Prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) on overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and disease control rate (DCR) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) from the RECOURSE study.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 744-744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillem Argiles ◽  
Takayuki Yoshino ◽  
Atsushi Ohtsu ◽  
Robert J. Mayer ◽  
Robert Winkler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Ethnic Origin ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Immune Response To Cancer ◽  
Cox Analysis ◽  
Metastatic Sites ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Tumor Types

744 Background: Elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR) ratios may represent markers of a suboptimal host immune response to cancer and have been shown to correlate with prognosis in multiple tumor types. Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI also known as TAS-102) compared with placebo significantly improved OS (median: 7.1 vs.5.3 months, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.58;0.81], p < 0.0001), PFS, and DCR in the phase 3 RECOURSE study, conducted in patients with refractory mCRC. A post-hoc analysis was conducted to assess correlation between clinical outcomes and baseline NLR (in blood) in RECOURSE. Methods: A retrospective review on 782/800 patients, with available NLR, was performed on OS, PFS, and DCR in two subgroups of patients with low ( < 3) or high (≥ 3) NLR at baseline. Based on literature, the cutoff value of 3 was chosen as the number of patients was similar in each NLR subgroup. Between-group comparison was performed using a stratified Cox’s proportional hazard model for OS and PFS, and Fisher’s Exact test for DCR. Results: The median value of NLR at baseline was similar in each group, FTD/TPI (N = 519): 4.4 ± 6.3, placebo (N = 263): 4.7 ± 6.5. Almost 60% of patients in each group had high NLR. In the low NLR vs. high NLR subgroup, there were differences at baseline for ethnic origin (Asian: 45% vs.29%), ECOG PS 0 (69% vs. 49%), and number of metastatic sites ≥ 3 (32% vs. 46%). The median OS [95 % CI] was statistically significantly higher in the low vs. high NLR subgroup: 8.4 [7.8;9.5] vs. 5.3 [4.7;5.7] months, HR = 0.49, 95% CI [0.41;0.59], p < 0.0001. Irrespective of NLR, all patients benefited from FTD/TPI vs. placebo. The results of PFS and DCR were statistically significantly better in the low NLR vs. high NLR subgroup. The multivariate Cox analysis for OS with the interaction test between treatment groups and NLR showed that NLR is not a predictive factor (p = 0.15). Conclusions: In this retrospectively analyzed mCRC population, NLR was shown to be an independent prognostic factor. Further research is warranted to assess if NLR can be a stratification factor in mCRC clinical trials. Clinical trial information: NCT01607957.

Impact of overall severity of adverse events (AEs) on long-term outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts) treated with first line systemic chemotherapy: Findings from 3,971 pts in the ARCAD database.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3582-3582
Author(s):  
John Raymond Zalcberg ◽  
Qian Shi ◽  
Danielle Angela Ferraro ◽  
Jeffrey P. Meyers ◽  
Leonard Saltz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Female Gender ◽  
First Line ◽  
Cox Models ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Impact On Survival ◽  
Metastatic Sites ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Tumor Types ◽  
The Impact

3582 Background: The prognostic importance of the incidence, severity, type and duration of AEs pts experience during chemotherapy varies between tumor types, and the available evidence across the board is often conflicting. Here we investigated the impact of the overall severity of AEs among pts with mCRC receiving first-line oxaliplatin (Oxa)- and/or irinotecan(Iri)-based regimens. Methods: The overall severity of AE data (i.e., max grade (G) of all AEs) were available on 3,971 pts (median age 61; 60% male, 47% ECOG PS 1+; 57% 2+ metastatic sites) enrolled onto 6 1st-line randomized trials. Around 46%, 45%, and 9% of pts had received Oxa-, Iri-, and Oxa+Iri-based regimens, respectively. Pts receiving biologic agents were excluded. Stratified multivariate Cox models were used to assess the associations with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS); adjusted hazard ratios (HRadj) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported. Results: Pts who only received Oxa-based treatment reported the lowest rate of G3+ AEs (p < .0001) compared to pts treated with Iri- or Oxa+Iri-based regimens. Older age, female gender, and PS 1 or 2+ were associated with higher grade AEs (all p < .0001). Considering AEs experienced within 6w after randomization, 10% and 61% of pts experienced G4+ and G2-3 AEs, respectively. G3+ AEs were associated with a shorter OS for both pts receiving Oxa- (HRadj= 1.2, 95% CI, 1.1-1.3, padj < .0001) and Iri-based regimens (HRadj= 1.4, 95% CI, 1.2-1.5, padj < .0001). For the entire treatment course, 19% and 72% of pts experienced G4+ and G2-3 AEs, respectively. For Oxa-based regimens, pts with G3+ AEs had a longer OS (HRadj= 0.86, 95% CI, 0.78-0.94, padj = .0016), whereas G3+ AEs were associated with a shorter OS (HRadj= 1.2, 95% CI, 1.1-1.4, padj = .0004) for pts treated with Iri-based regimens. Similar patterns were seen for PFS. Conclusions: Pts who reported higher grade AEs during initial treatment (≤6w) have significantly worse outcome than those who do not. Further analyses with treatment exposure/detailed dose-AE profile and its impact on survival are warranted.

