Spanish experience with the ipilimumab Expanded Access Program.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19023-e19023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfonso Berrocal ◽  
Jose A. Lopez-Martin ◽  
Ana Maria Arance ◽  
V. Soriano ◽  
Enrique Espinosa ◽  
...  

e19023 Background: Second line ipilimumab has proven efficacy in clinical trial but few is known outside this setting. Methods: We have retrospectively reviewed experience with the Expanded Access Program for Ipilimumab in Spain. We have collected data on demographics, response survival and toxicity. Ipilimumab was administered at a 3 mg/kg dose for four induction courses. Results: We have retrieved 99 expanded access ipilimumab applications that represent 40% of all possible applications. Five patients are not evaluable because they never received ipilimumab 4 due to progression and 1 declined consent. Median age is 58.5 years (30-81) and 54.3% of the patients are males. 59.6% have 3 or more metastatic locations, 50% have liver metastases, 16% have CNS metastasis and 74.6% have elevated LDH. ECOG performance status was 0 to 1 in 91.9%. Previous adyuvant treatment was received by 43.6% of the patients and consisted in high dose interferon in 85.4%. All except one patient have received previous first line chemotherapy and 34.2% have received 2 or more chemotherapy lines. Medium time from the start of metastatic disease to the start of ipilimumab was 11.2 months. 58.5% of the patients completed 4 doses of ipilimumab main reason for not completion was death or progression in 84.6% and toxicity in 5.1%. 8 patients are not evaluable for response, 5 have just completed the treatment and 3 are still on treatment. Responses are 1 (1.1%) CR, 6 (6.4%) PR, 6 (6.4%) PR with previous progression or new lesions, 13 (13.8%) SD, and 60 (63.8%) progressive disease. Reinduction treatment was offered to 5 patients 2 PR patients achieved a new PR, one PR patients a SD and 2 SD patients progressed after reinduction. Kaplan and Meier median survival is 150 days (95% CI 110,5-189.4). One year survival is 32.4% and 18 months survival 21.6%. Toxicity has been mild, skin, 20.2% grade I and 5.3% grade II, liver 7.4% grade I, 2.1% grade II, 3.2 grade III, and diarrhea 19.1% gI, 3.2% grade II and 1.1% grade IV. Only 7 patients experienced toxicity grade III to IV. Conclusions: Ipilimumab efficacy when it is used outside clinical trial is similar to the reported. There is room for improvement in patient selection as 40% of them did not completed treatment. Toxicity of the 3 mg/kg schedule is mild.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15039-e15039
Author(s):  
Philip Agop Philip ◽  
Brandon George Smaglo ◽  
Bassel F. El-Rayes ◽  
Christian Lesuisse ◽  
Lukas Makris

e15039 Background: A Phase 3 clinical trial (RECOURSE) showed that trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) was effective in the treatment of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) (Mayer et al. NEJM 2015;372:1909-19). An expanded-access program (EAP) for patients with refractory mCRC assessed FTD/TPI safety in a real-world setting. One limitation of RECOURSE was the small number of African-American (AA) patients enrolled in the study (n=8). The EAP enrolled 45 AA patients, enabling assessment of FTD/TPI safety in this population. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with refractory mCRC resistant to ≥2 regimens of standard chemotherapy and an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 were enrolled in this open-label EAP. Patients received FTD/TPI 35 mg/m2 twice daily for 5 days followed by 2 days’ rest repeated twice followed by 14 days’ rest over a 28-day treatment cycle until drug discontinuation. We investigated duration of exposure to FTD/TPI and associated adverse events (AEs) in AA patients to compare them with non-AA and US patients from RECOURSE. Results: Median duration of FTD/TPI therapy for AA patients in the EAP was 9.7 weeks, similar to non-AA patients in the EAP (9.7 weeks) and US patients in RECOURSE (8.9 weeks) (differences not statistically significant). 73.3% of AA patients (n=33) in the EAP discontinued treatment due to disease progression and 8.9% (n=4) discontinued due to AEs. AEs related to FTD/TPI are summarized in the table. Conclusions: Lung cancer patients in Eastern North Carolina possess a strikingly poor inflammatory signature with significant implications for quality of life and survival. Clinical trial information: NCT02286492. [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4604-4604
Author(s):  
Martin S. Auerbach ◽  
Edward M. Wolin ◽  
Val Nassiri ◽  
Per Broberg ◽  
Ghassan El-Haddad

