Differential benefit from fractionated dose-dense first-line chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) according to KELIM-evaluated tumor primary chemosensitivity: Exploratory analyses of ICON-8 trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5530-5530
Author(s):  
Benoit You ◽  
Andrew Clamp ◽  
Adrian David Cook ◽  
Iain A. McNeish ◽  
Olivier Colomban
Keyword(s):  
Elimination Rate ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Ca 125 ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Weekly Dose ◽  
First Line ◽  
Dose Dense ◽  
Line Setting ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Carboplatin Auc

5530 Background: ICON8 phase III trial did not show improvement in PFS or OS with first-line weekly dose-dense chemotherapy in EOC. This analysis evaluated the impact of tumor intrinsic primary chemosensitivity (assessed with modeled CA-125 ELIMination rate constant K (KELIM) based on the CA-125 kinetics during the first 100 days of chemo), on survival by treatment arms. Methods: Retrospective analysis of ICON8 where EOC patients were treated with chemo (Arm 1, standard (std) carboplatin AUC5-6 & paclitaxel 175mg/m2 q3weeks; Arm 2, carboplatin AUC 5-6 q3weeks and weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2; or Arm 3, weekly carboplatin AUC 2 & paclitaxel 80 mg/m2; ratio1:1:1) and debulking primary surgery (immediate (IPS), or delayed (DPS)). The association between standardized KELIM (dichotomized as favorable ≥ 1, or unfavorable < 1) and efficacy of treatment arms and surgery completeness was assessed univariate & multivariate analyses. Results: Of 1,566 enrolled patients, KELIM was calculated in 1,004 with ≥ 3 CA-125 available values. KELIM did not differ by treatment arm. Irrespective of surgical strategy, both KELIM and surgery completeness were significant prognostic factors, but treatment arms were not. In 354 IPS patients, 225 had unfavorable KELIM (63%). Weekly dose-dense carboplatin-paclitaxel (Arm 3) (compared to std chemo-Arm 1) was associated with improved survival in unfavorable KELIM patients (PFS:19.6 vs 11.0 months, HR 0.80 [0.54-1.17]; OS : 53.7 vs 40.1 months, HR 0.75 [0.50-1.14]), and worse survival in those with favorable KELIM (PFS: 26.7 vs 48.2 months, HR 1.27 [0.72-2.22]; OS: NR vs 69.2 months, HR 1.05 [0.53-2.06]). Maximum benefit was seen in highest-risk diseases (unfavorable KELIM + incomplete IPS; n = 116; PFS: 17.0 vs 7.4 months, HR 0.49 [0.29-0.82]; OS: 42.6 vs 27.0 months, HR 0.56 [0.33-0.96]). In 611 patients treated with neo-adjuvant chemo +/- DPS (279 unfavorable KELIM, 46%), the same trend for higher survival benefit from dose-dense carboplatin-paclitaxel was found in those with unfavorable KELIM (PFS: 10.8 vs 7.4 months, HR 0.84 [0.63-1.13]; OS: 26.4 vs 23.5 months, HR 0.80 [0.60-1.08]), and reversely. The higher KELIM, the higher the likelihood of complete surgery (OR 4.82 [3.21-7.37]). The prognostic impact of the surgery completeness was greater in unfavorable KELIM patients. Conclusions: In ICON8 trial, both the tumor primary chemosensitivity (by KELIM) and completeness of debulking surgery were major drivers of the prognosis & survival. Dose-dense fractionated chemotherapy in 1st-line setting may be beneficial for patients with lower tumor chemosensitivity, whilst it might be detrimental in those with highly chemosensitive disease. The greatest OS benefit (HR 0.56) from dose-dense chemotherapy was seen in highest-risk diseases (unfavorable KELIM and incomplete IPS).

scholarly journals Timing of immune checkpoint inhibitors for metastatic patients over 75 years of age: the earlier the better

