Interim analysis of the fierce-21 phase 2 (P2) study of vofatamab (B-701), a selective inhibitor of FGFR3, as salvage therapy in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4547-4547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Begona Mellado ◽  
Daniel E. Castellano ◽  
S Pang ◽  
Yuksul Urun ◽  
Se Hoon Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Reported Data ◽  
Fgfr3 Mutations

4547 Background: Patients (pts) with mUC with FGFR3 mutations who have failed platinum-based chemotherapy have a poor prognosis. Their response to immune checkpoint inhibitors appears diminished 10% or less compared to WT pts. 20% of mUC pts harbor FGFR3 mutations or fusions (M/F). Vofatamab is a fully human monoclonal antibody against FGFR3 that blocks activation of the wildtype and genetically activated receptor. FIERCE-21 is a Phase 1b/2 study designed to evaluate vofatamab monotherapy (VFM) or in combination with docetaxel (VFD). Methods: The P2 expansion enrolled mUC pts with FGFR3 M/F+ tumor (identified with FoundationONE CDx™), who failed ≥ 1 prior line of chemotherapy (including prior taxane for pts receiving VFM) or recurred ≤ 12 months of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. Pts had measurable disease and ECOG ≤ 1. Treatment consisted of vofatamab at 25 mg/kg alone and in combination with docetaxel at 75 mg/m2 q3w. Efficacy was assessed by investigators (RECIST 1.1). Primary objectives were safety and objective response-rate (ORR). Results: In the P2, 21 pts each received VFM and VFD. 57% of VFD pts had received at least 2, and 71% of VFM at least 3 prior lines of therapy. Best response to prior therapy was PD for 67% of VFD and 38% of VFM. The safety profile is consistent with previously reported data. TEAEs occurring in > 20% of pts were decreased appetite, diarrhea, pyrexia, asthenia, anemia, dyspnea, and fatigue. Most common vofatamab-related TEAEs in > 10% of pts were asthenia, diarrhea, decreased appetite and rash; all were Grade 1 or 2. In VFM, only 1 pt had a grade 3 TEAE and no pt discontinued treatment due to an AE. There were no cases of hyperphosphatemia, ocular or nail toxicity; 1 pt reported grade 2 skin toxicity. For pts receiving VM, median age was 70 yrs, ECOG 1 = 67%, Hgb < 10 g/dL 5%, liver metastases 19%. Responses have been seen in 7 pts to date including those receiving both VFM and VFD. Conclusions: Vofatamab both alone and combined with D in a q3w schedule are well tolerated with a low frequency of grade 3 TEAEs. Both VFM and VFD have demonstrated efficacy in terms of ORR. PFS/OS and DOR data will be presented at 7+ months for VFD and 9+ months for VFM. Clinical trial information: NCT02401542.

Fierce-21: Phase II study of vofatmab (B-701), a selective inhibitor of FGFR3, as salvage therapy in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 409-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Necchi ◽  
Daniel E. Castellano ◽  
B Mellado ◽  
S Pang ◽  
Yuksul Urun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Lower Sensitivity ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Neo Adjuvant Chemotherapy

