Characterization of ipilimumab exposure-efficacy/safety response relationships in subjects with previously treated or untreated advanced melanoma.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8541-8541
Author(s):  
Yan Feng ◽  
CJ Godfrey ◽  
Hui-May Chu ◽  
Eric Masson ◽  
Daphne Williams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Logistic Regression Models ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Previously Treated

8541 Background: Ipilimumab (IPI) is a fully human monoclonal antibody directed against CTLA-4 that is being developed as a novel immunotherapeutic agent against melanoma and other solid tumors. The objective of this analysis was to retrospectively characterize the exposure-response (E-R) relationships for efficacy (overall survival, OS) in subjects with previously untreated advanced melanoma (pu-MEL), and safety (immune related adverse-events, irAEs) in subjects with previously treated advanced melanoma (pt-MEL) or pu-MEL. Methods: The E-R analysis of OS included 498 pu-MEL from a phase III study (CA184024) of IPI administered at 10 mg/kg + dacarbazine (DTIC) or DTIC + placebo; and the E-R analyses of irAE included 1036 subjects from a phase I study (CA184078), 4 phase IIstudies (CA184004/007/008/022) and CA184024 of IPI administered at doses of 0.3, 3 or 10 mg/kg. The relationship between steady‑state IPI trough concentration (Cminss) and OS was described using a Cox proportional hazards model, and the relationships between Cminss and incidence of irAEs were described by ordinal logistic regression models (separate models for any irAE, as well as skin, liver and GI irAE). Results: The risk of death decreased with increasing Cminss, and is higher for subjects with elevated baseline LDH level. The risk of death was higher for subjects with baseline ECOG status > 0 and was higher with increasing stage of disease (M1C>M1B>M1A>M0). The hazard ratio for OS corresponding to the median Cminss of 49.99 µg/mL was 0.745 relative to subjects in DTIC + placebo group. The probability of Grade 2+ or Grade 3+ GI, skin, liver and any irAEs also increases with Cminss. Prior anti-cancer therapy (including prior DTIC) or concomitant DTIC were the only significant covariates in the E-R irAE models. Conclusions: These model-based analyses suggest that higher Cminss of IPI appears to be associated with improved survival in pu-MEL (based on data from CA184024) and higher Cminss also appears to be associated with increased probability of irAEs in pu-MEL or pt-MEL.

Effects of Azacitidine (AZA) Vs Conventional Care Regimens (CCR) in Elderly (≥75 years) Patients (Pts) with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) from the AZA-001 Survival Trial

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3629-3629 ◽  
Author(s):  
John F Seymour ◽  
Pierre Fenaux ◽  
Lewis B. Silverman ◽  
Ghulam J Mufti ◽  
Eva Hellström-Lindberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Active Treatment ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Risk Of Death

