Stage-based variation in the impact of colon cancer surveillance.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3609-3609
Author(s):  
Lucy Gately ◽  
Christine Semira ◽  
Azim Jalali ◽  
Ian Faragher ◽  
Sumitra Ananda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Cancer Surveillance ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Stage At Diagnosis ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Oligometastatic Disease ◽  
The Impact

3609 Background: Multiple meta-analyses have demonstrated that routine surveillance following curative intent colorectal cancer surgery improves overall survival. This benefit is largely driven by early detection and curative intent resection of oligometastatic disease. Intuitively, any surveillance benefit should be proportional to recurrence risk, leading some to question the value of surveillance for stage I patients where recurrence rates are low. However, the survival benefit of surveillance has not previously been reported by stage. Methods: We explored data from a multi-site cohort of colorectal cancer patients (pts) diagnosed from 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2016. Pts were followed according to standard protocols with a standardized comprehensive outcome data captured prospectively. Pts with a rectal primary or metastatic disease at presentation were excluded from the analysis. We examined the correlation of stage at diagnosis with tumor recurrence and subsequent outcomes. Results: Of 3608 colon cancer pts, 690 (19%) had stage 1, 1580 (44%) had stage 2, and 1338 (37%) had stage 3 disease. Median follow-up was 7.8 years. Stage at diagnosis impacted recurrence rate (4% stage I vs 12% stage II vs 28% stage III, p < .0001) but not median time to recurrence. Recurrence patterns varied with stage (e.g. distant nodal disease 5% vs 7% vs 16%, p = .003; liver metastases 90% vs 53% vs 42%, p = 0.001). In pts with recurrence, resection of oligometastatic disease varied significantly by stage (58% vs 42% vs 30%, p < .0001) as did post-resection 5 year survival (91% vs 66% vs 43%, p < 0.001). In pts with recurrence treated with palliative intent, stage at diagnosis also impacted post-recurrence 5 year survival (11% vs 7% vs 5%, p < 0.03). Conclusions: Colon cancer stage at diagnosis substantially impacts the proportion of pts able to undergo curative intent surgery for surveillance detected recurrent disease, potentially driven by stage specific metastatic patterns. Stage at diagnosis also has a significant impact on post-resection survival outcomes potentially driven by stage specific biology. Our data indicate a far greater survival impact of surveillance for stage I colon cancer than would be anticipated based on recurrence rate alone.

scholarly journals Actual survival after resection of primary colorectal cancer: results from a prospective multicenter study

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Inge van den Berg ◽  
Robert R. J. Coebergh van den Braak ◽  
Jeroen L. A. van Vugt ◽  
Jan N. M. Ijzermans ◽  
Stefan Buettner
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Multicenter Study ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Standard Therapy ◽  
Tumor Grade ◽  
National Registry ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Curative Intent

Abstract Background Colorectal cancer is the third most common type of cancer in the world. We characterize a cohort of patients who survived up to 5 years without recurrence and identify factors predicting the probability of cure. Methods We analyzed data of patients who underwent curative intent surgery for stage I–III CRC between 2007 and 2012 and who had had been included in a large multicenter study in the Netherlands. Cure was defined as 5-year survival without recurrence. Survival data were retrieved from a national registry. Results Analysis of data of 754 patients revealed a cure rate of 65% (n = 490). Patients with stage I disease and T1- and N0-tumor had the highest probability of cure (94%, 95% and 90%, respectively). Those with a T4-tumor or N2-tumor had the lowest probability of cure (62% and 50%, respectively). A peak in the mortality rate for older patients early in follow-up suggests early excess mortality as an explanation. A similar trend was observed for stage III disease, poor tumor grade, postoperative complications, sarcopenia, and R1 resections. Patients with stage III disease, poor tumor grade, postoperative complications, sarcopenia, and R1 resections show a similar trend for decrease in CSS deaths over time. Conclusion In the studied cohort, the probability of cure for patients with stage I–III CRC ranged from 50 to 95%. Even though most patients will be cured from CRC with standard therapy, standard therapy is insufficient for those with poor prognostic factors, such as high T- and N-stage and poor differentiation grade.

