Factors influencing treatment of inflammatory breast cancer in the United States.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 118-118
Author(s):  
Heather Y. Lin ◽  
Gildy Babiera ◽  
Isabelle Bedrosian ◽  
Simona Flora Shaitelman ◽  
Henry Mark Kuerer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Inflammatory Breast Cancer ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
High Volume ◽  
The United States ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Data ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Facility Level

118 Background: Guidelines for treating inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) using trimodality (chemotherapy, surgery and radiation) therapy (TT) remain largely unchanged since 2000. However, many such patients did not receive TT. It is unknown how patient-level (PL) and facility-level (FL) factors contribute to TT utilization. Methods: Using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), patients who underwent surgical treatment of locoregional IBC from 2003-2011 were identified. We correlated patient, tumor, and treatment data with TT. An observed to expected (O/E) ratio of number of patients treated with TT was calculated for each hospital by adjusting for PL factors. Hierarchical mixed effects models were used to assess the proportion of variation in the use of TT attributable to PL and FL factors, respectively. Results: Among 5,537 patients who met the study criteria, the use of TT fluctuated annually (67.3%-75.7%) and was less likely for patients who were over 70, had a lower income or had an N0 tumor (all p < 0.05). By insurance type, TT use was lowest among Medicare patients. Of the 542 hospitals examined, 55 (10.1%) and 24 (4.4%) were identified as significantly low and high outliers for the use of TT (p < 0.05), respectively. While comprehensive cancer centers represented the majority of high outliers, the TT use by facility type overall was not significantly different demonstrating variability within comprehensive cancer center practice. The percentage of the total variance in the use of TT attributable to facility (11%) was almost triple the variance attributable to the measured PL factors (3.4%). Conclusions: The use of standard of care TT varied widely across facilities with some high volume centers clearly underutilizing TT. To improve clinical outcomes for this rare and aggressive malignancy, it is critical to identify facility level factors impacting the use of TT to ensure the guideline adherence of IBC treatment.

A closer look at next generation sequencing (NGS) in breast cancer: A retrospective analysis.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13023-e13023
Author(s):  
Bahar Laderian ◽  
ANA CRISTINA Sandoval Leon ◽  
Loulwa Alsharhan ◽  
Dorraya El Ashry ◽  
Marc E. Lippman
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Tumor Board ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Subsequent Response ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Progression Of Disease

e13023 Background: Targeted cancer therapy has been posited to revolutionize treatment paradigms in oncology. There are, a paucity of data regarding the use of NGS in breast cancer (BC). Herein we report our experience with NGS in a consecutive series of BC patients. Methods: Using an IRB approved protocol, we retrospectively identified patients with BC treated at the Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (UMMSOM) who underwent NGS. Data were collected on demographics, tumor characteristics, genomic mutation profiles, and subsequent response to targeted therapy after 3 months. Results: Between January 2013 and April 2016, 101 BC patients underwent NGS. The mean age at diagnosis was 49. Ninety-one percent were stage IV, 6% were stage III, 2% were stage II, and 1% were stage I. Fifty percent had estrogen receptor (ER)+, HER2- tumors, 31% had triple-negative tumors, 13% had HER2+, ER+ tumors, and 6% had HER2+, ER- tumors. Ninety-six percent had at least one mutation, of which 78% had a targetable mutation. Sixteen patients received targeted therapy (TT). The average time between NGS and TT was 5 months ranging 0-22 months, during which seven patients received other systemic therapy. The most common reasons for not receiving TT were no actionable mutations (24%), not meeting criteria for an available clinical trial (14%), stable disease (SD) (13% ), lost to follow up (11%), physician decision (11%). Of the 16 patients who received TT, 7 patients had progression of disease, 3 died before response could be evaluated and presumably had no benefit, 2 discontinued TT due to side effects, 1 had SD, 1 had a partial response, and 2 were too early to be assessed. Conclusions: The majority of BC patients in our series had actionable mutations. However, TT was not offered to a significant number of patients for a multiplicity of reasons and the clinical benefit in those patients treated according to NGS findings was dismal. While NGS is surely a promising technology that should be utilized in combination with molecular tumor board, a host of reasons limit its usefulness at this time and its expense may well not justify its use outside of clinical trials.

