The combination of venetoclax, lenalidomide, and rituximab in patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma induces high response rates and MRD undetectability.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7505-7505
Author(s):  
Tycel Jovelle Phillips ◽  
Alexey Valeryevich Danilov ◽  
David Alan Bond ◽  
Alex Francisco Herrera ◽  
Kami J. Maddocks ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase 1 ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Grade 5 ◽  
Unrelated Condition ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Grade 3

7505 Background: MCL is a rare lymphoma without a standard of care but several regimens have demonstrated clinical activity, the majority based on traditional chemotherapy. We hypothesized that adding venetoclax (V) to R2 would be safe and effective in MCL pts irrespective of age, morphology or stage. Here we present safety and efficacy data from the on-going phase 1b study of R2 + V in pts with newly diagnosed MCL. Methods: This multi-center phase 1 study (NCT03523975) enrolled pts aged ≥18 yrs with untreated MCL. The primary objective was to characterize the safety and tolerability of R2 + V and determine the MTD. During induction (12 months (m)) pts received lenalidomide (L) 20 mg daily on day 1-21, Rituximab (R) was given weekly during c1 then on day 1 of every even cycle, V was escalated over 4 weeks to 400 mg beginning day 8. Each cycle is 28 days (d). The DLT period was 42 d beginning C1D8. In maintenance, R every 8 weeks for 36m, L at 10 mg or half of last dose during induction for 24 m and V for minimum 12 m. No pts have been transplanted. Pts with progression (PD) came off study. MRD was analyzed in parallel with scans during induction by clonoSEQ assay (Adaptive Biotechnologies). Results: As of Feb. 1st, 2021, we have enrolled all 28 planned pts on study. Pt characteristics/responses are summarized in Table. Among the 28 pts who have received at least one dose, the median treatment duration so far is 278d (IQR 170-560), with 24 pts still on treatment (Tx). 1 pt is off from a unrelated condition. All pts escalated to V 400 mg w/o any DLTs noted. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 100% of pts, and grade 3+ TEAEs were reported in 26 (93%) patients. The most common all-grade TEAEs (≥50% of pts), regardless of relationship to study Tx, were fatigue, neutropenia and diarrhea. Grade ≥3 TEAEs reported in ≥50% pts were neutropenia (68%) and thrombocytopenia (50%). No pts have withdrawn or d/c Tx due to AEs. There was one grade 5 event, in a non-evaluable pt, related to a PE that occurred prior to DLT period. In the 28 evaluable pts the ORR (CR/PR) was 96% (27/28 pts) with CR/CRu of 89%. Of the responding pts, two had PD, one w/ CR and one w/ PR. All pts with PD had baseline TP53 mutation. MRD testing was successful in all pts. At time of submission 20 of 28 (71%) were MRD - at 10-6. Conclusions: Interim results show that at the MTD the combination of V 400 mg daily, L 20 mg, with R is safe with a manageable toxicity profile and a high ORR and MRD - in pts with newly diagnosed MCL. Safety data is consistent with the AE profile noted for each drug without any unexpected or unique AEs. Updated results including BH3 profiling will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT03523975. [Table: see text]

ANCHOR (OP-104): Melflufen plus dexamethasone (dex) and bortezomib (BTZ) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)—Optimal dose, updated efficacy and safety results.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8037-8037
Author(s):  
Roman Hajek ◽  
Luděk Pour ◽  
Miquel Granell ◽  
Vladimir Maisnar ◽  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Cardiac Failure ◽  
Alkylating Agents ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Optimal Dose ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Development Of Resistance ◽  
Grade 3