409 Background: Patients (pts) with mUC who have failed platinum-based chemotherapy have a poor prognosis. About 20% of them usually respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Also, 20% of pts with mUC harbor FGFR3 mutations or fusions (M/F), and this feature may be associated with lower sensitivity to ICI. Vofatamab (B-701) is a fully human monoclonal antibody against FGFR3 that blocks activation of the wildtype and genetically activated receptor. FIERCE-21 is a Phase 1b/2 study designed to evaluate vofatamab monotherapy (VM) or in combination with docetaxel (VD). Methods: The study consists of a P 1b lead-in (P1b with VD), previously reported followed by P2 expansion cohort in FGFR3 M/F+ pts (identified with the FoundationONE CDx™ assay on archival samples). The study enrolled mUC pts with failure to ≥ 1 line prior chemotherapy (including prior taxane treatment) or ≤12 months of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, measurable disease and ECOG ≤ 1. Treatment consisted of vofatamab at 25 mg/kg alone (VM) and in combination with D (VD) at 75 mg/m2 q3w. Efficacy was assessed by investigators (RECIST 1.1). Primary objectives were safety and activity (objective response-rate [ORR]). Results: 55 pts have received treatment. In the Ph 2 study, 21 pts received VM, 15 pts received VD. 35% of pts were included as 2nd line therapy, 65% in 3rd or later line of treatment. For pts receiving VD, safety was consistent with Ph 1B data. For pts receiving VM, median age was 67 yrs, ECOG 1 = 71.4%, Hgb < 10 gm/dL 13%, liver metastases 19%, ≥ 2 prior regimens 57%, (best response to prior therapy PD 31%). TEAEs occurring in ≥5% patients were asthenia (19%), diarrhea (9.5%), flushing 14%, chills (9.5%), hypotension (9.5%), decreased appetite (19%) and creatinine increased (9.5%). The majority of TEAS were grade 1 and 2. Only 1 patient on MF had a grade 3 TEAE and only 1 patient discontinued treatment due to an AE. The ORR have been seen in 7 pts to date including those receiving both VM and VD. Conclusions: Vofatamab both alone and combined with D in an every 3-week schedule are well tolerated with a low frequency of grade 3 TEAEs. Both VM and VD have demonstrated efficacy in terms of ORR, and mature results with PFS data will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT02401542.

FIERCE-22: Clinical activity of vofatamab (V) a FGFR3 selective inhibitor in combination with pembrolizumab (P) in WT metastatic urothelial carcinoma, preliminary analysis.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4511-4511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arlene O. Siefker-Radtke ◽  
Graeme Currie ◽  
Esteban Abella ◽  
Daniel A. Vaena ◽  
Arash Rezazadeh Kalebasty ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Additional Patient ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Lower Sensitivity ◽  
Tumor Biopsy ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Neo Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Reported Data

4511 Background: Patients (pts) with mUC who have failed platinum-based chemotherapy have a poor prognosis. Reported response rates to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are approximately 20%. 20% of pts with mUC harbor FGFR3 mutations or fusions (M/F), which may result in lower sensitivity to ICI. V (B-701) is a fully human monoclonal antibody against FGFR3 that blocks activation of both the wildtype and genetically activated receptor. This is a Phase 1b/2 study designed to evaluate V monotherapy window followed in combination of V with P(VP) (NCT03123055). Methods: This trial enrolled mUC pts with failure to ≥ 1 prior line of chemotherapy or recurrence ≤ 12 months of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, measurable disease and ECOG <2. Treatment consisted of v at 25 mg/kg alone for 2 week monotherapy window followed by combination with P 200 mg q3w.during the V window paired tumor biopsy were obtained. Efficacy was assessed by investigators (RECIST 1.1). Primary objectives were safety and activity [ORR]). Results: 35 pts have received treatment (Ph1b:8, WT:20, M/F+: 7). WT patients were unselected for PD-1 status, predominately male (55%) white (95%), all had received at least 1 line of prior chemo and 60% had Bellmunt scores of > 1. The safety profile is consistent with previously reported data for P. TEAE occurring in >20% of patients were nausea, anemia, diarrhea and fatigue. Six WT patients (30%) had responses (4 confirmed responses, 1 unconfirmed), and an additional patient with an iRECIST response. Responses occurred at a median of 3.5 months. At 4+ months of follow up, 13(65%) remain on treatment @ a median of 8 cycles (range: 1-13). At 5+ months the median PFS has not been reached. Conclusions: VP combination therapy is well tolerated with an encouraging ORR and prolonged PFS in the WT cohort; greater than one would anticipate from P alone based upon historical data. We will be reporting 9+ month preliminary PFS/OS and updated OOR/DOR data. Clinical trial information: NCT03123055.

