patients it was 21/41 (51. 22% ) and 20/45 ( 44.44%) respectively. Patients treated with N showed a benefit in terms of PFS and OS with 12 month PFS rates of 89.0% and 74.1% in the Nintedanib and Placebo group respectively. P= 0.038 and HR (CI) 0.479 (0.236, 0.976). OS at 12/24 months N 96.26%/ 88.87% while in Placebo group 82.83%,/69.36%. P=0.022, HR (CI) 0.389 (0.168, 0.902). Toxicity was reported in terms of grade 3 adverse events [12/63 (19%) Placebo, 23/57 (40%) N] and Serious Adverse Events [35/63 (56%) Placebo, 34/57 (53%) N]. In terms of thromboembolic events, this was observed in 16/57 (28%) of patients treated with N and 13/63 (21%) without N (P=0.461). Conclusions: The study failed to reach its primary endpoint in demonstrating an improvement in pathological response rate between N and Placebo when given alongside G and C. The trial met its secondary end point in improvement of progression free survival and over all survival at 12 months and 24 months. Safety data from this placebo -controlled study confirms triplets can be given safely. There are efficacy signals with improvement in PFS and OS and the regimen warrants further investigation in randomised phase III trial. Translational studies to assess bio markers of response are planned. Clinical trial information: 11977.

scholarly journals Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S-1 compared with concurrent chemoradiotherapy with docetaxel and cisplatin for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi-Lei Zhou ◽  
Chang-Hua Yu ◽  
Wan-Wei Wang ◽  
Fu-Zhi Ji ◽  
Yao-Zu Xiong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background This retrospective study was to assess and compare the toxicity and efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with S-1 or docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods Patients with locally advanced ESCC who received CCRT with S-1 (70 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1–14, every 3 weeks for 2 cycles, S-1 group) or docetaxel (25 mg/m2) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2) on day 1 weekly (DP group) between 2014 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Radiotherapy was delivered in 1.8–2.0 Gy per fraction to a total dose of 50–60 Gy. Treatment-related toxicities (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0), response rate, and survival outcomes were compared between groups. Results A total of 175 patients were included in this study (72 in the S-1 group and 103 in the DP group). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two groups. The incidence of grade 3–4 adverse events were significantly lower in the S-1 group than that of the DP group (22.2% vs. 45.6%, p = 0.002). In the DP group, elderly patients (> 60 years) had a significantly higher rate of grade 3–4 adverse events than younger patients (58.1% vs. 31.3%, p = 0.01). The objective overall response rate (complete response + partial response) was 68.1% in the S-1 group, and 73.8% the DP group (p = 0.497). The 3-year overall survival was 34.7% in the S-1 group, and 38.8% in the DP group (p = 0.422). The 3-year progression free survival in the DP group was higher than that in the S-1 group but without significant difference (33.0% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.275). Conclusion CCRT with S-1 is not inferior to CCRT with docetaxel and cisplatin and is better tolerated in in elderly patients with locally advanced ESCC.

JUPITER-02: Randomized, double-blind, phase III study of toripalimab or placebo plus gemcitabine and cisplatin as first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA2-LBA2
Author(s):  
Rui-hua Xu ◽  
Hai-Qiang Mai ◽  
Qiu-Yan Chen ◽  
Dongping Chen ◽  
Chaosu Hu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
First Line Treatment