8037 Background: Development of resistance to standard treatments for RRMM highlights the need for novel therapies. Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate (PDC) that leverages aminopeptidases and rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumor cells. Melflufen + dex showed clinical activity and an acceptable safety profile in HORIZON (Richardson et al. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Dec 9 [Epub]). This is an update of the BTZ arm of the phase 1/2a ANCHOR study (NCT03481556). Methods: Patients (pts) with RRMM were intolerant or refractory to a prior IMiD, with 1-4 prior lines of therapy (LoTs). Prior treatment with a proteasome inhibitor (PI) was allowed, but pts could not be refractory to PIs in the last LoT. Melflufen (30, 40, or 20 mg intravenously; d 1 of each 28-d cycle) was administered with BTZ (1.3 mg/m2 subcutaneous) + oral dex (20 mg on d 1, 4, 8, and 11 and 40 mg on d 15 and 22; dex dose reduced if aged ≥ 75 y). The primary objective in phase 1 was to determine the optimal phase 2 dose of melflufen for this combination. Results: As of the data cutoff date (October 19, 2020), 13 pts received melflufen (30 mg, n = 6; 40 mg, n = 7) + dex and BTZ. In the 30 mg and 40 mg cohorts, respectively, median age was 78.5 y (range, 70-82) and 70.0 y (range, 61-76); median prior LoTs was 3.5 (range, 2-4) and 2.0 (range, 1-4); 33% and 50% of evaluable pts had high-risk cytogenetics; 83% and 71% were refractory to last LoT; 100% and 86% received a prior PI; 33% and 14% were refractory to PIs. In the 30 mg and 40 mg cohorts, respectively, median treatment duration was 6.5 mo (range, 1.4-29.0) and 8.7 mo (range, 2.1-19.6); 4 (67%) and 4 pts (57%) were still on treatment; 2 and 3 pts discontinued (30 mg: progressive disease [PD] and other [1 pt each]; 40 mg: adverse event [AE], lack of efficacy, and PD [1 pt each]). Confirmed overall response rate in the 30 mg and 40 mg cohorts, respectively, was 50% (1 very good partial response [VGPR] and 2 partial response [PR]) and 71% (1 complete response, 3 VGPR, and 1 PR). Most common grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were thrombocytopenia (30 mg: 50%; 40 mg: 100%) and neutropenia (30 mg: 33%; 40 mg: 71%); grade 3/4 nonhematologic TRAEs were infrequent; 3 pts discontinued study treatment due to treatment-emergent AEs (30 mg: cardiac failure chronic and osteolysis [1 pt each]; 40 mg: thrombocytopenia [1 pt]). Serious TRAEs occurred in 2 pts (33%) in the 30 mg cohort (neutropenia and pneumonia [1 pt], syncope [1 pt]) and 1 pt (14%) in the 40 mg cohort (thrombocytopenia and neutropenia). No dose-limiting toxicities occurred at either dose level. Fatal AEs occurred in 1 pt in the 30 mg cohort (cardiac failure chronic; unrelated to study treatment). Conclusions: ANCHOR determined that the optimal dose of melflufen is 30 mg + dex and BTZ; results showed clinical activity in heavily pretreated pts. Recruitment is ongoing; updated data will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03481556.

