CheckMate 459: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a randomized, multicenter phase III study of nivolumab (NIVO) versus sorafenib (SOR) as first-line (1L) treatment in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 483-483
Author(s):  
Julien Edeline ◽  
Thomas Yau ◽  
Joong-Won Park ◽  
Masatoshi Kudo ◽  
Kwang-Hyub Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Treatment Benefit ◽  
Patient Reported

483 Background: SOR is approved as 1L therapy for pts with aHCC, but there is still an unmet need to help improve or maintain HRQoL. This phase 3 study compared HRQoL of NIVO vs SOR as 1L therapy in pts with aHCC as an exploratory endpoint. Methods: FACT-Hep was administered cycle 1, day 1 and every other cycle. The effect of NIVO vs SOR on HRQoL using FACT-Hep was assessed via repeated measures mixed models (MMRM). Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional-hazards models determined between-treatment differences in time to first and time until definitive deterioration (TTD/TUDD) based on prespecified thresholds for minimally important differences. The GP5 item from FACT-Hep was used to assess the burden associated with treatment side effects. Results: 743 pts with aHCC were randomized to NIVO (n = 371) or SOR (n = 372). Median OS was 16.4 mo for NIVO, 14.7 mo for SOR (HR 0.85 [95% CI 0.72–1.02]; P = 0.0752). ORR was 15% for NIVO, 7% for SOR (OR 2.41 [95% CI 1.48–3.92]). HRQoL scores were completed at baseline by 94.6% and 92.5% of participants, respectively, and were similar (FACT-Hep total: NIVO 140.7 [SD 21.5] and SOR 140. 6 [SD 19.1]. Questionnaire compliance rates exceeded 70% at most visits. MMRM analyses yielded clinically meaningful and statistically significant least squares means differences favoring NIVO on FACT-Hep total (10.1 [95% CI 7.3–13.0]), physical well-being (PWB; 2.0 [95% CI 1.4–2.6]), and functional well-being (FWB; 2.5 [95% CI 1.7–3.2]) scores. No sub-scales favored sorafenib. TTD was significantly delayed in NIVO for FACT-Hep total (HR 0.62 [95% CI 0.51–0.74]), PWB (HR 0.62 [95% CI 0.52–0.74]), FWB (HR 0.73 [95% CI 0.61–0.88]), and hepatobiliary cancer subscale (HR 0.57 [95% CI 0.48–0.69]). TUDD results were consistent with TTD. A greater proportion of NIVO pts did not experience increased burden of side effects (50%–67.7%) compared with SOR (26.8%–45%) based on the GP5 item. Conclusions: These patient-reported findings demonstrate that pts taking NIVO had superior HRQoL and reduced side effect burden, further supporting clinical data showing a treatment benefit for 1L NIVO in aHCC. Clinical trial information: NCT02576509.

Treatment benefit of tivozanib hydrochloride versus sorafenib on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): TIVO-1 study results.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 355-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Cella ◽  
Cristina Ivanescu ◽  
Konstantina Skaltsa ◽  
Montserrat Casamayor ◽  
Andrew Louis Strahs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Mixed Effects ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Symptom Index ◽  
Treatment Benefit ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Treatment Naïve

