Phase I study of AMG 160, a half-life extended bispecific T-cell engager (HLE BiTE) immune therapy targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS261-TPS261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Tran ◽  
Lisa Horvath ◽  
Tanya B. Dorff ◽  
Richard Greil ◽  
Jean-Pascal H. Machiels ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Immune Therapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Total Serum ◽  
Leptomeningeal Disease ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Pet Ct

TPS261 Background: AMG 160 is a novel HLE BiTE immune therapy that redirects T cells to kill tumor cells by binding to PSMA on tumor cells and CD3 on T cells. Methods: Primary objectives of this open-label, ascending, multiple-dose, phase 1 study (NCT03792841) are to evaluate safety and tolerability and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of AMG 160 in men with mCRPC; secondary objectives are to characterize pharmacokinetics (PK) and evaluate preliminary efficacy. The dose exploration will estimate the MTD or RP2D by Bayesian logistic regression modeling. The dose expansion will assess safety, efficacy, PK, and pharmacodynamics (PD) of the selected dose and provide further safety and efficacy data. PD biomarkers and potential patient selection biomarkers will be explored. Preliminary antitumor activity will be assessed by objective response per RECIST 1.1 with PCWG3 modifications, PSA response, duration of response, time to progression, PFS (radiographic and PSA)/OS, and circulating tumor cell (CTC) response (CTC0 and CTC conversion). Imaging will include CT/MRI, bone scan, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, and 18F-FDG PET/CT. In cycle 1, patients will be pretreated with dexamethasone before short-term IV infusion of AMG 160 and will be hospitalized for 72 h after each AMG 160 dose. Key inclusion criteria: age ≥18 y; histologically/cytologically confirmed mCRPC that progressed after novel hormone therapy; failure of 1–2 taxane-based regimens or have refused a taxane regimen; bilateral orchiectomy or continuous androgen-deprivation therapy; evidence of progressive disease; total serum testosterone ≤50 ng/dL. Key exclusion criteria: active autoimmune disease or diseases requiring immunosuppressive therapy (low-dose prednisone permitted); CNS metastases, leptomeningeal disease, or spinal cord compression; prior PSMA-targeted therapy (177Lu-PSMA-617 may be allowed). The study will enroll 30–50 patients in the dose exploration and 50 patients in the dose expansion globally. The study opened in January 2019; dose exploration is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03792841.

Phase I study of AMG 757, a half-life extended bispecific T-cell engager (HLE BiTE immune therapy) targeting DLL3, in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS9080-TPS9080
Author(s):  
Taofeek Kunle Owonikoko ◽  
Hossein Borghaei ◽  
Stéphane Champiat ◽  
Luis G. Paz-Ares ◽  
Ramaswamy Govindan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
T Cell Activation ◽  
Cell Activation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Immune Therapy ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

TPS9080 Background: SCLC is an aggressive neuroendocrine tumor with poor prognosis and few treatment options. Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) is an inhibitory Notch ligand that is highly expressed on the surface of most SCLC tumors but minimally expressed in normal tissues. As such, DLL3 may be a promising therapeutic target. AMG 757 is an HLE BiTE immune therapy designed to redirect cytotoxic T cells to cancer cells by binding to DLL3 on cancer cells and CD3 on T cells, resulting in T cell activation and expansion and T cell-dependent killing of tumor cells. In addition to its direct antitumor effect, BiTE immune therapy can inflame the tumor microenvironment. Combining AMG 757 with a PD-1 pathway inhibitor may lead to increased antitumor activity by enabling sustained T cell-dependent killing of tumor cells. Methods: NCT03319940 is an open-label, ascending, multiple-dose, phase 1 study evaluating AMG 757 as monotherapy; the protocol was recently amended to also evaluate AMG 757 in combination with pembrolizumab. The study will include a dose exploration (monotherapy and combination) followed by a dose expansion (monotherapy). Key eligibility criteria: adult patients with relapsed/refractory SCLC whose disease progressed or recurred after at least 1 platinum-based chemotherapy regimen, ECOG performance status 0–2, at least 2 measurable lesions per modified RECIST 1.1, no untreated or symptomatic brain metastases, and adequate organ function. Primary objectives are to evaluate safety/tolerability and determine the maximum tolerated dose or recommended phase 2 dose of AMG 757 as monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab. Secondary objectives are to characterize pharmacokinetics and evaluate preliminary antitumor activity; exploratory objectives are to assess immunogenicity and changes in biomarkers in blood and tumor tissue. In the dose exploration phase, dose escalation/de-escalation decisions will be guided by a Bayesian logistic regression model; backfill enrollment at dose levels deemed safe and tolerable will be allowed. The study is open and recruiting patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03319940.