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thierry Landre ◽  
Gaetan Des Guetz ◽  
Kader Chouahnia ◽  
Virginie Fossey-Diaz ◽  
Stéphane Culine
Keyword(s):  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Line Setting ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background The impact of ageing on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) effectiveness remains controversial. However, data from clinical studies do not show any difference between patients over 65 years and those under 65 years. We focused our study on patients over 75 and looked at the potential impact of timing in the use of ICIs. Methods We performed a meta-analysis of published randomized control trials (RCTs) concerning ICIs versus standard therapy in patients with advanced solid tumors. Overall Survival (OS) among the older (≥75 years) was compared with that of younger patients (< 75 years). Hazard ratios (HRs) with their 95% confidence interval (CI) were collected and pooled. Results Fifteen phase III studies evaluating anti-PD-1(nivolumab or pembrolizumab), anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab or avelumab) or anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab) were included. Patients were enrolled for Non-Small-Cell-Lung-Cancer, Renal-Cell-Carcinoma, Melanoma, Head-and-Neck-Squamous-Cell-Carcinoma or Gastric Cancer. Eight studies assessed treatment in first-line setting and seven in the second line. The median age was 64 years, with 906 patients over 75 years of age and 5233 youngers. In first-line setting, HRs for death were 0.78 (95% CI: 0.61-0.99) in patients ≥75 years versus 0.84 (95% CI: 0.71-1.00) in younger. In second line setting, HRs for death were 1.02 (95% CI: 0.77-1.36) in patients ≥75 years versus 0.68 (95% CI: 0.61-0.75) in younger with a statistically significant difference observed between subgroups (p interaction = 0.009). Conclusions ICIs appears to be effective in patients over 75 years of age. However, the survival benefit is mainly observed in first-line treatment.

Is there a benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients over 75 years of age with advanced cancer in first and second line setting: A meta-analysis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12031-12031 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thierry Landre ◽  
Gaetan Des Guetz ◽  
Christos Chouaid ◽  
Jean F. Morere ◽  
Kader Chouahnia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Line Setting ◽  
The Impact

12031 Background: The impact of aging on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) effectiveness is controversial. Currently, data from clinical studies do not show any difference between patients over 65 years and those under 65 years. We propose to compare the clinical benefit of ICIs in those over 75 and in those under 75. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of published randomized control trials (RCTs) concerning ICIs versus standard therapy in patients with advanced solid tumours. Overall Survival (OS) among the older (≥75 years) was compared with that of younger patients ( < 75 years) in first and second line setting. Hazard ratios (HRs) with their 95% confidence interval (CI) were collected from the studies and pooled. Results: Fifteen phase III studies evaluating anti-PD-1 (nivolumab or pembrolizumab), anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab or avelumab) or anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab) were included. Patients were enrolled for Non-Small-Cell-Lung-Cancer, Renal-Cell-Carcinoma, Melanoma, Head-and-Neck-Squamous-Cell-Carcinoma or Gastric-Cancer. Eight studies assessed treatment in first line setting and seven in second line. The median age was 64 years, with 906 patients over 75 years of age and 5233 younger. In first line setting, HRs for death were 0.78 (95% CI: 0.61-0.99) in patients ≥75 years versus 0.84 (95% CI: 0.71-1.00) in younger. In second line setting, HRs for death were 1.02 (95% CI: 0.77-1.36) in patients ≥75 years versus 0.68 (95% CI: 0.61-0.75) in younger with a statistically significant difference observed between subgroups (p interaction = 0.009). Conclusions: ICIs appears to be effective in patients over 75 years of age. However, the survival benefit comes mainly from the first line of treatment. This result encourages the use of ICIs early in the therapeutic management of patients over 75 years of age.

