Overcoming sunitinib-induced resistance by dose escalation in renal cell carcinoma: Evidence in animal models and patients.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4582-4582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Pili ◽  
Remi Adelaiye ◽  
Kiersten Marie Miles ◽  
Eric Ciamporcero ◽  
Paula Sotomayor ◽  
...  

4582 Background: Sunitinib is considered a first-line therapeutic option for patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). However, despite the clinical efficacy, eventually tumors develop resistance and progress. Thus, we have tested the hypothesis whether sunitinib dose-escalation could overcome initial drug resistance. Methods: Human patient-derived ccRCC xenografts were implanted in SCID mice and were randomly assigned into two groups (sunitinib and vehicle). Mice were treated with sunitinib 5 days/week with a dose-escalation schema starting from 40 mg/kg to 60 mg/kg and 80 mg/kg. Tumor volumes and body weights were assessed weekly. Tumor tissues and blood were collected prior to dose increments. In selected patients treated with 50 mg sunitinib and presenting minimal toxicities, dose was escalated to 62.5 and 75 mg at the time of tumor progression. Results: Our preclinical results show that patient-derived tumors (RP-01 and RP-02), although initially responsive to sunitinib 40 mg/kg, eventually became resistant to treatment. Following dose increase to 60 mg/kg, we observed again tumor response but eventually the tumors became resistant. A similar effect was noticed when we further escalated sunitinib to 80 mg/kg. Immunohistochemistry analysis shows decreased tumor vascularization during response to sunitinib, but then hypervascularization at the time of resistance. Associated increase in expression of the methyltransferase EZH2, the histone marks H3K27me3, H3k4me2 and H3K9me2 in tumors resistant to sunitinib was observed. Analysis of sunitinib and VEGF/VEFGR2 blood and tumor levels will be reported. In parallel, our clinical experience shows that intra-patient sunitinib dose-escalation was safe and clinical benefit was observed. Details on tumor responses and toxicities will be reported. Conclusions: Overall, our results suggest that sunitinib-induced resistance may be overcome in part by increasing the dose of the VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor in mouse models and ccRCC patients, and highlights the potential role of epigenetic changes associated with sunitinib resistance.

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Del Vecchio ◽  
Robert J Ellis

Cabozantinib is a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor used for the treatment of various solid-organ tumours. It was recently approved as a first- and second-line therapeutic for the management of advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma based on the results of two randomised controlled trials. The phase III METEOR trial compared cabozantinib against everolimus as a second- or greater line therapy and found benefits in progression-free and overall survival, and the phase II CABOSUN trial compared cabozantinib against sunitinib as a first-line therapeutic and found benefits in terms of progression-free survival. This review briefly summarises how cabozantinib fits into current treatment paradigms for the management of advanced renal cell carcinoma.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Jacob W. Bruinius ◽  
Karl J. Dykema ◽  
Sabrina L. Noyes ◽  
Bin Tean Teh ◽  
Brian R. Lane

There is sparse literature demonstrating effective treatments for metastatic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC). The tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sunitinib selectively inhibits the VEGF pathway and it is a standard care for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), although data supporting its use in ChRCC is much more limited. A 56-year-old underwent palliative nephrectomy for locally-advanced ChRCC with sarcomatoid differentiation. Tumor gene expression profiling using Affymetrix HG-U133 Plus 2.0 GeneChip platform demonstrated significantly elevated VEGF-C expression compared to normal renal tissue n=12 and other types RCC n=158. Adjuvant sunitinib was used to treat his residual unresectable retroperitoneal lymph nodes. He demonstrated an exceptional response and underwent complete surgical resection four months later. He has been managed with TKIs for nearly nine years with only minimal disease progression. Additional studies exploring treatment options for patients with non-clear cell RCC are needed; in their absence, we would recommend TKIs for patients whose tumors bear a similar molecular profile.