355 Background: Tivozanib hydrochloride (T) was superior to sorafenib (S) in progression-free survival (medians of 11.9 vs. 9.1 months, respectively; 12.7 vs. 9.1 months, respectively, for metastatic treatment-naïve pts) in the phase III TIVO-1 study in pts with mRCC. T showed a differentiated safety profile with lower rates of dose interruptions/reductions v S (18/12 vs. 35/43, respectively; p<0.001). TIVO-1 also evaluated patient self-reported HRQoL. Methods: Pts with mRCC were randomized 1:1 to receive T (1.5 mg PO once daily for 3 weeks on, 1 week off) or S (400 mg bid, continuously). HRQoL was assessed on Cycle 1/Day1 (baseline [BL]) and at the beginning of each cycle, using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–General (FACT-G), FACT–Kidney Symptom Index Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS), and EuroQol 5-dimensional (EQ-5D) questionnaires; EQ-5D scores are not reported here. Pts with BL and ≥1 post-BL evaluable forms were analyzed. Changes from BL in FACT-G and FKSI-DRS scores over 18 treatment cycles were analyzed using repeated measures mixed-effects models. QoL improvement/deterioration was defined as an increase/decrease from BL of ≥3 points for FACT-G subscales and FKSI-DRS total score and 7 points for the FACT-G total score during the study. Results: In the mixed effects analyses, no significant differences in HRQoL (FACT-G and FKSI-DRS) were noted between T and S. More pts receiving T vs. S experienced a significant improvement during the study in physical well-being (PWB) (25.7% vs. 16.4%; p=0.011) and a favorable trend in all other FACT-G and FKSI scores (p values: 0.078–0.405). FKSI improvement was greater with T than S in treatment-naïve pts (34.1% vs. 23.6%; p=0.023), pts with ≥2 metastases (32.9% vs. 24.7%; p=0.054), or pts <65 years old (33.0% vs. 22.8%; p=0.022). Median time to QoL deterioration was usually longer with T (3.75-7.66 months) than S (2.04-8.80 months). Conclusions: HRQoL was generally similar for T and S. Non-significant numeric differences usually favored T over S, and PWB improvement occurred significantly more often with T. These results support the previously-reported PFS advantage of T over S. Clinical trial information: NCT01030783.

Overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP): A real-world retrospective study.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15658-e15658
Author(s):  
Kristin L. Hennenfent ◽  
Allicia C. Girvan ◽  
Aafia Chaudhry ◽  
Paolo Abada ◽  
Kristin Sheffield ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Best Supportive Care ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Cox Models ◽  
Sorafenib Treatment ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Oncology Practice

e15658 Background: HCC is associated with a worse prognosis in pts with high baseline AFP levels. The relationship between elevated baseline AFP and survival benefit with systemic HCC treatments in the real world setting is poorly characterized. Methods: A retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes among newly diagnosed advanced HCC pts treated in US community-based oncology practice settings was conducted. Pts treated with sorafenib or best-supportive care (BSC) between 10/1/2007 and 12/31/2013 were identified in the International Oncology Network electronic medical record (EMR) database and were followed until date of death, date of last visit, or 06/30/2014 (end of study). Baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, and AFP (≤ or > 400 ng/mL), plus date of death were extracted from the EMR and physician progress notes. Treatment differences in OS were evaluated and stratified by AFP, AST/ALT, and bilirubin using unadjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results: A total of 370 advanced HCC pts receiving sorafenib (217) or BSC (153) were identified. The mean age was 65.6 years and 77.0% were male. Cirrhosis (38.4%), hepatitis C (36.8%), and alcoholic liver disease (22.4%) were common hepatic-related comorbidities. 45.1% of pts had elevated AFP ( > 400 ng/mL) at baseline. The sorafenib cohort had significantly longer median OS time than the BSC cohort (29.6 vs 19.7 weeks, p= 0.048). OS for sorafenib vs BSC cohorts with AFP≤400 ng/mL and AFP > 400 ng/mL were 45.1 vs 25.3 weeks ( p= 0.128) and 25.3 vs 13.1 weeks ( p =0.197), respectively. Cox models revealed a consistent effect of sorafenib vs. BSC, regardless of AFP level (AFP ≤400ng/mL: HR = 0.79 (95% CI 0.55-1.13), p= 0.200; AFP > 400 ng/mL: HR = 0.80 (95% CI 0.53-1.52), p= 0.297). Conclusions: This study supports the poor prognosis for advanced HCC pts with baseline AFP levels > 400 ng/mL compared to baseline AFP ≤400 ng/mL. Limitations with retrospective, real-world studies require caution in interpretation, but this analysis suggests an OS benefit with sorafenib treatment compared to BSC. There remains an unmet need for effective therapies for advanced HCC associated with elevated AFP levels.