scholarly journals Cyst(e)ine in nutrition formulation promotes colon cancer growth and chemoresistance by activating mTORC1 and scavenging ROS

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiao Wu ◽  
Sai-Ching Jim Yeung ◽  
Sicheng Liu ◽  
Aiham Qdaisat ◽  
Dewei Jiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Cell ◽  
Cancer Progression ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patient ◽  
Nutrition Support ◽  
Immunodeficient Mice ◽  
The Impact

AbstractWeight loss and cachexia are common problems in colorectal cancer patients; thus, parenteral and enteral nutrition support play important roles in cancer care. However, the impact of nonessential amino acid components of nutritional intake on cancer progression has not been fully studied. In this study, we discovered that gastrointestinal cancer patients who received cysteine as part of the parenteral nutrition had shorter overall survival (P < 0.001) than those who did not. Cystine indeed robustly promotes colon cancer cell growth in vitro and in immunodeficient mice, predominately by inhibiting SESN2 transcription via the GCN2-ATF4 axis, resulting in mTORC1 activation. mTORC1 inhibitors Rapamycin and Everolimus block cystine-induced cancer cell proliferation. In addition, cystine confers resistance to oxaliplatin and irinotecan chemotherapy by quenching chemotherapy-induced reactive oxygen species via synthesizing glutathione. We demonstrated that dietary deprivation of cystine suppressed colon cancer xenograft growth without weight loss in mice and boosted the antitumor effect of oxaliplatin. These findings indicate that cyst(e)ine, as part of supplemental nutrition, plays an important role in colorectal cancer and manipulation of cyst(e)ine content in nutritional formulations may optimize colorectal cancer patient survival.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on stage at diagnosis of breast and colorectal cancers.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6501-6501
Author(s):  
Jade Zhou ◽  
Shelly Kane ◽  
Celia Ramsey ◽  
Melody Ann Akhondzadeh ◽  
Ananya Banerjee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Late Stage ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Screening Programs ◽  
Stage Distribution ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
The Impact

6501 Background: Effective cancer screening leads to a substantial increase in the detection of earlier stages of cancer, while decreasing the incidence of later stage cancer diagnoses. Timely screening programs are critical in reducing cancer-related mortality in both breast and colorectal cancer by detecting tumors at an early, curable stage. The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in the postponement or cancellation of many screening procedures, due to both patient fears of exposures within the healthcare system as well as the cancellation of some elective procedures. We sought to identify how the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the incidence of early and late stage breast and colorectal cancer diagnoses at our institution. Methods: We examined staging for all patients presenting to UCSD at first presentation for a new diagnosis of malignancy or second opinion in 2019 and 2020. Treating clinicians determined the stage at presentation for all patients using an AJCC staging module (8th edition) in the electronic medical record (Epic). We compared stage distribution at presentation in 2019 vs 2020, both for cancers overall and for colorectal and breast cancer, because these cancers are frequently detected by screening. Results: Total numbers of new patient visits for malignancy were similar in 2019 and 2020 (1894 vs 1915 pts), and stage distribution for all cancer patients was similar (stage I 32% in 2019 vs 29% in 2020; stage IV 26% in both 2019 and 2020). For patients with breast cancer, we saw a lower number of patients presenting with stage I disease (64% in 2019 vs 51% in 2020) and a higher number presenting with stage IV (2% vs 6%). Similar findings were seen in colorectal cancer (stage I: 22% vs 16%; stage IV: 6% vs 18%). Conclusions: Since the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been an increase in incidence of late stage presentation of colorectal and breast cancer, corresponding with a decrease in early stage presentation of these cancers at our institution. Cancer screening is integral to cancer prevention and control, specifically in colorectal and breast cancers which are often detected by screening, and the disruption of screening services has had a significant impact on our patients. We plan to continue following these numbers closely, and will present data from the first half of 2021 as it becomes available.