321 Phase I clinical trial assessing the combination of systemic chemokine modulatory regimen targeting TLR3 with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A347-A347
Author(s):  
Shipra Gandhi ◽  
Mateusz Opyrchal ◽  
Cayla Ford ◽  
Victoria Fitzpatrick ◽  
Melissa Grimm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Surrogate Marker ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center

BackgroundNeoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with taxanes is the standard of care in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Intratumoral prevalence of CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTLs) is associated with an improvement in relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), while regulatory T-cells (Treg) and myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC) are associated with poor survival. Higher ratio of CTL/Treg is associated with higher probability of obtaining pathological complete response (pCR), a surrogate marker for RFS. Intratumoral production of CCL5, CXCL9, CXCL10 and CXCL11 is critical for local infiltration with CTLs, while CCL22 is responsible for Treg attraction. Previous studies have shown that CXCL9 expression in the pre-treatment breast tissue is associated with a three-fold higher rate of achieving pCR. Our preclinical data show that Chemokine modulating (CKM) regimen, combining rintatolimod (TLR3 agonist), interferon (IFN)-α2b, and celecoxib (COX-2 inhibitor) increases CTL-attracting, and decreases MDSC-, Treg-favoring chemokines, increasing CTL/Treg ratio in tumor microenvironment, with preferential tumor tissue activation than adjacent healthy tissues. We hypothesize that the combination of CKM with paclitaxel will result in infiltration of TNBC with CTLs, and along with doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC), result in higher pCR, translating into improved RFS and OS.MethodsIn this phase I study NCT04081389, eligibility includes age ≥18 years, confirmed resectable TNBC, radiographically measurable disease ≥1 cm, ECOG PS ≤ 2, adequate organ and marrow function. Patients with autoimmune disease, serious mood disorders, invasive carcinoma within 3 years, history of peptic ulcers or hypersensitivity to NSAIDs will be excluded. We plan to treat three patients with early stage TNBC with paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 IV weekly for 12 weeks, rintatolimod 200 mg IV, celecoxib 200 mg oral twice daily, and accelerated titration of IFN-α2b at doses 0, 5, or 10 million units (MU)/m2 [Dose Levels (DL) 1, 2 and 3 respectively] on days 1–3 (no intra-patient dose escalation) in weeks 1–3. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) is defined as grade 3 or higher toxicities within the first 3 weeks. Any DLT will mandate recruitment per the 3+3 model. If no DLT, three patients will be enrolled at DL 4 at 20 MU/m2 IFN- α2b. This will be followed by standard dose-dense AC, and then surgery. The primary endpoint is safety and tolerability of combination and to identify the appropriate DL of CKM and paclitaxel for extended efficacy study. The secondary endpoints include investigation of efficacy (pCR and breast MRI response), along with RFS and OS. Intratumoral biomarkers will be analyzed in an exploratory manner.ResultsN/AConclusionsN/ATrial RegistrationNCT04081389Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center Institution’s Ethics Board, approval number I-73718.

Design of novel multi filter union feature selection framework for breast cancer dataset

2021 ◽  
pp. 1063293X2110160
Author(s):  
Dinesh Morkonda Gunasekaran ◽  
Prabha Dhandayudam
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Feature Selection ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Feature Selection Method ◽  
Selection Method ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Breast Cancer Dataset ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Health Care Center ◽  
Cancer Data

Nowadays women are commonly diagnosed with breast cancer. Feature based Selection method plays an important step while constructing a classification based framework. We have proposed Multi filter union (MFU) feature selection method for breast cancer data set. The feature selection process based on random forest algorithm and Logistic regression (LG) algorithm based union model is used for selecting important features in the dataset. The performance of the data analysis is evaluated using optimal features subset from selected dataset. The experiments are computed with data set of Wisconsin diagnostic breast cancer center and next the real data set from women health care center. The result of the proposed approach shows high performance and efficient when comparing with existing feature selection algorithms.