Safety of panitumumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr), in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) across clinical trials

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4138-4138 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Peeters ◽  
E. Van Cutsem ◽  
J. Berlin ◽  
J. R. Hecht ◽  
R. Ruiz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Infusion Reactions ◽  
Epidermal Growth ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Age Range

4138 Background: Panitumumab is indicated in pts with EGFr-expressing mCRC refractory to chemotherapy. We present a summary of safety with panitumumab monotherapy in mCRC pts across 10 clinical trials. Methods: Data were pooled from pts enrolled in 10 clinical trials (including 2 extension studies). Pts received at least 1 dose of panitumumab at 2.5 mg/kg QW, 6 mg/kg Q2W, or 9 mg/kg Q3W. Adverse events were graded using NCI-CTC or CTCAE criteria. Results: A total of 920 mCRC pts were included in this analysis: 60% were male; 88% were white; median age (range) was 61 (20, 88) years. All pts had prior therapy; 77% had failed prior fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan, and/or oxaliplatin. Most (80%) pts received panitumumab 6 mg/kg Q2W; 17% and 3% of pts received panitumumab 2.5 mg/kg QW and 9 mg/kg Q3W, respectively. Median (range) follow-up time was 21 (1–124) weeks. A total of 7264 panitumumab infusions were administered with a median (range) of 5 (1–94) infusions/pt. Treatment-related adverse events (AE) were experienced by 94% (grade = 3, 20%) of pts. All pts had = 1 AE. The most common AEs were skin-related and GI toxicities ( table ). Skin-related AEs resulted in discontinuation in 2% of pts. Overall, 12% of pts discontinued panitumumab due to toxicity. Four (0.4%) pts had grade = 3 infusion reactions. In pts with postdose samples (n = 613), increased and persistent postdose levels of anti-panitumumab antibodies were detected in 0.5% of pts by ELISA and in 4.6% of pts by Biacore assay. Conclusions: Skin toxicity was common, but rarely treatment-limiting. Most AEs were mild to moderate and infrequently resulted in discontinuation. Infusion reactions and formation of anti-panitumumab antibodies were rare. The safety profile of 9 mg/kg Q3W panitumumab appeared consistent with other dosages; however, because of the small pt size further evaluation is needed. Panitumumab at 2.5 mg/kg QW and 6 mg/kg Q2W was well tolerated across 10 clinical studies. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor–related skin toxicity: Review of interim data from a phase II study (20060314) of panitumumab (pmab) with FOLFIRI in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20634-e20634
Author(s):  
M. Karthaus ◽  
R. Hofheinz ◽  
L. Mineur ◽  
H. Letocha ◽  
R. Greil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Time ◽  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Severe Toxicity ◽  
First Line ◽  
Cutaneous Toxicity ◽  
Grade 3

e20634 Background: Skin toxicity that can impact quality of life as well as treatment adherence is commonly associated with EGFR therapy. Despite their particular importance in terms of making decisions regarding supportive care, time to onset and maximum grade of skin toxicity are seldom reported. Pmab is a fully human monoclonal antibody directed against the EGFR with demonstrated monotherapy activity in patients (pts) with wild-type KRAS expressing, chemotherapy refractory, mCRC. Methods: In this single-arm study, first-line pts with histologically confirmed mCRC were enrolled to receive pmab (6mg/kg) and FOLFIRI every 2 weeks. This trial is ongoing to evaluate the primary endpoint of objective response rate and secondary endpoints including disease control rate, duration of response, time to response, progression-free survival, time to progression and other safety aspects. The focus of this abstract is skin toxicity. Results: Cutoff for the initial interim analysis was 27 June 2008. Of the 154 pts enrolled, 68% are male; median age is 64 years (range 21–84) and 95% of pts had ECOG PS 0–1. A total of 97% of pts had experienced at least one adverse event (any grade) and 55% of pts had experienced a grade 3/4 event. Grade 3/4 skin and subcutaneous toxicities were observed in 20% of pts ( Table ). Median time to first cutaneous toxicity and median time to most severe toxicity were 9 (95%CI, 7–13) and 14 (95%CI, 13–16) days, respectively. The most severe toxicity was grade 4 in one pt. Conclusions: Combining pmab with FOLFIRI in the first-line setting is a well-tolerated regimen. Skin toxicity was observed in 92% of patients; onset, incidence, and severity of which appears to be comparable to published data. Management of skin toxicities will be presented. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