NANORAY-1100: A phase I study of NBTXR3 activated by radiotherapy in patients with advanced cancers treated with anti-PD-1 therapy.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS86-TPS86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colette J. Shen ◽  
Katherine LaRoque Jameson ◽  
Jared Weiss ◽  
Trevor Hackman ◽  
Robert Dixon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Response ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Lung Metastases ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Immune Therapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Systemic Effect ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Primary Cancer ◽  
Open Label

TPS86 Background: Most cancer patients present resistance to immune therapy; only approximately 15% of patients respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Strategies able to increase ICI response are thus of great interest. Radiotherapy (RT), by acting as an immunomodulator is a good candidate to increase the proportion of ICI responders. However, RT dose and ultimate efficacy are limited by potential toxicity to healthy tissues. NBTXR3, a first in class radioenhancer administered by intratumoral injection, has been designed at the nanoscale to increase RT energy dose deposition within the tumor. The result is increased radiation-dependent tumor cell killing, without increasing radiation exposure of healthy tissues. Preclinical and early clinical data suggest NBTXR3 activated by RT can increase the anti-tumor response yielding both local and systemic (abscopal) effects. We hypothesize that NBTXR3 activated by RT, in combination with anti-PD-1 therapy (R3/RT/PD-1), will act synergistically to maximize the local RT effect while also producing a systemic effect sufficient to increase the proportion of ICI responders or convert ICI non-responders to responders. Methods: NANORAY-1100 [NCT03589339] is a multicenter, open-label, phase 1 study to evaluate safety and tolerability of R3/RT/PD-1 in three cohorts: (1) Locoregionally recurrent or recurrent and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) amenable to re-irradiation of the HN field, (2) Lung metastases from any primary cancer eligible for anti-PD-1, or (3) Liver metastases from any primary cancer eligible for anti-PD-1. Approximately two-thirds of each cohort will be composed of anti-PD-1 non-responders. NBTXR3 injection volume is based on a percentage of gross tumor volume (GTV) determined by central review. The primary objective is to determine R3/RT/PD-1 RP2D. Secondary objectives are to evaluate anti-tumor response (objective response rate; ORR) of R3/RT/PD-1, safety and feasibility of NBTXR3 injection, and NBTXR3 body kinetic profile. Exploratory objectives will assess biomarkers of R3/RT/PD-1 response, including PD-L1 status by IHC, mRNA and cytokine immune marker profiling. Clinical trial information: NCT03589339.

A multicenter open-label phase 1 study evaluating the safety and tolerability of HMPL-306 in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors with IDH mutations.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3159-TPS3159
Author(s):  
Filip Janku ◽  
John S. Kauh ◽  
Christopher Tucci ◽  
Zhao Yang ◽  
Marek K. Kania ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Tricarboxylic Acid Cycle ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Low Grade Glioma ◽  
Statistical Hypothesis ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Idh Mutations

TPS3159 Background: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) is a rate-limiting tricarboxylic acid cycle enzyme with 3 isoforms. Mutations in IDH1 and IDH2 result in gain-of-function activity that can cause tumor formation and/or progression and have been associated with various tumor types. Therefore, selective, single mutant IDH (mIDH) isotype inhibitors (mIDH1 or mIDH2) can lead to insufficient efficacy and the potential for tumor resistance. HMPL-306 is an innovative, small-molecule, orally available, highly selective, potent inhibitor of both mIDH1 and mIDH2. Clinical development of a compound that concurrently targets, inhibits, and suppresses multiple mIDHs could lead to significant and durable clinical benefit for patients (pts) with solid tumors harboring IDH mutations. Methods: This is a phase 1, open-label, dose escalation (Part 1) and dose expansion (Part 2) study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and preliminary efficacy of HMPL-306 in pts ≥18 years with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors with any IDH mutations. HMPL-306 will be administered orally, once daily in a 28-day continuous dosing treatment cycle. The HMPL-306 dose will be escalated in Part 1 according to the modified toxicity probability interval-2 (mTPI-2) design in 4 cohorts in approximately 15-20 pts: 50, 100, 150, and 200 mg. Eligible pts must have locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors with IDH1 or IDH2 mutations. The primary objectives are to evaluate safety, dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), and PK. Approximately 95 pts will be enrolled at the RP2D in Part 2 to further characterize the safety, tolerability, PK, PD, and preliminary anti-tumor activities of HMPL-306. Part 2 will include 5 dose expansion cohorts: cholangiocarcinoma (n = 20), skeletal chondrosarcoma (n = 20), low-grade glioma (n = 20), perioperative low-grade glioma (n = 15), any other solid tumor harboring an IDH1/2 mutation (n = 20). All pts will continue treatment until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or at the investigator’s discretion. Safety will be assessed based on reports of adverse events including clinical laboratory testing, vital signs, physical examinations, and electrocardiograms. All pts who receive any study treatment will be included in safety and efficacy analyses. Antitumor activity based on investigator-assessed overall response will be evaluated using descriptive analyses. Objective response rate will be calculated with 95% confidence interval using the Clopper-Pearson method. The Kaplan-Meier method will be used to summarize the time-to-event data such as progression-free survival and duration of response. No statistical hypothesis testing is planned. Enrollment started February 2021.