LBA2 Background: Gemcitabine-cisplatin (GP) chemotherapy is the standard 1st line treatment for locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic (r/m) NPC. Toripalimab, a humanized IgG4K monoclonal antibody specific for PD-1, provided durable responses in patients (pts) with r/m NPC as monotherapy in the ≥2nd line setting (POLARIS-02 study). The results of JUPITER-02, a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded Phase III trial of toripalimab in combination with GP chemotherapy as first-line treatment for r/m NPC are summarized. Methods: Pts with advanced NPC with no prior chemotherapy in the r/m setting were randomized (1:1) to receive toripalimab 240 mg or placebo d1 in combination with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 d1, d8 and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 d1 every 3 weeks (Q3W) for up to 6 cycles, followed by monotherapy with toripalimab or placebo Q3W until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or completion of 2 years of treatment. Stratification factors were ECOG PS (0 vs. 1) and extent of disease (recurrent vs. primary metastatic) at enrollment. Progression-free survival (PFS) and response were assessed by independent review committee (IRC) per RECIST v1.1. The primary endpoint was PFS by IRC in the ITT population. Secondary end points included ORR, DOR and OS. There was one prespecified interim analysis of PFS at 130 PFS events with a planned final analysis at 200 PFS events. Results: 289 pts were randomized: 146 to the toripalimab arm and 143 to the placebo arm. By May 30, 2020 as the interim analysis cutoff date, the median treatment duration was 39 weeks in the toripalimab arm and 36 weeks in the placebo arm. A significant improvement in PFS was detected for the toripalimab arm compared to the placebo arm (HR = 0.52 [95% CI: 0.36-0.74] two-sided p = 0.0003), with median PFS of 11.7 vs. 8.0 months. The 1-year PFS rates were 49% and 28% respectively. An improvement in PFS was observed across relevant subgroups, including all PD-L1 subgroups. The ORR was 77.4% vs. 66.4% (P = 0.033) and the median DOR was 10.0 vs. 5.7 months (HR = 0.50 [95% CI: 0.33-0.78]). As of Jan 15, 2021, OS was not mature, with 25 deaths in the toripalimab arm and 35 in the placebo arm (HR = 0.68 [95% CI: 0.41-1.14], P = 0.14). The incidence of Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) (89.0% vs 89.5%); AEs leading to discontinuation of toripalimab/placebo (7.5% vs 4.9%); and fatal AEs (2.7% vs 2.8%) were similar between two arms; however, immune-related (irAEs) (39.7% vs. 18.9%) and Grade ≥3 irAEs (7.5% vs. 0.7%) were more frequent in the toripalimab arm. Conclusions: The addition of toripalimab to GP chemotherapy as 1st-line treatment for pts with advanced NPC provided superior PFS and ORR and longer DOR than GP alone with a manageable safety profile. These results support the use of toripalimab with GP chemotherapy as the new standard care for this population. Clinical trial information: NCT03581786.

Randomized Phase III Study of Gemcitabine-Cisplatin Versus Etoposide-Cisplatin in the Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felipe Cardenal ◽  
M. Paz López-Cabrerizo ◽  
Antonio Antón ◽  
Vicente Alberola ◽  
Bartomeu Massuti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE: We conducted a randomized trial to compare gemcitabine-cisplatin with etoposide-cisplatin in the treatment of patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary end point of the comparison was response rate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 135 chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced NSCLC were randomized to receive either gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) days 1 and 8 or etoposide 100 mg/m2 IV days 1 to 3 along with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 IV day 1. Both treatments were administered in 21-day cycles. One hundred thirty-three patients were included in the intent-to-treat analysis of response. RESULTS: The response rate (externally validated) for patients given gemcitabine-cisplatin was superior to that for patients given etoposide-cisplatin (40.6% v 21.9%; P = .02). This superior response rate was associated with a significant delay in time to disease progression (6.9 months v 4.3 months; P = .01) without an impairment in quality of life (QOL). There was no statistically significant difference in survival time between both arms (8.7 months for gemcitabine-cisplatin v 7.2 months for etoposide-cisplatin; P = .18). The overall toxicity profile for both combinations of drugs was similar. Nausea and vomiting were reported more frequently in the gemcitabine arm than in the etoposide arm. However, the difference was not significant. Gemcitabine-cisplatin produced less grade 3 alopecia (13% v 51%) and less grade 4 neutropenia (28% v 56% ) but more grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia (56% v 13%) than did etoposide-cisplatin. However, there were no thrombocytopenia-related complications in the gemcitabine arm. CONCLUSION: Compared with etoposide-cisplatin, gemcitabine-cisplatin provides a significantly higher response rate and a delay in disease progression without impairing QOL in patients with advanced NSCLC.

