The relationship between patient experience with service quality and survival in pancreatic cancer.
e14697 Background: Despite the recognized relevance of symptom burden in pancreatic cancer, there has been limited exploration of whether an individual patient’s assessment of the overall quality-of-care received might influence outcome. To assess this issue we evaluated the relationship between patient-reported experience with service quality and overall survival. Methods: We evaluated 496 returning pancreatic cancer patients treated at Cancer Treatment Centers of America between July 2007 and December 2010. Overall patient experience “considering everything, how satisfied are you with your overall experience with CTCA?” was measured on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from “completely dissatisfied” to “completely satisfied.” It was dichotomized into 2 categories: top box response (7) versus all others (1-6). Patient survival was the primary end point. Cox regression was used to evaluate the association between patient experience and survival. Results: 317 patients were newly diagnosed while 179 were previously treated. 16, 93, 81 and 306 patients had stage I, II, III and IV disease respectively. 292 were males and 204 females. Mean age was 57.3 years. 387 (78%) patients had expired at the time of this analysis. 345 patients were “completely satisfied” while 151 were not. Median overall survival was 7.9 months (95% CI: 7.3-8.6 months). On univariate analysis, “completely satisfied” patients had a significantly lower risk of mortality compared to those not “completely satisfied” (HR=0.62; 95% CI: 0.50-0.78; p<0.001). On multivariate analysis controlling for stage at diagnosis, treatment history, age and gender, “completely satisfied” patients demonstrated significantly lower mortality (HR=0.61; 95% CI: 0.49-0.76; p<0.001) compared to those not “completely satisfied”. Conclusions: Patient experience with service quality was an independent predictor of survival in pancreatic cancer. This finding underscores the importance of psychosocial factors in patient prognosis. Patients who evaluate their quality of care more favorably may in turn have more positive attitudes toward their treatment outcomes, and may engage in other health behaviors that could potentially increase survival.