Phase IIb trial of oral ModraDoc006/r as a tolerable and effective option in comparison with intravenous docetaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 132-132
Author(s):  
Ulka N. Vaishampayan ◽  
Marianne Keessen ◽  
Neal D. Shore ◽  
Elisabeth I. Heath ◽  
Robert Dreicer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Oral Prednisone ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Comparable Efficacy ◽  
Point Estimate ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Oral Tablet ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Patient Reported

132 Background: ModraDoc006 is a novel, oral tablet formulation of docetaxel. To enhance bioavailability, it is co-administered with ritonavir (r), an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 3A4 and P-glycoprotein. The oral combination, denoted ModraDoc006/r, has potential advantages in terms of patient convenience, elimination of infusion-related reactions and avoiding prophylactic steroid administration, as well as safety benefits. Safety and preliminary efficacy of ModraDoc006/r in mCRPC were established in a prior phase Ib trial. Methods: This is an open label 1:1 randomized phase IIb trial of ModraDoc006/r bi-daily once weekly (BIDW) regimen versus IV docetaxel 75 mg/m2 q day 21. Initially, BIDW 30-20 mg ModraDoc006 combined with 200-100 mg ritonavir was administered on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 21-day cycle. After 39 patients, the dose of ModraDoc006 was reduced to 20-20 mg BIDW to improve GI tolerability. All patients received 5 mg oral prednisone BID. Imaging is obtained every 8-9 weeks for the first 24 weeks, every 12 weeks thereafter. Initially mCRPC patients with RECIST 1.1 measurable disease were eligible; this was amended to evaluable disease per Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) to allow for wider recruitment. No prior taxane therapy is allowed. The primary efficacy endpoint is radiographic progression free survival (rPFS) per PCWG3 criteria. Secondary objectives include objective response rate, PSA-PFS, time to skeletal related events, disease control rate, duration of response and safety. Patient reported outcomes, QoL and FACT-P questionnaires are assessed. It is expected that ModraDoc006/r will be as effective as IV docetaxel. A sample size of approximately 50 evaluable patients per arm will provide a point estimate of the primary endpoint of rPFS for this study. Results: At the data cut-off of 30 Nov 2020, 90 patients were enrolled in US and EU: 44 patients had been randomized to IV docetaxel and 46 to ModraDoc006/r, with 58 patients currently on treatment. Preliminary PSA response rates and rPFS were noted to be comparable in both treatment arms. ModraDoc006/r was mainly associated with mild and reversible GI-toxicity, of which grade and incidence were reduced at 20-20 mg compared to the initial dose-level of 30-20 mg ModraDoc006. Myelosuppression and neurotoxicity were low to negligible in the ModraDoc006/r arm, with low accompanying levels of alopecia. Conclusions: Adverse events of cytopenias and alopecia were lower with ModraDoc006/r, and preliminary efficacy appears comparable in both arms. Oral chemotherapy option has become critically important during the COVID-19 pandemic. Preliminary data reveals that ModraDoc006/r is an attractive oral option in mCRPC with favorable toxicity profile and comparable efficacy. Clinical trial information: NCT04028388.

