QOLP-04. THE KETOGENIC DIET PLUS STANDARD CARE FOR RECENTLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA: A PHASE 1 SAFETY AND FEASIBILITY TRIAL

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi183-vi183
Author(s):  
Jethro Hu ◽  
L J Amaral ◽  
Gillian Gresham ◽  
Thomas Nelson ◽  
Amelia Welborn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ketogenic Diet ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Feasibility Trial ◽  
Phase 2 Trial ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract INTRODUCTION There is abundant interest in the potential therapeutic and supportive role of a ketogenic diet (KD) for glioblastoma patients. We conducted a single-arm phase 1 trial to assess the safety and feasibility of KD plus standard-of-care (SOC) in glioblastoma patients (NCT03451799). METHODS Adults within 3 months of diagnosis participated in a 16-week intervention of a classic 3:1 KD (grams fat : grams carbohydrate + protein) with dietitian support. Blood glucose and ketone levels were assessed twice daily (Keto-Mojo), with remote monitoring of daily weight and activity (Fitbit). The primary objective was to assess safety (weight stability, CTCAE) and feasibility (maintaining ketosis > 0.3mM for > 50% of study period). Secondary objectives included assessments of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and cognition (MoCA). RESULTS From 04/2018-02/2021, 14 patients were evaluable: female:male, 8:6, median age 55 years, KPS 80, BMI 24.5. MGMT promoter methylation: 6 present, 7 absent, 1 indeterminate. Adherence to KD was high, with all patients maintaining ketosis ( > 0.3mM) > 50% and 11 patients maintaining ketosis > 85% of study days. Adverse events (> Grade 2) potentially attributable to KD: appetite loss (Grade 2: 2); fatigue (Grade 2: 5); flu-like symptoms (Grade 2: 1); constipation (Grade 2: 5, Grade 3: 1). No patients were removed from study for safety reasons. HRQOL was stable, with improvements in role function (not statistically significant). MoCA score improved in 10/14 patients. Median PFS and OS from KD initiation were 11.7 and 29.1 months, respectively. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that a supervised KD plus SOC is safe and feasible in glioblastoma patients. KD was well-tolerated with encouraging trends in HRQOL and cognition. PFS and OS in this small trial compare favorably to historical control. A multicenter phase 2 trial powered to assess efficacy is planned.

The combination of venetoclax, lenalidomide, and rituximab in patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma induces high response rates and MRD undetectability.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7505-7505
Author(s):  
Tycel Jovelle Phillips ◽  
Alexey Valeryevich Danilov ◽  
David Alan Bond ◽  
Alex Francisco Herrera ◽  
Kami J. Maddocks ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase 1 ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Grade 5 ◽  
Unrelated Condition ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Grade 3