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and pain progression with enzalutamide (ENZ) in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) from the ARCHES study.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5044-5044
Author(s):  
Arnulf Stenzl ◽  
Curtis Dunshee ◽  
Ugo De Giorgi ◽  
Boris Alekseev ◽  
Taro Iguchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Brief Pain Inventory ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Pain Severity ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported

5044 Background: The Phase 3 ARCHES trial (NCT02677896) evaluated the efficacy and safety of ENZ + androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) vs placebo (PBO) + ADT in 1150 men with mHSPC. Here we report patient-reported outcome (PRO) data using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) and Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF). Methods: FACT-P and BPI-SF were assessed at baseline (BL), week (wk) 13, and then every 12 wks until disease progression. Longitudinal changes were assessed using mean scores and mixed-model repeated measures; lower BPI-SF scores represent less pain/interference; higher FACT-P scores represent better HRQoL. Time from BL to first deterioration in PRO score was assessed by Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models. Clinically meaningful difference was defined by change from baseline ≥10 for FACT-P total and ≥2 for worst pain/severity. Results: PRO instrument completion rates were high (88−96%) up to wk 73. At BL, men in both arms were generally asymptomatic and reported good HRQoL (FACT-P total: ENZ + ADT, 113.9; PBO + ADT, 112.7) and low pain (worst pain [item 3]: ENZ + ADT, 1.80; PBO + ADT, 1.77). HRQoL and pain scores remained stable over time and there were no clinically meaningful differences between groups in change from BL to wk 73. The proportion of men with no change or improvement in PRO scores (67–88%) was similar in both groups at all time points up to wk 73. There was no significant difference between arms for time to deterioration in FACT-P total (HR 0.90 [95% CI] (0.74, 1.09); p = 0.2998). ENZ + ADT significantly delayed time to pain progression for worst pain (HR 0.82 [0.69, 0.98]; p = 0.0322) and pain severity (HR 0.79 [0.65, 0.97]; p = 0.0209) vs PBO + ADT. Conclusions: Men with mHSPC were generally asymptomatic and had high levels of HRQoL and low levels of pain at BL, likely due to most men initiating ADT several months prior to study entry. No clinically meaningful differences in HRQoL were observed between ENZ and PBO. The prolongation in radiographic progression-free survival observed with ENZ + ADT was accompanied by a significantly prolonged time to progression of worst pain and pain severity vs PBO + ADT. Clinical trial information: NCT02677896.

scholarly journals The Joint Effects of Loneliness and Depression on Mortality: Does Gender Matter?

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 323-323
Author(s):  
Ted Kheng Siang Ng ◽  
Abhijit Visaria ◽  
Angelique W M Chan ◽  
Kheng Siang Ted Ng
Keyword(s):  
Los Angeles ◽  
Mortality Risk ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Joint Effect ◽  
Epidemiologic Studies ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Loneliness and depression are both associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality among older adults. However, the evidence on the joint effect of loneliness and depression is scarce. Furthermore, previous research has rarely examined the modifying effects of gender. We investigated these questions using the Panel on Health and Aging of Singaporean Elderly, a nationally-representative cohort study of community-dwelling older Singaporean adults aged 60 and above, conducted in 2009 with two follow-up waves in 2011 and 2015 (N=4536). We operationalized six groups based on three categories of loneliness measured using the 3-item University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) loneliness scale: always lonely, sometimes lonely, and never lonely; Two categories of depressive symptom scores were measured using the 11-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) scale: depressed and not depressed. Cox proportional hazards models were employed to estimate the mortality risks for each group, with an extensive set of covariates. Due to significant differences in the prevalence of loneliness and depression in different genders, we conducted gender-stratified analyses. Compared to being not depressed and never lonely, women who were depressed and sometimes lonely and who were not depressed but always lonely had a higher mortality risk. Men who were not depressed but sometimes lonely had a higher mortality risk. We conclude that loneliness appears to be the predominant construct in conferring excess mortality risk. Health policies and interventions addressing the factors common and unique to each gender may improve psychological well-being at older ages, thereby extending the lifespan.

scholarly journals Fatigue at enrollment predicts EDSS worsening in the New York State Multiple Sclerosis Consortium