scholarly journals Treatments after Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with dMMR/MSI Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 406
Author(s):  
Quang Loc Bui ◽  
Léo Mas ◽  
Antoine Hollebecque ◽  
David Tougeron ◽  
Christelle de la Fouchardière ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Immune Checkpoints ◽  
Repair Deficiency ◽  
Improved Outcomes ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Tumor Types

Background: Several studies reported improved outcomes with conventional treatments (CT, i.e., chemotherapy ± targeted therapy) administered after immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICI) in certain tumor types. No data are available concerning patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) harboring mismatch repair deficiency/microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI). We aimed to assess the outcomes of dMMR/MSI mCRC pts receiving CT after ICI failure. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study investigating the outcomes of all dMMR/MSI mCRC pts who received post-ICI CT between 2015 and 2020. Results: 31 pts (male 61%, median age 56 years) were included. ICI was an anti-PD(L)1 monotherapy in 71% of pts, and 61% received >2 lines before post-ICI CT. The overall response rate and disease control rate were 13% and 45%, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival of 2.9 and 7.4 months, respectively. No association of the outcomes with either ICI efficacy or anti-angiogenic agents was observed. Prolonged PFS (range 16.1–21.3 months) was observed in 4 pts (13%). Conclusions: Although conducted on a limited number of patients, our results do not support an association of previous ICI treatment with an enhanced efficacy of CT in dMMR/MSI mCRC. However, prolonged disease control was observed in several cases, suggesting that some pts might derive an unexpected benefit from post-ICI treatments.

Darbepoetin Alfa for the Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia: Disease Progression and Survival Analysis From Four Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trials

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (28) ◽  
pp. 6941-6948 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Hedenus ◽  
Johan Vansteenkiste ◽  
Dusan Kotasek ◽  
Matthew Austin ◽  
Rafael G. Amado
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Darbepoetin Alfa ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Dose Finding ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Tumor Types

Purpose To determine the effect of darbepoetin alfa (DA) on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). Patients and Methods Two 16-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III studies of weekly DA in anemic patients with lung cancer (n = 314) or lymphoproliferative malignancies (LPMs; n = 344) undergoing chemotherapy were analyzed with prospectively defined long-term PFS and OS end points. Short-term effects of DA on PFS and OS were analyzed by including two additional 16-week dose-finding, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in anemic patients with multiple tumor types (n = 405) and LPMs (n = 66). Results Median follow-up is 15.8 months (lung cancer) and 32.6 months (LPM). Median duration of PFS was comparable between DA and placebo: 5.1 months (95% CI, 4.1 to 6.9 months) versus 4.4 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 5.3 months) for lung cancer and 14.2 months (95% CI, 12.2 to 17.5 months) versus 15.9 months (95% CI, 13.1 to 19.0 months) for LPMs. The estimated hazard ratio (HR) of death related to DA use for lung cancer was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.59 to 1.01) and 1.26 (95% CI, 0.92 to 1.71) for LPMs. In the pooled analyses of all four studies (n = 1,129), no differences in PFS or OS were observed between DA and placebo (HR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.07; and HR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.16, respectively). Conclusion Treatment with DA does not seem to influence PFS or OS in patients with CIA. Prospective, randomized clinical trials will provide additional insights into the effects of DA on PFS and OS in specific tumor types.

