Maintenance immunosuppressive therapy with resumption of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment to reduce recurrence of immune-mediated colitis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2642-2642
Author(s):  
Hamzah Abu-Sbeih ◽  
Fangwen Zou ◽  
Barbara Dutra ◽  
Mehmet Altan ◽  
Jennifer Leigh McQuade ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Immunosuppressive Therapy ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Adequate Treatment ◽  
Univariate Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Immune Mediated ◽  
Md Anderson ◽  
Current Guidelines

2642 Background: Immune-mediated colitis (IMC) may limit immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) treatment. Current guidelines recommend consideration of resuming ICI when IMC symptoms subside to ≤ grade 1. We aimed to investigate the effect of maintenance immunosuppressive therapy (IST) on the outcome of IMC in patients who resume ICI therapy. Methods: We retrospectively studied patients who resumed ICI therapy after adequate treatment of IMC from March 2015 to June 2020 at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Relevant demographic, oncologic, and ICI data were collected and analyzed. Univariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess risk factors of IMC recurrence. Results: We included 102 patients with a median age of 61 years. 66% were males and 97% were Caucasians. 48 patients (47%) received IST maintenance in conjunction with ICI resumption and 54 patients did not. Symptoms of IMC recurred in 28 patients, 8 (17%) in the concurrent IST group and 20 (37%) in the other group. Compared to no concurrent IST group, patients on concurrent IST were more likely to have received combined ICI regimen (60% vs 41%, p = 0.003) and more initial ICI doses (9 vs 5 doses, p = 0.030). Concurrent IST group had significantly longer ICI treatment duration on resumption (72 vs 62 days, p = 0.023), more ICI resumed doses (5 vs 4 doses, p = 0.038), and lower IMC recurrence (17% vs 37%, p = 0.027). Patient who received more IST doses, both therapeutic and prophylactic, had lower rate of IMC recurrence (OR 0.72, p = 0.012; table). IST maintenance treatment (OR 0.34, p = 0.024) was associated with lower IMC recurrence rate after ICI resumption. Vedolizumab was the predominant IST used. Overall survival was comparable among the two groups (p = 0.934). Conclusions: Concurrent IST treatment with ICI resumption after IMC was associated with significantly lower IMC recurrence and more extended ICI treatment while reserving similar overall survival to patients without IST maintenance therapy. Future prospective randomized trial of concurrent IST is still merited for further clarification.[Table: see text]

scholarly journals Association of Chronic Immune-Mediated Diarrhea and Colitis With Favorable Cancer Response

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 700-708
Author(s):  
Fangwen Zou ◽  
Hamzah Abu-Sbeih ◽  
Weijie Ma ◽  
Yuanzun Peng ◽  
Wei Qiao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Immunosuppressive Therapy ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Acute Group ◽  
Long Duration ◽  
Immune Mediated ◽  
Cancer Outcome

Background: Immune-mediated diarrhea and colitis (IMDC) is a common immune-related adverse effect related to immune checkpoint inhibitors. We aimed to identify risk factors for chronic IMDC and its prognostic value in cancer outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively collected data on patients with a diagnosis of IMDC between January 2018 and October 2019 and grouped them based on disease duration into acute (≤3 months) and chronic (>3 months) categories. A logistic regression model and the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests were used for biostatistical analysis. Results: In our sample of 88 patients, 43 were in the chronic group and 45 were in the acute group. Genitourinary cancer and melanoma accounted for 70% of malignancies. PD-1/L1 monotherapy (52%) was the more frequently used regimen. We showed that chronic IMDC was associated with proton pump inhibitor use (odds ratio [OR], 3.96; P=.026), long duration of IMDC symptoms (OR, 1.05; P<.001) and hospitalization (OR, 1.07; P=.043), a histologic feature of chronic active colitis (OR, 4.8; P=.025) or microscopic colitis (OR, 5.0; P=.045), and delayed introduction of selective immunosuppressive therapy (infliximab/vedolizumab; OR, 1.06; P=.047). Chronic IMDC also reflected a better cancer response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (30% vs 51%; P=.002) and was accompanied by improved overall survival (P=.035). Similarly, higher doses of selective immunosuppressive therapy were associated with better overall survival (P=.018). Conclusions: Chronic IMDC can develop among patients with a more aggressive disease course and chronic features on colon histology. It likely reflects a prolonged immune checkpoint inhibitor effect and is associated with better cancer outcome and overall survival.