A phase II trial of regorafenib for advanced urothelial cancer (aUC) following prior chemotherapy.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 498-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gurudatta Naik ◽  
Ulka N. Vaishampayan ◽  
Lisle Nabell ◽  
Mollie R. De Shazo ◽  
Lakshminarayanan Nandagopal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Cleveland Clinic ◽  
Prior Chemotherapy ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3

498 Background: Salvage therapy options for aUC following platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have modest activity. Regorafenib is a multitargeted TKI that targets VEGF and Tie2 receptors among others, which is approved for multiple malignancies. Both VEGF and Tie2 inhibitors have preliminarily exhibited activity in aUC. Hence, a rationale was made to evaluate regorafenib in aUC progressing following chemotherapy. Methods: We conducted a single arm, non-randomized Phase II study (NCT02459119) of regorafenib for aUC following chemotherapy. All patients (pts) started at 120 mg po qd for one cycle (28 days) before escalating to 160 mg po qd in the absence of intolerable regorafenib related toxicities. Pts who had progressed after 1-3 prior chemotherapy regimens and exhibited measurable disease by RECIST 1.1 were selected. The primary objectives was progression free survival at 6 months (PFS-6) and the secondary objectives were objective response rates (ORR), overall survival (OS) and toxicities. PFS6 of ≥20% was considered of interest and the target accrual was 32 evaluable pts. The treatment was continued until progression or intolerable adverse events. Results: We enrolled 17 pts across 3 institutions (UAB, Wayne State and Cleveland Clinic) between May 2015 and May 2019. Of these, 14 patients were male (82%) and the median age was 67 years. Pts received a median of 2 prior therapies including chemotherapy. 9 pts had received a prior ICI. 13 pts (76.5%) experienced treatment related adverse events (AE), and 7 pts (41.2%) had grade 3 toxicities including–anemia, thrombocytopenia, myalgia, hypophosphatemia, abdominal pain and fatigue. Treatment was discontinued for patients who suffered grade 3 myalgia and abdominal pain. There were no treatment related deaths. 3 patients attained PFS6 (18%) who also displayed minor regressions and 1 of them had received a prior ICI. Conclusions: Although the trial was halted for slow accrual, regorafenib appeared to demonstrate activity in heavily pretreated pts with aUC who had received chemotherapy or ICI. Further evaluation may be warranted in less heavily pretreated pts and in combination with rational agents with non-overlapping toxicities. Clinical trial information: NCT02459119.

scholarly journals 363 Vactosertib and durvalumab as second or later line treatment for PD-L1 positive non-small cell lung cancer: interim result

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A388-A388
Author(s):  
Byoung Chul Cho ◽  
Ki Hyeong Lee ◽  
Ji-Youn Han ◽  
Byoung Yong Shim ◽  
Hye Ryun Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