Survival outcomes in patients with IDC and ILC breast cancer: A well matched single institution study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13056-e13056
Author(s):  
Michael Grimm ◽  
Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy ◽  
Maryam B. Lustberg ◽  
Robert Wesolowski ◽  
Sagar D. Sardesai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Single Institution ◽  
First Line ◽  
Response To Chemotherapy ◽  
Significant Difference

e13056 Background: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) accounts for only 10-15% of all invasive breast cancers but has distinct clinicopathologic characteristics and genomic profiles. In particular, metastatic lobular cancers (mILC) have unique sites of metastasis and it is unclear if the response to initial endocrine therapy differs from metastatic ductal cancers (mIDC). Therefore we have undertaken a single-institution, retrospective analysis to compare overall outcomes and response to initial endocrine therapy (ET) in patients (pts) with metastatic ILC and IDC. Methods: An IRB approved retrospective review of medical records was conducted evaluating pts treated for metastatic IDC and ILC at The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2014. Pts diagnosed with mIDC were matched on age, year of diagnosis, estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor and HER2 status and site of metastasis 2:1 to patients diagnosed with mILC. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from metastasis to death or last known follow-up. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as time from metastasis to progression on first-line ET. Time to chemotherapy (TTC) was defined as time from starting ET for metastasis to initiation of chemotherapy. Kaplan Meier (KM) methods were used to calculate median OS, PFS and TTC. Results: A total of one hundred sixty one pts with metastatic breast cancer were included in this analysis. The demographic features between the two groups were well balanced and included in the table below. The median OS was 2.6 yrs (95% CI: 1.55, 3.22) for mILC and 2.2 yrs (95% CI: 1.95, 2.62) for mIDC. A subset of 111 patients who started on endocrine therapy were used in the PFS and TTC analyses. The median PFS following first-line ET was 2.2 yrs (95% CI: 0.1.0, 2.7) for mILC and 1.4 yrs (95% CI: 0.91, 1.90) for mIDC. Median TTC was 2.1 yrs (95% CI: 1.71, 4.92) for mILC and 2.4 yrs (95% CI: 1.90, 4.77) for mIDC. There was no statistically significant difference in outcomes between the two groups. Conclusions: Outcomes in patients with ILC and IDC have been varied, with several studies reporting that patients with ILC have worse outcomes and response to chemotherapy. Our retrospective study examining outcomes in mILC in comparison with mIDC showed no difference in OS. Given the concern of resistance to conventional therapies in patients with lobular cancers, it is reassuring to see that the median PFS on first line ET and TTC was similar to metastatic ductal cancers.[Table: see text]

The feasibility of same day pegfilgrastim-cbqv administration in breast cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy regimens at a northern Virginia cancer center.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18687-e18687
Author(s):  
Maya Leiva ◽  
Angela Pennisi ◽  
Kathleen Kiernan Harnden ◽  
Patricia Conrad Rizzo ◽  
Lauren Ann Mauro
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Small Sample Size ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Secondary Prophylaxis ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Myelosuppressive Chemotherapy

