Survival trends in patients diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer: A nationwide analysis.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 171-171
Author(s):  
John Thomas Helgstrand ◽  
Nina Klemann ◽  
Birgitte Grønkaer Toft ◽  
Ben Vainer ◽  
Klaus Brasso ◽  
...  

171 Background: The risk of prostate cancer (PCa)-death in men diagnosed with metastatic (M+) PCa is high. During the past decade, new life-prolonging therapies have been approved for the treatment of advanced PCa. Even though demonstrated in randomized clinical trials, the impact of these advancements on mortality of men with newly diagnosed M+ PCa has not been described in a nation-wide setting. Methods: In the Danish Prostate Cancer Registry (DaPCaR), all men diagnosed with M+ PCa in Denmark from 1995 to 2011 were identified. Patients were grouped according to the year of diagnosis; 1995-2000, 2001-2005 and 2006-2011. In a competing risk setting, the 5-year cumulative incidences of PCa, other-cause, and overall death were calculated. Multivariate cause-specific Cox analysis was performed. Results: A total of 1,892 (1995-2000), 2,329 (2001-2005), and 2,653 (2006-2011) men were included (total: 6,874). Patient characteristics at diagnosis showed essential differences as median age and median PSA decreased by 1.0 year (74.1 to 73.1) and 134 ng/mL (276 to 142), respectively, in the period studied. The 5-year PCa-specific mortality decreased by 17.0% from 72.8% (1995-2000) (95%CI: 70.8% – 74.8%) to 55.8% (2006-2011) (95%CI: 53.9% – 57.7%), p < 0.0001. The 5-year other-cause mortality increased by 5.7% from 11.4% (95%CI: 9.9% – 12.8%) to 17.1% (95%CI: 15.6 – 18.6), p < 0.0001. The risk of PCa-death decreased for patients diagnosed in 2000-2005; HR: 0.69 (95%CI 0.61-0.79) and for patients diagnosed in 2006-2011; HR: 0.53 (95%CI 0.47-0.61) compared to patients diagnosed in 1995-2000, when adjusting for age, PSA, and Gleason score (GS) in the statistical analysis. Conclusions: A significant reduction in 5-year PCa-specific mortality was observed in a nationwide cohort of patients diagnosed with M+ PCa since 1995. Changes in age and PSA at diagnosis suggest that lead-time introduced by increased PSA use may have affected the results. However, in multivariate analysis, a significant reduction in hazard of almost 50% was observed when adjusting for age, PSA, and GS. Only minor changes in other cause mortality were found, which suggests that the improvement to a large extend can be credited to improved management of men with advanced PCa.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 188-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan Ramos-Esquivel ◽  
Joao M. Baptista ◽  
Luis Corrales-Rodriguez ◽  
Ileana Gonzðlez ◽  
Melissa Juarez Villegal ◽  
...  

188 Background: Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) is the standard of treatment for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostatic cancer. Nevertheless, recent trials have suggested a role for chemotherapy in these patients. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of docetaxel-based chemotherapy in combination with ADT for patients with hormone-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer. Methods: Randomized clinical trials (RCT) were identified after systematic searching of electronic databases (MEDLINE, OVID and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), as well as ASCO conference proceedings from 2010 to 2015. We included only RCT comparing ADT versus the combination of ADT plus docetaxel-based chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer. A random-effect model was used to determine the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for the efficacy outcomes: overall survival (OS) and clinical progression-free survival (PFS), according to the inverse-variance method. Heterogeneity was measured using the Q and I2statistics. Results: Three RCT (n = 2 262), were included in our meta-analysis (E3805, GETUG-AFU 15 and the M1 subgroup from STAMPEDE Trial). Docetaxel-based chemotherapy plus ADT was associated with improved OS (HR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.60-0.90; p = 0.003). The heterogeneity of these trials was moderate (Tau2: 0.02; I2: 51%; p = 0.13). Clinical PFS was also significantly better in patients receiving docetaxel-based chemotherapy (HR: 0.67; 95% CI 0.55-0.82; p = 0.0001), with moderate between-study heterogeneity detected (Tau2: 0.01; I2: 42%; p = 0.19). Different subset of patients in these trials can explain the aforementioned heterogeneity. Regarding adverse drug reactions grade 3 or higher, neutropenia was reported in a range from 36% in the GETUG-AFU 15 Trial to 12% in the STAMPEDE trial and febrile neutropenia was reported from 6.1% in the E3805 Trial to 12% in the STAMPEDE Trial. Conclusions: The addition of docetaxel-based chemotherapy to ADT improves OS and clinical PFS. New trials are needed to determine which patients benefit the most from this intervention.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derya Tilki ◽  
Christopher P Evans

Oncologic outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) are poor, with overall survival in the range of 44 to 60 months. The treatment paradigm for newly diagnosed mPCa is changing. Previous retrospective studies reported a survival benefit for local treatment (radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy) in addition to androgen deprivation treatment in the setting of oligometastatic prostate cancer. Several randomized clinical trials are now evaluating integration of local treatment in the approach to mPCa. The aim of this review is to summarize the studies reporting local treatment in men with mPCa at diagnosis. This review contains 1 table and 27 references.  Key Words: cytoreductive prostatectomy, hormone-naive, local treatment, metastatic prostate cancer, oligometastatic, radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy, randomized


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15) ◽  
pp. 1521-1539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Morris ◽  
R. Bryan Rumble ◽  
Ethan Basch ◽  
Sebastien J. Hotte ◽  
Andrew Loblaw ◽  
...  