Stage at cancer diagnosis during the COVID-19 pandemic in western Washington state.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 145-145
Author(s):  
Catherine R. Fedorenko ◽  
Karma L. Kreizenbeck ◽  
Li Li ◽  
Laura Elizabeth Panattoni ◽  
Veena Shankaran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Care ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Washington State ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Stage At Diagnosis ◽  
Stage Iv Cancer ◽  
Using Data ◽  
The Impact

145 Background: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted medical care, including routine cancer screening for breast, colorectal, lung and cervical cancers. We aimed to investigate the impact of the pandemic on stage at diagnosis for cancer patients. Methods: Using data from the Washington State SEER records we compared AJCC stage for patients diagnosed with cancer in 2017-2019 to 2020 for two time periods, March to June (initial pandemic months) and July to December (later pandemic months). Patients were included if they were age 18+, diagnosed with a solid tumor, and not diagnosed at autopsy. Results: In the early phase of the pandemic, March – June 2020, there was a shift to cancers being diagnosed at a later stage compared to the same time period in 2017-2019 (Stage III: 13.5% to 14.9%, Stage IV: 16.2% to 19.7%). There was also a decrease in cancer diagnoses for cancers that are often detected through routine screening. As a percentage of all cancer diagnoses, both melanoma (13.2% to 9.8%) and colon cancer diagnoses (7.2% to. 6.7%) decreased during the early pandemic. In the later phase of the pandemic, July to December 2020, the stage at diagnosis showed an indication of returning to pre-pandemic levels with an increase in the proportion of early stage cancers (In situ: 16.6% to 19.3%, Stage I: 38.8% to 41.1%). Stage at diagnosis trends varied by tumor type. For colorectal cancer, the overall number of diagnoses decreased during the initial pandemic months. Stage I diagnoses decreased and Stage IV cancer diagnoses increased in both early and late stages of the pandemic. Conclusions: In Washington State, the COVID-19 pandemic had an impact on stage at diagnosis potentially caused by delays or interruptions in medical care. Additional studies are needed to understand how this shift in stage at diagnosis impacted treatment and outcomes for patients.

Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Management of Colorectal Cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina E Bailey ◽  
Eduardo Vilar ◽  
Y. Nancy You
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
The United States ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Colon And Rectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common and lethal cancer in men and women in the United States. At presentation, a significant proportion of patients with CRC are able to undergo resection with curative intent, but up to 50% of these patients will develop recurrent disease. Fortunately, recurrence rates for both colon and rectal cancer have improved with the introduction of multimodality therapies, which include chemotherapy, chemoradiation therapy, and radiation therapy. These therapies are adjuncts to surgery and can be administered before (i.e. neoadjuvant) or after (i.e. adjuvant) surgery. This review summarizes the current evidence for the use of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies in colon and rectal cancer. This review contains 2 figures, 7 tables, and 77 references. Keywords: Colon cancer, rectal cancer, neoadjuvant therapy, adjuvant therapy, total neoadjuvant therapy, induction chemotherapy in rectal cancer, chemoradiation, organ preservation, non-operative management

Impact of BRAF mutations on prognosis and immunotherapy response in microsatellite instability/mismatch repair deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3557-3557
Author(s):  
Robin Park ◽  
Laércio Lopes da Silva ◽  
Sunggon Lee ◽  
Anwaar Saeed
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Braf Mutation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Braf Mutations ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
The Impact