4604 Background: The NETTER-1 clinical trial showed that peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with 177Lu-DOTATATE increased progression-free survival in patients with somatostatin-receptor-positive advanced midgut neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) compared with high-dose octreotide long-acting repeatable, and was associated with few serious adverse events (AEs). To assess the safety profile of 177Lu-DOTATATE in a real-world population, we analyzed safety data from a US expanded access program (NCT02705313). Methods: Patients had inoperable, histologically proven, somatostatin-receptor-positive, locally advanced or metastatic GEPNETs (Ki-67 index ≤ 20%) that progressed after somatostatin analog therapy. Exclusion criteria were: surgery, radiotherapy or chemotherapy in the last 12 weeks; treatment with an interferon, mTOR inhibitor, or other systemic therapy in the last 4 weeks; or ongoing octreotide therapy that could not be interrupted for PRRT. Patients with impaired renal function (serum creatinine > 1.7 mg/dL or creatinine clearance < 50 mL/min) or serious coexisting conditions were excluded. The analysis included patients who received ≥ 1 cycle of 177Lu-DOTATATE between July 5, 2016 and December 21, 2018. Data were collected from the first cycle to the latest data collection point (up to October 7, 2019). Results: 299 patients received a mean 177Lu-DOTATATE cumulative dose of 552 mCi (20.4 GBq) (standard deviation [SD]: 220 mCi [8.1 GBq]) over a mean of 2.8 cycles (SD: 1.1). Mean age was 60.8 years (SD: 11.7); 38.5% of patients were men. Over a mean follow-up of 131 days (SD: 87), 48.8% of patients reported treatment-related AEs (TRAEs), with a maximum severity of grade 1, 2 and 3 for 26.8% (n = 80), 18.1% (n = 54) and 4.0% (n = 12) of patients, respectively; there were no grade 4–5 TRAEs. The most common TRAEs of any grade (≥ 5.0% of patients) were nausea (31.1%), vomiting (13.7%), fatigue (9.4%) and thrombocytopenia (6.0%). The most prevalent grade 3 TRAEs were lymphocyte count decrease (1.0%) and thrombocytopenia (0.7%). Serious TRAEs occurred in 1.0% of patients (carcinoid crisis, dehydration, syncope and vomiting). AEs led to dose modification in 1.7% of patients, dose delay in 6.4% (most commonly due to nausea [2.0%] or thrombocytopenia [2.0%]) and discontinuation in 1.3% (due to thrombocytopenia [1.0%] and extravasation [0.3%]). Conclusions: In a real-world population of US patients with advanced GEPNETs, 177Lu-DOTATATE treatment was well tolerated with few TRAEs, consistent with the safety profile in the NETTER-1 trial. Clinical trial information: NCT02705313 .


BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e030731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jarad Martin ◽  
Paul Keall ◽  
Shankar Siva ◽  
Peter Greer ◽  
David Christie ◽  
...  

IntroductionStereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a non-invasive alternative to surgery for the treatment of non-metastatic prostate cancer (PC). The objectives of the Novel Integration ofNew prostate radiation schedules with adJuvant Androgen deprivation (NINJA) clinical trial are to compare two emerging SBRT regimens for efficacy with technical substudies focussing on MRI only planning and the use of knowledge-based planning (KBP) to assess radiotherapy plan quality.Methods and analysisEligible patients must have biopsy-proven unfavourable intermediate or favourable high-risk PC, have an Eastern Collaborative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1 and provide written informed consent. All patients will receive 6 months in total of androgen deprivation therapy. Patients will be randomised to one of two SBRT regimens. The first will be 40 Gy in five fractions given on alternating days (SBRT monotherapy). The second will be 20 Gy in two fractions given 1 week apart followed 2 weeks later by 36 Gy in 12 fractions given five times per week (virtual high-dose rate boost (HDRB)). The primary efficacy outcome will be biochemical clinical control at 5 years. Secondary endpoints for the initial portion of NINJA look at the transition of centres towards MRI only planning and the impact of KBP on real-time (RT) plan assessment. The first 150 men will demonstrate accrual feasibility as well as addressing the KBP and MRI planning aims, prior to proceeding with total accrual to 472 patients as a phase III randomised controlled trial.Ethics and disseminationNINJA is a multicentre cooperative clinical trial comparing two SBRT regimens for men with PC. It builds on promising results from several single-armed studies, and explores radiation dose escalation in the Virtual HDRB arm. The initial component includes novel technical elements, and will form an important platform set for a definitive phase III study.Trial registration numberANZCTN 12615000223538.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 188-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Thomson ◽  
Natalie Charnley ◽  
Omi Parikh

