Association of baseline prostate atrophy with lower tumor volume in men with prostate cancer on repeat biopsy.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 122-122
Author(s):  
Daniel M. Moreira ◽  
Gerald L. Andriole ◽  
Ramiro Castro ◽  
Stephen J. Freedland
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Tumor Volume ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Repeat Biopsy ◽  
Lower Baseline ◽  
Tumor Involvement ◽  
Biopsy Methods ◽  
Central Pathology

122 Background: We have previously shown baseline prostate atrophy (PA) was independently associated with lower prostate cancer (PC) risk. Beyond PC risk, for those who develop PC it is unclear whether PA is associated with smaller, less aggressive and/or less advanced tumors. Thus, we evaluated whether baseline PA and PA severity in men with initial negative biopsy for PC was associated with PC volume at the 2-year repeat prostate biopsy. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 763 men 50-75 years-old with negative baseline prostate biopsy and positive 2-year repeat biopsy for PC with complete data in the REDUCE study. Presence and severity of PA, and tumor volume were determined by central pathology. The association of PA at baseline biopsies with 2-year repeat biopsy cancer volume variables was evaluated with linear and Poisson regressions and controlling for age, race, body-mass index (BMI), digital rectal exam (DRE), prostate volume, baseline and pre-repeat biopsy prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and treatment arm. Results: PA was detected in 458 (60%) baseline biopsies and was considered mild in 398 (87%) and moderate in 60 (13%) cases. Patients with PA had significantly larger prostates and lower baseline and pre-repeat biopsy PSA (P < 0.01). PA was unrelated to race, BMI, DRE or treatment arm. At 2-year biopsy, men with baseline PA had significantly lower overall mean total tumor volume (2.04µL vs 3.02µL; P = 0.006), mean number of biopsy cores involved (1.79 vs 2.11; P = 0.001), mean percent of cores involved (17.9% vs 21.2%; P = 0.001), average core involvement (0.20µL vs 0.30µL; P = 0.001) and overall mean percent tumor involvement (1.64% vs 2.35%; P = 0.006) than those without PA. The results were virtually unchanged in multivariable analysis (all P < 0.05 except for overall percent tumor involvement where P = 0.061). In the analysis of PA severity, a biological gradient was observed where moderate PA was associated with greater reduction in tumor volume compared to mild PA (data not shown). Conclusions: In a cohort of men with 2-year repeat prostate biopsy positive for PC after a negative baseline biopsy, baseline PA was associated with lower PC volume. These results suggest PA may be associated with less aggressive PC.

scholarly journals Tumor-Associated Release of Prostatic Cells into the Blood after Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy in Patients with Histologically Confirmed Prostate Cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 161-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon A Joosse ◽  
Burkhard Beyer ◽  
Christin Gasch ◽  
Paulina Nastały ◽  
Andra Kuske ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Standard Procedure ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Systemic Spread

Abstract BACKGROUND Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS) is a standard procedure for prostate cancer diagnosis. Because prostate cancer is a multifocal disease in many patients, multiple sampling (n ≥ 10) is required, which may bear the risk of systemic spread of cancer cells. DESIGN Using the standardized CellSearch® system that allows for the detection of single epithelial cell adhesion molecule-positive circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in blood, we investigated whether prostate biopsy is associated with release of prostatic tumor cells into the circulation. Peripheral blood was obtained before and within 30 min after performing prostate biopsy from 115 men with increased serum prostate-specific antigen. RESULTS The number of CTCs significantly increased after biopsy in men with histologically confirmed prostate cancer (odds ratio, 7.8; 95% CI, 4.8–12.8), whereas no biopsy-related changes could be detected in men without confirmed prostate cancer. Multivariable analysis showed that biopsy-related increase of CTCs was significantly correlated with a worse progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 12.4; 95% CI, 3.2–48.6) within the median follow-up of 41 months. CONCLUSIONS Prostate biopsies may lead to a tumor-associated release of CTCs into the blood circulation. Larger confirmatory trials with longer follow-up periods are required before any change in clinical practice can be recommended.