3557 Background: Mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability high (dMMR/MSI-H) colorectal cancer (CRC) defines a molecular subtype with distinct clinicopathologic characteristics including an excellent response to immunotherapy. Although BRAF mutations are established as a negative prognostic marker in CRC, whether they retain their negative prognostic impact in or alter the response to immunotherapy in dMMR/MSI-H CRC remains unknown. Herein, we present a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of BRAF mutations on the overall survival (OS) and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) response in dMMR/MSI-H CRC. Methods: Studies published from inception to 26 January 2021 were searched in PubMed, Embase, and major conference proceedings (AACR, ASCO, and ESMO). Eligible studies included the following: 1) observational studies reporting outcomes based on BRAF mutation status in dMMR/MSI-H CRC patients and 2) experimental studies of ICI reporting outcomes based on BRAF mutation status in dMMR/MSI-H CRC patients. A summary hazard ratio (HR) was calculated for OS in BRAF mutated ( BRAFmut) vs. BRAF wild type ( BRAFwt) patients (pts) with the random effects meta-analysis (REM). A summary odds ratio (OR) was calculated for objective response rate (ORR) in BRAFmut vs. BRAFwt pts treated with ICI with the REM. Results: Database search conducted according to PRISMA guidelines found 4221 studies in total. Initial screening identified 30 studies and after full-text review, 9 studies (N = 4158 pts) were included for the meta-analysis of prognosis (analysis A) and 3 studies (N = 178 pts) were included for the meta-analysis of ICI response (analysis B). The outcome measures are summarized in the table below. Analysis A showed that in stage I-IV dMMR/MSI-H CRC pts, BRAFmut was associated with worse OS than BRAFwt (HR 1.57, 1.23-1.99). The heterogeneity was low (I2 = 21%). Subgroup analysis showed no significant difference in the prognostic impact of BRAF mutation status between stage IV only and stage I-IV CRC pts. Analysis B showed no difference in ORR (OR 1.04, 0.48-2.25) between BRAFmut vs. BRAFwt dMMR/MSI-H pts who received ICI. The heterogeneity was low (I2 = 0%). Conclusions: BRAF mutations retain their negative prognostic impact in dMMR/MSI-H stage I-IV and stage IV CRC but are not associated with differential ICI response. Limitations include the following: analysis A was based on retrospective studies; also, the impact of BRAF status on the survival outcome of ICI could not be assessed due to limited number of studies.[Table: see text]

A National Cancer Database (NCDB) analysis of the impact of nonmetastatic colon cancer sidedness on survival.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 139-139
Author(s):  
Deven Patel ◽  
Timothy DiPeri ◽  
Brian Cox ◽  
Andrew Eugene Hendifar ◽  
Arsen Osipov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Large Population ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Metastatic Colon Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Features ◽  
Binomial Logistic Regression ◽  
The Impact

139 Background: Differences in embryological origin and tumor biology distinguish right-sided colon cancer (RCC) from left-sided colon cancer (LCC). Previous studies characterizing the prognostic impact of colon cancer laterality on clinical outcomes in non-metastatic colon cancer have been conflicting, thus closer examination is needed. Methods: Using the NCDB, patients with stage I-III colon cancer between 2004-2014 were stratified according to tumor location; RCC vs. LCC. Patient (pt) and tumor characteristics were compared in univariate analysis, survival (OS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Binomial logistic regression analysis was utilized to identify variables associated with colon cancer laterality. Results: Of the 342,735 pts who met inclusion criteria, 210,343 (61.4%) were diagnosed with RCC, and 132,392 (38.6%) with LCC. Pts with RCC were older (mean 71.6 vs. 66.4 years, p< 0.001) and predominantly female (65% vs. 35%, p< 0.001) compared to those with LCC. A trend towards poorer OS was seen in pts with RCC (mean 91.0 mos [95% CI: 90.2-91.8]) compared to LCC (112.2 mos [95% CI: 110.9-113.6]) in unadjusted analysis. On Cox multivariable adjusted analyses there was a significant but minimal impact on OS and laterality (hazard ratio or HR [LCC as ref] 0.978, 95% CI 0.967-0.989 p< 0.0001). Multiple unadjusted KM survival analyses showed RCC with T4 disease, high-grade, LVI/PNI, positive margins, N0-N2 disease, tumor deposits, and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy had poorer OS than those features in LCC (all p < 0.0001). Binomial logistic regression showed RCCs were significantly more likely to be higher grade (odds ratio or OR 2.024) and MSI-H (OR 2.010) with trends (nonsignificant) towards more likely having N1-2 positive disease, LVI, less receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy, and fewer tumor deposits. Conclusions: The impact of sidedness on prognosis in stage I-III colon cancer is complex. In this large, population-based study, RCC tends to be associated with more adverse prognostic features than LCC. More investigation into the biologic differences between RCC and LCC is warranted and how they impact phenotype and survival.