Abstract Background. A recent phase III trial (AZA-001) showed AZA is the first treatment to significantly extend overall survival (OS) in higher-risk MDS patients (pts) (Blood2007;110:817). MDS incidence increases with age resulting in limited treatment options, particularly for those ≥75 years of age, given the poor tolerability and ineffectiveness of cytotoxic therapies. This subgroup analysis compared the effects of AZA vs CCR on OS, hematologic improvement (HI), transfusion independence (TI), and tolerability in pts ≥75 yrs of age. Methods. Higher-risk MDS (FAB: RAEB, RAEB-T, CMML and IPSS: Int-2 or High) pts were enrolled. All pts were pre-selected by site investigators – based on age, performance status, and comorbidities – to receive 1 of 3 CCR: best supportive care only (BSC); lowdose ara-C (LDAC), or intensive chemotherapy (IC). Pts were then randomized to AZA (75 mg/m2/d SC × 7d q 28d), or to CCR. Those randomized to AZA received AZA; those randomized to CCR received their pre-selected treatment. Randomization was stratified based on FAB subtype (RAEB and RAEB-T) and IPSS (Int-2 or High). Erythropoiesis stimulating agents were disallowed. OS was assessed using Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods and HI and TI were assessed per IWG 2000. To adjust for baseline imbalances, a Cox proportional hazards model was used, with ECOG status, LDH, number of RBC transfusions, Hgb, and presence or absence of -7/del(7q) at baseline as variables in the final model. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated using NCI-CTC v. 2.0. Results. Of all enrolled pts (N=358, median age 69 yrs), 87 pts (24%) were ≥75 yrs of age (AZA n=38, CCR n=49 [BSC, n=33; LDAC, n=14; IC, n=2]). The majority of pts randomized to CCR received BSC only, suggesting clinicians are generally reticent to use active treatment in this population. Similar to the overall AZA-001 results, treatment with AZA was associated with prolonged survival in pts ≥75 yrs of age, with KM median OS in the AZA group not reached at 17.7 months of follow-up, vs KM median OS for CCR at 10.8 months (HR: 0.48 [95%CI: 0.26, 0.89]; p=0.0193). In these pts, OS rates at 2 years were significantly higher in the AZA group vs CCR: 55% vs 15% (p=0.0003). Two-fold more RBC transfusion-dependent pts at baseline in the AZA group achieved TI vs CCR: 10/23 (44%) vs 7/32 (22%), p=0.1386, respectively. Similarly, more pts in the AZA group achieved HI (major + minor) vs CCR: 58% vs 39%, (p=0.0875), respectively. As previously reported, AZA was generally well tolerated. Anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were seen in 42%, 66%, and 71% of pts in the AZA group, respectively, vs 47%, 26%, and 40% in the CCR group, who were predominately receiving BSC only. Infections were reported by 79% and 60% of AZA and CCR pts, respectively. Discontinuations due to an AE occurred in 13% of AZA and 8% of CCR pts ≥75 yrs of age. Conclusion. Data from this subgroup analysis indicate pts ≥75 yrs of age with higher-risk MDS receiving active treatment with AZA experience significantly prolonged 2-year OS and reduced risk of death. AZA is generally well tolerated in this elderly patient population.

scholarly journals Dementia Adjudication Triggers Associated With Increased Mortality for Older Australians: Evidence From ASPREE

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 161-161
Author(s):  
Jane Banaszak-Holl ◽  
Xiaoping Lin ◽  
Jing Xie ◽  
Stephanie Ward ◽  
Henry Brodaty ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Service Planning ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Cognitive Test ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Hazards Model ◽  
Using Data

Abstract Research Aims: This study seeks to understand whether those with dementia experience higher risk of death, using data from the ASPREE (ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly) clinical trial study. Methods: ASPREE was a primary intervention trial of low-dose aspirin among healthy older people. The Australian cohort included 16,703 dementia-free participants aged 70 years and over at enrolment. Participants were triggered for dementia adjudication if cognitive test results were poorer than expected, self-reporting dementia diagnosis or memory problems, or dementia medications were detected. Incidental dementia was adjudicated by an international adjudication committee using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) criteria and results of a neuropsychological battery and functional measures with medical record substantiation. Statistical analyses used a cox proportional hazards model. Results: As previously reported, 1052 participants (5.5%) died during a median of 4.7 years of follow-up and 964 participants had a dementia trigger, of whom, 575 (60%) were adjucated as having dementia. Preliminary analyses has shown that the mortality rate was higher among participants with a dementia trigger, regardless of dementia adjudication outcome, than those without (15% vs 5%, Χ2 = 205, p <.001). Conclusion: This study will provide important analyses of differences in the hazard ratio for mortality and causes of death among people with and without cognitive impairment and has important implications on service planning.

One-Year Risk of Recurrent Stroke and Death Associated with Vertebrobasilar Artery Stenosis and Occlusion in a Cohort of 10,515 Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 40-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adnan I. Qureshi ◽  
Mushtaq H. Qureshi ◽  
Li-Ming Lien ◽  
Jiunn-Tay Lee ◽  
Jiann-Shing Jeng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Recurrent Stroke ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Large Artery ◽  
Stroke Registry ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Vertebrobasilar Artery