scholarly journals 236 Predictors of ICI renal toxicity: a pathological approach

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A252-A252
Author(s):  
Ala Abudayyeh ◽  
Liye Suo ◽  
Heather Lin ◽  
Omar Mamlouk ◽  
Cassian Yee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Renal Toxicity ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Interstitial Fibrosis ◽  
Transplant Rejection ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Renal Response ◽  
Md Anderson

BackgroundInflammatory response in unintended tissues and organs associated with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors also known as immune related adverse events (irAEs) is a management challenge, and renal irAEs are associated with increased patient morbidity and mortality. The most common renal toxicity is acute interstitial nephritis (AIN), characterized by infiltration of renal tissue with immune cells, and may be analogous to kidney transplant rejection. Using both clinical variables and tissue findings we evaluated a large cohort of ICI cases to determine predictors of renal response and overall survival.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed all patients treated with ICI (August 2007 to August 2020) at MD Anderson Cancer Center. A total of 38 patients with biopsy confirmed AIN and available tissue were identified. All slides were reviewed by two board certified renal pathologists and the severity of inflammation and chronicity was graded using transplant rejection BANFF criteria. Patients were categorized as renal responders if creatinine improved or returned to baseline after treatment and non-responders if it did not. Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables and t-test/ANOVA or the counterparts of the non-parametric approaches (Wilcoxon rank-sum or Kruskal-Wallis) for continuous variables were used to compare patient‘s characteristics between groups. The distribution of overall survival (OS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test was performed to test the difference in survival between groups.ResultsBased on the detailed pathological findings, patients with increased interstitial fibrosis were less likely to have renal response with treatment compared to patients with less fibrosis, (p < 0.05). Inflammation, tubulitis, number of eosinophils and neutrophils had no impact on renal response. Patients with response within 3 months of AKI treatment had a superior OS in comparison to patients who responded late (12-month OS rate: 77% vs 27%, p < 0.05). Notably, patients who received concurrent ICI and achieved renal response within 3 months had the best OS while those who did not receive concurrent ICI nor achieved renal response had worst OS (12-month OS rate: 100% (renal response and concurrent ICI) vs 72% ( renal response with no concurrent ICI), vs 27% ( no renal response and nonconcurrent ICI) (p < 0.05).ConclusionsThis is the first analysis of ICI induced nephritis where a detailed pathological and clinical evaluation was performed to predict renal response. Our findings highlight the importance of early diagnosis and treatment of ICI-AIN while continuing concurrent ICI therapy.Ethics ApprovalThis retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, and the procedures followed were in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Association of antibiotic exposure with overall survival and colitis in patients with stage III and IV melanoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 56-56
Author(s):  
Brian Chu ◽  
Jahan J. Mohiuddin ◽  
Andrea Facciabene ◽  
Xingmei Wang ◽  
Abigail Doucette ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Antibiotic Exposure ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Immune Mediated