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caila B Vaughn ◽  
Katelyn S Kavak ◽  
Michael G Dwyer ◽  
Aisha Bushra ◽  
Muhammad Nadeem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
New York ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
New York State ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Common Symptom ◽  
York State ◽  
Study Enrollment ◽  
Severe Fatigue ◽  
Patient Reported

Background: Fatigue is one of the most common and distressing symptoms among persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate fatigue as a predictor for disease worsening among pwMS. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study of New York State MS Consortium (NYSMSC) registry, MS patients reporting moderate-to-severe fatigue at study enrollment ( n = 2714) were frequency matched to less-fatigued subjects ( n = 2714) on age, baseline Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), disease duration, and MS phenotype. Change from baseline patient-reported outcomes (PROs), as measured by LIFEware™, categorized participants into two groups: those with stable/improved outcomes and those who worsened. In a subgroup of patients with longitudinal data ( n = 1951), sustained EDSS worsening was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards modeling to explore the effect of fatigue. Results: The median survival time from study enrollment to sustained EDSS worsening was 8.7 years (CI: 7.2–10.1). Participants who reported fatigue at baseline were more likely to experience sustained EDSS worsening during follow-up (HR: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.2–1.7). Patients who were fatigued at baseline were also more likely to report worsening psychosocial limitations (all ps ⩽ 0.01). Conclusion: In addition to being a common symptom of MS, severe fatigue was a significant predictor for EDSS worsening in the NYSMSC.

scholarly journals Long-Term Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life After Breast-Conserving Therapy: A Prospective Study Using the BREAST-Q

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilona Stolpner ◽  
Jörg Heil ◽  
Fabian Riedel ◽  
Markus Wallwiener ◽  
Benedikt Schäfgen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Aesthetic Surgery ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Breast Conserving Therapy ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Background Poor patient-reported satisfaction after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) has been associated with impaired health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and subsequent depression in retrospective analysis. This prospective cohort study aimed to assess the HRQOL of patients who have undergone BCT using the BREAST-Q, and to identify clinical risk factors for lower patient satisfaction. Methods Patients with primary breast cancer undergoing BCT were asked to complete the BREAST-Q preoperatively (T1) for baseline evaluation, then 3 to 4 weeks postoperatively (T2), and finally 1 year after surgery (T3). Clinicopathologic data were extracted from the patients’ charts. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine significant differences in mean satisfaction and well-being levels among the test intervals. Multiple linear regression was used to evaluate risk factors for lower satisfaction. Results The study enrolled 250 patients. The lowest baseline BREAST-Q score was reported for “satisfaction with breast” (mean, 61 ± 19), but this increased postoperatively (mean, 66 ± 18) and was maintained at the 1 year follow-up evaluation (mean, 67 ± 21). “Physical well-being” decreased from T1 (mean, 82 ± 17) to T2 (mean, 28 ± 13) and did not recover much by T3 (mean, 33 ± 13), being the lowest BREAST-Q score postoperatively and in the 1-year follow-up evaluation. In multiple regression, baseline psychosocial well-being, body mass index (BMI), and type of incision were risk factors for lower “satisfaction with breasts.” Conclusion Both the aesthetic/surgery-related and psychological aspects are equally important with regard to “satisfaction with breasts” after BCT. The data could serve as the benchmark for future studies.

scholarly journals Patient-reported outcomes in drug development for hematology

Hematology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 (1) ◽  
pp. 496-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Acquadro ◽  
Antoine Regnault
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Drug Development ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Well Being ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Specific Situation ◽  
Treatment Benefit ◽  
Hematologic Diseases ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are any outcome evaluated directly by the patient himself and based on the patient's perception of a disease and its treatment(s). PROs are direct outcome measures that can be used as clinical meaningful endpoints to characterize treatment benefit. They provide unique and important information about the effect of treatment from a patient's view. However, PROs will only be considered adequate if the assessment is well-defined and reliable. In 2009, the FDA has issued a guidance, which defines good measurement principles to consider for PRO measures intended to give evidence of treatment benefit in drug development. In hematologic clinical trials, when applied rigorously, they may be used to evaluate overall treatment effectiveness, treatment toxicity, and quality of patient's well-being at short-term and long-term after treatment from a patient's perspective. In situations in which multiple treatment options exist with similar survival outcome or if a new therapeutic strategy needs to be evaluated, the inclusion of PROs as an endpoint can provide additional data and help in clinical decision making. Given the diversity of the hematological field, the approach to measurement needs to be tailored for each specific situation. The importance of PROs in hematologic diseases has been highlighted in a number of international recommendations. In addition, new perspectives in the regulatory field will enhance the inclusion of PRO endpoints in clinical trials in hematology, allowing the voice of the patients with hematologic diseases to be taken into greater consideration in the development of new drugs.