A Prospective, Randomized, Phase III Study of Melphalan 200 mg/m2 (MEL200) Versus Melphalan 100 mg/m2 (MEL100) in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Patients.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 55-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
Sara Bringhen ◽  
Maria Teresa Petrucci ◽  
Antonietta Falcone ◽  
Anna Marina Liberati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Psychiatric Disease ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Several trials have shown the superior impact of high-dose melphalan (usually 200 mg/m2, MEL200) versus standard therapy in myeloma patients. Intermediate-dose melphalan (100 mg/m2, MEL100) was also superior to the standard dose, but MEL100 has not been clinically compared with MEL200 in a randomized study. In a case-matched study, response rate and event-free survival of MEL200 were superior to MEL100, but overall survival (OS) was similar. In this prospective, randomized, phase III trial, we compared the efficacy and toxicity of MEL200 and MEL100. Between January 2002 and July 2006, 299 patients were enrolled. Inclusion criteria were previously untreated myeloma, aged < 65 and Durie and Salmon stage II or III. Exclusion criteria were abnormal cardiac function, respiratory disease, abnormal liver function, abnormal renal function, HBV, HCV, or HIV positivity, concomitant cancer or psychiatric disease. The institutional review board approved the protocol and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. All patients received: 2 dexamethasone-doxorubicin-vincristine debulking courses (doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 day 1, vincristine 1 mg day 1, dexamethasone 40 mg days 1, 2, 3, 4, each course repeated every 28 days), 2 cycles of cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2, day 1) plus G-CSF followed by stem cell harvest. The MEL200 group was conditioned with 2 cycles of melphalan 200 mg/m2 followed by stem cell reinfusion; the MEL100 group was conditioned with 2 courses of melphalan 100 mg/m2 followed by stem cell reinfusion. At the present, 246 patients, median age 57 (range 32–65), completed the assigned therapy and were evaluated for response, progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. One-hundred and twenty-four patients were randomized to MEL200 and 122 to MEL100. Patient characteristics were similar in both groups. Abnormal cytogenetics (13q deletion, t(4;14), t(11;14), p53) were 75% in MEL200 patients and 56% in MEL100 patients (p=0.05). Forty-six patients did not complete tandem MEL200; 36 patients did not complete tandem MEL100. The near complete response rate of MEL200 was superior to MEL100 (32% versus 18%, p=0.011), but partial response was 80% versus 71%, respectively (p=0.079). The median follow-up for censored patients was 26.5 months. The 3 years PFS was 51% in the MEL200 arm and 33% in the MEL100 arm (HR=0.81, 95% CI 0.55–1.21, p=0.31). The 3 years OS was 86% in the MEL200 group and 71% in the MEL100 group (HR=0.82, 95 CI 0.45–1.48, p=0.51). Duration of grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was comparable in two arms, but MEL200 patients required more platelet transfusions (p=0.03). Grade 3–4 non-hematological adverse events were reported in 49% of the MEL200 patients and in 38% of the MEL100 patients (P=0.07). The most frequent grade 3–4 adverse events were infections (54% of MEL200 patients versus 45% of MEL100 patients, p=0.25), mucositis (31% of MEL200 patients versus 7% of MEL100 patients, p=0.002) and gastrointestinal toxicities (20% of MEL200 patients versus 14% of MEL100 patients, p=0.3). In conclusion, MEL200 resulted in a significantly higher near complete response rate but this did not translate in a superior PFS and OS.

Phase III randomized study of sorafenib plus doxorubicin versus sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): CALGB 80802 (Alliance).

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 192-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa ◽  
Donna Niedzwieski ◽  
Jennifer J. Knox ◽  
Andreas Kaubisch ◽  
James Posey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Hepatic Failure ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Secondary Malignancy ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Prior Systemic Therapy