Clinical Activity of the Immunoconjugate CMC-544 in B-Cell Malignancies: Preliminary Report of the Expanded Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) Cohort of a Phase 1 Study.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2711-2711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Fayad ◽  
Hemant Patel ◽  
Gregor Verhoef ◽  
Myron Czuczman ◽  
James Foran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Remission Rate ◽  
International Workshop ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
B Cell Lymphomas ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: CMC-544 is an antibody-targeted chemotherapy agent composed of a humanized antibody that specifically targets the CD22 antigen, conjugated to calicheamicin, a potent cytotoxic antitumor agent. Malignant cells of mature B-lymphocyte lineage express CD22, suggesting that CMC-544 may be useful for treating lymphomas of B-cell origin. A phase 1 dose-escalation trial of CMC-544 was performed at 14 European and US sites with 36 patients in the dose escalation portion and 48 in the expanded MTD portion. The MTD dose was 1.8 mg/m2 every 4 weeks. In the dose escalation phase the main toxicities observed were thrombocytopenia, asthenia, nausea, neutropenia, elevated liver function tests (LFTs) and anorexia. Grade 3–4 levels were only seen for thrombocytopenia, asthenia, neutropenia and LFTs (incidence of 40%, 13%, 9% and 9% respectively). Responses were seen in 8/22 (36%) patients (Advani A, et. al. Blood, abstract# 230, 2005:106). We now report the results of the expanded cohort at the MTD. Patients and Methods: Relapsed/refractory lymphoma patients were treated at the 1.8 mg/m2 dose level every 4 weeks. In addition to safety data, preliminary efficacy data (assessed using the International Workshop to Standardize Response Criteria for NHL) were collected. Results: As of July 2006, 48 patients were treated: median age 57 years (range 26–75); 51% females; 61% with ≥ 4 prior lines of therapy; 22 (46%) follicular lymphomas (FL) and 26 (54%) diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL). Data were available on 48 patients evaluable for safety and 34 patients (19 FL and 15 DLBCL) evaluable for response. The overall safety profile was manageable; the most common drug-related adverse events (all grades) included thrombocytopenia (90%; the only bleeding noted was grade 1–2 epistaxis [12%]), asthenia (57%), nausea (39%), neutropenia (37%) and elevated levels of AST/SGOT (41%), ALT/SGPT (18%), alkaline phosphatase (27%) and bilirubin (18%). Grade 3–4 AEs that occurred with a frequency ≥ 10% included thrombocytopenia (57%) and neutropenia (29%). Responses in evaluable patients are shown in Table 1. The objective response rate was 69% and 33% for patients with FL and DLBCL, respectively. Conclusions: CMC-544 exhibits effficacy against recurrent/refractory B-cell lymphomas, with the main toxicity being clinically manageable, self limited thrombocytopenia. These encouraging data support the continuing development of CMC-544. Number (%) of Responses in Evaluable Patients: Response Follicular Lymphoma (n=19) DLBCL (n=15) ORR = Overall Remission Rate, (CR/CRu+PR) CR/CRu 6 (31.7) 2 (13.3) PR 7 (36.8) 3 (20.0) ORR 13 (68.5) 5 (33.3)

Interim safety and clinical activity in patients (pts) with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma from a multicohort phase 1 study of ramucirumab (R) plus pembrolizumab (P).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 102-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Chau ◽  
Johanna C. Bendell ◽  
Emiliano Calvo ◽  
Rafael Santana-Davila ◽  
Jordi Rodon Ahnert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase 1 ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Maculopapular Rash ◽  
Pneumocystis Pneumonia ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Dosing Regimens ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

102 Background: Angiogenesis and immunosuppression are hallmarks of tumor growth. This is the first study to combine R (anti-VEGFR2) with P (anti-PD-1) to simultaneously target both processes in the tumor microenvironment. Methods: This ongoing, multi-cohort, phase 1a/b trial (NCT02443324) enrolled pts with confirmed G/GEJ adenocarcinoma with prior progression on systemic therapy, measurable disease, ECOG PS 0-1, and baseline tumor tissue. PD-L1 was classified as positive (≥1%) or negative using the DAKO PD-L1 22C3 IHC pharmDx assay. Two dosing regimens were evaluated, Cohort A (R 8 mg/kg on Days 1&8) and Cohort B (R 10 mg/kg on Day 1), given with P 200 mg on Day 1 q3W. The primary objective was to assess safety and tolerability of adding R to P; preliminary efficacy will be examined. Results: As of 23-Jun-2016, 40 G/GEJ pts have been enrolled (Cohort A: n=23; Cohort B: n=17). First pt treated in Cohorts A and B were on 29-Feb-2016 and 26-Oct-2015, respectively. The median age was 59 y, 75% were male, 65% had ECOG PS of 1, 48% were PD-L1 positive, and 70% received study treatment as third or subsequent regimen. Median duration of treatment was 2.1 mo and 4.1 mo for Cohort A and B, respectively. All grades treatment-related AEs (TRAE) occurred in 31 (78%) pts and similar between cohorts; TRAEs in ≥10% of pts were fatigue (30%), infusion related reaction (12.5%), decreased appetite (12.5%), pruritus (10%), maculopapular rash (10%), and hypertension (10%). Ten (25%) pts had grade 3-4 TRAEs, most commonly colitis (7.5%) and hypertension (7.5%). One treatment-related death occurred (pneumocystis pneumonia and pulmonary sepsis). Preliminary efficacy data showed 3 of 40 (7.5%) pts (PD-L1 negative, n=1; PD-L1 positive, n=2) have responded (1 confirmed and 2 unconfirmed PR) to treatment with a 45% disease control rate. Median PFS was 2.10 mo (95% CI, 1.18 to 4.04) and 2.60 mo (1.38, NR) for Cohorts A and B, respectively. Fifteen (37.5%) pts, including all responders, remain on treatment. Conclusions: R+P generated no new safety signals and demonstrated antitumor activity in pts with previously treated advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Clinical trial information: NCT02443324.