Antitumor activity of dostarlimab in patients with mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite instability–high tumors: A combined analysis of two cohorts in the GARNET study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2564-2564
Author(s):  
Dominique Berton ◽  
Susana N. Banerjee ◽  
Giuseppe Curigliano ◽  
Sara Cresta ◽  
Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Microsatellite Instability ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Tumor Types

2564 Background: Dostarlimab is an investigational, humanized programmed death 1 (PD-1) receptor monoclonal antibody that blocks interaction with the PD-1 ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2. GARNET (NCT02715284) is a phase 1 study assessing the antitumor activity and safety of dostarlimab monotherapy in patients with solid tumors. Methods: This multicenter, open-label, single-arm study is being conducted in 2 parts: dose escalation and expansion. Here we report on the 2 expansion cohorts that enrolled mismatch repair–deficient/microsatellite instability–high (dMMR/MSI-H) patients. Cohort A1 enrolled patients with advanced or recurrent dMMR/MSI-H endometrial cancer (EC), and cohort F enrolled patients with advanced or recurrent dMMR/MSI-H or POLε-hypermutated non-EC solid tumors, mainly gastrointestinal (GI) tumors (99 [93.4%] had GI tumors, including 69 [65.1%] with colorectal cancer). Patients received 500 mg IV of dostarlimab every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, then 1000 mg IV every 6 weeks until disease progression or discontinuation. The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) by RECIST v1.1. Here we report ORR and DOR, by individual cohort and as an overall population, in patients with dMMR tumors identified by immunohistochemistry testing. Results: For this interim analysis, an efficacy analysis was performed for the patients who had baseline measurable disease and ≥6 months of follow-up in the study (N = 209). The ORR was 41.6% (95% CI, 34.9%–48.6%) for the combined A1+F dMMR cohorts (Table). Responses were durable, and median DOR has not been reached in either cohort (median follow-up: cohort A1, 16.3 months; cohort F, 12.4 months). A total of 267 patients were included in the safety population (all patients who received ≥1 dose; cohort A1, N = 126; cohort F, N = 141). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were consistent across tumor types. Overall, the most frequently reported any-grade TRAEs were asthenia (13.9%), diarrhea (13.5%), and fatigue (11.2%). The most common grade ≥3 TRAEs were anemia (2.2%), lipase increased (1.9%), alanine aminotransferase increased (1.1%), and diarrhea (1.1%). No deaths were attributed to dostarlimab. Conclusions: Dostarlimab demonstrated durable antitumor activity in patients with dMMR solid tumors, with consistent antitumor activity seen across endometrial and nonendometrial tumor types. The safety profile was manageable, with no new safety signals detected. Most TRAEs were low grade and were similar across cohorts. Clinical trial information: NCT02715284. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Re‐treatment with radium‐223: 2‐year follow‐up from an international, open‐label, phase 1/2 study in patients with castration‐resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases

The Prostate ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 79 (14) ◽  
pp. 1683-1691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver Sartor ◽  
Daniel Heinrich ◽  
Neil Mariados ◽  
Maria José Méndez Vidal ◽  
Daniel Keizman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Bone Metastases ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Radium 223 ◽  
Open Label Phase

Graft-versus-leukemia reactions in allogeneic chimeras

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 103 (3) ◽  
pp. 767-776 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans-Jochem Kolb ◽  
Christoph Schmid ◽  
A. John Barrett ◽  
Dolores J. Schendel
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Immune Therapy ◽  
Suicide Gene ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Normal Tissues ◽  
Graft Versus Leukemia

AbstractThere is a strong graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) due to elimination of tumor cells by alloimmune effector lymphocytes. When leukemia relapses after allogeneic SCT, donor lymphocyte transfusions (DLTs) can induce sustained remissions in some patients. This review summarizes the current status on clinical use of DLT, the basis of GVL reactions, problems associated with this therapy, and new strategies to improve DLT. Several multicenter surveys demonstrated that the GVL effect of DLT is most effective in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), whereas it is less pronounced in acute leukemia and myeloma. Cytokine stimulation to induce differentiation of myeloid progenitor cells or to up-regulate costimulatory molecules on tumor cells may improve the efficacy of DLT. Infections and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) are major complications of DLT. Control of GVHD may be improved using suicide gene–modified T cells for DLT, allowing T-cell elimination if severe GVHD develops. Hopefully, in the future, GVL effect can be separated from GVHD through adoptive transfer of selected T cells that recognize leukemia-specific antigens or minor histocompatibility antigens, which are expressed predominantly on hematopoietic cells, thereby precluding attack of normal tissues. In patients with leukemia and lymphomas with fast progression, tumor growth may outpace development of effector T cells. Here it may be preferable to select stem cell transplant donors with HLA-mismatches that allow alloreactive natural killer cells, which appear early after transplantation, to retain their cytolytic function. New approaches for adoptive immune therapy of leukemia, which promise a better prognosis for these patients, are being developed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document