BackgroundTargeting transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) is reported to augment the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) through either enhanced anti-tumor immunity or the correction of tumor microenvironment (TME). Therefore, the combination of vactosertib, a highly selective TGF-β RI kinase inhibitor, and durvalumab is anticipated to improve anti-tumor activity of the ICI. A phase 1b/2a study was conducted to evaluate the combination of vactosertib and durvalumab in patients with advanced NSCLC who progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy.MethodsPatients were treated with vactosertib at a dose of 200 mg twice daily (five days on and two days off) and durvalumab at a dose of 1500 mg every four weeks. Eligible patients were ≥19 years old with good performance status (ECOG 0–1) and have no prior exposure to immune checkpoint inhibitors or other TGF- β R1 kinase inhibitors. The objectives of this analysis were to evaluate the safety, antitumor activity including objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and time to response (TTR) as well as circulating pharmacodynamic biomarkers related to TGF-β signaling. Response was assessed per RECIST (v1.1).ResultsBy August 4 2020, twenty-six PD-L1 positive (SP263 assay) patients were analyzed. Median age was 61.5 years (range 48–83), 69.2% were male, median number of previous lines of chemotherapy was 1 (range 1–4), and all patients were PD-L1 positive (15 patients with PD-L1≥25% and 11 patients with PD-L1 1–24%). The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were itching (38.5%) and skin rash (34.6%), but no Gr≥3 itching and rash were observed. Each case of the following was reported as Grade 3 TRAEs: adrenal insufficiency, anemia, and pneumonitis; Grade 4 TRAE, CPK increase, was observed in one patient. Objective response rate was 30.8% and 40.0% in patients with PD-L1≥1% and ≥25% respectively. Circulating PAI-1 and CTGF evaluated in 15 patients decreased significantly on Cycle 1 day 5. Ongoing biomarker results will be presented.ConclusionsThe combination of vactosertib and durvalumab has demonstrated a manageable safety profile and encouraging anti-tumor activity as a potential therapeutic strategy in patients with advanced NSCLC. The efficacy outcomes of this combination in a larger number of patients with advanced NSCLC will be followed.Trial RegistrationNCT03732274Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by Ethics Board of Severance Hospital (4-2018-0892), National Cancer Center (NCC2019-0057), St. Vincent’s Hospital (VC19MDDF0205), and Chungbuk National University Hospital (2019-08-015).

Response to selpercatinib versus prior systemic therapy in patients (pts) with RET fusion+ non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9032-9032
Author(s):  
Alexander E. Drilon ◽  
Oliver Gautschi ◽  
Benjamin Besse ◽  
Vivek Subbiah ◽  
Daniel Shao-Weng Tan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Survival Duration ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Systemic Therapies

9032 Background: Selpercatinib, a first-in-class highly selective, potent, CNS-active RET kinase inhibitor, is approved in multiple countries for treatment of RET fusion+ lung or thyroid cancers. Selpercatinib demonstrated durable antitumor activity in previously treated pts with RET fusion+ NSCLC in an ongoing Phase 1/2 trial, LIBRETTO-001 (Besse et al., ASCO 2021). Methods: Pts with RET fusion+ NSCLC enrolled in the global, multicenter, LIBRETTO-001 trial (NCT03157128; 16 countries, 89 sites). Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, duration of response, and safety. This post-hoc intrapatient analysis was based on a 30 March 2020 data cutoff date. Historical physician-reported best overall response (BOR) from last systemic therapy received prior to enrollment was compared with selpercatinib BOR by independent review committee per RECIST v1.1, with each patient serving as his/her own control. Results: In efficacy-evaluable pts (N = 218) who previously received platinum-based chemotherapy (chemo), median pt age was 61 years, the majority with ECOG of 0/1 (37%/61%), with a median of 2 (range: 1-15) prior systemic therapies. Overall, 57% of patients responded to selpercatinib while 16% responded to the immediate prior therapy. ORR improvements with selpercatinib were observed regardless of prior therapy: chemotherapy + immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) (57% vs 14%), single-agent ICI (48% vs 3%), or chemotherapy (58% vs 15%). A total of 108 patients (49%) did not respond to immediate prior therapy but responded to selpercatinib. Fewer patients had progressive disease as their BOR with selpercatinib (2%) compared to the immediate prior therapy (28%). The median duration of therapy for selpercatinib was notably extended compared with that of the immediate prior therapy (11.8 vs. 3.4 months, respectively). Conclusions: In pts with RET fusion+ NSCLC treated on LIBRETTO-001, systemic therapies administered prior to enrollment achieved less meaningful clinical benefit than selpercatinib. Selpercatinib demonstrated consistent efficacy regardless of the type of prior therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03157128.