e18687 Background: The long-acting injectable G-CSF, pegfilgrastim and its biosimilars have historically been given to patients 24 hours following the administration of myelosuppressive chemotherapy for either primary or secondary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia (FN). Previous literature has indicated that pegfilgrastim administration prior to 24 hours post chemotherapy, may result in a deepened and prolonged neutropenia due to the increase in circulating granulocytes exposed to chemotherapy. With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and to reduce potential SAR-CoV-2 exposure to cancer patients on therapy, we implemented same day administration of injectable pegfilgrastim-cbqv among select breast cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy regimens from March 2020 – February 2021. Methods: Utilizing retrospective EHR chart reviews, 55 patients among 4 medical oncologists in our breast cancer group were identified as meeting the criteria of same day pegfilgrastim-cbqv administration. Inclusion was based on completion of at least 2 consecutive cycles of same day pegfilgrastim-cbqv 6 mg subcutaneous injection for primary or secondary prophylaxis. The selected patient charts were reviewed for the incidence and severity of FN. Among the patients who had documented FN, further subgroup analyses were done regarding baseline characteristics, timing of neutropenia, regimens, regimen sequence, and reported ADRs associated with pegfilgrastim-cbqv. Results: 9 (16.4%) of the 55 patients experienced FN (Grades 3-4) and 6 (10.9%) patients were hospitalized. There were no Grade 5 events and none had therapy discontinued due to FN. 8 (88.9%) of the patients experienced FN between cycles 1 and 2. Of note, there were no cases of COVID-19 among the 9 patients who had an episode of FN. 52 (94.5%) of the 55 patients received treatment with curative intent and 3 (5.5%) had metastatic disease on a subsequent line of therapy. The median age was 49.1 years (range 29-71) and patients were 56.4% Caucasian, 18.1% Black or African American, 12.7% Asian, and 12.7% Hispanic/Latina. Conclusions: Based on the retrospective data analysis, same day pegfilgrastim-cbqv appears to be a safe and effective option in the primary and secondary prophylaxis of FN with myelosuppressive standard of care chemotherapy used in breast cancer treatment. Though our review was limited by a relatively small sample size and confined to younger (49.1 median age) breast cancer patients, this opens the door to further re-evaluation of same day pegfilgrastim-cbqv administration in other patient populations. In a post pandemic treatment world, this slight change in practice has the potential to reduce patient financial toxicity associated with multiple medical visits, provide an alternative to on-body injector formulations, and ensure treatment adherence.

Comparison of Models to Predict Nonsentinel Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer Patients With Metastatic Sentinel Lymph Nodes: A Prospective Multicenter Study

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (17) ◽  
pp. 2800-2808 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Coutant ◽  
Camille Olivier ◽  
Eric Lambaudie ◽  
Eric Fondrinier ◽  
Fréderic Marchal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Multicenter Study ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Lymph Node Status ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Prospective Multicenter Study ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Nonsentinel Lymph Node

Purpose Several models have been developed to predict nonsentinel lymph node (non-SN) status in patients with breast cancer with sentinel lymph node (SN) metastasis. The purpose of our investigation was to compare available models in a prospective, multicenter study. Patients and Methods In a cohort of 561 positive-SN patients who underwent axillary lymph node dissection, we evaluated the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs), calibration, rates of false negatives (FN), and number of patients in the group at low risk for non-SN calculated from nine models. We also evaluated these parameters in the subgroup of patients with micrometastasis or isolated tumor cells (ITC) in the SN. Results At least one non-SN was metastatic in 147 patients (26.2%). Only two of nine models had an AUC greater than 0.75. Three models were well calibrated. Two models yielded an FN rate less than 5%. Three models were able to assign more than a third of patients in the low-risk group. Overall, the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center nomogram and Tenon score outperform other methods for all patients, including the subgroup of patients with only SN micrometastases or ITC. Conclusion Our study suggests that all models do not perform equally, especially for the subgroup of patients with only micrometastasis or ITC in the SN. We point out available evaluation methods to assess their performance and provide guidance for clinical practice.

scholarly journals A culturally specific dietary plan to manage weight gain among African American breast cancer survivors

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen A Griffith ◽  
Renee Royak-Schaler ◽  
Kim Nesbitt ◽  
Min Zhan ◽  
Adriane Kozlovsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Breast Cancer Survivors ◽  
Vegetable Intake ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Daily Consumption ◽  
Culturally Specific ◽  
Fat Consumption