56 Background: Recent studies suggest that changes in the gut microbiome modulate response to cancer treatment, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Broad-spectrum antibiotics (Abx) are known to cause significant dysbiosis. We hypothesize that recent Abx exposure worsens outcomes in patients (pts) with stage III/IV melanoma (MM) receiving ICI. Methods: We identified MM pts treated with ICI from our institutional database. All received their first ICI between 2004-2019. Antibiotic exposure was defined as receipt of Abx within 3 months prior to the first infusion of ICI. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and the secondary outcome was immune-mediated colitis requiring intravenous (IV) steroids. Stage III and IV pts were analyzed separately for the primary analysis. Results: Of 568 pts in our database, 20% received Abx within the 3 months prior to ICI. 36% of pts had stage III disease and 26% of pts were treated with either adjuvant or neoadjuvant ICI. 1.6% of pts died of causes other than MM. The Abx+ and Abx- groups were balanced in terms of stage, race, age, sex, BRAF status, LDH, prior systemic therapies, and class of ICI received. Only 4 pts were hospitalized due to the infection prompting the Abx, and no pts died due to the infection. In the Stage IV group, Abx+ pts had worse OS on MV analysis (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.2). Stage III Abx+ also had worse OS (HR 2.8, 95% CI 1.3-5.9). In a sensitivity analysis excluding pts who received IV Abx or were admitted due to infection, survival was still worse for Abx+ pts (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2-2.4). In a Fine-Grey competing risk MV model, Abx+ had a higher rate of immune-mediated colitis requiring IV steroids (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.02-4.5). Conclusions: In MM pts treated with ICI, receipt of Abx within 3 months prior to ICI initiation was associated with decreased OS and increased colitis. Future research should include prospective studies to better define the risk/benefit profile of antibiotics in close proximity to ICI. [Table: see text]

Correlation of pathogenic POLE mutations with clinical benefit to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3008-3008
Author(s):  
Benjamin Garmezy ◽  
Jinesh S. Gheeya ◽  
Kyaw Zin Thein ◽  
Patrick Glen Pilie ◽  
Wanlin Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Predictive Biomarker ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Dna Polymerase Epsilon ◽  
Number Variation ◽  
Md Anderson ◽  
Chi Square Analysis

3008 Background: Mutations in DNA polymerase epsilon ( POLE) may induce DNA replication errors, increasing neoantigen load and potentially enhancing clinical benefit to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). We present a clinicopathologic analysis of patients (pts) with advanced cancers harboring POLE mutations and their response to ICI therapy at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Methods: We used targeted exome sequencing via CLIA-certified next generation sequencing assays to identify pts with POLE-aberrant tumors and their co-occurring mutations. The pathogenicity of each POLE mutation was annotated utilizing InterVar and ClinVar databases. Chi-square analysis was performed. Results: Tumors from 12,947 pts were analyzed and 448 (3.5%) pts had a mutation or copy number variation in POLE (3.5%), comparable to the TCGA PanCancer Atlas (4.0%). Clinical data were available for 293 pts; the most common cancers were colorectal (14.7%), non-small cell lung (13.7%), cholangiocarcinoma (13.3%) and melanoma (10.2%). There were 267 unique co-mutations, including KRAS (23.0%), ARID1A (21.5%), BRCA2 (18.7%), ATM (18.4%), CDKN2A (17.5%), BRAF (15.3%), EGFR (15.3%), ATRX (12.6%), CREBBP (11.7%), APC (11.3%), ATR (11.0%), BRCA1 (11.0%) and CDK12 (10.4%). POLE variants were annotated in all pts: pathogenic/likely pathogenic (n = 34, 11.6%), benign/likely benign (61, 20.8%), and variant of unknown significance (198, 67.6%). 104 (35.8%) of 293 pts with POLE mutations received PD-1/L1 inhibitors as monotherapy or in combination. 93 (88.4%) of 104 pts were evaluable for response: Radiological CR 4.3% (n = 4), PR 26.9% (n = 25), SD 22.6% (n = 21), PD 46.2% (n = 43), for a clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + SD) of 53.8%. Pathogenic status of POLE mutation was associated with clinical benefit to PD-1/L1 inhibitors (p = 0.04). TMB (p = 0.44), PD-L1 (p = 0.11), and MSI (p = 0.66) status were not associated with pathogenic status. MSI-H status was not over-represented in pts with ICI clinical benefit (p = 0.36). Conclusions: Pathogenic POLE mutations were associated with clinical benefit to ICI therapy. Further studies are warranted to validate POLE mutations as a predictive biomarker. Multiple co-occurring DNA damage response mutations were found, which may contribute to ICI clinical benefit.

scholarly journals Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Oral Mucositis Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jake S. Jacob ◽  
Barbara E. Dutra ◽  
Victor Garcia-Rodriguez ◽  
Kavea Panneerselvam ◽  
Fiyinfoluwa O. Abraham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oral Mucositis ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Symptom Duration ◽  
University Of Texas ◽  
Md Anderson