Diagnostic Value of Different Systematic Prostate Biopsy Methods in the Detection of Prostate Cancer with Ultrasonographic Hypoechoic Lesions - A Comparative Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guang Xu ◽  
Minghua Yao ◽  
Jian Wu ◽  
Lehang Guo ◽  
Lijing Feng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
Prostate Volume ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Lesion Core ◽  
Biopsy Methods ◽  
Hypoechoic Lesion ◽  
A Prospective Study

Objective: To assess if a less extended biopsy in the transperineal approach is sufficient for detection of prostate cancer (PC) in patients with hypoechoic lesions. Methods: This was a prospective study of 167 consecutive patients with prostate hypoechoic lesion and who underwent transperineal ultrasound (TPUS)-guided 12-core and hypoechoic lesion core biopsy between January 2012 and February 2013. Results: PC was detected in 64.1% (107/167) of patients. The PC detection rate of the 12-core prostate biopsy scheme was the highest, but when including the hypoechoic lesion core, there was no difference between the 6- and 12-core schemes (all p > 0.05), irrespective of prostate volume or prostate-specific antigen levels (all p > 0.05). Conclusions: A more limited biopsy scheme could be sufficient for the detection of PC if the hypoechoic lesion is sampled.

Lower risk of prostate cancer in patients with sedentary occupations presenting for a prostate biopsy: Analysis of a Veterans Affairs cohort.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 257-257
Author(s):  
Rimaz M. Khadir ◽  
Rashid K. Sayyid ◽  
Martha K. Terris
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Veterans Affairs ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Patient Reported

257 Background: Sedentary behavior has been associated with increased serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. It is currently unknown whether this correlates with an increased risk of underlying prostate cancer (PCa). Our objective was to determine whether patients with sedentary occupations presenting for a prostate biopsy were at increased risk of PCa diagnosis. Methods: A prospectively collected registry of patients undergoing a prostate biopsy between July 1995 and June 2016 at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Augusta, GA was utilized. The occupation was classified as sedentary if it was associated with prolonged periods of sitting (i.e. >50% work hours). This was determined via patient reported history at time of biopsy. The associations between a sedentary lifestyle and risk of a positive prostate biopsy, high grade cancer (i.e. Gleason score 8 or higher), and high volume cancer (i.e. at least 50% of total cores were positive) were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analyses, controlling for age, race, body mass index, PSA level, free PSA ratio, clinical stage, prostate volume, and family history of prostate cancer. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using R version 3.6.1. Results: Our cohort included 1,914 patients. 271 (14.2%) patients had sedentary jobs. Median patient age was 61.0 years (Interquartile range [IQR] 57.0 – 66.0). Median PSA at time of biopsy was 5.7 ng/ml (IQR 4.4 – 8.2). Of the 1,914 initial biopsies performed, 974 (50.9%) were positive for malignancy. Of patients diagnosed with PCa, 229 (23.5%) had high-grade disease and 316 (32.4%) had high volume disease. On multivariable analysis, patients with a sedentary job had a significantly decreased risk of PCa diagnosis (Odds ratio [OR] 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18-1.03, p= 0.058), but no difference in odds of high grade (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.089-2.99, p= 0.60) or high volume disease (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.93-1.21, p= 0.89). Conclusions: Patients with sedentary occupations presenting for a prostate biopsy are at a lower apparent risk for a positive prostate biopsy. These results suggest that the serum PSA levels in such patients may be artificially elevated secondary to increased recumbence with no corresponding increase in risk of malignancy. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals A Urine-Based Exosomal Gene Expression Test Stratifies Risk of High-Grade Prostate Cancer in Men with Prior Negative Prostate Biopsy Undergoing Repeat Biopsy