188 Background: Abiraterone or enzalutamide are licensed for use post-docetaxel in metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Both target the androgen receptor signalling pathway. There is little information describing their sequential use. Methods: Patients with mCRPC who had failed treatment with docetaxel and abiraterone received enzalutamide as part of an expanded access program. Patients were reviewed four weekly and post-treatment PSA used to determine efficacy. Results: Twenty three patients, median age 76 (range, 65 to 82), performance status of 1 (15/23) or 2 (8/23) with mCRPC (22/23 bone and 4/23 visceral disease) were enrolled. All had received prior docetaxel and abiraterone as well as cabazitaxel (35%), dexamethasone (30%), and stillboestrol (52%). Median biochemical progression free survival (bPFS) was 11.9 weeks. Nine (39%) patients showed sensitivity to enzalutamide, defined as a greater than 50% reduction in PSA. There was a correlation between PSA response to abiraterone and enzalutamide (R=0.45, p=0.03). In 10 out of 23 and 13 out of 23 patients who were sensitive and insensitive to abiraterone, 60% and 23% had a great than 50% reduction in PSA, respectively. There was a trend to improved bPFS in those sensitive to abiraterone (15.7 vs. 11.4 weeks, p=0.40) and in those who showed any PSA response to abiraterone (15.9 vs. 5.3 weeks, p=0.06). Conclusions: Enzalutamide has activity following failure of docetaxel and abiraterone in mCRPC. The effectiveness is more pronounced in those who have responded to abiraterone.


2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Hogg ◽  
J. G. Monzon ◽  
S. Ernst ◽  
X. Song ◽  
E. McWhirter ◽  
...  

Background Combination nivolumab and ipilimumab is approved for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced melanoma in several jurisdictions (United States, European Union, and Canada). CheckMate 218 is a North American expanded access program (EAP) of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma. We report safety and survival outcomes of the Canadian cohort in this EAP.Methods Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with unresectable stage III or stage IV melanoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and no prior anti–PD-1 or anti–CTLA-4 therapy. Patients were treated with nivolumab 1 mg/kg combined with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 4 cycles (induction phase) and then continued with nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (maintenance phase) until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or a maximum of 48 weeks, whichever occurred first. Safety and overall survival (OS) data were collected.Results A total of 194 patients were enrolled; 174 were treated, and 51% continued on nivolumab maintenance. The median follow-up time was 12.9 months. All-grade and grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 98% and 60% of patients, respectively, and led to treatment discontinuation in 40% and 28% of patients, respectively. Two treatment-related deaths were reported. Twelve- and 18-month OS rates were 80% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 73 to 86) and 76% (95% CI: 67 to 82), respectively.Conclusion In this Canadian population, nivolumab plus ipilimumab demonstrated a safety profile and survival outcomes consistent with phase 2 and 3 clinical trial data.Trial registration: NCT02186249


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2710-2710
Author(s):  
Kelda M Gardner ◽  
Kathleen Shannon Dorcy ◽  
Rachele O'Leary ◽  
Donelle Rizzuto ◽  
Roland B. Walter ◽  
...  