7505 Background: MCL is a rare lymphoma without a standard of care but several regimens have demonstrated clinical activity, the majority based on traditional chemotherapy. We hypothesized that adding venetoclax (V) to R2 would be safe and effective in MCL pts irrespective of age, morphology or stage. Here we present safety and efficacy data from the on-going phase 1b study of R2 + V in pts with newly diagnosed MCL. Methods: This multi-center phase 1 study (NCT03523975) enrolled pts aged ≥18 yrs with untreated MCL. The primary objective was to characterize the safety and tolerability of R2 + V and determine the MTD. During induction (12 months (m)) pts received lenalidomide (L) 20 mg daily on day 1-21, Rituximab (R) was given weekly during c1 then on day 1 of every even cycle, V was escalated over 4 weeks to 400 mg beginning day 8. Each cycle is 28 days (d). The DLT period was 42 d beginning C1D8. In maintenance, R every 8 weeks for 36m, L at 10 mg or half of last dose during induction for 24 m and V for minimum 12 m. No pts have been transplanted. Pts with progression (PD) came off study. MRD was analyzed in parallel with scans during induction by clonoSEQ assay (Adaptive Biotechnologies). Results: As of Feb. 1st, 2021, we have enrolled all 28 planned pts on study. Pt characteristics/responses are summarized in Table. Among the 28 pts who have received at least one dose, the median treatment duration so far is 278d (IQR 170-560), with 24 pts still on treatment (Tx). 1 pt is off from a unrelated condition. All pts escalated to V 400 mg w/o any DLTs noted. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 100% of pts, and grade 3+ TEAEs were reported in 26 (93%) patients. The most common all-grade TEAEs (≥50% of pts), regardless of relationship to study Tx, were fatigue, neutropenia and diarrhea. Grade ≥3 TEAEs reported in ≥50% pts were neutropenia (68%) and thrombocytopenia (50%). No pts have withdrawn or d/c Tx due to AEs. There was one grade 5 event, in a non-evaluable pt, related to a PE that occurred prior to DLT period. In the 28 evaluable pts the ORR (CR/PR) was 96% (27/28 pts) with CR/CRu of 89%. Of the responding pts, two had PD, one w/ CR and one w/ PR. All pts with PD had baseline TP53 mutation. MRD testing was successful in all pts. At time of submission 20 of 28 (71%) were MRD - at 10-6. Conclusions: Interim results show that at the MTD the combination of V 400 mg daily, L 20 mg, with R is safe with a manageable toxicity profile and a high ORR and MRD - in pts with newly diagnosed MCL. Safety data is consistent with the AE profile noted for each drug without any unexpected or unique AEs. Updated results including BH3 profiling will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT03523975. [Table: see text]

Intergroup study EORTC-1333-GUCG: A randomized multicenter phase III trial comparing enzalutamide vs. a combination of Ra223 and enzalutamide in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients metastatic to bone (PEACE III).

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS390-TPS390
Author(s):  
Bertrand F. Tombal ◽  
Yohann Loriot ◽  
Fred Saad ◽  
Raymond S. McDermott ◽  
Sandrine Marreaud ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Favourable Safety Profile ◽  
Health Related

TPS390 Background: α-emitting radiopharmaceutical Ra-223 reduces the risk of death by 30% vs placebo in phase 3 ALSYMPCA (Parker et al. NEJM 2013). Ra-223’s favourable safety profile and lack of significant toxicity support combining it with other agents. The ALSYMPCA trial was developed to add Ra-223 on the contemporary standard of care that did not include last generation AR pathway inhibitors enzalutamide, one of the modern reference treatments for asymptomatic or moderately symptomatic metastatic CRPC (Gillessen et al. Eur Urol. 2017). In addition Ra-223 is registered in symptomatic prostate cancer (PCa), a very late stage of modern patient disease. There is thus a good rationale to combine Ra-223 to modern AR pathway inhibitors and to initiate the treatment in asymptomatic or moderately symptomatic patients. Methods: The EORTC 1333-GUCG study will run in 51 sites (21 activated) across 7 European countries, 4 sites in US and 12 sites in Canada. The study is an intergroup initiative between EORTC (Coordinating Group), UNICANCER; Cancer Trials Ireland (Ireland), ACCRU (The United States), and CUOG (Canada). A total of 560 patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive enzalutamide 160 mg q.d. p.o. or enzalutamide at the same dose and Ra223 at 55 kBq/kg i.v. monthly for 6 months. Patients will be stratified by country, pain (BPI 0-1 vs BPI 2-3), prior docetaxel use (no vs yes) and use of bone targeting agents (no vs yes). The main inclusion criteria require asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic (defined as no opioids and BPI-SF question 3 < 4), metastatic to bone with ≥ 2 bone metastases with or without additional lymph node metastases. Visceral metastases are not allowed. The primary endpoint is radiological progression-free survival (rPFS1), according to PCWG3. Secondary endpoints include: overall survival, PCa specific survival, 1st symptomatic skeletal event (SSE), time to initiation of next systemic anti-neoplastic therapy, time to pain progression, health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L and BPI). Clinical trial information: NCT02194842.