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
James McKiernan ◽  
Mikkel Noerholm ◽  
Vasisht Tadigotla ◽  
Sonia Kumar ◽  
Phillipp Torkler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Repeat Biopsy ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Cut Point ◽  
Negative Biopsy ◽  
Initial Biopsy

Abstract Background : Initial prostate biopsy often fails to identify prostate cancer resulting in patient anxiety, especially when clinical features such as prostate specific antigen (PSA) remain elevated, leading to the need for repeat biopsies. Prostate biomarker tests, such as the ExoDx™ Prostate (IntelliScore) , or EPI test, have been shown to provide individualized risk assessment of clinically significant prostate cancer at initial biopsy; however, the performance in the repeat biopsy setting is not well established. Methods : As part of a previous prospective clinical validation study evaluating the performance of the EPI test, we collected first-catch, non-DRE urine samples across 22 sites from men with prior negative biopsy scheduled to undergo a repeat prostate biopsy to rule out prostate cancer. All men were 50 years or older with a PSA 2-10ng/mL. Exosomal mRNA was extracted and expression of three genomic markers, PCA3, ERG and SPDEF was measured. The resulting EPI score was correlated with biopsy results.Results : 229 men with a prior negative biopsy underwent repeat biopsies. ExoDx Prostate demonstrated good performance ruling out high-grade (Grade group 2, GG2, or higher) prostate cancer (HGPCa) using the previously validated 15.6 cut point in the initial biopsy setting. The EPI test yielded an NPV of 92% independent of other clinical features and would have avoided 26% of unnecessary biopsies while missing only five patients with HGPCa (2.1%). Furthermore, the EPI test provided additional information at a cut-point of 20 and 29.6 with an NPV of 94%, potentially delaying 35% and 61% of unnecessary biopsies, respectively. Conclusions : The EPI test provided good performance using the 15.6 cut-point for ruling out HGPCa / GG2 or higher in men undergoing a repeat prostate biopsy with a PSA of 2-10ng/ml. Furthermore, the test utilizes gene expression data independent of clinical features to predict the likelihood of HGPCa / GG2 on a subsequent needle biopsy.

scholarly journals Comparison of Tumor Volume Parameters on Prostate Cancer Biopsies

2020 ◽  
Vol 144 (8) ◽  
pp. 991-996
Author(s):  
Esther I. Verhoef ◽  
Charlotte F. Kweldam ◽  
Intan P. Kümmerlin ◽  
Daan Nieboer ◽  
Chris H. Bangma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Tumor Volume ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Surgical Margin ◽  
Grade Group ◽  
Tumor Length

Context.— Prostate biopsy reports require an indication of prostate cancer volume. No consensus exists on the methodology of tumor volume reporting. Objective.— To compare the prognostic value of different biopsy prostate cancer volume parameters. Design.— Prostate biopsies of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer were reviewed (n = 1031). Tumor volume was quantified in 6 ways: average estimated tumor percentage, measured total tumor length, average calculated tumor percentage, greatest tumor length, greatest tumor percentage, and average tumor percentage of all biopsies. Their prognostic value was determined by using either logistic regression for extraprostatic expansion (EPE) and surgical margin status after radical prostatectomy (RP), or Cox regression for biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) after RP (n = 406) and radiation therapy (RT) (n = 508). Results.— All tumor volume parameters were significantly mutually correlated (R2 &gt; 0.500, P &lt; .001). None were predictive for EPE, surgical margin, or BCRFS after RP in multivariable analysis, including age, prostate-specific antigen, number of positive biopsies, and grade group. In contrast, all tumor volume parameters were significant predictors for BCRFS (all P &lt; .05) and DSS (all P &lt; .05) after RT, except greatest tumor length. In multivariable analysis including only all tumor volume parameters as covariates, calculated tumor length was the only predictor for EPE after RP (P = .02) and DSS after RT (P = .02). Conclusions.— All tumor volume parameters had comparable prognostic value and could be used in clinical practice. If tumor volume quantification is a threshold for treatment decision, calculated tumor length seems preferential, slightly outperforming the other parameters.

scholarly journals Can Urinary PCA3 Supplement PSA in the Early Detection of Prostate Cancer?

