Trial in progress: A multicenter phase II study of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced small bowel adenocarcinomas.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS535-TPS535
Author(s):  
Katrina Pedersen ◽  
Michael J. Overman ◽  
Nathan R. Foster ◽  
Sunnie S. Kim ◽  
Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Small Bowel ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Bowel Function ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
Colon Cancers

TPS535 Background: Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare malignancy, possibly because of the high rate of immunosurveillance in baseline small bowel function, and is frequently diagnosed in late stages. Due to these factors, there is no consistent standard of care for metastatic disease beyond first-line where several prospective studies have confirmed activity of FOLFOX/CAPOX. Historically, second-line treatment of SBA has been extrapolated from colon/gastric cancer. Recent studies suggest that SBA has a distinct genomic profile, including higher incidence of microsatellite instability, compared to gastric and colon cancers. Additionally, the tumor microenvironment reflects a greater degree of PD-L1 expression and infiltration by lymphocytes. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have not previously been tested in SBA unselected for MSI status. Methods: The study is a phase 2, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial of pembrolizumab (200 mg IV every 3 weeks) for patients with unresectable or metastatic SBA refractory to first-line chemotherapy. Forty patients with any tumor mismatch repair status will be enrolled at 8 US sites as part of the ACCRU network and International Rare Cancer Initiative (IRCI) with a primary objective to assess the confirmed response rate (H0 p < 10%, HA: p > 30%) to pembrolizumab. Secondary endpoints include PFS, OS, and adverse events. Correlative aims include assessing blood and tissue biomarkers (i.e. PD-L1, MSI-H/MSS status, cfDNA, mutation burden, etc.) for association with clinical benefit. An interim analysis will be performed to assess efficacy after 18 patients become evaluable. The study is open with 16 patients enrolled at time of submission. Clinical trial information: NCT02949219.

scholarly journals CTIM-15. PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF A PHASE II STUDY OF NIVOLUMAB WITH HYPOFRACTIONATED RE-RADIATION AND BEVACIZUMAB FOR RECURRENT MGMT METHYLATED GLIOBLASTOMA

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii36-ii36
Author(s):  
Christian Grommes ◽  
Minesh Mehta ◽  
Alexandra Miller ◽  
Mariza Daras ◽  
Anna Piotrowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Disease Recurrence ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Significant Finding ◽  
Trial Treatment

Abstract Standard of standard of care for glioblastoma (GBM) remains unsatisfactory with universal disease recurrence and a median survival of &lt; 2 years. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have shown limited single-agent activity in GBM thus far. GBMs with methylated MGMT promoter and no baseline corticosteroid dependence may be most likely to derive benefit from ICI. The combination of ICIs with radiation has shown promising activity in other human cancers. Combining nivolumab and re-RT/bevacizumab in GBM may augment ICI activity through immunogenic effects of radiation, may reduce the risk of radiation necrosis by addition of bevacizumab at the time of radiation, and may reduce the need for corticosteroids. In this multicenter phase II study, nivolumab is combined with re-irradiation and optional concurrent bevacizumab followed by nivolumab in patients with first recurrence of IDH-wildtype and MGMT methylated glioblastoma. Primary objective is to improve 1-year overall survival (OS) from 33 (based on EORTC 26101) to 50%. Nine-three patients are required to show a significant finding with an α of 0.05 and 81% power. Thirteen of 93 patient (14%) have been enrolled with a median age of 59 (range 42–71) with a median KPS of 90 (range 70–90). Treatment has been tolerated well without any grade ≥ 4 toxicities and only one grade 3 (amylase elevation). The most common adverse events were pruritus and hypothyroidism in 3/13 (23%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) is 7 months with a 6months PFS of 55.6%. The 12months OS is 66.7%. Patients with recurrent MGMT methylated, IDH-wildtype glioblastoma tolerate trial treatment with acceptable toxicities. Clinical efficacy in the first patients enrolled shows a promising effect. Enrollment is ongoing.

scholarly journals Front Line Applications and Future Directions of Immunotherapy in Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 506
Author(s):  
Selina K. Wong ◽  
Wade T. Iams
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Limited Stage ◽  
Extensive Stage

After being stagnant for decades, there has finally been a paradigm shift in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) with the emergence and application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Multiple trials of first-line ICI-chemotherapy combinations have demonstrated survival benefit compared to chemotherapy alone in patients with extensive-stage SCLC, establishing this as the new standard of care. ICIs are now being applied in the potentially curative limited-stage setting, actively being investigated as concurrent treatment with chemoradiation and as adjuvant treatment following completion of chemoradiation. This review highlights the evidence behind the practice-changing addition of ICIs in the first-line setting of extensive-stage SCLC, the potentially practice-changing immunotherapy trials that are currently underway in the limited-stage setting, and alternate immunotherapeutic strategies being studied in the treatment of SCLC.