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO, MylotargTM) was re-approved by the FDA and has been commercially available since September 2017. Prior to re-approval, adults and children with relapsed/refractory AML or APL were treated with GO obtained through an expanded access program under an institutional IND at our Cancer Consortium: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (FHCRC), the University of Washington Medical Center (UWMC), Seattle Children's Hospital (SCH), and the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance (SCCA). METHODS: Between 2014-2017, we enrolled 44 patients (median age 40); patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Twelve were children treated at SCH and 32 adults at SCCA/UWMC. Forty had AML, 3 mixed phenotype acute leukemia and 1 APL. Forty-two had relapsed disease and 2 were primary refractory. Median duration of CR1 was 11.2 months (range 0-104). Median number of prior induction attempts was 2 (range 1-8). Eligibility initially required intermediate or "good" risk cytogenetics, though subsequently patients whose blasts were CD33 positive were included regardless of cytogenetics. Additional inclusion criteria were ECOG performance status (PS) ≤3, bilirubin ≤2.0 mg/dl, and ALT/AST ≤5 fold the institutional upper limit of normal. RESULTS: Two patients received single-agent GO (9mg/m2 day 1), 1 patient with APL received GO + ATRA + Aza, and the remainder typically received 3mg/m2 with chemotherapy for a single dose or on days 1, 4, and 7 (Table 2). Patients received a median of 2 cycles (range 1-6) of GO (the APL patient received 6 cycles). Timing of GO around hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) is also noted in Table 2. Table 3 shows the grade 3-4 toxicities occurring within 60 days of receipt of GO per number of patients, rather than number of events. Two children developed sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (SOS) >60 days post GO. Both incidences were post an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), one at 15 days post HCT and the other 28 days post HCT. The first patient had complete resolution of SOS and remains alive 2 years later, the second patient developed SOS day 28 post HCT then died of an invasive mucormycosis infection in the setting of immunosuppression on day 37 of the HCT. Six deaths occurred within 60 days of beginning GO: 1 from cardiogenic shock, 1 from multiorgan failure post aspiration event, 2 from pneumonia/sepsis, and 2 from disease progression. No deaths were attributed to GO. Thirteen of the 44 patients (29%; 95% CI:18-44%) achieved complete remission (CR), 3 with measurable residual disease (MRD 7%) (Table 4). The MRD was detected by flow cytometry in 2 patients, and PCR for inversion 16 in 1 patient. Sixteen had CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) and 15 were resistant or died before assessment. Eight remain alive in CR with a median event free survival (EFS) of 31 months (range 7-47). Thirty-six patients have died, with a median survival of 17.2 months (range 0.5-9.4). Table 4 outlines response by "more" or "less" intense regimens (intensity is defined in Table 2) and by adult vs. pediatric populations. We found higher response rates in patients who received GO combined with more intensive [78% CR+CRi] rather than less intensive therapy [44% CR+CRi] and in those with fewer prior regimens [100% CR+CRi in patients with 1 prior regimen compared to 48% with ≥2 prior regimens]. In addition, responses were obtained in patients with intermediate risk cytogenetics (11 out of 19 total intermediate = 58%) or unfavorable (3 out of 8 total unfavorable = 37%), although a higher fraction of responses were seen with favorable cytogenetics [t(8;21, inv16, t(15;17)] (15 out of 17 total favorable = 88%). CONCLUSION: GO was safe and well tolerated. Based on CR1 duration and number of salvage regimens, the observed 9/28 CR rate with GO + intense therapy compares with a rate of expected 7/28 had the same patients received prior intense salvage therapy without GO (Estey E, Blood [1996/88:756]). GO combinations are a reasonable option for relapsed/refractory AML, but might be of more value in patients with only measurable residual disease. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: The GO team wishes to acknowledge Pfizer Inc. for their commitment to patients by supplying drug, and our Investigational Pharmacy, the Institutional Review Board, and the FDA for supporting the efforts of this expanded access program in making gemtuzumab ozogamicin accessible to people with relapsed or refractory AML. Disclosures Walter: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Other: Clinical trial support, Research Funding; Covagen AG: Consultancy, Other: Clinical trial support, Research Funding; Aptevo Therapeutic: Consultancy, Other: Clinical trial support, Research Funding; Amphivena Therapeutics: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Other: Clinical trial support, Research Funding; Amgen Inc.: Other: Clinical trial support, Research Funding; Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Other: Clinical trial support, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy. Scott:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding. Cassaday:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Other: Spouse Employment, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Becker:GlycoMimetics: Research Funding.


2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 388-393
Author(s):  
Yekaterina Anokhina ◽  
V. Rubinchik ◽  
Yekaterina Yaremenko ◽  
Gulfiya Teletaeva ◽  
Dilorom Latipova ◽  
...  

Ipilimumab (IPI) provides a ten-year overall survival in almost 20 % of selected patients participated in several phase II-III trials. However, the expanded access program (EAP) looks more like routine practice than like clinical trials& This is why the results of such application could be different. Here we present the long-term follow-up data of single center EAP. Ninety-six patients with disseminated melanoma progressing after at least one lines of drug therapy were included at the N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology. Sixty-seven (70 %) patients had stage IV M1c, 35 patients (36 %) had elevated LDH before initiating IPI therapy. All patients received IPI 3 mg / kg IV every 3 weeks for a maximum of 4 cycles. Totally, 320 cycles (mean - 3.3 per patient) were conducted. Grade 3-4 immuno-mediated adverse events (imAE) observed in 18 (19 %) patients. Three patients died of adverse events, possibly associated with ongoing therapy. The median time to progression was 3 (95 % CI, 2.4 to 3.5) mo., the median overall survival was 13 (95 % CI, 8.3 to17.6) mo. Previous immunotherapy with dendritic cell vaccines decreased the risk of death by 48 % (Log-rank p = 0.049). The wild type BRAF status increased three-year overall survival from 29 to 68 % (p = 0.042). Our data confirms long-term safety and efficacy of IPI in patients with pretreated disseminated melanoma in the close to real practice setting.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document