Background: The natural history of vertebrobasilar artery (VBA) stenosis or occlusion remains understudied. Methods: Patients with diagnosis of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) who were noted to have VBA stenosis based on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging or catheter-based angiogram were selected from Taiwan Stroke Registry. Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the hazards ratio (HR) of recurrent stroke and death within 1 year of index event in various groups based on severity of VBA stenosis (none to mild: 0–49%; moderate to severe: 50–99%: occlusion: 100%) after adjusting for differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between groups at baseline evaluation. Results: None to mild or moderate to severe VBA stenosis was diagnosed in 6972 (66%) and 3,137 (29.8%) among 10,515 patients, respectively, and occlusion was identified in 406 (3.8%) patients. Comparing with patients who showed none to mild stenosis of VBA, there was a significantly higher risk of recurrent stroke (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.01–1.45) among patients with moderate to severe VBA stenosis. There was a nonsignificantly higher risk of recurrent stroke (HR 1.49, 95% CI 0.99–2.22) and significantly higher risk of death (HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.72–2.83), among patients with VBA occlusion after adjustment of potential confounders. Conclusions: VBA stenosis or occlusion was relatively prevalent among patients with TIA or ischemic stroke and associated with higher risk of recurrent stroke and death in patients with ischemic stroke or TIA who had large artery atherosclerosis.

G CSF association with prolonged survival in HIV infected patients with disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex infection

1998 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 394-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Keiser ◽  
Steven Rademacher ◽  
James Smith ◽  
Daniel Skiest
Keyword(s):  
Mycobacterium Avium ◽  
Mycobacterium Avium Complex ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Cd4 Count ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Hazards Model

Summary: Clarithromycin can ameliorate symptoms and improve survival in disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex DMAC infection. Optimal combina tions of this drug with other agents remain unknown. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor G CSF is a cytokine that can improve phagocytosis of M. avium complex in vitro . We aim to determine if G CSF administration is associated with improved survival in patients with DMAC in a retrospective, cohort study. Case records from 1991 to 1995 of 91 patients with DMAC at Parkland Memorial Hospital were reviewed for date of initial DMAC diagnosis, baseline CD4 count, race, sex, antiretroviral use, G CSF use, therapy for DMAC clarithromycin, ethambutol, ciprofloxacin and rifabutin and date of death. Of 91 cases identified, 25 were treated with G CSF and 66 never received this drug. Baseline characteristics were similar in each group including CD4 count 40 cells mm 3 vs 33 cells mm 3, P =0.68 , clarithromycin use 18 patients vs 52 patients, P =0.90 , and antiretroviral use 20 patients vs 42 patients, P =0.21 . Subjects treated with G CSF lived longer than those who did not receive this drug 355 days vs 211 days, P 0.01 . In the subgroup treated with clarithromycin, G CSF was also associated with increased survival 377 days vs 252 days, P 0.01 . Cox proportional hazards model showed a decreased risk of death in patients treated with G CSF RH=0.22, P 0.01 , clarithromycin RH=0.13, P 0.01 and ethambutol RH=0.51, P =0.02 . Ciprofloxacin and rifabutin use did not influence survival. These data support the use of clarithromycin and ethambutol in the treatment of DMAC. Addition of G CSF to a regimen of clarithromycin and ethambutol may increase survival in DMAC and should be studied prospectively.

scholarly journals Fish intake and the risk of fatal prostate cancer: findings from a cohort study in Japan

2009 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 609-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Truong-Minh Pham ◽  
Yoshihisa Fujino ◽  
Tatsuhiko Kubo ◽  
Reiko Ide ◽  
Noritaka Tokui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Fish Consumption ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Inverse Association ◽  
High Intake ◽  
Risk Of Death

AbstractObjectiveWe investigated the relationship between the intake of fish and the risk of death from prostate cancer.DesignData were derived from a prospective cohort study in Japan. Fish consumption obtained from a baseline questionnaire was classified into the two categories of ‘low intake’ and ‘high intake’. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals.SubjectsData for 5589 men aged 30–79 years were analysed.ResultsA total of twenty-one prostate cancer deaths were observed during 75 072 person-years of follow-up. Mean age at baseline study of these twenty-one subjects was 67·7 years, ranging from 47 and 79 years old. Results showed a consistent inverse association of this cancer between the high v. low intake groups. The multivariate model adjusted for potential confounding factors and some other food items showed a HR of 0·12 (95 % CI 0·05, 0·32) for the high intake group of fish consumption.ConclusionsThese results support the hypothesis that a high intake of fish may decrease the risk of prostate cancer death. Given the paucity of studies examining the association between prostate cancer and fish consumption, particularly in Asian populations, these findings require confirmation in additional cohort studies.