Purpose This clinical practice guideline addresses abiraterone or docetaxel with androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) for metastatic prostate cancer that has not been treated (or has been minimally treated) with testosterone-lowering agents. Methods Standard therapy for newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer has been ADT alone. Three studies have compared ADT alone with ADT and docetaxel, and two studies have compared ADT alone with ADT and abiraterone. Results Three prospective randomized studies (GETUG-AFU 15, STAMPEDE, and CHAARTED) examined overall survival (OS) with adding docetaxel to ADT. STAMPEDE and CHAARTED favored docetaxel (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.93; n = 2,962 and HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.89; n = 790, respectively). GETUG-AFU 15 was negative. LATITUDE and STAMPEDE examined the impact on OS of adding abiraterone (with prednisone or prednisolone) to ADT. LATITUDE and STAMPEDE favored abiraterone (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.76; n = 1,199 and HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.76; n = 1,917, respectively). Recommendations ADT plus docetaxel or abiraterone in newly diagnosed metastatic non-castrate prostate cancer offers a survival benefit as compared with ADT alone. The strongest evidence of benefit with docetaxel is in men with de novo high-volume (CHAARTED criteria) metastatic disease. Similar survival benefits are seen using abiraterone acetate in high-risk patients (LATITUDE criteria) and in the metastatic population in STAMPEDE. ADT plus abiraterone and ADT plus docetaxel have not been compared, and it is not known if some men benefit more from one regimen as opposed to the other. Fitness for chemotherapy, patient comorbidities, toxicity profiles, quality of life, drug availability, and cost should be considered in this decision. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/genitourinary-cancer-guidelines .


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron C. Zhang ◽  
Rehana Rasul ◽  
Anne Golden ◽  
Michael A. Feuerstein

Introduction: In the past decade, prostate cancer screening decreased, raising the concern of delays in diagnosis and leading to increase in new cases of metastatic prostate cancer. This study evaluated whether these changes may have impacted trends in metastatic prostate cancer incidence and survival. Methods: Metastatic prostate cancer diagnoses from 2008–2016 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 registries. Age-adjusted incidence rates per 100 000 were calculated by time periods and demographic variables. Two-year all-cause and prostate cancer-specific mortality were calculated for patients diagnosed from 2008–2014, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the impact of demographic and clinical variables. Results: Incidence rates of metastatic prostate cancer increased by 18% from 2008–2009 to 2014–2016 (Incidence rate ratio [IRR]=1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14–1.21). This trend was observed across multiple subgroups but was greatest in non-Hispanic Whites and patients living in counties 0–10% below poverty level. There was an overall decreased risk of all-cause and prostate cancer-specific mortality, but unmarried men and men living in counties >20% below poverty level showed statistically significant increased risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality. Conclusions: Non-Hispanic Whites and the wealthiest subgroups had the largest increase in incidence of metastatic prostate cancer since 2008. Despite trends of decreased risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality, we found certain populations experienced increases in mortality risk. Studies exploring the role of socioeconomic factors on screening and access to newer treatments are needed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Kappler ◽  
Michael A. Morgan ◽  
Philipp Ivanyi ◽  
Stefan J. Brunotte ◽  
Arnold Ganser ◽  
...  

AbstractTo date, only few data concerning the biologically active, free form of testosterone (FT) are available in metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) and the impact of FT on disease, therapy and outcome is largely unknown. We retrospectively studied the effect of docetaxel on FT and total testosterone (TT) serum levels in 67 mPC patients monitored between April 2008 and November 2020. FT and TT levels were measured before and weekly during therapy. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were prostate-specific antigen response and radiographic response (PSAR, RR), progression-free survival (PFS), FT/TT levels and safety. Median FT and TT serum levels were completely suppressed to below the detection limit during docetaxel treatment (FT: from 0.32 to < 0.18 pg/mL and TT: from 0.12 to < 0.05 ng/mL, respectively). Multivariate Cox regression analyses identified requirement of non-narcotics, PSAR, complete FT suppression and FT nadir values < 0.18 pg/mL as independent parameters for PFS. Prior androgen-receptor targeted therapy (ART), soft tissue metastasis and complete FT suppression were independent prognostic factors for OS. FT was not predictive for treatment outcome in mPC patients with a history of ART.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document