Safety and clinical activity of durvalumab monotherapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4071-4071 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zev A. Wainberg ◽  
Neil Howard Segal ◽  
Dirk Jaeger ◽  
Kyung-Hun Lee ◽  
John Marshall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Sorafenib Treatment ◽  
Secondary Objective ◽  
Pugh Class ◽  
Grade 3

4071 Background: Durvalumab, an anti-PD-L1 mAb, has shown early and durable clinical activity with manageable safety in an ongoing Phase 1/2, multicenter, open-label study in pts with advanced solid tumors. Interim analyses from the HCC cohort in the dose-expansion part of this study are reported here. Methods: Patients with HCC (Child-Pugh class A) received durvalumab 10 mg/kg i.v. q2w for 12 months or until confirmed progressive disease, whichever occurred first. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety profile; secondary objective was to assess the antitumor activity (investigator-assessed RECIST v1.1). Clinical activity was evaluated for the total HCC population and by viral status. Results: As of Oct 24 2016, 40 HCC pts with median 23.9 (range 2.4–34.7) weeks follow-up received durvalumab. 93% had prior sorafenib. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 80.0% of pts, most commonly fatigue (27.5%), pruritus (25.0%) and elevated aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (22.5%). Grade 3–4 treatment-related AEs were reported in 20.0% of pts, most commonly elevated AST (7.5%) and elevated alanine aminotransferase (5.0%). 7 (17.5%) pts completed the initial 12-month treatment and 7 (17.5%) pts discontinued treatment because of an AE (none related to treatment). There were no deaths due to treatment-related AEs. Clinical activity is presented in the table. 4 pts achieved a PR; 2 were ongoing at data cut-off. Conclusions: Durvalumab had an acceptable safety profile and showed promising antitumor activity and OS in pts with HCC, particularly HCV+ pts. Clinical trial information: NCT01693562. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Phase 1 study of the ATR inhibitor berzosertib in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumours

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey I. Shapiro ◽  
Robert Wesolowski ◽  
Craig Devoe ◽  
Simon Lord ◽  
John Pollard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase 1 ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Solid Tumours ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Background Berzosertib (formerly M6620, VX-970) is a highly potent and selective, first-in-class ataxia telangiectasia-mutated and Rad3-related protein kinase (ATR) inhibitor. We assessed the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of berzosertib plus cisplatin. Methods Adult patients with advanced solid tumours refractory or resistant to standard of care therapies received ascending doses of cisplatin (day 1) and berzosertib (days 2 and 9) every 3 weeks (Q3W). Results Thirty-one patients received berzosertib (90–210 mg/m2) and cisplatin (40–75 mg/m2) across seven dose levels. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (20.0%) and anaemia (16.7%). There were two dose-limiting toxicities: a grade 3 hypersensitivity reaction and a grade 3 increase in alanine aminotransferase. Berzosertib 140 mg/m2 (days 2 and 9) and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 (day 1) Q3W was determined as the recommended Phase 2 dose. Cisplatin had no apparent effect on berzosertib pharmacokinetics. Of the 31 patients, four achieved a partial response (two confirmed and two unconfirmed) despite having previously experienced disease progression following platinum-based chemotherapy. Conclusions Berzosertib plus cisplatin is well tolerated and shows preliminary clinical activity in patients with advanced solid tumours, warranting further evaluation in a Phase 2 setting. Clinical Trials Identifier NCT02157792.