A phase II study of modified FOLFOX as first-line chemotherapy in advanced small bowel adenocarcinoma

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 561-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao Jun Xiang ◽  
Ya Wen Liu ◽  
Ling Zhang ◽  
Feng Qiu ◽  
Feng Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Small Bowel ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

Microsatellite Instability as a Predictor of Outcomes in Colorectal Cancer in the Era of Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Csongor György Lengyel
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Microsatellite Instability ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Dna Mismatch ◽  
Dominant Component ◽  
Colon Cancers

: The microsatellite instable phenotype resulting from errors in DNA mismatch repair proteins accounts for as far as 15 to 20% of non-hereditary colon cancers but is scarce in rectal cancer. It has been shown that the increased existence of tumor-specific neoantigens in hypermutated tumors is correlated with higher tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and overexpression of immune checkpoint receptors and ligands, mainly PD-1 and PD-L1. In particular, the data gained up to now gives evidence that neoantigen recognition constitutes a dominant component in the course of immunotherapies. This review's primary objective is to describe current approvals and summarize present knowledge about the outcomes of immuno-oncology treatment of microsatellite instable colorectal cancer (CRC). The secondary objective is to give a narrative report about testing methodologies, prognostics, and the predictive value of microsatellite instability. For this purpose, a literature review was performed, focusing on published clinical trial results, ongoing clinical trials and timelines, testing methods, and prognostic and predictive value of MSI. Following four recent FDA approvals of immunotherapy of MSI-high CRC, further work should be warranted by pathology societies towards standardization and rising concordance and reproducibility across the IHC/MSI testing landscape in order to facilitate professionals to offer better survival options for patients with CRC.

Pharmacogenetic dosing by UGT1A1 genotype as first-line therapy for advanced small-bowel adenocarcinoma: A North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) trial.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 314-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert R. McWilliams ◽  
Michelle R. Mahoney ◽  
Benjamin T. Marchello ◽  
Aminah Jatoi ◽  
Keith D. Krewer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Small Bowel ◽  
Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
Prospective Data ◽  
North Central ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Dosing Strategy ◽  
Prolonged Response ◽  
Ugt1a1 Genotype

314 Background: Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SB-ACA) is rare, having little prospective data guiding management. A prior phase I study evaluated UGT1A1 genotype specific dosing of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and capecitabine. Our prospective, multicenter clinical trial assessing tumor response in pts having metastatic SB-ACA, used a similar dosing strategy. Methods: Genotypes were determined via central lab. Previously untreated pts were dosed by UGT1A1*28 genotypes 6/6, 6/7, and 7/7 receiving 100/85/85 mg/m2 oxaliplatin d1, 150/150/75 mg/m2 irinotecan d1, and 1600/400/200 mg/m2 capecitabine (BID) d2-15 of 21 days. The study design was such that 1 confirmed response in 16 pts expanded enrollment to 33 pts, with 7 required for demonstrating efficacy. Results: 28 pts (13-6/6, 10-6/7, 5-7/7) have been enrolled [75% male, mean age 62.5 (range 41-77)]. Location of primary included: duodenum (63%), jejunum (26%), and ileum (7%), with pts having >1 metastatic site (abdominal-41%, bone-7%, liver-56%, lung-30%, nodal-52%, subcutaneous-4%, other-19%). Gr 3+ treatment related toxicity was not significantly different by genotype (50%-6/6, 44%-6/7, 20%-7/7, p=0.48) and included (pts): diarrhea(5), vomiting(5), leukopenia(5), neutropenia(7), and nausea(6). 57% (13 of 23) pts achieved responses during therapy, with a confirmed response rate of 39% (95% CI 0-58%). 18 have died, with a median follow-up of 8.3 mos (range 0-43). Conclusions: UGT1A1 genotype directed dosing with oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and capecitabine appears to result in prolonged response in this population. Larger studies are needed to determine comparability to CapeOx alone or if response/toxicity differs among genotypes. Supported by NIH Grant CA25224, Sanofi-Aventis, and Pfizer. [Table: see text]

Determination of the recommended phase II dose of birinapant in combination with pembrolizumab: Results from the dose-escalation phase of BPT-201.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2506-2506
Author(s):  
Russell J. Schilder ◽  
Mark Albertella ◽  
James Fredric Strauss ◽  
Malin Sydvander ◽  
Dung T. Le ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Synergistic Effects ◽  
Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Recist 1.1 ◽  
Suitable Standard ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose

2506 Background: Birinapant is a bivalent SMAC mimetic targeting cIAP1. Synergistic effects of combining birinapant with immune checkpoint inhibitors have been demonstrated in preclinical models. Based on these observations, a clinical trial with birinapant and pembrolizumab was initiated (NCT02587962). Methods: Patients ≥18 years with advanced solid tumors without further suitable standard therapeutic options were eligible for inclusion. Birinapant (5.6-22 mg/m2) was administered IV on day 1 and 8 in addition to pembrolizumab 200 mg on day 1 in a 21-day cycle until disease progression using standard 3+3 dose-escalation. The primary objective was to determine the safety and tolerability of the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of birinapant in combination with pembrolizumab. Secondary and exploratory objectives included antitumor activity assessed by RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST, pharmacokinetics and assessment of biomarkers including serum cytokines, cIAP1, PD-L1 expression and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. Results: Nineteen patients were enrolled at 4 dose levels of 5.6 (n = 3), 11 (n = 3), 17 (n = 6) and 22 (n = 7) mg/m2. Most common tumors were pancreatic (n = 5), colorectal (n = 4), ovarian (n = 3) and sarcoma (n = 3). Median prior therapies were 4 (0-12). The most common AE related to any of the study drugs was rash occurring in 3 patients. Ten patients had 17 SAE's of which only one (stomatitis) was judged related to birinapant. Increased ALT/AST (G3/G2) leading to missed day 8 dose constituted a DLT at 22 mg/m2. Grade 2 lipase increases were seen in 2 patients. No cases of Bell’s palsy were detected. ORR by RECIST 1.1 was 5.6% (n = 1) in 18 evaluable patients. The responding patient had microsatellite stable colorectal carcinoma (MSS-CRC)) and remains on therapy 13+ months after first dose. By iRECIST, ORR was 11.1%. CBR (PR+SD) by RECIST was 22.2%. The exposure to birinapant generally increased with dose. The RP2D was determined to be 22 mg/m2. Conclusions: Birinapant and pembrolizumab is a safe and tolerable combination that has shown encouraging signals of efficacy. A phase 2 study evaluating efficacy of this combination in MSS-CRC is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02587962.

Assessment of the Fanconi anemia repair pathway as a predictor of clinical activity of pembrolizumab (PEM).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2555-2555
Author(s):  
Miguel Angel Villalona-Calero ◽  
John Paul Diaz ◽  
Zuanel Diaz ◽  
Wenrui Duan ◽  
Eric Douglas Schroeder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fanconi Anemia ◽  
Solid Tumor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Functional Assay ◽  
Phase 2 Trial

2555 Background: Given the activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in mismatch repair deficient tumors, we evaluated if homologous recombination repair deficiency associates with solid tumor response to ICI. Methods: We conducted a phase 2 trial (NCT03274661) of PEM in metastatic solid tumor patients progressing on standard of care and for whom PEM had no FDA approved indication. We evaluated a triple stain (FANCD2foci/DAPI/Ki67) immunofluorescence functional assay of the Fanconi Anemia pathway (FATSI) in treated patients’ archived tumors as a correlative biomarker. Patients with microsatellite unstable tumors were not eligible. The primary objective was objective response rate (iORR, CR+PR) by Immune Response Criteria, with the hypothesis that patients with FATSI negative tumors will have better clinical outcome. Secondary objectives were progression free survival (PFS), 6 months PFS and survival. PEM was given every 3 weeks and computed tomography scans were performed every 6 weeks. We utilized a two-stage phase II trial design to detect an iORR ≥ 20% in the whole population tested vs. the null hypothesis that the true iORR ≤5%. If ≥ 2 of the first 20 evaluable patients had an objective response the trial proceeded to full accrual of 39 evaluable patients. Outcomes were evaluated according to FATSI staining. Results: 42 patients (40 evaluable) (35F,7M; median age 62[36-83]) enrolled. Median # of prior regimens was 2[1-7]. Primary Dx included ovarian/fallopian (13), endometrial (10), colorectal (3), cervix (2), pancreatic(2), vaginal (2) and 1 each of various others. No unexpected toxicities occurred. Response evaluation showed 2 CR, 5 PR, 11 SD, 22 PD and 2 NE (iORR 18%). FATSI tumor analyses results are available in 34 patients; 25 FATSI positive, 9 negative. 2 PR, 8 SD, 14 PD, 1 NE occurred among the FATSI (+) (iORR 8%) and 2 CR, 2 PR, 2 SD, 3 PD among the FATSI (-) patients (iORR 44%). mPFS and 6m-PFS were 54 days and 12% (3/25) in FATSI (+), versus 248 days and 56% (5/9) in FATSI (-) patients; p = 0.017. Conclusions: PEM has meaningful antitumor activity in non MSI-high malignancies with no current FDA approved indications. Evaluation of FATSI as a biomarker supports a biomarker selected population approach. Clinical trial information: NCT03274661.