Impact of KRAS mutational status on outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer (PDAC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4142-4142
Author(s):  
Lucy Xiaolu Ma ◽  
Gun Ho Jang ◽  
Amy Zhang ◽  
Robert Edward Denroche ◽  
Anna Dodd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Advanced Disease ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
First Line ◽  
Kras Mutations ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Mutational Status ◽  
Translational Research Program ◽  
The Impact

4142 Background: KRAS mutations (m) (KRASm) are present in over 90% of pancreatic adenocarcinomas (PDAC) with a predominance of G12 substitutions. KRAS wildtype (WT) PDAC relies on alternate oncogenic drivers, and the prognostic impact of these remains unknown. We evaluated alterations in WT PDAC and explored the impact of specific KRASm and WT status on survival. Methods: WGS and RNAseq were performed on 570 patients (pts) ascertained through our translational research program from 2012-2021, of which 443 were included for overall survival (OS) analyses. This included 176 pts with resected and 267 pts with advanced PDAC enrolled on the COMPASS trial (NCT02750657). The latter cohort underwent biopsies prior to treatment with first line gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel or mFOLFIRINOX as per physician choice. The Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards methods were used to estimate OS. Results: KRAS WT PDAC (n = 52) represented 9% of pts, and these cases trended to be younger than pts with KRASm (median age 61 vs 65 years p = 0.1). In resected cases, the most common alterations in WT PDAC (n = 23) included GNASm (n = 6) and BRAFm/fusions (n = 5). In advanced WT PDAC (n = 27), alterations in BRAF (n = 11) and ERBB2/3/4 (n = 6) were most prevalent. Oncogenic fusions (NTRK, NRG1, BRAF/RAF, ROS1, others) were identified in 9 pts. The BRAF in-frame deletion p.486_491del represented the most common single variant in WT PDAC, with organoid profiling revealing sensitivity to both 3rd generation BRAF inhibitors and MEK inhibition. In resected PDAC, multivariable analyses documented higher stage (p = 0.043), lack of adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.001), and the KRAS G12D variant (p = 0.004) as poor prognostic variables. In advanced disease, neither WT PDAC nor KRAS specific alleles had an impact on prognosis (median OS WT = 8.5 mths, G12D = 8.2, G12V = 10.0, G12R = 12.0, others = 9.2, p = 0.73); the basal-like RNA subtype conferred inferior OS (p < 0.001). A targeted therapeutic approach following first line chemotherapy was undertaken in 10% of pts with advanced PDAC: MMRd (n = 1), homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) (n = 19), KRASG12C (n = 1), CDK4/6 amplification (n = 3), ERBB family alterations (n = 2), BRAF variants (n = 2). OS in this group was superior (14.7 vs 8.8 mths, p = 0.04), mainly driven by HRD-PDAC where KRASm were present in 89%. Conclusions: In our dataset, KRAS G12D is associated with inferior OS in resected PDAC, however KRAS mutational status was not prognostic in advanced disease. This suggests that improved OS in the WT PDAC population can only be achieved if there is accelerated access to targeted drugs for pts.

The prognostic impact of bone metastasis in urothelial carcinoma treated with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 415-415
Author(s):  
Husam Alqaisi ◽  
Zachary William Neil Veitch ◽  
Carlos Stecca ◽  
Jeenan Kaiser ◽  
Scott A. North ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Cancer Centre ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Line Setting

415 Background: Metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) is an aggressive disease with a median overall survival (OS) of ≈ 15 months. In the first-line setting, key prognostic factors include ECOG performance status, white blood cell count, and response to treatment per the Galsky nomogram. Bone metastases (BM) in mUC are associated with morbidity and mortality but are grouped with visceral disease; hence, their impact on prognosis is not well established. We aimed to assess the survival impact of BM in mUC patients treated with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC). Methods: A retrospective collection of patient and tumor characteristics, with clinical response to treatment (complete response [CR], partial response [PR]; stable disease [SD] or progressive disease [PD]) for patients treated at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, and Cross Cancer Institute from 2005-2018 was performed. Progression-free survival (PFS) and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate (UVA) followed by multivariate analysis (MVA) of patient variables [Cox] using PFS and OS was performed. Results: Overall 376 mUC patients were included; 222 (59%) had soft-tissue metastases (STM) only, 70 (19%) had bone-only metastases, and 84 (22%) had both STM and BM. Overall, 35% had PR or CR, 19% had SD, and 39% had PD (7%: unknown response). The median PFS and OS for the whole cohort were 5.6 months (95%CI: 4.8-6.4) and 9.7 months (95% CI: 8.8-10.8) respectively. Select UVA by metastatic site showed inferior PFS for bone-only (p=0.03) and combination STM and BM (p=0.017). Only combination STM and BM were significant on UVA for OS (p=0.002). MVA showed that bone-only metastases (p=0.03) and ECOG 3-4 (p<0.0001) were associated with worse PFS (Table). Predictors of worse OS were the combination of STM and BM (p=0.02), ECOG 3-4 (p=0.001), and WBCs ≥ULN (p=0.02), (Table). Conclusions: BM are a significant predictor of worse outcomes for mUC patients treated with first-line PBC. Consideration as a treatment stratification factor for future studies is suggested. Strategies for the treatment of mUC patients with BM (ie: bone targeted agents) in the first-line setting should be addressed in future trials. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Bevacizumab for Newly Diagnosed Ovarian Cancers: Best Candidates Among High-Risk Disease Patients (ICON-7)