scholarly journals A Phase 1/2, Dose and Schedule Evaluation Study to Investigate the Safety and Clinical Activity of Belantamab Mafodotin Administered in Combination with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Transplant-Ineligible Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2736-2736
Author(s):  
Evangelos Terpos ◽  
Maria Gavriatopoulou ◽  
Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos ◽  
Panagiotis Malandrakis ◽  
Despina Fotiou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Adverse Event ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Safety Analysis ◽  
Health Data ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: The combination of lenalidomide with dexamethasone (Rd) represents a preferred treatment backbone for newly diagnosed, transplant-ineligible patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM), while the addition of a third drug (i.e., daratumumab, bortezomib, carfilzomib or ixazomib) leads to higher response rates and deeper responses. Belantamab mafodotin (belamaf; GSK2857916) is a multi-modal antibody-drug conjugate that has demonstrated a clinically meaningful anti-myeloma activity with a manageable safety profile in heavily pre-treated pts with relapsed or refractory MM. Preclinical evidence suggest a potential synergy between belamaf and lenalidomide; at the same time, these drugs do not have overlapping toxicities. Thus, there is strong rationale for investigating the clinical activity of upfront belamaf in combination with Rd in transplant-ineligible MM pts. Aims: The present analysis evaluates the safety profile of belamaf in 3 different dosing schemes in combination with Rd in treatment-naïve, transplant-ineligible MM pts. Methods: BelaRd (study short title) is an open-label, single-center, phase 1/2 study conducted in Greece, aiming to enroll 66 newly diagnosed, transplant-ineligible MM pts. The study comprises 2 parts. Part 1 will evaluate 3 doses of belamaf (2.5, 1.9, and 1.4 mg/kg) in combination with Rd, each given in an individual cohort of pts, and will determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). In this part, belamaf will be administered q8w and, depending on toxicity, dosing may be rescheduled to q4w or q12w. In Part 2, a single cohort of pts will be treated with belamaf in the RP2D in combination with Rd to further evaluate the safety and clinical activity of this regimen. Part 2 will also evaluate 2 different sets of guidelines for ocular adverse events (AEs) in 2 separate groups of pts to identify the optimal method for the management of belamaf-related keratopathy. This is the initial safety analysis of Part 1 and includes pts who received ≥1 belamaf dose and were followed up for ≥8 weeks. Results: Overall, as of 16 July 2021 (cut-off date), 18 pts completed the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) observation period, defined as specific ≥ grade 3 AEs occurring during the first cycle of study treatment, and were included in the safety analysis. The median age was 72 years (range: 65-82), and the majority of pts were male (55.6%). Lytic bone lesions were present in 12 (66.7%) pts; no pts had extramedullary disease. Most pts (9, 50.0%) had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 followed by those at 1 (8, 44.4%) and 2 (1, 5.6%). Regarding the revised International Staging System, most pts (13, 72.2%) were at stage II, followed by those at stages III (2, 11.1%) and I (3, 16.7%); 3 (16.7%) pts had high-risk cytogenetics, defined as del17p13, t(4;14) or t(14;16). By the cut-off date, pts had received a median of 4 treatment cycles, with 17 (94.4%) pts still being on treatment; 1 (5.6%) pt died due to pneumonia, unrelated to the study treatment. 16 (88.9%) pts experienced ≥1 treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE). In total, 11 (61.1%) pts had ≥1 TEAE grade 3/4, of which 1 was related to belamaf; 1 (5.6%) pt experienced a serious adverse event (SAE). There were 2 cases of dose reduction and 1 case of dose delay. The most common grade 3/4 TEAEs were fatigue (5 pts, 27.8%) and rash (4 pts, 22.7%), all related to lenalidomide. One SAE was reported: pneumonia grade 5 in the 2.5 mg/kg cohort. DLTs were noted in 3 (16.7%) pts: 1 pt with grade 3 fatigue in the 1.4 mg/kg cohort and 1 pt with grade 3 rash in each of the 1.9 and 1.4 mg/kg cohorts, all related to lenalidomide. Regarding belamaf-related ocular AEs, there were 2 cases of superficial punctuate keratopathy (grade 1 and 2 each, both in the 2.5 mg/kg cohort), 10 cases of decreased visual acuity (grade 1 [8 pts, 44.4%]: 4 in the 1.9 mg/kg cohort and 4 in the 1.4 mg/kg cohort; grade 2 [2 pts, 11.1%] in the 2.5 mg/kg cohort), and 1 case of grade 1 blurred vision in 2.5 mg/kg cohort. Conclusions: In the first safety analysis of the BelaRd study no new safety signals for the belamaf-Rd combination were observed. The frequency of ocular AEs was within the anticipated range. This early analysis shows that the triplet combination can be safely administered in treatment-naïve, transplant-ineligible MM pts. The enrollment in the study is ongoing, and more safety and efficacy data will become available with the inclusion of additional pts in an updated analysis. Disclosures Terpos: Novartis: Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genesis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria. Gavriatopoulou: Janssen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Genesis: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Gkolfinopoulos: Health Data Specialists: Current Employment. Manousou: Health Data Specialists: Current Employment. Dimopoulos: Janssen: Honoraria; Beigene: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria.