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy predisposes patients to immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Data are limited regarding the incidence, management, and outcomes of one such irAE: mucositis. In this study, we evaluated the clinical characteristics, disease course, treatment, and outcomes of ICI-mediated mucositis. Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center study of patients who received ICI therapy and developed oral mucositis at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center from January 2009 to September 2019. Inclusion criteria included age ≥18 years, a diagnosis of oral mucositis and/or stomatitis based on ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes, and therapy using CTLA-4 or PD-1/L1 inhibitors alone or combined with other agents. Results: We identified 152 patients with a mean age of 60 years, 51% of whom were men. Of the sample patients, 73% had stage IV cancer, with melanoma the most common (28%). Median time from ICI initiation to mucositis was 91 days. The most common clinical presentation of mucositis was odynophagia and/or oral pain (89%), 91% developed CTCAE grade 1–2 mucositis, and 78% received anti–PD-1/L1 monotherapy. Compared with anti–PD-1/L1–based therapy, anti–CTLA-4–based therapy was more frequently associated with earlier onset of mucositis (73 vs 96 days; P=.077) and a lower rate of symptom resolution (76% vs 92%; P=.029); 24% of patients required immunosuppressive therapy, which was associated with longer symptom duration (84 vs 34 days; P=.002) and higher mucositis recurrence rate (61% vs 32%; P=.006). ICI interruption was associated with worse survival (P=.037). Mucositis recurrence, immunosuppressant use, and presence of other irAEs did not affect survival. Conclusions: For ICI-mediated mucositis, a diagnosis of exclusion has not been well recognized and is understudied. Although the clinical symptoms of mucositis are mostly mild, approximately 25% of patients require immunosuppression. Mucositis recurrence can occur in approximately 39% patients. Our results showed that ICI interruption compromises overall survival.

657 Interleukin-6 receptor blockade for management of immune checkpoint inhibitor related adverse events in patients with melanoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A694-A694
Author(s):  
Chantal Saberian ◽  
Faisal Fa’ak ◽  
Jean Tayar ◽  
Maryam Buni ◽  
Sang Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Interleukin 6 ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Interleukin 6 Receptor ◽  
Md Anderson

BackgroundManagement of certain immune mediated adverse events (irAEs) can be challenging and may require prolonged/chronic immune suppression with corticosteroids or other immunosuppressant which could compromise and even reverse the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). While the exact immunobiology of irAEs is not fully understood there is enough evidence that IL-6 induced Th-17 that may play critical role in the pathogenesis. Herein, we describe our clinical experience using interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R) blockade in management of irAEs in melanoma patients.MethodsWe searched MD Anderson databases to identify cancer patients who had received ICIs between January 2004 and March 2020. Of 11,391 ICI-treated patients, 21 patients with melanoma who received IL-6R blockade after ICI infusion were identified and their medical records were reviewed.ResultsMedian age was 61 years (41–82), 52% were females, 90% received anti-programmed cell death-1 antibodies. Fourteen patients (67%) had de novo onset irAEs (11 had arthritis, and 1 each with polymyalgia rheumatica, oral mucositis, and CNS vasculitis), and 7 patients (33%) had flare of their pre-existing autoimmune diseases (5 had had rheumatoid arthritis, and 1 each with myasthenia gravis and Crohn’s disease). Median time from ICI initiation to irAEs was 91 days (range, 1–496) and to initiation of IL-6R blockade was 6.6 months (range, 0.6–24.3). Median number of IL-6R blockade was 12 (range, 1–35), and 16 patients (76%) were concomitantly receiving corticosteroids of median dose of 10 mg (range, 5–20 mg). Of the 21 patients, irAEs improved in 14 (67%) (95% CI: 46%-87%). Of 13 evaluable patients with arthritis, 11 (85%) achieved remission or minimal disease activity as defined by the clinical disease activity index. Median time from initiation of IL-6R blockade till improvement of irAEs was 2.9 months (range, 1.5–36.9). Nineteen patients tolerated well IL-6R blockade, while two patients stopped treatment due to abdominal pain and sinus tachycardia. The median CRP levels at irAEs was 84 mg/L (0.6–187) and decreased to 1.9 mg/L (0.56–12) at 10 weeks after initiation of IL-6R blockade (P=0.02). Of the 17 evaluable patients, the overall tumor response rate by RECIST-1.1 criteria was similar before and after IL-6R blockade initiation (41% vs. 53%).ConclusionsOur data demonstrated that IL-6R blockade could be an effective therapy for irAEs management without dampening the efficacy of ICIs. Prospective clinical trials with longitudinal blood, tumor, and inflamed tissue biopsies are planned to accurately validate these findings and better study the immunobiology of irAEs.Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center intuition’s Ethics Board, approval number PA19-0089