Assessment of safety with abbreviated, weight-based bevacizumab infusions in a variety of solid tumors

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 19674-19674
Author(s):  
J. W. Hart ◽  
J. R. Murillo ◽  
M. S. Oholendt ◽  
H. A. Preti
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Central Nervous System Involvement ◽  
Minimal Risk ◽  
Phase I Clinical Trials ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Humanized Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Infusion Schedule ◽  
Tumor Types

19674 Background: Bevacizumab (BEV), a humanized monoclonal antibody that neutralizes vascular endothelial growth factor, has shown improved responses in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) while displaying activity in a variety of other solid tumors. Phase I clinical trials with BEV utilized standard 90- 60-, and 30-minute infusions for 1st, 2nd, and subsequent infusions, as tolerated; initial doses reported less than 3% incidence of infusion-related adverse events (AEs), with 0.2% grade III/IV reactions. Recommended infusion rates for BEV remain unchanged despite the minimal risk of infusion-related AEs. Saltz and colleagues recently reported novel data supporting the safety and tolerability of abbreviated BEV infusions in CRC patients within a single institution. Our objective was to replicate previously reported safety profiles while utilizing abbreviated infusions of BEV in multiple tumor types. Methods: An internal retrospective analysis revealing minimal infusion AEs with standard infusions facilitated this current study. BEV- naïve and previously-treated patients were consented for the study utilizing the following weight-based infusion times: 5, 10, and 15 mg/kg doses over 10, 20, or 30 minutes, respectively, for all doses. Patients were assessed throughout and immediately following the infusion for any infusion-related AE. Results: A variety of tumor types are represented in 26 enrolled patients including CRC, NSCLC, breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and brain. Central nervous system involvement accounted for 35% of patients [primary brain (23%) and metastatic disease (12%)]. A considerable number of patients (19%) were treated with single-agent BEV. Nine BEV-naïve patients were initiated on abbreviated infusions, while 16 were converted from the standard infusion schedule. Seventy-seven total doses utilizing the abbreviated infusions failed to produce infusion-related AEs. Conclusion: These results support previous data affirming the safety and tolerability of abbreviated BEV infusions in CRC patients, while also reporting promising safety of abbreviated infusions in a variety of additionally unreported solid tumors types. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Exploratory analysis of the effect of FTD/TPI in patients treated in RECOURSE by prognostic factors.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 677-677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josep Tabernero ◽  
Alberto F. Sobrero ◽  
Christophe Borg ◽  
Atsushi Ohtsu ◽  
Robert J. Mayer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Metastasis ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Good Prognosis ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Kras Status ◽  
Indolent Disease ◽  
Metastatic Sites ◽  
Ecog Ps

677 Background: The Phase III RECOURSE trial, in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory to standard therapies, demonstrated that trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) significantly extended overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo in all subgroups, regardless of age, geographical origin, or KRAS status, with acceptable safety. Literature reports have shown optimal benefit for pts with low tumor burden (< 3 metastatic sites), indolent disease (≥ 18 mo since diagnosis of first metastasis), ECOG PS 0-1, and no liver metastasis when treated in late line mCRC. Methods: This exploratory post hoc analysis of RECOURSE (all ECOG 0-1) compared pts on FTD/TPI or placebo with good prognostic characteristics (GPC; low tumor burden and indolent disease) and poor prognostic characteristics (PPC; high tumor burden and/or aggressive disease). These subgroups were then analyzed by liver metastasis at baseline, ECOG PS, KRAS status and age. Results: Baseline characteristics were generally similar between the two groups. GPC placebo pts performed better than the PPC placebo pts, but worse than the GPC pts treated with FTD/TPI. GPC pts treated with FTD/TPI showed median OS of 9.3 mo versus 5.3 mo in PPC pts (HR 0.46; 95% CI: 0.37, 0.57; p < 0.0001); there was a similar effect for PFS. GPC pts had significantly better mOS and mPFS regardless of age (≥ 65 vs. < 65 y), ECOG PS (0–1), KRAS status (mutant vs. wildtype), and liver metastasis (y/n). No liver metastasis was the best prognostic factor: mOS in such pts treated with FTD/TPI was 16.4 mo and 7.6 mo in the GPC (n = 97) and PPC (n = 35) groups, respectively (HR 0.42; 95% CI: 0.24, 0.74; p < 0.0019); there was a similar effect for PFS. Pts with ECOG PS 0 at baseline remained PS 0-1 at discontinuation in 96% of the GPC group. Conclusions: Low tumor burden and indolent disease indicate good prognosis in late line mCRC. Pts with no liver metastasis have the best prognosis and are likely to have longer OS. GPCs might explain the percentage of long-term responders on FTD/TPI in RECOURSE. Maintenance of ECOG PS 0–1 during treatment is crucial in the continuum of care, allowing pts to benefit from further treatment options. Clinical trial information: NCT01607957.