QOLP-04. THE KETOGENIC DIET PLUS STANDARD CARE FOR RECENTLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA: A PHASE 1 SAFETY AND FEASIBILITY TRIAL

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi183-vi183
Author(s):  
Jethro Hu ◽  
L J Amaral ◽  
Gillian Gresham ◽  
Thomas Nelson ◽  
Amelia Welborn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ketogenic Diet ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Feasibility Trial ◽  
Phase 2 Trial ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract INTRODUCTION There is abundant interest in the potential therapeutic and supportive role of a ketogenic diet (KD) for glioblastoma patients. We conducted a single-arm phase 1 trial to assess the safety and feasibility of KD plus standard-of-care (SOC) in glioblastoma patients (NCT03451799). METHODS Adults within 3 months of diagnosis participated in a 16-week intervention of a classic 3:1 KD (grams fat : grams carbohydrate + protein) with dietitian support. Blood glucose and ketone levels were assessed twice daily (Keto-Mojo), with remote monitoring of daily weight and activity (Fitbit). The primary objective was to assess safety (weight stability, CTCAE) and feasibility (maintaining ketosis > 0.3mM for > 50% of study period). Secondary objectives included assessments of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and cognition (MoCA). RESULTS From 04/2018-02/2021, 14 patients were evaluable: female:male, 8:6, median age 55 years, KPS 80, BMI 24.5. MGMT promoter methylation: 6 present, 7 absent, 1 indeterminate. Adherence to KD was high, with all patients maintaining ketosis ( > 0.3mM) > 50% and 11 patients maintaining ketosis > 85% of study days. Adverse events (> Grade 2) potentially attributable to KD: appetite loss (Grade 2: 2); fatigue (Grade 2: 5); flu-like symptoms (Grade 2: 1); constipation (Grade 2: 5, Grade 3: 1). No patients were removed from study for safety reasons. HRQOL was stable, with improvements in role function (not statistically significant). MoCA score improved in 10/14 patients. Median PFS and OS from KD initiation were 11.7 and 29.1 months, respectively. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that a supervised KD plus SOC is safe and feasible in glioblastoma patients. KD was well-tolerated with encouraging trends in HRQOL and cognition. PFS and OS in this small trial compare favorably to historical control. A multicenter phase 2 trial powered to assess efficacy is planned.

CTIM-08. SAFETY, EFFICACY, AND SURVIVAL RESULTS FROM A PHASE 1 STUDY OF THE ONCOLYTIC ADENOVIRUS DNX-2401 FOLLOWED BY STANDARD OF CARE RADIOTHERAPY FOR NEWLY DIAGNOSED DIFFUSE INTRINSIC PONTINE GLIOMA (DIPG)