scholarly journals Pyrotinib in HER2-Mutant Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma After Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase II Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (24) ◽  
pp. 2753-2761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caicun Zhou ◽  
Xingya Li ◽  
Qiming Wang ◽  
Guanghui Gao ◽  
Yiping Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE Targeted therapies against non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring HER2 mutations remain an unmet need. In this study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib in patients with HER2-mutant advanced NSCLC in a prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with stage IIIB or IV HER2-mutant lung adenocarcinoma who were previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled to receive pyrotinib at a dose of 400 mg/d for 21-day cycles. The primary end point was objective response rate per independent review committee (IRC). RESULTS Between October 20, 2016, and December 10, 2018, 60 patients received pyrotinib monotherapy. At baseline, 58 (96.7%) were stage IV, and 25 (41.7%) received at least 2 lines of prior chemotherapy. As of data cutoff on June 20, 2019, IRC-assessed objective response rate was 30.0% (95% CI, 18.8% to 43.2%). All subgroups of patients with different HER2 mutation types showed a favorable objective response rate. The objective response rates were similar between patients with and without brain metastases (25.0% v 31.3%). The median duration of response was 6.9 months (95% CI, 4.9 to 11.1 months). The median progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.5 to 8.3 months) per IRC. The median overall survival was 14.4 months (95% CI, 12.3 to 21.3 months). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 28.3% of patients, with the most common being diarrhea (20.0%; all grade 3). No treatment-related deaths were reported. CONCLUSION Pyrotinib showed promising antitumor activity and an acceptable safety profile in chemotherapy-treated patients with HER2-mutant NSCLC.

scholarly journals Ramucirumab in Combination with Pembrolizumab in Treatment-Naïve Advanced Gastric or GEJ Adenocarcinoma: Safety and Antitumor Activity from the Phase 1a/b JVDF Trial

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 2985
Author(s):  
Ian Chau ◽  
Nicolas Penel ◽  
Andres O. Soriano ◽  
Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau ◽  
Jennifer Cultrera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Metastatic Setting ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Combined Positive Score ◽  
Grade 3

Ramucirumab (anti-VEGFR2) plus pembrolizumab (anti-PD1) demonstrated promising antitumor activity and tolerability among patients with previously treated advanced cancers, supporting growing evidence that combination therapies modulating the tumor microenvironment may expand the spectrum of patients who respond to checkpoint inhibitors. Here we present the results of this combination in first-line patients with metastatic G/GEJ cancer. Twenty-eight patients (≥18 years) with no prior systemic chemotherapy in the advanced/metastatic setting received ramucirumab (8 mg/kg days 1 and 8) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg day 1) every 3 weeks as part of JVDF phase 1a/b study. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS). Tumors were PD-L1-positive (combined positive score ≥ 1) in 19 and -negative in 6 patients. Eighteen patients experienced grade 3 treatment-related adverse events, most commonly hypertension (14%) and elevated alanine/aspartate aminotransferase (11% each), with no grade 4 or 5 reported. The ORR was 25% (PD-L1-positive, 32%; PD-L1-negative, 17%) with duration of response not reached. PFS was 5.6 months (PD-L1-positive, 8.6 months; PD-L1-negative, 4.3 months), and OS 14.6 months (PD-L1-positive, 17.3 months; PD-L1-negative, 11.3 months). Acknowledging study design limitations, ramucirumab plus pembrolizumab had encouraging durable clinical activity with no unexpected toxicities in treatment-naïve biomarker-unselected metastatic G/GEJ cancer, and improved outcomes in patients with PD-L1-positive tumors.