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (36) ◽  
pp. 4066-4072 ◽  
Author(s):  
John T. Wei ◽  
Ziding Feng ◽  
Alan W. Partin ◽  
Elissa Brown ◽  
Ian Thompson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Early Detection ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Repeat Biopsy ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Initial Biopsy

Purpose Given the limited sensitivity and specificity of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), its widespread use as a screening tool has raised concerns for the overdiagnosis of low-risk and the underdiagnosis of high-grade prostate cancer. To improve early-detection biopsy decisions, the National Cancer Institute conducted a prospective validation trial to assess the diagnostic performance of the prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) urinary assay for the detection of prostate cancer among men screened with PSA. Patients and Methods In all, 859 men (mean age, 62 years) from 11 centers scheduled for a diagnostic prostate biopsy between December 2009 and June 2011 were enrolled. The primary outcomes were to assess whether PCA3 could improve the positive predictive value (PPV) for an initial biopsy (at a score > 60) and the negative predictive value (NPV) for a repeat biopsy (at a score < 20). Results For the detection of any cancer, PPV was 80% (95% CI, 72% to 86%) in the initial biopsy group, and NPV was 88% (95% CI, 81% to 93%) in the repeat biopsy group. The addition of PCA3 to individual risk estimation models (which included age, race/ethnicity, prior biopsy, PSA, and digital rectal examination) improved the stratification of cancer and of high-grade cancer. Conclusion These data independently support the role of PCA3 in reducing the burden of prostate biopsies among men undergoing a repeat prostate biopsy. For biopsy-naive patients, a high PCA3 score (> 60) significantly increases the probability that an initial prostate biopsy will identify cancer.

One-year experience of government-funded magnetic resonance imaging prior to prostate biopsy: A case for omitting biopsy in men with a negative magnetic resonance imaging

2021 ◽  
pp. 205141582110043
Author(s):  
Hanna J El-Khoury ◽  
Niranjan J Sathianathen ◽  
Yuxin Jiao ◽  
Reza Farzan ◽  
Dennis Gyomber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Clinically Significant

Objectives: This study aimed to characterise the accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) as an adjunct to prostate biopsy, and to assess the effect of the new Australian Medicare rebate on practice at a metropolitan public hospital. Patients and methods: We identified patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy at a single institution over a two-year period. Patients were placed into two groups, depending upon whether their consent was obtained before or after the introduction of the Australian Medicare rebate for mpMRI. We extracted data on mpMRI results and TRUS-guided biopsy histopathology. Descriptive statistics were used to demonstrate baseline patient characteristics as well as MRI and histopathology results. Results: A total of 252 patients were included for analysis, of whom 128 underwent biopsy following the introduction of the Medicare rebate for mpMRI. There was a significant association between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System v2 (PI-RADS) classification and the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer ( p<0.01). Only one man with PI-RADS ⩽2 was found to have clinically significant prostate cancer. Four men with a PI-RADS 3 lesion were found to have clinically significant cancer. A PI-RADS 4 or 5 lesion was significantly associated with the diagnosis of clinically significant cancer on multivariable analysis. Conclusion: mpMRI is an important adjunct to biopsy in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer. Our findings support the safety of omitting/delaying prostate biopsy in men with negative mpMRI. Level of evidence: Level 3 retrospective case-control study.

scholarly journals Integrated predictive model for prostatic cancer using clinical, laboratory and ultrasound data

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 430-437
Author(s):  
GUSTAVO DAVID LUDWIG ◽  
HENRIQUE PERES ROCHA ◽  
LÚCIO JOSÉ BOTELHO ◽  
MAIARA BRUSCO FREITAS
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Predictive Model ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Prostate Volume ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Roc Curves ◽  
Rectal Examination ◽  
Psa Density