192 Background: An exploratory analysis of a randomized phase II study in HCC comparing doxorubicin (D) alone to doxorubicin plus sorafenib (D+S) showed a significant improvement in overall survival favoring D+S (JAMA, 2011). The results appeared promising compared to the historic outcomes seen in the pivotal sorafenib (S) trials. CALGB 80802 was designed to determine if D+S improved survival compared to S alone. Methods: Patients with histologically proven advanced HCC, no prior systemic therapy and Child-Pugh A were randomized to receive D 60 mg/m2 every 21 days plus S 400 mg PO twice daily (D+S) or S alone. For bilirubin ≥ 1.3x normal, D and S doses were halved. D was maxed out at 360 mg/m2. The study was stratified by extent of disease (locally advanced; metastatic), the primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); and secondary endpoint progression-free survival (PFS). The final analysis was to occur when 364 events were observed among 480 total patients, with 90% power to detect a 37% increase in median OS (10.7 to 14.7 months; 1-sided α = 0.05). Results: The Alliance DSMB halted the study after accrual of 346 patients (173 on each of D+S and S) when a futility boundary was crossed at a planned interim analysis. With 107 events in each arm, median OS was 9.3 months (95%CI 7.1-12.9) for D+S, and 10.5 months (95% CI 7.4-14.3) for S with a hazard ratio (HR) 1.06 (95% CI 0.8-1.4) for D+S vs. S. Median PFS was 3.6 (95% CI 2.8-4.6) and 3.2 months (95% CI 2.3-4.1), respectively (HR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.72-1.2). There were 38 deaths on treatment: 18 on D+S and 20 on S. Among these 8 [sepsis (1), dysphagia (1), pneumonia (1), cardiac (2), hepatic failure (2), and not otherwise specified (1)] on D+S, and 3 [fatigue (1), hepatic failure (1), and a secondary malignancy (1)] on S, were at least possibly related to treatment. A maximum grade 3 or 4 only hematologic adverse events (AE) occurred in 37.8% of patients on D+S and 8.1% of patients on S. Non-hematologic AEs were comparable, in 63.6% and 61.5% of patients, respectively. Conclusions: The addition of D to S resulted in higher toxicity and did not improve OS or PFS. The S median OS of about 10 months is consistent with previous reports. NCI Grant U10CA180821 Clinical trial information: NCT01015833.

A randomized phase II trial with gemcitabine with or without pertuzumab (rhuMAb 2C4) in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (OC): Preliminary safety data

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13001-13001 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Glenn ◽  
F. Ueland ◽  
A. Bicher ◽  
D. Dizon ◽  
M. Gold ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Grade 3

13001 Background: Pertuzumab (P), a humanized HER2 antibody, represents a new class of targeted agents called HER dimerization inhibitors (HDIs). P inhibits dimerization of HER2 with EGFR, HER3 and HER4, and subsequently inhibits signaling through MAP and PI3 kinases. Single agent P has demonstrated clinical benefit in advanced OC (ASCO 2005 abstract #5051). Methods: 40 pts with platinum-resistant OC (progressed within 6 months of receiving a platinum-based chemotherapy) were enrolled in this 1:1 randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial of gemcitabine with or without P. Gemcitabine was administered IV on day 1 and 8 at 800 mg/m2 of a 21 day cycle. Blinded placebo or 420 mg P was administered IV on day 1. Gemcitabine was dose reduced for neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. P was not dose reduced. Results: 40 pts have been enrolled and treated with at least 1 cycle of gemcitabine in combination with blinded study drug. The median age was 58.5 (range 18–82); 26 had PS ECOG 0, 13 ECOG 1, 1 ECOG 2. The most common grade 3/4 events were neutropenia in 7 pts (17.5%), thrombocytopenia in 6 pts (15%), small bowel obstruction in 4 pts (10%), constipation in 3 pts (7.5%) and elevated ALT in 3 pts (7.4%). There was one grade 3 diarrhea, but no grade 3 or 4 rash. There were 4 serious adverse events (SAEs) attributed to study drug. These were a pleural effusion, thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, and a deep vein thrombosis. Nine pts required one or two dose reductions of gemcitabine for hematological toxicity. Of 29 pts with post-baseline echo or MUGA values obtained, no pt had LVEF drop to <50%. The adverse events evaluated after 40 pts did not meet the prespecified criteria to call for an independent safety monitoring board evaluation of unblinded data. Conclusions: Preliminary safety data indicate that pertuzumab or placebo combined with gemcitabine is well tolerated with no unexpected additive toxicity. The nature and frequency of the adverse events are similar to what has been observed with either single agent gemcitabine or P. Updated data will be presented at ASCO. [Table: see text]