Assessment of the Fanconi anemia repair pathway as a predictor of clinical activity of pembrolizumab (PEM).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2555-2555
Author(s):  
Miguel Angel Villalona-Calero ◽  
John Paul Diaz ◽  
Zuanel Diaz ◽  
Wenrui Duan ◽  
Eric Douglas Schroeder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fanconi Anemia ◽  
Solid Tumor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Functional Assay ◽  
Phase 2 Trial

2555 Background: Given the activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in mismatch repair deficient tumors, we evaluated if homologous recombination repair deficiency associates with solid tumor response to ICI. Methods: We conducted a phase 2 trial (NCT03274661) of PEM in metastatic solid tumor patients progressing on standard of care and for whom PEM had no FDA approved indication. We evaluated a triple stain (FANCD2foci/DAPI/Ki67) immunofluorescence functional assay of the Fanconi Anemia pathway (FATSI) in treated patients’ archived tumors as a correlative biomarker. Patients with microsatellite unstable tumors were not eligible. The primary objective was objective response rate (iORR, CR+PR) by Immune Response Criteria, with the hypothesis that patients with FATSI negative tumors will have better clinical outcome. Secondary objectives were progression free survival (PFS), 6 months PFS and survival. PEM was given every 3 weeks and computed tomography scans were performed every 6 weeks. We utilized a two-stage phase II trial design to detect an iORR ≥ 20% in the whole population tested vs. the null hypothesis that the true iORR ≤5%. If ≥ 2 of the first 20 evaluable patients had an objective response the trial proceeded to full accrual of 39 evaluable patients. Outcomes were evaluated according to FATSI staining. Results: 42 patients (40 evaluable) (35F,7M; median age 62[36-83]) enrolled. Median # of prior regimens was 2[1-7]. Primary Dx included ovarian/fallopian (13), endometrial (10), colorectal (3), cervix (2), pancreatic(2), vaginal (2) and 1 each of various others. No unexpected toxicities occurred. Response evaluation showed 2 CR, 5 PR, 11 SD, 22 PD and 2 NE (iORR 18%). FATSI tumor analyses results are available in 34 patients; 25 FATSI positive, 9 negative. 2 PR, 8 SD, 14 PD, 1 NE occurred among the FATSI (+) (iORR 8%) and 2 CR, 2 PR, 2 SD, 3 PD among the FATSI (-) patients (iORR 44%). mPFS and 6m-PFS were 54 days and 12% (3/25) in FATSI (+), versus 248 days and 56% (5/9) in FATSI (-) patients; p = 0.017. Conclusions: PEM has meaningful antitumor activity in non MSI-high malignancies with no current FDA approved indications. Evaluation of FATSI as a biomarker supports a biomarker selected population approach. Clinical trial information: NCT03274661.

Initial results of a phase III investigation of safety/efficacy of nivolumab and ABI-009 (nab-sirolimus) in advanced undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), liposarcoma (LPS), chondrosarcoma (CS), osteosarcoma (OS), and Ewing sarcoma.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 21-21
Author(s):  
Victoria S. Chua-Alcala ◽  
Katherine Kim ◽  
Nupur Assudani ◽  
Ahmad Al-Shihabi ◽  
Doris Quon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ewing Sarcoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Dose Finding ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma ◽  
Pleomorphic Sarcoma ◽  
Grade 3