Overall survival (OS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) by depth of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline in the phase III PROSPER trial of men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) treated with enzalutamide (ENZA).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 94-94
Author(s):  
Maha H. A. Hussain ◽  
Cora N. Sternberg ◽  
Eleni Efstathiou ◽  
Karim Fizazi ◽  
Qi Shen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Reference Group ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Analysis Model ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Psa Nadir ◽  
Post Hoc

94 Background: The PROSPER trial demonstrated prolonged MFS and OS for men with nmCRPC and rapidly rising PSA treated with ENZA vs placebo, both in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The final survival analysis of PROSPER (Sternberg et al. NEJM 2020) recently reported a median OS of 67.0 months (95% CI, 64.0 to not reached) with ENZA and 56.3 months (95% CI, 54.4 to 63.0) with placebo (hazard ratio [HR] for death, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.89; P = .001). Post hoc analyses of PROSPER evaluating PSA dynamics have demonstrated longer MFS with greater PSA decline (Hussain et al. ESMO Sept 19-21, 2020. Poster 685P) and increased risk of metastases in patients with even modest PSA progression vs those without (Saad et al. Eur Urol 2020). Here we further explored the relationship between PSA dynamics and outcomes in PROSPER using uniquely defined PSA subgroups of decline. Methods: Eligible men in PROSPER had nmCRPC, a PSA level ≥ 2 ng/mL at baseline, and a PSA doubling time ≤ 10 months. Men continued ADT, were randomized 2:1 to ENZA 160 mg once daily vs placebo, and had PSA evaluation at week 17 and every 16 weeks thereafter. This post hoc analysis evaluated OS and MFS for 4 mutually exclusive subgroups defined by PSA nadir using men with PSA reduction < 50% as the reference group. The HR is based on an unstratified Cox proportional hazards analysis model. Results: 1401 men were enrolled in PROSPER; 933 were treated with ENZA and PSA data were available for 905. Measured at nadir, 38% of these men achieved PSA reduction ≥ 90% (actual nadir < 0.2 ng/mL), and another 27% achieved PSA reduction ≥ 90% (actual nadir ≥ 0.2 ng/mL). Among men in the placebo arm of PROSPER only 3/457 reported PSA reduction ≥ 90%. Median OS and MFS increased with increasing depth of PSA decline (Table). Conclusions: In men with nmCRPC and rapidly rising PSA treated with ADT plus ENZA, there was a close relationship between the degree of PSA decline and survival outcomes. Defining PSA by both percent decline and actual decline below 0.2 ng/mL revealed a previously under-appreciated relationship between these PSA metrics and highlights the importance of PSA nadir as an intermediate biomarker in nmCRPC. Clinical trial information: NCT02003924. [Table: see text]

Checkmate 577:Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a randomized, double-blind phase III study of nivolumab (NIVO) versus placebo (PBO) as adjuvant treatment in patients (pts) with resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer (EC/GEJC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 167-167
Author(s):  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
Prianka Singh ◽  
James M. Cleary ◽  
Ronan Joseph Kelly ◽  
Markus H. Moehler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Meaningful Improvement ◽  
Utility Index ◽  
Patient Reported