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi50-vi51
Author(s):  
Jaime Gállego Pérez-Larraya ◽  
Marc Garcia-Moure ◽  
Ana Patiño-García ◽  
Marisol González-Huarriz ◽  
Jasper Van der Lugt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma ◽  
Oncolytic Adenovirus ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Pontine Glioma ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Tumor Biopsy ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract BACKGROUND Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is the most lethal pediatric brain tumor. Median overall survival (OS) with standard of care radiation therapy (RT) is approximately 8-10 months and 2-year survival is < 10%. A Phase 1 single-center study was conducted to evaluate the oncolytic adenovirus, DNX-2401 (tasadenoturev), followed by RT for DIPG. METHODS Newly-diagnosed DIPG patients 1-18 years old received a tumor biopsy through the cerebellar peduncle followed by intratumoral injection of 1e10 – 5e10 vp DNX-2401 and conventional RT 1-3 weeks later. RESULTS Subjects were enrolled (n=12) from December 2017 to January 2020 and had a median age of 9 years (range 3-18) and Lansky/Karnofsky performance scores of 90-100 (n=4; 33%) or 70-80 (n=8; 67%). Genetic assessment was completed for 11 subjects (92%) and histone 3 K27M mutations were identified in 10 subjects, including H3F3A (n=8), HIST2H3C (n=1), and HIST1H3B (n=1); 1 subject was H3 wildtype (n=1). TP53 mutations were identified in 5 subjects (42%). DNX-2401 was administered followed by RT (n=11; 92%). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed and the treatment regimen was well-tolerated. The most commonly reported adverse events (≥ 5 subjects), regardless of study drug relationship, include asthenia, headache, vomiting, pyrexia, and neurological deterioration. Three serious adverse events were reported including grade 3 abdominal pain, grade 3 lymphopenia, and grade 3 clinical deterioration. Tumor reductions were reported for 9 subjects (75%), including 2 confirmed (17%) and 2 unconfirmed (17%) responses per RAPNO criteria. As of the data cutoff, median OS is 19.7 months and OS-24 is 32% with follow-up ongoing for 3 subjects (26.9, 25.6, 13.7 months). CONCLUSIONS DNX-2401 followed by RT can be safely administered to DIPG. Survival outcomes are encouraging, thus warranting further evaluation in a Phase 2 study.

A Phase 1 Trial of the Pan Bcl-2 Family Inhibitor Obatoclax Mesylate (GX15-070) in Combination with Bortezomib in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 2569-2569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andre Goy ◽  
Peggy Ford ◽  
Tatyana Feldman ◽  
Andrew Pecora ◽  
Stuart Goldberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Dosage Group ◽  
Efficacy Evaluation ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Obatoclax is a small molecule inhibitor of all members of the bcl-2 family of prosurvival proteins which mimics the BH3-only pro-apoptotic proteins of the bcl-2 family. By binding to a hydrophobic groove on the prosurvival bcl-2 proteins (such as bcl-2 and mcl-1), obatoclax releases bax and bak and induces apoptosis. Obatoclax has clinical activity in CLL (O’Brien et al, ASH 2005) with a recommended phase II dose of 28 mg/m2 given over 3 h every 3 weeks with DLT of grade 3 infusional CNS toxicities. Similar toxicities with weekly dosing led to an MTD of 20 mg/m2 weekly (Firozvi et al, ASCO2006). Bortezomib has been shown to be an effective agent in patients with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) but increases levels of mcl-1, a bcl-2 prosurvival family member. Obatoclax inhibits mcl-1, and in vitro data indicate synergy between obatoclax and bortezomib in MCL cell lines and patient samples (Blood109:4441, 2007). We have completed an ascending dose study evaluating the combination of obatoclax (3 hour IV infusion) and bortezomib (IV push) in patients with MCL. Both obatoclax and bortezomib were administered on days 1, 4, 8, & 11 of 21 day cycles, and up to 8 cycles were administered. Three patients received 30 mg of obatoclax and 1.0 mg/m2 of bortezomib, 3 received 30 mg of obatoclax and 1.3 mg/m2 of bortezomib, and 6 received 45 mg of obatoclax and 1.3 mg/m2 of bortezomib, which was the highest dose evaluated. Efficacy evaluation was performed every 2 cycles, approximately every 6 weeks. Median age was 67 (range 44 – 81), with 7 males. All patients had prior anthracyclines and rituximab, and 5 had previously received bortezomib. In preliminary data on the first 9 patients, adverse events with an overall incidence of ≥25% were thrombocytopenia, abdominal distension, abdominal pain, constipation, diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, weight loss, dehydration, neuropathy, somnolence, euphoric mood, cough, and rash. The most common grade 3 and grade 4 adverse event was thrombocytopenia (22.2%). Somnolence and euphoric mood resolved soon after the infusion ended. There were no grade 3 or 4 infusional CNS toxicities. Obatoclax 45 mg and bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 was determined to be the combination dosage to be used for further evaluation. Using Investigator Reported assessments confirmed by evaluation after 2 additional cycles of treatment, 2 patients in the obatoclax 30 mg/bortezomib 1.0 mg/m2 dosage group and 1 patient in the obatoclax 30 mg/bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 dosage group achieved a CR/CRu. Two of these patients had prior high dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplants, and the third had prior bortezomib. Conclusions: Obatoclax and bortezomib (45 mg and 1.3 mg/m2, respectively) administered on days 1, 4, 8, & 11 of a 21 day cycle was found to have acceptable tolerability. Building on pre-clinical data indicating synergy, this study supports a novel twice-weekly administration schedule for obatoclax with bortezomib, and demonstrates initial evidence of efficacy of the combination in heavily-pretreated patients with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma. Prior Treatment and Response by Dosage Group Dosage Group* Mean # Regimens Prior Bortezomib CR/CRu SD PD Unk^ Total * Obatoclax mg/bortezomib mg/m2 ^ Follow-up ongoing 30/1.0 2 (1–3) 1 2 1 0 0 3 30/1.3 3 (1–7) 1 1 1 1 0 3 45/1.3 2 (1–4) 3 0 2 3 1 6