ESMO Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
pp. e000445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary Joseph Doherty ◽  
Deirdre Lynskey ◽  
Athena Matakidou ◽  
Kate Fife ◽  
Tim Eisen

IntroductionThe AXIS trial established axitinib as a standard of care treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) after failure of a prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Axitinib dosing begins at 5  mg twice daily, with escalation of doses to 7  and 10  mg after consecutive 2-week intervals if tolerated (as per the drug label). Given clinical concerns about drug-related toxicity, we have used a pragmatic strategy where dose escalations were made only after disease progression or where rapid responses were clinically required.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of electronic health records and radiology of all patients with mRCC treated with axitinib for >2 weeks at Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK, over a 37 -month period to determine the clinical and radiological effects of dose escalations made according to the above strategy.Results42 patients fitting these criteria were identified, 29 having ≥1  dose escalation event (DEE). 60 DEEs were identified (median of two per patient), and the objective radiological consequences of 53 DEEs could be evaluated. The disease control rate (partial response or stable disease) after the first DEE instituted for disease progression was similar to that after the second DEE (68.8% vs 70%). 56.6 % of all DEEs and 63.6 % of DEEs made as a result of disease progression resulted in disease control. The median OS from the commencement of axitinib for all dose-escalated patients was 19.9 months, and 16.5 months for the entire cohort. The mean dose (for all patients) at 90 days after starting axitinib was 5.92  mg.ConclusionThese data suggest that dose escalation of axitinib after disease progression may be an effective dosing strategy for patients with mRCC, and this may be a preferred option in patients in whom there are particular concerns about drug-related toxicity, quality of life optimisation or healthcare-associated costs.


2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 513-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Remi Adelaiye ◽  
Eric Ciamporcero ◽  
Kiersten Marie Miles ◽  
Paula Sotomayor ◽  
Jonathan Bard ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 484-493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toyonori Tsuzuki ◽  
Naoto Sassa ◽  
Yoshie Shimoyama ◽  
Takamitsu Morikawa ◽  
Ryoichi Shiroki ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21138-e21138
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ahsan Siraj ◽  
Christophe Pichon ◽  
Aurelian Radu ◽  
Nicolae Ghinea

e21138 Background: Sunitinib is an antiangiogenic receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor used to treat advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma and other types of cancer. Sunitinib is effective in only approx. 70% of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) patients, has significant adverse side effects, and no method is available to predict which patients will not respond. Our purpose was to explore the possibility of introducing an effective prediction method based on a marker of the tumor vasculature, the Follicle Stimulating Hormone Receptor (FSHR). Methods: Using immunohistochemistry on paraffin sections with anti-FSHR monoclonal antibodies we studied by photonic and fluorescence microscopy the expression of FSHR in 50 patients diagnosed with advanced metastatic CCRCC. All patients were subjected to surgery for removal of the primary tumor and were subsequently treated with sunitinib orally for ≥ 3 months with a dose of 50 mg/day for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks off. After therapy the patients were categorized as “responsive”, “stable”, or “non-responsive” based on the RECIST guidelines. The blood vessel density and the percentage of FSHR-positive vessels were determined by immunofluorescence on sections from the primary tumors removed by surgery, prior to the sunitinib treatment. Von Willebrand factor (vWF) was used as specific endothelial marker. Results: There were no significant differences in the total density of vessels (detected with anti-vWF antibody) among the responsive, stable and non-responsive patients. The percentage of FSHR-stained vessels was on average five fold higher for the patients that responded to the treatment in comparison with the stable group and almost eight fold higher than in the non-responsive group. The percentage allowed the detection of responders with 87-100% sensitivity and specificity. Conclusions: The data suggest that FSHR expression levels in the blood vessels of CCRCC primary tumors can be used to predict, with high sensitivity and specificity, the patients that will respond to sunitinib therapy.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 468-468
Author(s):  
Maria cossu Rocca ◽  
Elena Verri ◽  
Simona Blotta ◽  
Laura Adamoli ◽  
Davide Radice ◽  
...  

