Impact of overall survival (OS) as a function of facility caseload on feasibility of referral of radical prostatectomy (RP) to higher volume facilities.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 363-363
Author(s):  
Hamed Ahmadi ◽  
Afsaneh Barzi ◽  
Primo Lara ◽  
David I. Quinn ◽  
Eric A. Klein ◽  
...  

363 Background: We recently reported a significant all-cause mortality (ACM) risk reduction associated with higher annual caseload for RP (PMID 31398279). Four volume groups (VG) were defined as VG1: <50th, VG2: 50th-74th, VG3: 75th-89th and VG4: top 10 percentile of caseload. The adjusted OS difference between VG1 and VG4 at 90th percentile survivorship reached 13.2 months, HR 1.30 (p<0.0001). Here we explore this economics of referral to VG4. Methods: Using a Markov model, we designed 4 scenarios (Sc) where 100,000 RPs were performed. In Sc 1 all RPs were performed at VG1; in Sc 2, 3 & 4, all RPs were performed at VG2, 3 &4 respectively. Subjects were followed for up to 20 years after RP. Survival and costs of care for each Sc were recorded. Probabilities of PSA recurrence (PSAR), development of metastatic disease (Met), cancer specific mortality (CSM) and ACM were adjusted for each VG according to the published HRs. Savings resulting from fewer recurrences, avoidance of salvage radiation therapy (SRT) and management of fewer Met were calculated. Standard discounting at 3% were applied to costs and benefits. Survival benefit and costs savings associated with making referrals from VG1, VG2, or VG3 centers to VG4 center were calculated. Using a willingness to pay (WTP) of $50K per life years gained (LYG), the maximum referral costs (MRC) were calculated. Results: Referral from a VG1 to a VG4 center was associated with highest OS benefit of 720 LYG at 20 years of follow up per 1000 referrals (PKR). Within a WTP of $50K, MRC of up to $37K was cost effective- Table. Conclusions: Given the survival benefit associated with performing RP at facility with high annual caseload, significant resources could be allocated to making a referral possible while still remaining within cost effectiveness boundaries.[Table: see text]

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21606-e21606
Author(s):  
Binliang Liu ◽  
Zongbi Yi ◽  
Xiuwen Guan ◽  
Fei Ma ◽  
Yi-Xin Zeng

e21606 Background:Breast cancer is the most common cancer in females. The effects of statins on breast cancer prognosis have long been controversial, so it is important to investigate the relationship between statin type, exposure time, and breast cancer prognosis. This study sought to explore the effect of statins on breast cancer prognosis. Methods:We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library between October 15, 2016 and January 20, 2017. Searches combined the terms “breast neoplasms[MeSH]”, “statins”, “prognosis” or “survival” or “mortality” with no limit on publication date. Data were analyzed using Stata/SE 11.0. Results: 7 studies finally met the selection criteria and 197,048 included women. Overall statin use was associated with lower cancer-specific mortality and all-cause mortality (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.59-0.92, P = 0.000 and HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.58-0.89, P = 0.000). Lipophilic statins were associated with decreased breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.46-0.70, P = 0.000 and HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.48-0.69, P = 0.000); however, hydrophilic statins were weakly protective against only all-cause mortality (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.97, P = 0.132) and not breast cancer-specific mortality (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.76-1.17, P = 0.174). Of note, more than four years of follow-up did not show a significant correlation between statin use and cancer-specific mortality or all-cause mortality (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.71-1.00, P = 0.616 and HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.75-1.19, P = 0.181), while groups with less than four years of follow-up still showed the protective effect of statins against cancer-specific mortality and all-cause mortality (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.44-0.87, P = 0.000 and HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45-0.80, P = 0.000). Conclusions:Although statins can reduce breast cancer patient mortality, the benefit appears to be constrained by statin type and follow-up time. Lipophilic statins showed a strong protective function in breast cancer patients, while hydrophilic statins only slightly improved all-cause mortality. Finally, the protective effect of statins could only be observed in groups with less than four years of follow-up.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 1486-1486
Author(s):  
Marissa Shams-White ◽  
Nigel Brockton ◽  
Giota Mitrou ◽  
Lisa Kahle ◽  
Jill Reedy