Treatment outcome for metastatic papillary and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients treated with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) sunitinib and sorafenib

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5037-5037 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Plantade ◽  
T. Choueiri ◽  
B. Escudier ◽  
B. Rini ◽  
S. Negrier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Clear Cell Rcc ◽  
Tki Treatment

5037 Background: Sunitinib (SUNI) and sorafenib (SORAF) are novel TKIs that have shown significant clinical activity in metastatic clear-cell RCC. Papillary (PAP) and chromophobe (CHRM) histologies represent the majority non-clear-cell RCC. The activity of SUNI and SORAF in non-clear cell histologies has not been evaluated. Methods: Clinical features at study entry and treatment outcomes were evaluated in all patients (pts) with metastatic PAP and CHRM RCC who received either SUNI or SORAF as their initial TKI treatment at one of five different cancer centers in France and USA between 2002 and 2006. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the collected data. Overall Response rate (ORR) was investigator-assessed per RECIST criteria. Fisher’s exact test was used for categorical variables and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival (Overall Survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS)). Results: Median age for the 53 patients was 59 years and 64% were male. The number of patients with PAP and CHRM histologies were 41 (77%) and 12 (23%), respectively. Nephrectomy was performed in 87% of patients and 33/53 (62%) of pts were previously treated (26/33, 79%, with cytokines). ORR, PFS and OS for the entire cohort were 10%, 8.9 months (m) and 12.2 m, respectively. Twenty (38%) and 33 (62%) pts were treated with SUNI and SORAF, respectively. 3/12 (25%) of CHRM pts had an ORR vs. 2/41(4.8%) with PAP histology (P=0.07). PFS for CHRM pts was 9.3 m compared to 6.6 m for PAP pts (p=0.07). OS was not different across histologies and type of TKI received. SUNI treated pts had an ORR of 15% and PFS of 11.9 m compared to 6% (p=0.3) and 5.5 m for SORAF pts (p=0.002), respectively. Other factors found to be associated with shorter PFS include ECOG PS >0 (p=0.03) and hemoglobin< normal (p=0.02). Conclusions: TKI may have activity in metastatic CHRM RCC, similar to what is seen in clear-cell histology. Minimal activity however is noted in PAP RCC, justifying continued investigations of novel agents in this histology. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

The effect of cytoreductive radiofrequency ablation (cRFA) on results of therapy with sunitinib or interferon-alpha (IFN) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients with a small primary tumor.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 414-414
Author(s):  
Ilya Tsimafeyeu ◽  
Bin Chung ◽  
Janie S. Zart ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Good Prognosis ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Small Primary ◽  
Metastatic Sites ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Metastatic Rcc

414 Background: At least 5% of the patients (pts) with small primary RCC initially present with metastasis. The main objective of this trial was to evaluate the role of cRFA in metastatic RCC pts with small primary tumor treated with immuno- or targeted therapy. Methods: Three parallel single-arm prospective studies were conducted. Eligibility criteria were nearly identical for all trials, and included histopathologically confirmed RCC; metastatic measurable disease; size of primary tumor ≤5 cm; good prognosis by MSKCC model; no previous therapy. Study 1: Pts were treated with percutaneous cRFA under CT guide and following IFN, 9 MIU, s.c, 3 tiw. Study 2: Pts received cRFA and following sunitinib in repeated 6-week cycles of 50 mg/day for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks off. Study 3: Pts with unresected primary RCC received sunitinib alone. The primary endpoint was a 33% increase in progression-free survival (PFS) over expected 5 months in study 1 and over expected 11 months in studies 2-3 (power 80%; significance .05). Sample size was 38 pts for each study. Results: Studies were comparable by baseline patient characteristics (age, gender, histology, ECOG PS, number of metastatic sites, primary tumor size). Efficacy data for 114 evaluable pts showed an objective response rate (ORR) of 8% (95% CI 4.5, 10.5) for study 1, 28.9% (95% CI 15.2, 34) for study 2, and 31.6% (95% CI 20.3, 38.9) for study 3; median PFS of 9.1 (95% CI 6.9, 10.2), 13.4 (95% CI 9.8, 14), and 12.7 (95% CI 11.3, 13.5) months for studies 1-3, respectively. ORR and PFS were significantly higher in sunitinib trials comparing with study 1 (P<.01 all differences); no differences were found between studies 2 and 3 (ORR, P=.1; PFS, P=.6). The study 1 met its primary end point, showing that PFS was significantly increased. There were no unexpected toxicities of medical treatment and complications of cRFA. Conclusions: cRFA is a safe and effective approach for select patients with metastatic RCC treated with immunotherapy. Cytoreductive ablative technique did not improve PFS in pts treated with sunitinib. Sunitinib was effective in metastatic RCC pts with unresected small primary tumor.