scholarly journals The Impact of Comorbid Diabetes on Short-Term Postoperative Outcomes in Stage I/II Colon Cancer Patients Undergoing Open Colectomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Ko-Chao Lee ◽  
Kuan-Chih Chung ◽  
Hong-Hwa Chen ◽  
Kung-Chuan Cheng ◽  
Kuen-Lin Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Open Colectomy ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
The Impact

Purpose. This study aimed at evaluating the impact of comorbid diabetes on short-term postoperative outcomes in patients with stage I/II colon cancer after open colectomy. Methods. The data were extracted from the National Inpatient Sample database (2005-2010). Short-term surgical outcomes included in-hospital mortality, postoperative complications, and hospital length of stay. Results. A total of 49,064 stage I/II colon cancer patients undergoing open surgery were included, with a mean age of 70.35 years. Of them, 21.94% had comorbid diabetes. Multivariable analyses revealed that comorbid diabetes was significantly associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality and postoperative complications. Compared to patients without diabetes, patients with uncomplicated diabetes had lower percentages of in-hospital mortality and postoperative complications, but patients with complicated diabetes had a higher percentage of postoperative complications. In addition, patients with diabetes only, but not patients with diabetes and hypertension only, had a lower percentage of in-hospital mortality than patients without any comorbidity. Conclusion. The present results suggested the protective effects of uncomplicated diabetes on short-term surgical outcomes in stage I/II colon cancer patients after open colectomy. Further studies are warranted to confirm these unexpected findings and investigate the possible underlying mechanisms.

Sizing of Polyp Illustrations Differs by Endoscopists’ Gender and Improves With a Measurement Reference

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 270-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nabiha Shamsi ◽  
Aasma Shaukat ◽  
Sofia Halperin-Goldstein ◽  
Joshua Colton
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Surveillance ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Polyp Size ◽  
Detection Rates ◽  
Demographic Groups ◽  
Adenoma Detection ◽  
Adenoma Detection Rates ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Surveillance ◽  
The Impact

Colorectal cancer surveillance intervals by colonoscopy are based on the size and number of polyps removed. Evidence suggests endoscopists’ estimation of polyp size is often inaccurate, but the differences by endoscopists’ characteristics have not been reported. This study assesses endoscopists’ accuracy of measuring polyp illustrations, the effect of endoscopists’ characteristics, and the impact of having a measurement reference. Endoscopists in a community-based, gastroenterology practice estimated the size of several illustrations in a booklet. One month later, they estimated the size of illustrations with a provided measurement reference. Accuracy was defined as no difference between estimated and actual value. Endoscopists were accurate in sizing only 15% of the time, with a tendency toward undersizing. Female endoscopists, those with less than 10 years in practice and those with lower adenoma detection rates, were more likely to undersize polyps. Accuracy of measuring the polyp illustrations increased to 50% ( p < .01) with the measurement reference. The improvement in accuracy was seen across endoscopists’ demographic groups. Endoscopists had poor accuracy of measuring polyp illustrations. Almost universally, endoscopists tended to undersize the polyp illustrations. Accuracy improved significantly with the use of a polyp-measuring guide, particularly when considering important surveillance thresholds of 5 and 10 mm.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document