Breast cancer survival rates are lower in African Americans (AAs) than in Caucasians, owing in part to a higher prevalence of obesity in the former, which increases the risk of recurrence and mortality. The Women’s Intervention Nutrition Study (WINS) found that Caucasian women who followed a low-fat eating plan experienced a lower rate of cancer recurrence than women who maintained their usual diets. The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility of a WINS plan tailored to the cultural needs of AA breast cancer survivors. This feasibility pilot study was conducted at a university National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center outpatient clinic with AA breast cancer survivors. The culturally specific WINS (WINS-c) plan included eight individual counseling sessions, five educational group meetings, and follow-up telephone calls over a 1-year period. Outcome measures included dietary fat, triglyceride, insulin and glucose levels, and fruit and vegetable intake. Participants ( n = 8) had a mean age of 61.1 years (standard error of the mean (SEM) 3.1 years) and a mean BMI of 32 kg/m2 (SEM 4.25 kg/m)2. Baseline daily fat consumption decreased from 64.6 g (range 36.8–119.6g) to 44.0 g (21.6–73.4g) at 52 weeks ( p = 0.07). Mean daily consumption of fruits and vegetables increased by 36% and 15%, respectively. Mean triglyceride levels decreased at 12 months ( p < 0.05). Sustained hyperinsulinemia was noted in most participants, including those without diabetes. Mean calcium and vitamin D consumption decreased over the 1-year study period. In AA breast cancer survivors, the WINS-c program resulted in a trend toward reduced fat consumption and may represent a sustainable approach in this population for improvement of diet quality after breast cancer.

scholarly journals Malignancy Trends in HIV-Infected Patients Over the Past 10 Years in a Single-Center Retrospective Observational Study in the United States

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 107327481879795 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Rihana ◽  
Sowmya Nanjappa ◽  
Cara Sullivan ◽  
Ana Paula Velez ◽  
Narach Tienchai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Anal Cancer ◽  
Invasive Cervical Cancer ◽  
Human Herpesvirus ◽  
Kaposi Sarcoma ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma

The introduction of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in 1995 had a dramatic impact on the morbidity and mortality of the HIV population, and subsequently, the natural history of cancer has changed. The purpose of our study was to review the prevalence of AIDS-defining malignancies and non-AIDS defining cancers (NADC), taking into consideration racial and gender variations. After the institutional review board approval, the study was conducted as a retrospective chart review of 279 HIV-infected patients who were treated at the Moffitt Cancer Center between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2010. The demographic characteristics included gender, ethnicity, race, presence or absence of ART, and the type of malignancy reviewed. Of 233 men, 78 (33.5%) had AIDS-defining malignancies. AIDS-related non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) was detected in 49 (21%) patients and Kaposi sarcoma (KS) in 29 (12%) patients. Two-thirds of male patients had NADC, with anal cancer being the most prevalent (8.5%), followed by Hodgkin lymphoma (6%). AIDS-related NHL was also the predominant malignancy for women with a prevalence of 19.5% followed by invasive cervical cancer (ICC) and breast cancer, both with a similar prevalence of 11%. Kaposi sarcoma and anal cancer were equally detected in 2% of women. The prevalence rates of AIDS-defining malignancies among those of white race were 34%, ranging from 21% for NHL to 13% for KS and 1.5% for ICC. Twenty-one (7.7%) patients had anal cancer. AIDS-defining malignancies were found in 36% of patients of black race and 60% had NHL. Non-AIDS-related NHL was the second most common malignancy, followed by breast cancer and anal cancer with a similar prevalence of 6.5%. Of 279 patients, 53% were taking ART; 39.4% were not taking ART; and in 7.5% of the patients, it was unknown if they were taking ART. In the ART era, our study found NADC to be more prevalent than AIDS-defining malignancies with 60% versus 40%, respectively. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma remained the most common AIDS-related malignancy in both genders. Among the patients with NADC, anal cancer was the predominant malignancy. The increasing incidence of some of the NADC is expected as this population is living longer with chronic exposure of viral replication of virus with oncogenic potential such as Human papillomavirus (HPV), Hepatitis B virus (HBV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and Human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8). Early ART initiation, aggressive vaccination, and judicious cancer screening are the cornerstone of cancer prevention of this growing population.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document