Abstract Objectives To examine how adherence to the 2018 World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) and American Institute for Cancer Research (AICR) Cancer Prevention Recommendations may impact risk for all-cause and cancer-specific mortality among older adults in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study. Methods The seven components of the 2018 WCRF/AICR Score were calculated using baseline data (1995–1997) for dietary intake (124-item food frequency questionnaire), height, weight, and waist circumference, and a follow-up questionnaire (2004) for moderate and vigorous physical activity (N = 220,389). Total Scores were categorized (0–2 (ref), &gt; 2–5, and 5–7 points). Covariates included age, race/ethnicity, marital status, education, total energy, and diabetes, and hormone replacement therapy (women only). Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated, stratified by sex and smoking status (never, former, current). Results There were 24,119 and 8170 all-cause and cancer deaths, respectively, through 2011 during a mean 14.7 person-years of follow-up. Men with the highest (5–7 points) compared to the lowest 2018 WCRF/AICR Scores had a reduced risk of all-cause mortality depending on smoking history: never HR: 0.46 (95% CI 0.38–0.55); former HR: 0.42 (95% CI 0.36–0.48); current HR: 0.56 (95% CI 0.39–0.80). Findings were similar among women (never HR: 0.45 (95% CI 0.38–0.53); former HR: 0.41 (95% CI 0.35–0.49); current HR: 0.48 (95% CI 0.38–0.61)). For cancer mortality, there was a reduced risk for former smokers (men HR: 0.52 (95% CI 0.42– 0.66); women HR: 0.67 (95% CI 0.51– 0.89)) and never smokers (women only, HR: 0.55 (95% CI 0.40–0.75)), but this was not seen for current smokers or men who reported never smoking. Conclusions We found greater adherence to the 2018 WCRF/AICR Cancer Prevention Recommendations to be associated with a lower risk for all-cause mortality in older adults, as well as cancer-specific mortality among former smokers and female never smokers. Future research is warranted to further explore how smoking modifies these relationships, and the influence of the different constructs included in the Score in different populations and in different cancer-relevant outcomes. Funding Sources All authors contributed their efforts without receiving funding or salary support.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (22) ◽  
pp. 2335-2343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baiyu Yang ◽  
Marjorie L. McCullough ◽  
Susan M. Gapstur ◽  
Eric J. Jacobs ◽  
Roberd M. Bostick ◽  
...  

Purpose Higher calcium, vitamin D, and dairy product intakes are associated with lower colorectal cancer incidence, but their impacts on colorectal cancer survival are unclear. We evaluated associations of calcium, vitamin D, and dairy product intakes before and after colorectal cancer diagnosis with all-cause and colorectal cancer-specific mortality among colorectal cancer patients. Patients and Methods This analysis included 2,284 participants in a prospective cohort who were diagnosed with invasive, nonmetastatic colorectal cancer after baseline (1992 or 1993) and up to 2009. Mortality follow-up was through 2010. Prediagnosis risk factor information was collected on the baseline questionnaire. Postdiagnosis information was collected via questionnaires in 1999 and 2003 and was available for 1,111 patients. Results A total of 949 participants with colorectal cancer died during follow-up, including 408 from colorectal cancer. In multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models, postdiagnosis total calcium intake was inversely associated with all-cause mortality (relative risk [RR] for those in the highest relative to the lowest quartiles, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.53-0.98; Ptrend = .02) and associated with marginally statistically significant reduced colorectal cancer-specific mortality (RR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.33 to 1.05; Ptrend = .01). An inverse association with all-cause mortality was also observed for postdiagnosis milk intake (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.94; Ptrend = .02), but not vitamin D intake. Prediagnosis calcium, vitamin D, and dairy product intakes were not associated with any mortality outcomes. Conclusion Higher postdiagnosis intakes of total calcium and milk may be associated with lower risk of death among patients with nonmetastatic colorectal cancer.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liu Yang ◽  
Jiahong Sun ◽  
Min Zhao ◽  
Costan G. Magnussen ◽  
Bo Xi

Several prospective cohort studies have assessed the association between multimorbidity and all-cause mortality, but the findings have been inconsistent. In addition, limited studies have assessed the association between multimorbidity and cause-specific mortality. In this study, we used the population based cohort study of National Health Interview Survey (1997–2014) with linkage to the National Death Index records to 31 December 2015 to examine the trends in prevalence of multimorbidity from 1997 to 2014, and its association with the risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality in the U.S. population. A total of 372,566 adults aged 30–84 years were included in this study. From 1997 to 2014, the age-standardized prevalence of specific chronic condition and multimorbidity increased significantly (P &lt; 0.0001). During a median follow-up of 9.0 years, 50,309 of 372,566 participants died from all causes, of which 11,132 (22.1%) died from CVD and 13,170 (26.2%) died from cancer. Compared with participants without the above-mentioned chronic conditions, those with 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 of chronic conditions had 1.41 (1.37–1.45), 1.94 (1.88–2.00), 2.64 (2.54–2.75), and 3.68 (3.46–3.91) higher risk of all-cause mortality after adjustment for important covariates. Similarly, a higher risk of CVD-specific and cancer-specific mortality was observed as the number of chronic conditions increased, with the observed risk stronger for CVD-mortality compared with cancer-specific mortality. Given the prevalence of multimorbidity tended to increase from 1997 to 2014, our data suggest effective prevention and intervention programs are necessary to limit the increased mortality risk associated with multimorbidity.