Tislelizumab, an investigational anti-PD-1 antibody, combined with chemotherapy as first-line treatment for lung cancer in Chinese patients.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14067-e14067 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Wang ◽  
Jun Zhao ◽  
Zhijie Wang ◽  
Zhiyong Ma ◽  
Jiuwei Cui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Advanced Lung Cancer ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Cell Clearance ◽  
First Line Treatment

e14067 Background: Tislelizumab, an investigational anti-PD-1 antibody, was engineered to minimize binding to FcγR on macrophages in order to abrogate antibody-dependent phagocytosis, a mechanism of T-cell clearance and potential resistance to anti-PD-1 therapy. Previous reports showed tislelizumab was generally well tolerated and had antitumor activity in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors; 200 mg IV Q3W was established as the RP2D. Methods: This phase 2 clinical trial (NCT03432598) assessed tislelizumab (200 mg Q3W) with platinum (plt)-based chemotherapy (Q3W) as first-line treatment for Chinese pts with advanced lung cancer. All pts received tislelizumab + plt doublet (4–6 cycles) until disease progression. Nonsquamous (nsq) NSCLC pts received pemetrexed (PMX) + plt (4 cycles) followed by PMX maintenance; squamous (sq) NSCLC pts received A) paclitaxel (PXL) + plt or B) gemcitabine + plt; SCLC pts received etoposide + plt. Tumor response (RECIST v1.1) and safety/tolerability were evaluated. PD-L1 expression was retrospectively assessed with the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) assay. Results: As of 15 Oct 2018, 54 pts (median age 61 yr; 74% male; 72% current/former smokers; 31% with ≥10% PD-L1 expression on tumor cells) received tislelizumab; 24 pts remain on treatment. Confirmed PR was observed in 36 pts and most occurred within the first 2 assessments. Other efficacy estimates (eg, PFS) are maturing. Grade ≥3 AEs occurring in > 15% of pts were decreased neutrophil counts (n = 25) and anemia (n = 9); immune-related AEs occurring in ≥2 pts were decreased triiodothyronine, hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, and pyrexia (n = 2 each). One sq-NSCLC pt ( A) experienced fatal myocarditis/myositis after 1 cycle; other AEs resolved with tislelizumab interruption (n = 30), discontinuation (n = 4), or other appropriate treatment. Conclusions: Tislelizumab in combination with standard of care plt-based chemotherapy was generally well tolerated and demonstrated antitumor activity. Clinical trial information: NCT03432598. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals CDK12-Mutated Prostate Cancer: Clinical Outcomes With Standard Therapies and Immune Checkpoint Blockade

2020 ◽  
pp. 382-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael T. Schweizer ◽  
Gavin Ha ◽  
Roman Gulati ◽  
Landon C. Brown ◽  
Rana R. McKay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Gleason Grade ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
Grade Group ◽  
Distinct Subgroup

PURPOSE Translational studies have shown that CDK12 mutations may delineate an immunoresponsive subgroup of prostate cancer, characterized by high neo-antigen burden. Given that these mutations may define a clinically distinct subgroup, we sought to describe outcomes to standard drugs and checkpoint inhibitors (CPI). PATIENTS AND METHODS Clinical data from consecutive patients with CDK12 mutations were retrospectively collected from 7 centers. Several clinical-grade sequencing assays were used to assess CDK12 status. Descriptive statistics included PSA50 response rate (≥ 50% decline in prostate-specific antigen from baseline) and clinical/radiographic progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS Of 52 patients with CDK12-mutated prostate cancer, 27 (52%) had detected biallelic CDK12 alterations. At diagnosis, 44 (88%) had Gleason grade group 4-5, 52% had T3-T4, and 14 (27%) had M1 disease. Median follow-up was 8.2 years (95% CI, 5.6 to 11.1 years), and 49 (94%) developed metastatic disease. Median overall survival from metastasis was 3.9 years (95% CI, 3.2 to 8.1 years). Unconfirmed PSA50 response rates to abiraterone and enzalutamide in the first-line castration-resistant prostate cancer setting were 11 of 17 (65%) and 9 of 12 (75%), respectively. Median PFS on first-line abiraterone and enzalutamide was short, at 8.2 months (95% CI, 6.6 to 12.6 months) and 10.6 months (95% CI, 10.2 months to not reached), respectively. Nineteen patients received CPI therapy. PSA50 responses to CPI were noted in 11%, and PFS was short; however, the estimated 9-month PFS was 23%. PFS was higher in chemotherapy-naïve versus chemotherapy-pretreated patients (median PFS: not reached v 2.1 months, P = .004). CONCLUSION CDK12 mutations define an aggressive prostate cancer subgroup, with a high rate of metastases and short overall survival. CPI may be effective in a minority of these patients, and exploratory analysis supports using anti–programmed cell death protein 1 drugs early. Prospective studies testing CPI in this subset of patients with prostate cancer are warranted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document