Rituximab, gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (R-GEMOX): An effective regimen for relapsed and refractory B-cell lymphoma

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7562-7562 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. El Gnaoui ◽  
J. Dupuis ◽  
K. Belhadj ◽  
A. Rahmouni ◽  
C. Copie-Bergman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Induction Phase ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Grade 3

7562 Background: High-dose therapy with autologous stem cell support (HDT) is an established treatment for chemosensitive relapse in lymphoma. However, not all patients are candidates for HDT because of age, comorbidities or previous HDT. In addition,effective and less toxic alternatives to classical Cisplatin/ARA-C-based salvage regimens are needed. Methods: Based on the clinical activity, tolerability of rituximab (R), gemcitabine (G) and oxaliplatin (Ox) and synergy between these drugs, the R-GEMOX regimen was designed with R (375mg/m2 d 1), G (1,000 mg/m2 d 2) and Ox (100 mg/m2 d 2). Treatment was given every two weeks. Between January 2002 and June 2005, 46 patients with refractory/relapsing B-cell CD20+ lymphoma not eligible for HDT were enrolled in an unicenter pilot study whose primary objective was overall response rate (ORR) after 4 cycles (induction phase). Patients were planned to receive 8 cycles if at least PR was observed after 4 cycles. Median age was 64 years (range: 43–78) and histological subtypes were: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n = 33), follicular (n = 8) and mantle cell (n = 5). Prior treatments included anthracyclin in 45 patients, rituximab in 26 (56%) and HDT in 14 (30%). The median number of prior treatments was 2 (range: 1 to 5) and 13 patients (28%) had received at least 3 prior regimens. Results: 315 cycles were given. The dose administered was 100% of the intended dose for the three drugs in all patients but 8, for whom the dose of oxaliplatin was reduced due to neurotoxicity (n = 7) or preexisting renal insufficiency (n = 1). Eight patients progressed during the induction phase. After 4 cycles, responses were: 10 CR, 13 CRu and 15 PR resulting in an ORR of 83%. At the end of treatment, among the 38 responder-patients, 36 patients achieved CR (78% of the entire population), one patient remained in PR and one progressed. With a median follow-up of 27 months, the 2-year progression-free and overall survivals were 53% and 66%, respectively. NCIC grade 3–4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were reported in 48% and 22% of the cycles. A grade 4 infection was observed in only 3% of the cycles. There was no renal toxicity. Conclusions: The R-GEMOX regimen shows promising activity with an acceptable toxicity. It is currently evaluated in a multicentric phase II study. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document