2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 382-382
Author(s):  
Stephen J. Freedland ◽  
Elizabeth B. Humphreys ◽  
Leslie A. Mangold ◽  
Mario Eisenberger ◽  
Alan W. Partin

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Úna McMenamin ◽  
Blánaid Hicks ◽  
Carmel Hughes ◽  
Peter Murchie ◽  
Julia Hippisley-Cox ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is widely used and has proven benefits for women with menopausal symptoms. An increasing number of women with cancer experience menopausal symptoms but the safety of HRT use in women with cancer is unclear. There are particular concerns that HRT could accelerate cancer progression in women with cancer, and also that HRT could increase the risk of cardiovascular disease in such women. Therefore, our primary aim is to determine whether HRT use alters the risk of cancer-specific mortality in women with a range of common cancers. Our secondary objectives are to investigate whether HRT alters the risk of second cancers, cardiovascular disease, venous thromboembolism and all-cause mortality. Methods The study will utilise independent population-based data from Wales using the SAIL databank and Scotland based upon the national Prescribing Information System. The study will include women newly diagnosed with common cancers from 2000 to 2016, identified from cancer registries. Women with breast cancers will be excluded. HRT will be ascertained using electronic prescribing in Wales or dispensing records in Scotland. The primary outcome will be time to cancer-specific mortality from national mortality records. Time-dependent cox regression models will be used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for cancer specific death in HRT users compared with non-users after cancer diagnosis after adjusting for relevant confounders, stratified by cancer site. Analysis will be repeated investigating the impact of HRT use immediately before cancer diagnosis. Secondary analyses will be conducted on the risk of second cancers, cardiovascular disease, venous thromboembolism and all-cause mortality. Analyses will be conducted within each cohort and pooled across cohorts. Discussion Our study will provide evidence to inform guidance given to women diagnosed with cancer on the safety of HRT use and/or guide modifications to clinical practice.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 555-555
Author(s):  
Song-Yi Park ◽  
Yurii Shvetsov ◽  
Minji Kang ◽  
V Wendy Setiawan ◽  
Carol Boushey ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives We examined the association of postdiagnostic diet quality with all-cause and cancer-specific mortality in older adults diagnosed with invasive cancer, in comparison with those without invasive cancer, in the Multiethnic Cohort. Methods Data were from 66,374 African American, Native Hawaiian, Japanese American, Latino, and White men and women, who had no prevalent cancer, heart disease, or stroke at baseline (1993–1996, 45–75 years) and completed a quantitative food frequency questionnaire at both baseline and 10-year follow-up (2003–2007). Overall diet quality was measured by the Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2015, the Alternative HEI-2010 (AHEI-2010), the alternate Mediterranean Diet (aMED), and the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) scores. Invasive cancer cases between the baseline and 10-year surveys and deaths after the 10 year survey were identified through linkage to cancer registries and to state death files and the National Death Index. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated in multivariate Cox models for the dietary indexes at 10-year follow-up with subsequent mortality. Results Age-adjusted mean scores of the 4 dietary indexes at baseline (prediagnosis) and 10-year follow-up (postdiagnosis) were similar or slightly lower in participants with cancer (n = 5998), compared to those without cancer (n = 60,376). Among participants with cancer (71.5 ± 8.0 years), 2006 all-cause and 1005 cancer-specific deaths were identified during a mean follow-up of 8 years after the 10-year survey. Postdiagnostic scores from all 4 indexes were associated with lower risk of all-cause and cancer mortality: for the highest vs. lowest quartiles, HR (95% CI) for all-cause mortality was 0.72 (0.62–0.82) for HEI-2015, 0.84 (0.73–0.96) for AHEI-2010, 0.74 (0.63–0.86) for aMED, and 0.76 (0.66–0.87) for DASH. The corresponding HRs (95% CIs) for cancer mortality were 0.81 (0.66–0.99), 0.81 (0.66–0.99), 0.72 (0.58–0.89), and 0.79 (0.65–0.97). These HRs were similar to those for participants without cancer. Conclusions Postdiagnostic high-quality diet was related to lower all-cause and cancer mortality in older adults with invasive cancer, with risk reduction comparable to that among participants without cancer. Funding Sources National Cancer Institute.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document