Phase III randomized study of vinorelbine (V), gemcitabine (G) followed by docetaxel (D) (VGD) versus paclitaxel (P) and carboplatin (C) (PC) in patients (pts) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (Japan Multinational Trial Organization LC00–03)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7013-7013
Author(s):  
M. Kawahara ◽  
M. Ogawara ◽  
Y. Nishiwaki ◽  
K. Kubota ◽  
K. Komuta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iiib ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Level Of Significance ◽  
Ecog Ps

7013 Background: Our phase II study of non-platinum VGD for advanced NSCLC demonstrated excellent results with the median survival time (MST) of 15.7 mos and a 1-year survival rate of 59% (Brit J Cancer 88:42,2003). A phase III trial was performed to determine the survival benefit of VGD compared with PC for advanced NSCLC as a Japan-SWOG Lung Cancer Common Arm Trial. Methods: Between Mar 2001 and Apr 2005, 401 chemo-naïve NSCLC pts with Stage IIIB with pleural effusion or Stage IV without brain metastasis, who had ECOG PS 0–1, were randomized to VGD; V 25 mg/m2 iv and G 1000 mg/m2 iv, days 1, 8, every 21 days for 3 cycles followed by D 60 mg/m2 iv, d1, every 21 days for 3 cycles or PC; C AUC=6 iv and P 225 mg/m2 iv, day 1, every 21 days for 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). For a two-sided test at the 5% level of significance and power of 85%, the number of pts required to detect a 40% difference in MST was 400. Results: 393 pts (196 VGD, 197 PC) were evaluable for response, OS and toxicity. Baseline demographics were balanced (VGD vs PC): median age 65 yrs(both arms);male(74 vs 69%); PS 0 40%(both arms);Stage IIIB (17 vs 18%); Ad/Sq (66%/23% vs 76%/15%). There were 238 deaths with a median follow-up of 23 mos. 49% in VGD and 29% in PC arm completed 6 cycles (p=0.00005). Response rates in arms VGD/PC were 23% vs 36% (p= 0.008). There were no significant differences in progression free survival, OS, 1- and 2-yr survivals between VGD and PC arms: 5.9 vs 6.0 mos (p=0.95, Log rank), 13.1 vs 13.8 mos (MST, p=0.28, Log rank), 55.6 vs 55.5%, and 27.6 vs 31.8%. Grade 3/4 toxicities in arms VGD/PC were: neutropenia (G4) (30 vs 54%, p<0.00001), thrombocytopenia (4 vs 6%), febrile neutropenia (20 vs 19%), neuropathy (2 vs 21%, p<0.00001), pulmonary (9 vs 2%, p=0.0006). There were 2 treatment-related deaths (pneumonitis) in VGD arm. Conclusions: Non-platinum triplet chemotherapy had comparable activity in pts with advanced NSCLC. The VGD had significantly less myelosuppression, but more pulmonary toxicity than PC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A randomized phase III multicenter trial of neoadjuvant docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) versus neoadjuvant PF in patients with locally advanced unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Final analysis of EORTC 24971

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5516-5516 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Remenar ◽  
C. Van Herpen ◽  
J. Germa Lluch ◽  
S. Stewart ◽  
T. Gorlia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Response Rate ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Treatment Center ◽  
Severe Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Phase Ii Studies