21 Background: Objectives: (1) To investigate the MTD of ABI-009 when given with nivolumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, in previously treated advanced undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, liposarcoma, chondrosarcoma, osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma; (2) To investigate the disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of this combination therapy in the above mentioned patient group, and (3) To correlate PFS with PD-L1 and other biomarker expression in patients’ tumors. Methods: This is an IRB approved protocol with 2 parts. The Phase 1 part is a dose-finding study using the “cohort of three design”, wherein standard doses of nivolumab 240 mg is given iv every 3 weeks (Day 1 of every 21-day Cycle). ABI-009 will be given IV on Days 8 and 15 of each cycle starting on Cycle 2 following the 2nd nivolumab dose. The starting dose of ABI-009 is 56 mg/m2, and sequentially escalating doses are 75, and 100 mg/m2. The Phase 2 part of study will enroll 31 additional patients to further assess efficacy and safety at the MTD. Results: The Phase 1 part of study is closed, after 9 patients were treated successfully at 3 dose levels. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed, the MTD was not reached, and 100 mg/m2 ABI-009 was designated as the recommended phase 2 dose. Safety analysis: At Dose 1 (n=3): Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) included hyperdyslipidemia (n=1), and hyperglycemia (n=1). At Dose 2 (n=3): Grade 3 TRAEs included increased ALT (n=1). At Dose 3 (n=3): Grade 3 TRAEs included hypophosphatemia (n=1). Seven of 9 patients have discontinued treatment: 5 patients due to PD, 2 with SD opted to stop treatment due to drug-related Grade 2 AEs (pruritus, acneiform rash, and 2 with SD are still on therapy at Dose 3. Conclusions: The primary objective has been met with no DLTs, the MTD was not reached and Dose 3 has been designated as the phase 2 dose of ABI-009 which is on-going. Clinical trial information: NCT03190174.

scholarly journals ACTR-15. PHASE 1 TRIAL OF A KETOGENIC DIET IN PATIENTS RECEIVING STANDARD-OF-CARE TREATMENT FOR RECENTLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi15-vi15
Author(s):  
Gillian Gresham ◽  
Lauren Amaral ◽  
Laura Lockshon ◽  
Dana Levin ◽  
Jeremy Rudnick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ketogenic Diet ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Feasibility Trial ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Immune Biomarkers ◽  
Standard Of Care Treatment ◽  
High Doses

Abstract BACKGROUND There is abundant interest in the potential therapeutic and supportive role of a ketogenic diet (KD) in patients with glioblastoma (GBM). The KD is a high fat/low carbohydrate metabolic therapy that modulates several of the bioenergetic and biosynthetic pathways that are dysregulated in GBM. To date, studies of the KD in cancer patients have been limited in scope. This study will provide preliminary evidence on the safety and feasibility of a 16-week ketogenic diet in patients with GBM. METHODS This is an open-label single-arm feasibility trial being conducted at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. We will recruit 20 recently diagnosed GBM patients who are receiving standard-of-care (SOC) treatment. Patients may enroll within 3 months of diagnosis, thus allowing patients who have already begun SOC chemoradiation the opportunity to participate. Excluded are patients with a KPS < 70, BMI < 22, or on high doses of steroids. Consenting patients will maintain a 16-week ketogenic diet (KD) supervised and monitored by study dietitians (RD). The primary outcome of safety will be assessed by monitoring weight, BMI, and adverse events. Secondary outcomes are: 1) Adherence to the KD, as assessed by BID blood glucose and ketone levels; 2) Time to progression and overall survival from date of KD initiation 3) Mean change in overall QOL, as measured using the QLQ30 and QLQ-BN20 questionnaires; and 4) Mean change in cognitive scores at 16 weeks from baseline. Exploratory outcomes include metabolic, inflammatory, and immune biomarkers; gut microbiota analysis; large oncosome analysis; and daily activity assessed with a wearable activity monitor. This novel trial incorporates multiple digital devices and mobile applications into the study design. Accrual is ongoing with 10 patients currently enrolled (NCT03451799).

Final report: A phase I trial of BYL719 in combination with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 398-398
Author(s):  
Heloisa P. Soares ◽  
Taymeyah E. Al-Toubah ◽  
Richard D. Kim ◽  
Jongphil Kim ◽  
Neron K Lewis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Therapeutic Window ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Gene Encoding ◽  
Grade 3