Phase (Ph) I/II study of investigational Aurora A kinase (AAK) inhibitor MLN8237 (alisertib): Updated ph II results in patients (pts) with small cell lung cancer (SCLC), non-SCLC (NSCLC), breast cancer (BrC), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), and gastroesophageal cancer (GE).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 605-605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bohuslav Melichar ◽  
Antoine Adenis ◽  
Libor Havel ◽  
Albert C. Lockhart ◽  
Jaafar Bennouna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Aurora A Kinase ◽  
Stage Design ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Tumor Types

605 Background: MLN8237 is an investigational oral AAK inhibitor being evaluated in pts with hematologic (Ph III) and non-hematologic malignancies. We report here Ph II results from a, 5-arm study of single agent MLN8237 in pts with advanced, predominantly refractory, solid tumors (NCT01045421; closed for enrolment). Methods: Pts ≥18 years with relapsed/refractory disease measurable by RECIST, ECOG PS 0–1, and ≤2 prior (≤4 for BrC pts) cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens were enrolled. Pts with stable brain metastases were eligible. Pts were treated at the recommended Ph II dose; 50 mg BID for 7 d in 21-d cycles. For each cohort, a Simon’s 2-stage design was employed for Ph II, with ≥2 responses required in the first 20 response-evaluable pts to proceed to stage 2. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1; safety and progression-free survival (PFS) were key secondary endpoints. Results: As of Dec 2012, 47 SCLC, 23 NSCLC, 49 BrC, 45 HNSCC and 47 GE pts in Ph II were response-evaluable (median age, 61 yrs [range 30–88]). NSCLC did not proceed to stage 2. ORR was 9%, 6%, and 4% in HNSCC, GE, and NSCLC pts, respectively; median PFS was 2.7, 1.5 and 3.1 months. BrC and SCLC data are shown in the Table. 92% of pts had a drug-related adverse event (DRAE). 57% of pts had Gr ≥3 DRAEs; including neutropenia (38%), anemia (10%), stomatitis (8%), and thrombocytopenia (6%). 22 pts died during the study; none were study-drug related. Conclusions: Single-agent activity of MLN8237 was evaluated across a range of solid tumors with a manageable toxicity profile. Encouraging Ph2 data in BrC and SCLC pts suggest that MLN8237 warrants further evaluation in these tumor types. Clinical trial information: NCT01045421. [Table: see text]

Systemic chemo (CTX) plus surgery and intraperitoneal (IP) CTX for patients (pts) with gastric cancer (GC) and peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 117-117
Author(s):  
Megan Greally ◽  
Vivian E. Strong ◽  
Sam S. Yoon ◽  
Joanne F. Chou ◽  
Marinela Capanu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clin Oncol ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
R1 Resection ◽  
Post Surgery ◽  
French Study ◽  
Ecog Ps