468 Background: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the third most common genitourinary cancer. Up to 30% of patients (pts) with RCC presents with advanced disease. Sunitinib(S), an orally available tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is the well established first-line therapy for these population. Actually few data are available in the literature about its use in patients > 75 yrs investigating the feasibility, the efficacy and the toxicity in this population. Methods: From 2007 to 2011, 16 pts >75 yrs with mRCC received S. 75% of pts had a clear cell carcinoma, 87.5% had a surgery on primary tumor, 18.7% had a metastic disease at diagnosis and the median time to metastatic progression was 13.5 months. Median age was 78 years (range 71-88y).All patients had 0-1 performance status and 69% of them received S as first-line treatment. Four pts started S on the approved 50 mg /d 4-week-on-2-off schedule, but three of them reduced to 37.5 mg continuous once daily dosing(ODD)starting from the third cycle. Five out of 8 pts receiving 37.5 mg continuous ODD reduced the dose at 25 mg continuous ODD or modified the schedule. Four pts started with 25 mg continuous ODD and 2 of them continued the treatment at modified schedule. Median number of cycles administered was 7 (range 2-16). Results: Response rate was 87% (13pts) in 15 evaluable pts. Overall response included 40% (6 pts) of PR, 20% (3pts) of CR, 33% (5pts) of SD > 6 mos. Progressive disease was observed only in 1patient. TTP was 12.4 months (95% CI, 4.8-32.6). Overall survival was 34.2 months (95% CI, 27.3- ). The main toxicity requiring dose reduction or schedule modification was haematological (46%), G3Anemia in 1 pt G3-4 thrombocytopenia in 3pts and G3 leukoneutrophenia in 3pts. No any toxicity required treatment interruption. Conclusions: In summary these results show the feasibility and the efficacy of S in elderly population with high response rate regardless the doses and schedule used.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loic Verlingue ◽  
Daphne Morel ◽  
Mickael Schaeffer ◽  
Laurent Tanguy ◽  
Jordane Schmidt ◽  
...  

Short summary: Personalized biomarkers can facilitate decision making upon multiple therapeutic options in ccRCC. VEGFR2 expression denoised with 37 normal and tumor gene expressions relates to sunitinib effect whereas raw VEGFR2 expression does not relate to sunitinib effect. Background: Several studies suggested that molecular analysis of patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) could indicate whether a patient is susceptible of benefiting from sunitinib in first line systemic treatment compared to immunotherapies. However, data remain conflicting and no predictive biomarker is validated so far to decipher if sunitinib could still represent a good therapeutic option in first line setting and beyond. Methods: PREDMED denoised the tumor RNA expression of 37 genes including KDR (encoding VEGFR2) estimated by RTqPCR, by normalizing it on the expression of normal kidney tissue and cell types. We investigated the performance of PREDMED VEGFR2-scoring to predict the clinical effect of sunitinib for patients affected by ccRCC. Results: Among the 34 ccRCC patients samples retrospectively retrieved from the UroCCR project (NCT03293563), high VEGFR2 scores were associated with objective clinical responses under sunitinib treatment and low scores with stable disease or progression with a sensitivity of 86%, a specificity of 67% and an AUC of 72.5% (95%CI[50.1, 94.9]; p=0.04). VEGFR2 scores were significantly and positively related to progression-free survival (HR = 0.465; 95%CI[0.221, 0.978]; p=0.0311) and overall survival (HR = 0.400; 95%CI[0.192, 0.834]; p=0.0134) under sunitinib treatment. In our cohort, raw VEGFR2 expression (before PREDMED processing) was not related to the above mentioned outcomes. Conclusion: We describe a gene expression based algorithm that is accurately related to the effect of sunitinib for patients with ccRCC. We further plan a validation of PREDMED for combinatorial strategies involving antiangiogenics and immune-checkpoint blockers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document