Retrospective analysis of resected primary colorectal cancer revealed
e15137 Background: Lymphadenectomy in colorectal cancer is believed to be a critical component concerning prognosis and survival of patients.. The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between the number of lymph nodes harvested (LNH) and the number of lymph nodes involved (LNI), at the histological examination of the specimens of resected primary colorectal cancer (CRC) at our unit. Results: Over the five-year study period, 142 resections for primary CRC were performed on 141 patients (one metachronous). Mean number of resections per annum was 28. There were 86 (60.5%) colonic and 56 (39.5%) rectal cancers (Fig 1). There were 70 (49.3%) anterior resections (Fig 2). M:F ratio was 0.97:1. Median age was 71years for colonic and 69.5years for rectal cancers. Eighty eight percent of resections were elective (OR=2.2 RR=1.14 p=0.003 compared to the national audit)1. Adenocarcinoma NOS constituted 94% of all histology results (5% mucinous and 1% signet ring). Median CRM was 7.5mm (mean=8.8mm) (fig 3). The CRM involvement was 12.7% for all CRC and 16% for rectal cancers. The LRM involvement was 1.5%. Median overall LNH was 12, (mean=13 p=0.08 when compared to the recommended LNH of 12) (Fig 5). Median LNH for rectal cancers=11 and for colonic cancer=13. There were 11 (14%) APRs compared to 70 (86%) sphincter-saving operations from a total of 83 rectal resections. 84%of resections were R0. The 30-day all-cause mortality was 4.3%. Actuarial survival curve demonstrated 17.6% chance of metastasis at presentation, all-stage 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) of 67% and of 82% for stages I-III (Tany Nany M0). CEA relapse as a marker of disease recurrence (available for n=125) revealed 3-year DFS=71%.When correlation was determined between LNH and lymph node involvement, it revealed a low correlation (r=0.159 p=0.06) which was statistically insignificant. When the national audit calculated the same relationship among its much larger sample the results were the same (r=0.152 p=0.001)3 and had achieved statistical significance. Conclusions: LNI as a function of tumour and host behaviour is of prognostic significance whereas LNH may be a marker of ‘pathologist's diligence’ at the histological examination and therefore a quality assurance (QA) tool. No significant financial relationships to disclose.