117 Background: The role of IP CTX in pts with GC and PC is unclear. The PHOENIX-GC phase III study (J Clin Oncol 2018;35:1922) did not show overall survival (OS) benefit for IP CTX plus systemic CTX while a retrospective French study suggested benefit for IP CTX and cytoreductive surgery (J Clin Oncol 36:8 [abstr]). Prolonged survival may be possible in pts with chemosensitive disease (dz). Methods: We reviewed GC pts diagnosed with PC (+ve cytology and/or gross dz) at diagnostic laparoscopy (DL). We identified pts treated with gastrectomy and IP floxuridine 1,000mg/ m2/leucovorin 240 mg/m2 ×3d q14d and pts who had CTX alone. Pts with visible dz on imaging were excluded. Progression-free survival (PFS) and OS were calculated from surgery date and estimated using Kaplan-Methods in surgery + IP CTX pts. Pt characteristics were compared using Fisher’s exact test and Wilcoxon Rank-Sum tests. Results: From 2000-2017, 18 pts had surgery + IP CTX (IP); 45 pts received CTX alone. Median age was 50 in IP pts and 65 in CTX only pts (p = 0.002); 94% of IP pts were ECOG PS 0/1 vs. 78% in CTX only pts (p = 0.16). 56% and 67% of pts had gross dz at DL in IP and CTX only pts respectively; remaining pts had +ve cytology only. IP pts received CTX (72% 5-FU/platinum based) for a median 3.3 months before repeat DL. 14/18 pts cleared dz; four pts with residual dz (1 +ve cytology only) had gross dz at baseline. Fourteen pts had R0 resection; 83% of tumors were ypT3-4N+. 4 pts had R1 resection; three had residual gross PC at DL. Pts received IP CTX for a median of 1 month post surgery. Median PFS and OS were 12.4 and 23 months respectively in surgery + IP CTX pts. While there was no difference in PFS in pts with -ve vs. persistently +ve cytology at repeat DL following CTX (15.5 vs. 4.7 months, p = 0.3), median OS was improved in pts who cleared cytology (29 vs. 8 months, p = 0.01). Median PFS and OS were 7 and 13.5 months respectively in CTX only pts. Conclusions: Surgery and IP CTX may have a role in highly select pts with GC and +ve cytology or small-volume gross dz. While survival was encouraging, no pt had OS > 5 years. Surgery and IP CTX may be considered in pts who have a -ve repeat DL after initial CTX. Survival in CTX only pts is comparable with stage IV pts enrolled on clinical trials.

scholarly journals Agnostic Evaluation of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab Association: A Metanalysis.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Marchetti ◽  
Andrea Botticelli ◽  
Antonio Paolo Ascierto ◽  
Giuseppe Curigliano ◽  
Diana Giannarelli
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Combination Strategy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Single Agent Therapy ◽  
Tumor Types

Abstract Background. Ipilimumab and Nivolumab, targeting the molecules CTLA-4, PD-1, respectively, have shown efficacy against several types of cancer. Despite these results, only a small percentage of patients maintain a long-lasting effect. Even Ipilimumab, in combination with nivolumab, has demonstrated a significant clinical benefit in multiple tumor types. However, no trial has been designed with the primary endpoint to compare the efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab combined, compared to nivolumab alone. Hence, the added value of ipilimumab in the combination has not clearly been established yet. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the superiority of the combination strategy compared to single agent therapy.Materials and methods. We performed a meta-analysis of Phase I-II-III Clinical Trials, published from 2010 up to 2020, in which the combination of ipilimumab plus nivolumab was compared to nivolumab alone. We extracted ORR, OS and PFS HR on the basis of treatment from the subgroup analysis of each trial. Results. A total of 8 trials were included in the present meta-analysis. Overall, 1313 patients were treated with the nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination compared to 1110 patients treated with nivolumab alone. All trials reported the Objective response rate (ORR) (Table 2), no heterogeneity was found and the pooled Odds Ratio (Figure 1) was highly in favor of the nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination with respect to nivolumab alone (1.683; 95% CI: 1.407-2.012; P<0.0001). Three studies were considered for Progression free survival (PFS) analysis (Table 3), no heterogeneity was found and the pooled Hazard Ratio (Figure 2) favored the combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab with respect to nivolumab alone (0.807; 95% CI: 0.719-0.907; P<0.0001). The Overall survival (OS) endpoint was considered only in 2 trials (Table 4), no heterogeneity was found and the pooled HR (Figure 3) favored, also in this case, the combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab with respect to nivolumab alone (0.87; 95% CI: 0.763-0.997; P=0.045).Conclusions. The combination of ipilimumab plus nivolumab seems to be superior to nivolumab alone in cancer patients, regardless of histology.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document