ABSTRACT Objective: to develop a predictive model to estimate the probability of prostate cancer prior to biopsy. Methods: from September 2009 to January 2014, 445 men underwent prostate biopsy in a radiology service. We excluded from the study patients with diseases that could compromise the data analysis, who had undergone prostatic resection or used 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors. Thus, we selected 412 patients. Variables included in the model were age, prostate specific antigen (PSA), digital rectal examination, prostate volume and abnormal sonographic findings. We constructed Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves and calculated the areas under the curve, as well as the model's Positive Predictive Value (PPV) . Results: of the 412 men, 155 (37.62%) had prostate cancer (PC). The mean age was 63.8 years and the median PSA was 7.22ng/ml. In addition, 21.6% and 20.6% of patients had abnormalities on digital rectal examination and image suggestive of cancer by ultrasound, respectively. The median prostate volume and PSA density were 45.15cm3 and 0.15ng/ml/cm3, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that only five studied risk factors are predictors of PC in the study (p<0.05). The PSA density was excluded from the model (p=0.314). The area under the ROC curve for PC prediction was 0.86. The PPV was 48.08% for 95%sensitivity and 52.37% for 90% sensitivity. Conclusion: the results indicate that clinical, laboratory and ultrasound data, besides easily obtained, can better stratify the risk of patients undergoing prostate biopsy.

scholarly journals PSA Density Help to Identify Patients With Elevated PSA Due to Prostate Cancer Rather Than Intraprostatic Inflammation: A Prospective Single Center Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salvatore M. Bruno ◽  
Ugo G. Falagario ◽  
Nicola d’Altilia ◽  
Marco Recchia ◽  
Vito Mancini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Prostate Volume ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Binary Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Negative Biopsy ◽  
Psa Density ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Prostatic Inflammation

The association between PSA density, prostate cancer (PCa) and BPH is well established. The aim of the present study was to establish whether PSA density can be used as a reliable parameter to predict csPCa and to determine its optimal cutoff to exclude increased PSA levels due to intraprostatic inflammation. This is a large prospective single-center, observational study evaluating the role of PSA density in the discrimination between intraprostatic inflammation and clinically significant PCa (csPCa). Patients with PSA ≥ 4 ng/ml and/or positive digito-rectal examination (DRE) and scheduled for prostate biopsy were enrolled. Prostatic inflammation (PI) was assessed and graded using the Irani Scores. Multivariable binary logistic regression analysis was used to assess if PSA density was associated with clinically significant PCa (csPCa) rather than prostatic inflammation. A total of 1988 patients met the inclusion criteria. Any PCa and csPCa rates were 47% and 24% respectively. In the group without csPCa, patients with prostatic inflammation had a higher PSA (6.0 vs 5.0 ng/ml; p=0.0003), higher prostate volume (58 vs 52 cc; p&lt;0.0001), were more likely to have a previous negative biopsy (29% vs 21%; p=0.0005) and a negative DRE (70% vs 65%; p=0.023) but no difference in PSA density (0.1 vs 0.11; p=0.2). Conversely in the group with csPCa, patients with prostatic inflammation had a higher prostate volume (43 vs 40 cc; p=0.007) but no difference in the other clinical parameters. At multivariable analysis adjusting for age, biopsy history, DRE and prostate volume, PSA density emerged as a strong predictor of csPCA but was not associated with prostatic inflammation. The optimal cutoffs of PSA density to diagnose csPCa and rule out the presence of prostatic inflammation in patients with an elevated PSA (&gt;4 ng/ml) were 0.10 ng/ml2 in biopsy naïve patients and 0.15 ng/ml2 in patients with a previous negative biopsy. PSA density rather than PSA, should be used to evaluate patients at risk of prostate cancer who may need additional testing or prostate biopsy. This readily available parameter can potentially identify men who do not have PCa but have an elevated PSA secondary to benign conditions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document