The Current Role of Immunotherapy in mCRPC: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dalibey H ◽  
◽  
Hansen TF ◽  
Zedan AH ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: The development of immunotherapy has shown promising results in several malignant diseases, including prostate cancer, calling for a systematic review of the current literature. This review aims to evaluate the present data and prospects of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC). Methods: Articles were identified via a systematic search of the electronic database Pubmed, in accordance with the PICO process and following the PRISMA guidelines. Articles in English studying immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with mCRPC published between March 2010 and March 2020 were eligible for inclusion. Endpoints of interest were Overall Survival (OS), Progression-Free Survival (PFS), clinical Overall Response Rate (ORR), and Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) response rate. Results: Ten articles were identified as eligible for inclusion. The studies primarily explored the use of Ipilimumab, a CTLA-4 inhibitor, and Pembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor. These drugs were both used either as monotherapy or in combination with other treatment modalities. The largest trial included in the review demonstrated no significant difference in overall survival between the intervention and placebo. However, two studies presented promising data combing immunotherapy and immune vaccines. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events ranging from 10.1% to 82.3%, whit diarrhea, rash, and fatigue were the most frequently reported. Forty relevant ongoing trials were identified exploring immunotherapy with or without a parallel treatment modality. Conclusion: Overall, the current data shows that the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors as monotherapy may have limited impact on mCRPC, and the results from ongoing combinational trials are eagerly awaited.

scholarly journals 803 Immune-related adverse events correlate with improved outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with combinations of immune-checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A840-A840
Author(s):  
Lindsey Shantzer ◽  
Sean Dougherty ◽  
Wendy Novicoff ◽  
John Melson ◽  
Daniel Reed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the backbone of treatment for most driver-mutation negative, advanced non-small cell lung cancers. ICIs have been approved both as monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy for front line management. While ICIs are generally regarded as well-tolerated, an unintended activation of the immune system can result in a variety of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which can limit their use in severe cases. In patients with NSCLC treated with ICI monotherapy, the occurrence of an irAE and the development of multisystem irAEs have been associated with improved clinical outcomes, suggesting irAE occurrence could have prognostic implications.1–4 However, in patients treated with combination immunotherapy plus chemotherapy, the correlation between irAEs and survival has not been completely elucidated.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective chart review of 94 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with a combination of ICI plus chemotherapy between 2015 and 2021 to evaluate for a correlation between irAE occurrence and overall survival (OS). Patients were divided into two groups: those who experienced at least one irAE and those who did not experience an irAE. To account for immortal time bias, we conducted landmark analyses at 12 and 24 weeks. We additionally investigated the impact of multisystem irAEs on clinical outcomes and described the profile of irAEs observed at our institution.ResultsAmong the 94 evaluable patients identified in our population, 43.6% experienced at least one irAE. Of those patients who experienced an irAE, 26 (63.4%) experienced a single irAE, 9 (22.0%) experienced 2 irAEs, and 6 (14.6%) experienced 3 or more irAEs. The most commonly observed irAEs were dermatitis followed by pneumonitis and colitis. In our cohort, patients with at least one irAE had significantly longer median OS (16.8 mos vs 9.8 mos) compared to those who did not experience an irAE (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.43–0.76, p=0.011) (figure 1). Landmark survival analyses at 12 and 24 weeks continued to support significant differences in median OS based on presence or absence of an irAE (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.24–0.46, and HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.21–0.60 respectively). Among patients with at least one irAE, the subset of patients who experienced multiple irAEs had further improved median OS compared to those with a single irAE.ConclusionsIn patients with advanced NSCLC treated with combination ICI plus chemotherapy, the occurrence of an irAE is associated with improved overall survival.ReferencesTeraoka S, Fujimoto D, Morimoto T, et al. Early Immune-related adverse events and association with outcome in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with Nivolumab: a prospective cohort study. Journal of Thoracic Oncology : Official Publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer 2017;12(12):1798–1805. doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2017.08.022.Ricciuti B, Genova C, De Giglio A, et al. Impact of immune-related adverse events on survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab: long-term outcomes from a multi-institutional analysis. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 2019;145(2):479–485. doi:10.1007/s00432-018-2805-3.Toi Y, Sugawara S, Kawashima Y, et al. Association of immune-related adverse events with clinical benefit in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab. The Oncologist. 2018;23(11):1358–1365. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0384.Shankar B, Zhang J, Naqash AR, et al. Multisystem immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. JAMA Oncol 2020;6(12):1952–1956. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.5012Ethics ApprovalThis research study obtained ethics approval by the institutional review board at the University of Virginia, IRB# 19083.Abstract 803 Figure 1Overall Survival by presence or absence of an irAE in patients with advanced lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy

CCND1 amplification profiling identifies a subtype of melanoma associated with poor survival and an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21552-e21552
Author(s):  
Yu Chen ◽  
Liu Jun ◽  
Jing Lin ◽  
Xuefeng Wang ◽  
Xiao-bin Zheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Lipid Metabolism ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
The Cancer Genome Atlas ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Antiangiogenic Agents ◽  
Ccnd1 Amplification ◽  
Melanoma Patients

e21552 Background: Melanoma is generally regarded as an immunogenic type of tumor that will respond to immune checkpoint therapy. However, melanoma tumors with CCND1 amplification respond poorly to checkpoint therapy. Further understanding of how CCND1 amplification modifies the effect of checkpoint therapy is necessary to design future clinical trials. Methods: We used the data from the Geneplus Institute (n = 302), The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) (n = 367),and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) (n = 350) to identify the incidence of CCND1 amplification and the relationship between CCND1 amplification and survival in melanoma patients and explored molecular mechanisms. Results: The frequency of CCND1 amplification co-occurring with BRAF V600, NRAS, NF1, and KIT mutations was low in these three cohorts. Data from TCGA did not show a statistically significant correlation between CCND1 amplification levels and prognosis of melanoma patients irrespective of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). In contrast, we found opposite results using the MSKCC cohort where CCND1 amplification was an unfavorable prognostic factor for melanoma patients. This was especially true for patients received ICIs who were harboring a high tumor mutation burden (TMB). The TCGA data showed that CCND1 amplification were related to a higher proportion of immunosuppressive cells (Treg cells and M2 macrophages) and a lower proportion of immunity boosting cells (follicular helper T-cells, naive B-cells, CD8+ T-cells). Furthermore, GSEA analysis from the TCGA database suggests that the signaling pathways such as oxidative phosphorylation, reactive oxygen species, adipogenesis, fatty acid metabolism, DNA repair, and myc targets were differentially enriched in melanoma tumors with CCND1 amplification. Finally, we found that angiogenesis related molecules (HIF1A, VEGFA, VEGFR1, FGF2, FGFR1, FGFR4, HGF, PDGFA, PDGFRA, ANGPT1, and ANGPT2) were remarkable decreased in a CCND1 High Amplification group from the TCGA database. Conclusions: Melanoma with CCND1 amplificationis an independent genomic subtype associated with a poor prognosis, an immunosuppressive TME, activated oxidative and lipid metabolism, and down-regulated angiogenesis. Taken together, avoiding ICIs and antiangiogenic agents, while employing CDK4/6 inhibitors alone or in combination with ICIs, targeting oxidative and lipid metabolism pathway may be effective and promising therapeutic strategies for melanoma patients harboring CCND1 amplification.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document