Final results of the randomized phase III trial of sorafenib in advanced renal cell carcinoma: Survival and biomarker analysis

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5023-5023 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. M. Bukowski ◽  
T. Eisen ◽  
C. Szczylik ◽  
W. M. Stadler ◽  
R. Simantov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Vegf Signaling ◽  
Hazards Model ◽  
Biomarker Analysis ◽  
Tumor Biopsies

5023 Background: Based on the significant PFS benefit of sorafenib (SOR) vs placebo (P) in a Phase III advanced RCC trial, P patients were unblinded and crossed over to SOR in May 2005. Final OS and biomarker data are reported. Methods: Final OS analysis was planned at ∼540 events (a=0.037 after adjusting for previous analyses). To minimize effect of crossover on OS, a secondary analysis was planned censoring P data on June 30, 2005 (a=0.037). Plasma VEGF and sVEGFR2 were measured by ELISA at baseline (BL), cycle (C) 1 day (D) 21, and C3D1. pERK was assayed by IHC. Results: 903 patients were randomized (SOR, 451; P, 452). The only OS analysis before crossover (May 2005) showed an estimated 39% OS improvement for SOR vs P (HR=0.72; p=0.018) (ECCO 2005); 216 P patients had crossed to SOR. OS analysis 6 months after crossover (Nov 2005) showed a 30% improvement in OS for SOR vs P (HR=0.77, p=0.015) (ASCO 2006). These OS differences did not reach prespecified O’Brien-Fleming statistical boundaries. Final OS (Sep 2006) at 561 deaths showed an improvement of 13.5% for SOR vs P and was not significant (median 17.8 vs 15.2 months; HR=0.88; p=0.146; a=0.037). Secondary analysis censoring P data (June 2005) showed a significant OS benefit for SOR vs P (HR=0.78, 95% CI: 0.62, 0.97; p=0.0287; a=0.037), suggesting crossover had confounded OS. Changes in VEGF (n=712) and sVEGFR2 (n=717) were observed after SOR treatment (AACR 2006); VEGF increased 32% (n=279) at C1D21 and 47% (n=203) at C3D1, and sVEGFR2 decreased 18% (n=282) and 24% (n=206). Using a COX proportional hazards model, BL VEGF was an independent prognostic factor (p=0.014); patients with high BL VEGF (>131 pg/ml) had poorer prognosis and a trend towards greater PFS benefit with SOR (SOR vs P, HR=0.48 vs 0.64 for high vs low VEGF, p=0.096). BL sVEGFR2, changes in VEGF or sVEGFR2 at C1D21, and pERK levels in limited diagnostic tumor biopsies were not predictive of SOR response. Conclusion: SOR demonstrated a PFS benefit in advanced RCC, although ITT final OS analysis showed a confounding effect of crossover. Significant OS benefit of SOR was seen in a planned secondary analysis adjusting for crossover. VEGF levels have prognostic importance, and SOR-associated changes in VEGF and sVEGFR2 are consistent with inhibition of VEGF signaling. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

CA19-9 decrease at 8 weeks as a predictor of overall survival (OS) in a randomized phase III trial (MPACT) of weekly nab-paclitaxel (nab-P) plus gemcitabine (G) versus G alone in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4058-4058 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Gabriela Chiorean ◽  
Daniel D. Von Hoff ◽  
Thomas J. Ervin ◽  
Francis P. Arena ◽  
Jeffrey R. Infante ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Hazards Model ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
To Receive ◽  
The Relationship

