Gemcitabine (G) + nab-paclitaxel (nab-P) versus G in patients (pts) with advanced pancreatic cancer (PDAC) after FOLFIRINOX: A single center, retrospective review.
348 Background: The MPACT study showed that G + nab-P improved OS and PFS over G as first line therapy for metastatic PDAC. However, there is limited data studying this combination after FOLFIRINOX. Here, we compared G + nab-P to G in pts with advanced PDAC previously treated with FOLFIRINOX. Methods: From 3/2010 to 5/2014, we identified all pts treated with FOLFIRINOX for PDAC who later received G +/- nab-P at the MGH. PFS and OS were calculated from the start of G +/- nab-P and analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox-regression analyses. Results: 40 pts received G + nab-P and 36 pts received G. 29 of 36 pts in the G arm started G prior to the FDA approval of nab-P. Baseline characteristics were similar except 7 pts in the G + nab-P arm had locally advanced PDAC at start of G + nab-P while all other pts in both arms had metastatic PDAC. The median OS was 4.8 months (m) for G + nab-P vs 4.2m with G (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.42 – 1.13). The median PFS was 2.4m for G + nab-P vs 1.8m for G (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.44-1.12). The median OS did not change when the analysis was restricted to pts with metastatic PDAC – 4.8m vs 4.2m (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.41-1.14). The median PFS for pts with metastatic PDAC was also similar – 2.7m for G + nab-P vs 1.8m with G (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.42-1.12). Pts treated with G + nab-P received a median of 4m of treatment vs 2m for pts with G alone. The median relative dose of G was 50% of the maximum anticipated dose over the first 8 weeks for G + nab-P vs 66% with G. The median relative dose for nab-P was 50% of the maximum anticipated dose over the first 8 weeks. The most common reasons for discontinuing therapy were progression (62.5% vs 69%), patient decision (5% vs 11%), and infection (12.5% vs 0%). Conclusions: Although retrospective and limited by a small sample size, our data suggests that G + nab-P could be considered over G for advanced PDAC after FOLFIRINOX. However, G + nab-P affords marginal improvement in median OS and PFS, thus calling for the need to explore other agents in the second-line setting. Moreover, our experience suggests that the addition of nab-P led to a reduction in the achievable dose of G – raising the question of tolerability in combining further agents to G + nab-P in this setting.