5516 Background: So far, the Wayne State regimen combining 100 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 1 and 1000 mg/m2/d continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil over 5 days (PF), is the gold standard in advanced SCCHN. Improvement of PF induction chemotherapy by adding a taxane has been suggested from phase II studies and 2 randomized phase III trials. We now report the final analysis of EORTC 24971. Methods: Eligible were patients (pts) with unresectable stage III/IV SCCHN (no distant metastases), 18 to 70 yrs of age, PS≤1, and adequate hematologic, renal and hepatic function. Pts were stratified by primary disease site (oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, larynx) and treatment center and randomized to PF (as above) or TPF (T 75 mg/m2/1h, P 75 mg/m2/1h, both d1, F 750 mg/m2/d, d1–5) q 3 wks, for 4 cycles unless progression (PD) or unacceptable toxicity, or refusal. Thereafter (interval 4–7 wks), all pts not in PD received radiotherapy (RT: conventional [66–70 Gy], accelerated [max. 70 Gy] / hyperfractionated [max. 74 Gy]). Surgery was allowed before RT (neck) or 3 months after RT (primary, neck). Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and 348 pts and 260 events were needed to detect a 50% increase in median PFS (10 vs 15 mo) with 85% power. Results: Between April 1999 and March 2002, 358 pts were accrued (181 PF, 177 TPF). At a median follow-up (FUP) of 32 mo, PFS was significantly improved with TPF (HR 0.72, p = 0.0071; median 8.2 vs 11.0 mo). A 51 mo median FUP showed an overall survival (OS) benefit with TPF (HR 0.71, p = 0.0052; median 14.2 vs 18.6 mo). Estimated 3-yr survival rates are 23.9% (95% CI: 17.9%;30.5%) for PF and 36.5% (29.3%;43.6%) for TPF. Response rate also favored TPF (53.6% vs 67.8%, p = 0.006). There was more severe (G3+4) leucopenia (41.6% vs 22.9%) and neutropenia (76.9% vs 52.5%) with TPF, and more severe thrombocytopenia with PF (17.9% vs 5.2%). Severe alopecia occured more with TPF (55.5% vs 11.7%); hearing loss (2.8% vs 0%) and toxic death (7.8% vs 3.7%) more with PF. Conclusions: TPF (→ RT) is superior to PF (→ RT) for PFS, OS (including long-term), response rate, and is better tolerated. [Table: see text]

Planned interim analysis of the intergroup FFCD-GERCOR-FNCLCC-AERO phase III study comparing two sequences of chemotherapy in locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancers

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4533-4533 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Guimbaud ◽  
O. Bouché ◽  
C. Rebischung ◽  
F. Bonnetain ◽  
C. Louvet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Grade 3

4533 Background: There are several standard chemotherapies in locally advanced or metastatic gastric or cardia adenocarcinoma, including ECF. Methods: Patients (pts) with a gastric or cardiac adenocarcinoma, locally advanced or metastatic, not surgically curable, with a WHO PS ≤2 and evaluable or measurable lesions, were randomized (1:1) according to the following sequences: ECC (epirubicin 50 mg/m2 D1+ cisplatin 60 mg/m2 D1 + capecitabine 2000 mg/m2 D2 to D15, every 3 weeks) in 1st line, then FOLFIRI (IRI 180 mg/m2 D1, leucovorin 400 mg/m2 D1, bolus 5FU 400 mg/m2 D1 and continuous 5FU 2400 mg/m2 in 46h, every 2 weeks) in 2nd line (Arm A) vs the reverse sequence (Arm B) with a stratification for center, PS, adjuvant treatment, site, linitis and measurable disease. To show an improvement in median time to treatment failure for the 1st line (TTF: time between randomization and progression, or treatment discontinuation or recurrence or death) of 15 to 20 weeks for arm B (α bilateral 5%; β 20 %), 381 failures and 416 pts are required in 4-year period. An interim analysis is planned when at least 190 failures are observed (ITT). TTF is estimated according to the Kaplan Meier method and compared with a Log-rank test. Results: In arm A and B, 174 and 175 pts were included respectively, between 17/06/05 and 21/12/07. Pts characteristics are: PS 1: 51%, med. age 60 years, gastric 67%, M+ 88%, resected primary tumor 27% and linitis 23%. In arms A and B respectively, 141 and 147 pts received at least one dose in 1st line and 61 and 44 pts in 2nd line. Toxicities during the first line is more frequent in the ECC than in the FOLFIRI arm: grade 3/4 (88 vs 68% - p ≤0.0001) and grade 3/4 hemato toxicities (69 vs 36% - p ≤0.001). In 2nd line, toxicities frequency is not different in both arms. The median TTF in 1st line (n = 310 pts) is 4.7 months [3.8 - 5.7] for ECC and 5.2 months [4.4–6.0] for FOLFIRI (Log Rank p = 0. 78). Regarding the 252 failures observed (67% of the required events), the significance level to reject H0 is p = 0.012 (EAST V5). Conclusions: It is not possible yet to conclude to the superiority of FOLFIRI in 1st line; the final analysis after observation of 381 failures is required. Regarding toxicity, hemato-toxicity is more frequent with ECC in 1st line. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document