4058^ Background: nab-P + G showed promising efficacy in a phase I/II study in MPC, and decreases in CA19-9 correlated with OS. In MPACT, patients (pts) who received nab-P + G vs G had improved median OS (8.5 vs 6.7 mo; HR 0.72; p = 0.000015), PFS (5.5 vs 3.7 mo; HR 0.69; p = 0.000024) and ORR (23% vs 7%; p = 1.1 × 10−10). Here we present a prespecified exploratory analysis of CA19-9 from the MPACT trial. Methods: 861 previously untreated pts with MPC were randomized 1:1 to receive nab-P 125 mg/m2 + G 1000 mg/m2 days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks or G alone 1000 mg/m2 weekly for 7 weeks followed by a week of rest (cycle 1) and then days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks (cycle ≥ 2). CA19-9 was evaluated at baseline and then every 8 weeks. OS comparisons at different CA19-9 criteria were performed by stratified Cox proportional hazards model (P by stratified log-rank test using randomization criteria). Results: 750 pts had an evaluable CA19-9 at baseline. More pts in the nab-P + G arm vs the G arm demonstrated a best CA19-9 decrease from baseline of ≥ 20% and ≥ 90% (61% vs 44% and 31% vs 14%, respectively; Table). At the first postbaseline assessment (week 8), greater proportions of pts in the nab-P + G arm vs the G arm had CA19-9 decreases of ≥ 20% and ≥ 90% (Table). At that time point, for pts with a decrease of ≥ 20% in CA19-9, nab-P + G demonstrated a significantly longer OS vs G. The risk reduction for pts with a ≥ 90% decrease was greater than in pts with a ≥ 20% decrease. In pts with an 8-week CA19-9 decrease < 20%, median OS for nab-P + G vs G was 8.3 vs 8.0 mo (HR 0.92; p = 0.705). The relationship of CA19-9 kinetics with OS will also be examined. Conclusions: Higher proportions of pts in the nab-P + G arm had CA 19-9 responses of ≥ 20% and ≥ 90% vs the G arm. Pts who achieved a CA19-9 decrease at 8 weeks of ≥ 20% or ≥ 90% had significantly longer OS with nab-P + G than with G. Clinical trial information: NCT00844649. [Table: see text]

Relationship between biomarkers and everolimus efficacy in the phase III RECORD-1 trial of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 352-352
Author(s):  
Stephane Oudard ◽  
Bernard J. Escudier ◽  
John A. Thompson ◽  
Viktor Grünwald ◽  
Cristina Masini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Levels ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Day Treatment ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Baseline Levels

352 Background: Compared with placebo, everolimus provided significant improvement in median PFS in the RECORD-1 study of VEGFr-TKI-refractory mRCC. To investigate the role of angiogenesis pathway molecules as potential biomarkers of everolimus efficacy in RECORD-1, plasma levels of sVEGFR-2, VEGF-A, and bFGF were estimated. Methods: In addition to best supportive care, patients received everolimus 10 mg/day (n = 277) or placebo (n = 139). Placebo patients who progressed were offered everolimus. Predose blood samples were collected on day 1 of the first four 28-day treatment cycles. Plasma levels of sVEGFR-2, VEGF-A, and bFGF were assessed by ELISA. Effect of treatment over time on each biomarker was assessed by a mixed effects model. Hazard ratios (HR) for prognostic effects were obtained using log baseline biomarker values as continuous variables in a stratified Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Plasma levels of sVEGFR-2, VEGF-A, and bFGF were available for 45%, 45%, and 39% of everolimus patients and 50%, 50%, and 45% of placebo patients. Patients with biomarker data had baseline characteristics similar to those of the overall population. Mean baseline levels (pg/mL) of sVEGFR-2, VEGF-A, and bFGF were similar for everolimus (8945, 245, and 8, respectively) and placebo (8985, 253, and 13, respectively). Everolimus significantly improved median PFS over placebo irrespective of baseline levels of the analyzed biomarkers (p < 0.001), indicating they are not predictive of everolimus efficacy. Prolonged PFS in the biomarker population was associated with lower VEGF-A baseline level (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.03-1.57; p = 0.028), suggesting VEGF-A may be prognostic for mRCC. Compared with placebo, everolimus significantly reduced bFGF (p = 0.0095) and sVEGFR-2 (p< 0.001) levels over the time course of the study; no effect on VEGF-A levels was observed. Conclusions: Everolimus significantly improved PFS compared with placebo, regardless of baseline biomarker levels. Lower VEGF-A levels may be a potential prognostic factor for longer PFS. Everolimus treatment significantly downregulated plasma levels of bFGF and sVEGFR-2 from baseline. Clinical trial information: NCT00410124.