167 Background: NIVO is the first adjuvant therapy to provide a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) versus PBO in resected EC/GEJC following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy as demonstrated by CheckMate 577. NIVO was well tolerated with an acceptable safety profile. This analysis provides additional information on the exploratory HRQoL endpoints in this clinical trial. Methods: The effect of NIVO versus PBO on HRQoL, including general and disease-related symptoms, functioning, disease burden, and overall QoL, was assessed using FACT-E and EQ-5D-3L patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires administered at baseline (BL), every 4 weeks during the 12-month treatment period, and at post-treatment follow-up visits (up to 2 years after last dose). Longitudinal change from BL in PRO scores over 12 months was assessed using descriptive statistics. Additionally, mixed model for repeated measures and time to deterioration analyses evaluated the difference between treatment with NIVO and PBO (data not shown). Results: 794 pts with EC/GEJC were randomized 2:1 to NIVO (n = 532) or PBO (n = 262). PRO completion rates were ≥ 95% at BL and ~ 90% at 12 months on treatment. Mean (SD) BL HRQoL scores were similar between treatment arms for the FACT-E total score (NIVO: 133.40 [20.97]; PBO: 134.03 [20.40]); esophageal cancer subscale (ECS; NIVO: 50.2 [9.3]; PBO: 50.1 [8.9]); EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (NIVO: 70.4 [22.3]; PBO: 69.1 [24.1]); and EQ-5D Utility Index (NIVO: 0.820 [0.179]; PBO: 0.831 [0.163]) based on the UK value set. Descriptive analyses showed a trend for increases from baseline at most time points through week 49 for both NIVO and PBO treatment groups for FACT-E total score, ECS, and EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale and Utility Index. Conclusions: Preliminary results from CheckMate 577 demonstrated that pts on NIVO treatment showed trends of improvement in both esophageal-specific and general HRQoL. Similar trends were also observed in pts treated with PBO over 1 year. Pts treated with NIVO did not experience a reduction in HRQoL, further supporting clinical data to demonstrate treatment benefit and tolerability for adjuvant NIVO in pts with resected EC/GEJC. Clinical trial information: NCT02743494.

Patient reported sexual concerns in routine cancer care.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12128-12128
Author(s):  
Brittany Lees ◽  
Smitha Vilasagar ◽  
Jubilee Brown ◽  
Peter E Clark ◽  
Maxim McKibben ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Health ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Cancer Site ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Symptoms ◽  
Health Concerns ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Sexual Concerns

12128 Background: Sexual health is an important component of overall well-being and can be adversely impacted by chemotherapy, surgery, radiation, in addition to the psychological effects of cancer treatments. Sexual health is challenging to discuss and may be overlooked or avoided during cancer care. Methods: Patients presenting for consultation in an outpatient multisite cancer center completed electronic distress screening (EDS) between January 2017 and December 2020. The EDS contains 42 questions; demographic information, cancer symptoms and side effects, and psychosocial factors. The EDS is completed by patients before a clinical encounter for early symptom identification and intervention. We conducted a retrospective data analysis of sexual health concerns (>5; scale 0-10) and evaluated patient characteristics and clinically relevant distress (>4; NCCN Distress Tool), depression risk (>3; PhQ2), and anxiety risk (>3; GAD2). Our primary aim was to identify the prevalence of sexual health concerns. The secondary aim was to examine the relationship between sexual health and emotional well-being. Results: 57,375 EDS screens were completed. 13,950 patients (24%) reported sexual concerns or lack of interest in sex (>5) within the last 2 weeks. The frequency of these concerns at specific clinics ranged from 12% to 48%, with the highest rates at Palliative care (39%) and Psycho-Oncology (48%) clinics. Genitourinary (30%), Gynecologic (27%) and Gastroenterology (26%) reported the highest frequency of sexual concerns from cancer site specific clinics. Males reported a higher rate of sexual problems compared to females (30% vs 21%, p < 0.001), but a lower rate of relationship concern distress (12% vs 13%, p < 0.05). Patients with a risk for depression (n = 9,126) or anxiety (n = 10,809) had higher rates of self-reported sexual concerns than those with a negative screen (44% vs 21% depression, p < 0.001; 40% vs 21% anxiety, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Sexual health is a concern for approximately one-quarter of patients presenting for cancer care. Sexual health concerns were prevalent across cancer sites. Patients with positive screens for anxiety and/or depression have nearly double the rates of reported sexual health concerns. Sexual health is a current unmet need that impacts cancer patients and warrants attention.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document