Phase I-II Trial of Oral Cyclophosphamide, Prednisone and Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) (CPR) for the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3055-3055
Author(s):  
Donna E. Reece ◽  
Esther Masih-Khan ◽  
Arooj Khan ◽  
Saima Dean ◽  
Sharon Fung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3055 Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) and dexamethasone is an effective regimen for relapsed/refractory (rel/ref) multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts) with an overall response rate of 60% and median time to progression of 13.4 months (Dimopoulos ME, et al. Leukemia 2009; 23: 2147-52). We combined lenalidomide with the alkylating agent combination of cyclophosphamide and prednisone—an older regimen with minimal cumulative myelosuppression and good activity as second or third line therapy (Trieu Y, et al, Mayo Clin Proc 2005; 80: 1582). The CPR regimen consisted of cyclophosphamide (CY) on days 1, 8, and 15, lenalidomide on days 1–21 and prednisone 100 mg q 2 days in a 28-day cycle. ASA 81 mg/day was given as DVT prophylaxis. Three dose levels were evaluated using a 3 × 3 dose escalation design. Thirty-two pts were entered between 11/2007-06/2009; median age was 64 (42-80) yrs, 60% were male, and immunoglobulin isotype was IgG in 19 (62%), IgA in 8 (25%) and light chain in 4 (13%) pts. Median β2-microglobulin level was 257 (92-767) nm/L, albumin 39 (34-48) g/L, creatinine 83 (50-126) μmol/L, platelet count 355 (75-479) × 109/L and ANC 2.5 (1.1-6.1) × 109/L. The median number of prior regimens was 2 (1-5). Prior therapy included: ASCT (single in 91%; double in 19%), thalidomide (28%) and bortezomib (50%). FISH cytogenetics were available in 13 pts; 1 had del 13q but none had t(4;14) or del p53. Table 1 summarizes protocol treatment delivered. Table 1. Dose level N Cyclophosphamide dose (mg/m2) Lenalidomide dose (mg) Prednisone dose (mg) Median # cycles given 1 3 150 15 100 12 (12–34+) 2 3 150 25 100 10 (9–23) 3 26 300 25 100 17 (5–28+) 1–3 (All) 32 150–300 15–25 100 19 (5–34+) Dose limiting toxicity was not observed during cycle 1 at any dose level. Grade 3–4 toxicities during the trial included: thrombocytopenia in 7 (22%) and neutropenia in 9 (29%), managed with dose reduction and/or growth factors; five episodes of febrile neutropenia occurred, all at dose level 3. In cohort 3, other grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicities included 1 episode each of abdominal pain/bacteremia, hypokalemia, fatigue, sick sinus syndrome, cardiac amyloidosis, perforated diverticulum and 2 episodes of DVT. Two heavily pretreated pts developed 2° MDS, including 1 previously treated for lymphoma, 43 and 190 mos after the diagnosis of MM. The best response using modified EBMT criteria was documented at a median of 7 (1-26) cycles and included the following: dose level 1 (1 CR, 2 PR); dose level 2 (1 VGPR, 2 PR); dose level 3 (4 CR, 14 VGPR, 11 PR, 1 MR and 1 stable disease). At a median F/U of 16 (5-34) months, 13 pts remain on study and 18 have progressed at a median of 10 (2-23) mos; 1 was lost to F/U and 9 have died of progressive MM. The 1-year actuarial OS and PFS rates are 93% (95% CI 76–98%) and 78% (95% CI 60–89%), respectively. We conclude: 1) the combination of full doses of the agents in CPR can be given in a 28 day cycle with an acceptable safety profile; 2) the objective response rate (CR + PR + MR) in all 32 pts to date is 94%; 3) the 1-year OS of 93% and PFS of 78% compare favorably with other 3-drug combinations in rel/ref MM pts; 4) further evaluation of this regimen in newly diagnosed pts would be of interest. Disclosures: Reece: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Combination of lenalidomide and cyclophosphamide and prednisone in relapsed and refractory myeloma patients. Chen:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kukreti:Celgene: Honoraria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document