Early carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) dynamics to predict fruquintinib efficacy in FRESCO, a 3+ line metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) phase III trial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16001-e16001
Author(s):  
Yuxian Bai ◽  
Shukui Qin ◽  
Jin Li ◽  
Yanhong Deng ◽  
Lei Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
P Value ◽  
Radiological Evaluation

e16001 Background: The FRESCO phase 3 trial demonstrated a significant survival benefit with fruquintinib vs. placebo in the third-line or later therapy of mCRC patients. CEA levels are widely used in conjunction with imaging to monitor response to systemic therapy in patients with mCRC. Herein, we undertook post-hoc analyses of FRESCO patient data to investigate the early changes in CEA during treatment, as well as potential relationships with efficacy parameters. Methods: Patients were included if baseline CEA was abnormal according to local lab reference range. Serum CEA levels were measured at baseline and Day 1 of each cycle (except for Cycle 1). Early CEA change was analyzed at first radiological evaluation (C3D1, Week 8), CEA response was defined as ≥ 50% decrease from baseline, and CEA progression was defined as ≥ 100% increase from baseline. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method; hazard ratio (HR) was estimated through Cox proportional hazards model; p-value was generated from log rank test. Results: 88.4% (245/277) and 94.9% (130/137) of patients had an abnormal baseline CEA in the fruquintinib group and placebo group, respectively. Median baseline CEA values were similar between treatment groups. After 2 cycles of treatment, the proportion of patients had CEA response was significantly higher in the fruquintinib group than placebo group (30.0% vs. 1.3%, p < 0.001). In the fruquintinib group, patients with early CEA response (n = 63) had longer median OS (12.8 vs. 7.8 months, HR = 0.45, p < 0.001) and median PFS (5.6 vs. 3.7 months, HR = 0.49, p < 0.001) than patients without (n = 147). 66.7% (140/210) of patients in fruquintinib group had stable disease (SD), and fruquintinib in those patients with concomitant CEA response exhibited a significantly greater OS benefit than with CEA progression (14.4 vs. 8.7 months, HR = 0.38, p = 0.004). Conclusions: Fruquintinib increased early CEA response. CEA response at first radiological evaluation after cycle 2 could be considered as a predictor for better OS and PFS. Among patients with SD at first evaluation, those with CEA response seems benefit more from fruquintinib. Clinical trial information: NCT02314819 .

Comparison of outcomes with pembrolizumab monotherapy (P) versus combination with chemotherapy (P+C) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21579-e21579
Author(s):  
Kartik Sehgal ◽  
Ritu R. Gill ◽  
Poorva Bindal ◽  
Anita Geevarghese Koshy ◽  
Danielle C McDonald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Ecog Performance Status

e21579 Background: P and P+C are standard-of-care (SOC) treatment options for advanced NSCLC. However, they have not yet been directly compared in clinical trials. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with advanced NSCLC who initiated treatment with SOC P±C at our center from 2/11/16 to 10/15/19 (data cutoff 1/15/20). Patient demographic, clinicopathologic, therapeutic and outcomes data were extracted. All radiographic scans were independently evaluated by a thoracic radiologist using iRECIST. Survival time was defined from the start of P±C. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards model were utilized. Results: Of 103 patients with median follow up of 17.7 months, 74 (71.8%) had received P, while 29 (28.2%) had received P+C. In PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) unselected population, there were no significant differences in age, sex, smoking status, driver mutation, tumor mutational burden (TMB), line of therapy, ECOG performance status (PS) or immune-related adverse events (irAE) between P and P+C groups. 71.6% in P vs 13.8% in P+C had PD-L1 TPS ≥50% (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), unadjusted progression-free survival (PFS) or unadjusted overall survival (OS) (Table). Multivariable adjustment for confounding factors between P+C vs P revealed no differences in OS [hazard ratio (HR) for death, 1.53, 95% CI 0.55 – 4.25] or PFS [HR for progression/death, 1.75, 95% CI 0.63 – 4.91]. Further stratification into PD-L1 TPS ≥50% and < 50% showed no significant differences between P+C vs. P in adjusted OS [HR for death, TPS < 50%- 1.54 (95% CI 0.59 – 4.03); TPS ≥50%- 0.71 (95% CI 0.11 – 4.52)] or PFS [HR for progression/death, TPS < 50%- 1.58 (95% CI 0.72 – 3.48); TPS ≥50%- 0.64 (95% CI 0.06 – 6.93)]. ECOG PS and development of irAE influenced OS in all groups, while TMB was relevant in PD-L1 ≥50% only. Conclusions: Our study shows no significant differences in outcomes with P vs P+C in advanced NSCLC in a real-world setting, albeit with limitations of single-center design, limited sample size, different line settings and lack of disease burden stratification. Ongoing phase III trials comparing front line P vs P+C will definitively address the long-term clinical benefits -if any- of combining cytotoxic chemotherapy with anti-PD-1 drugs. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document