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Colomban ◽  
Michel Tod ◽  
Julien Peron ◽  
Timothy J Perren ◽  
Alexandra Leary ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Elimination Rate ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
Ca 125 ◽  
Ovarian Cancers ◽  
High Risk Disease

Abstract Bevacizumab is approved as a maintenance treatment in first-line setting in advanced-stage III-IV ovarian cancers, because GOG-0218 and ICON-7 phase III trials demonstrated progression-free survival benefits. However, only the subgroup of patients with high-risk diseases (stage IV, and incompletely resected stage III) derived an overall survival (OS) gain in the ICON-7 trial (4.8 months). The modeled CA-125 elimination rate constant K (KELIM) parameter, based on the longitudinal CA-125 kinetics during the first 100 days of chemotherapy, is a potential indicator of the tumor primary chemo-sensitivity. In the ICON-7 trial dataset, the OS of patients within the low- and high-risk disease groups was assessed according to treatment arms and KELIM. Among the patients with high-risk diseases, those with favorable standardized KELIM of at least 1.0 (n = 214, 46.7%) had no survival benefit from bevacizumab, whereas those with unfavorable KELIM less than 1.0 (n = 244, 53.2%) derived the highest OS benefit (absolute difference = 9.1 months, 2-sided log-rank P = .10; Cox hazard ratio = 0.78, 95% confidence interval = 0.58 to 1.04, 2-sided P = .09).

scholarly journals Prognostic Impact of Stromal Immune Infiltration before and after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NAC) in Triple Negative Inflammatory Breast Cancers (TNIBC) Treated with Dose-Dense Dose-Intense NAC

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 2657
Author(s):  
Luca Campedel ◽  
Paul Blanc-Durand ◽  
Asker Bin Asker ◽  
Jacqueline Lehmann-Che ◽  
Caroline Cuvier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Dose Dense ◽  
The Impact

Inflammatory breast cancers are very aggressive, and among them, triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) has the worst prognosis. While many studies have investigated the association between tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and outcome in TNBC, the impact of post-NAC TIL and TIL variation in triple negative inflammatory breast cancer (TNIBC) outcome is unknown. Between January 2010 to December 2018, all patients with TNIBC seen at the breast disease unit (Saint-Louis Hospital) were treated with dose-dense dose-intense NAC. The main objective of the study was to determine factors associated with event-free survival (EFS), particularly pathological complete response (pCR), pre- and post-NAC TIL, delta TIL and post-NAC lymphovascular invasion (LVI). After univariate analysis, post-NAC LVI (HR 2.06; CI 1.13–3.74; p = 0.02), high post-NAC TIL (HR 1.81; CI 1.07–3.06; p = 0.03) and positive delta TIL (HR 2.20; CI 1.36–3.52; p = 0.001) were significantly associated with impaired EFS. After multivariate analysis, only a positive TIL variation remained negatively associated with EFS (HR 1.88; CI 1.05–3.35; p = 0.01). TNIBC patients treated with intensive NAC who present TIL enrichment after NAC have a high risk of relapse, which could be used as a prognostic marker in TNIBC and could help to choose adjuvant post-NAC treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document