Retrospective cohort study on the safety and efficacy of cetuximab for metastatic colorectal cancer patients: HGCSG0901—Analysis of predictive markers.
683 Background: The anti-EGFR antibody Cetuximab (Cmab) do not provide therapeutic effect to patients with KRAS mutations. It has been reported that there is no correlation between the staining intensity of EGFR and efficacy of Cmab. Moreover, the previous studies have suggested that the intensity of skin toxicity that occurs after the administration is a predictive marker of Cmab. Methods: Of 269 cases registered in the multi-institutional retrospective study (HGCSG0901) treated with Cmab, 252 patients for 3rd line or after treatment line were analyzed. Each degree of skin toxicity, KRAS mutation status and EGFR expression status, respectively, were analyzed for response rates, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The Response Evaluation in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria version 1.0 was used to assess tumor response. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to determine PFS and OS. Log-rank test was used to compare each regimen in terms of PFS and OS. All statistical tests were performed using SPSS. Results: KRAS status: wild type (WT)/mutant type (MT): 135/32, EGFR status: positive/negative: 210/38, Skin toxicity: Grade 0/1/2/3: 31/50/128/43. Analysis of KRAS status: Response rate: WT 23.7%/MT 6.3% (p=0.028), Progression-free survival: WT 4.8 months /MT 2.1 months (p<0.001), Overall survival: WT 9.9 months/MT 5.3 months (p=0.003). There was a significant correlation between the degree of skin toxicity and efficacy. However, EGFR expression status showed no differences in efficacy. Conclusions: Here, we reported the results of efficacy analysis for each predictive marker of Cmab. As with previous reports, patients with KRAS mutations did not benefit from Cmab. Degree of skin toxicity was a useful indicator of effectiveness after starting treatment, whereas EGFR status was not effective predictor in daily practice setting.