398 Background: The PI3K/mTOR pathway has emerged as a potential target for anticancer therapy. Considerable evidence suggests that targeting a single isoform of PI3K (p110α) would have sufficient antitumor activity and improved therapeutic window. Further, PI3KCA mutations, gene encoding isoform p110α, are described in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC). BYL719 is an oral class I α-specific PI3K inhibitor that showed preclinical anti-tumor activity. The first in human phase 1 trial of BYL719 defined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) at 400mg QD. Methods: This was a phase I, single center study (standard 3+3 design). The primary objective was to determine the MTD of BYL719 in combination with gemcitabine (G) and nab-paclitaxel (nabP) as frontline therapy in locally advanced or metastatic PAC. BYL719 was given orally daily (Table). Patients (pts) were restaged q2 cycles. The study was closed prematurely due to slow accrual. Results: Fifteen pts were enrolled (median age was 58 years). Three pts each participated in cohorts 1 and 2. Nine pts were enrolled in cohort 3, but 4 were replaced (3 pts withdrew consent prior to evaluation and 1 missed > 10 days of treatment). One pt in cohort 3 had DLT related to grade 3 nausea and vomiting. A total of 19 grade 3 and 4 adverse events were records as probably or possibly associated with BYL719. The most common ones were hyperglycemia, anemia, and neutrophil count decreased. One pt developed Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) during cycle 7. Although we could not completely exclude BYL719 as a cause, PRES was attributed to G. One pt had sudden death during cycle 4 that was attributed to progression. Only 8 pts were evaluable for response. Two had stable disease, 5 had partial responses and 1 had progression. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.36 months (1.6 to 10 months) and 8.74 months (3.8 to 21.2 months) respectively. Conclusions: The combination of full doses of G + nabP and BYL719 can be safely administered up to BYL dose of 250 mg/day. Clinical trial information: NCT02155088. [Table: see text]

Phase II trial of stereotactic ablative radiation (SAbR) for oligoprogressive kidney cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4564-4564
Author(s):  
Raquibul Hannan ◽  
Michael Christensen ◽  
Aurelie Garant ◽  
Hans J. Hammers ◽  
Waddah Arafat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Local Control ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3

4564 Background: Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients on systemic therapy may experience oligoprogression. SAbR has been demonstrated to be safe and is associated with high local control rates in mRCC. In this prospective phase II single arm trial, we investigated SAbR to control oligoprogressive mRCC. Methods: Patients with mRCC who demonstrated response to systemic therapy with subsequent radiographic evidence of three or fewer sites of progression were treated with SAbR to all progressive sites. Systemic therapy was held during SAbR at the discretion of the treating oncologist. Follow-up included radiographic imaging at three-month intervals. Sequential SAbR for continued oligoprogression was allowed. The primary objective was extension of ongoing systemic therapy by >6 months in 40% of the patients. Progression was defined by any of these 3 criteria: (1) local failure at a radiated site; (2) progression ineligible for additional SAbR (>3 sites) or involving >30% of metastasis; or (3) progression as clinically determined by treating physicians. An exact binomial test was used to test the probability of postponing systemic therapy. Secondary endpoints focused on overall survival (OS), local control (LC) rates, toxicity, and health-related quality of life (QOL). Results: The trial completed accrual with enrollment of 20 patients who received SAbR to a total of 36 sites. At enrollment four, twelve, three, and one patients were on first, second, third, and fourth line of systemic therapy, respectively. Eleven were on immunotherapy and nine on a tyrosine-kinase inhibitor. Three patients required repeat SAbR to a new site for sequential disease control. At a median follow-up of 8.3 months (interquartile range 3.9 – 15.1), SAbR extended the duration of the ongoing systemic therapy by >6 months in 12 out of 17 patients (70.6%, 95% CI: 48.9%-92.3%). Thirteen out of 20 patients progressed with a median PFS of 8.7 months (95% CI: 3.2-12.4). Five patients died and the OS did not reach the median. LC was 36/36 (100%). Treatment related grade 1 and grade 2 toxicity was experienced by three and one patient, respectively; no grade 3 toxicities were reported. When compared to baseline, no significant decline in QOL was detected. Conclusions: SAbR extended PFS of ongoing systemic by >6 months in oligoprogressive patients with mRCC. SAbR was safe and did not adversely affect QOL. These data support further evaluation of SAbR for oligoproressive mRCC in a prospective randomized setting. Clinical trial information: NCT03696277.

A phase II trial of radiation and cetuximab followed by irinotecan/cetuximab for children with newly diagnosed diffuse pontine tumors and high-grade astrocytomas.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10030-10030 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret Macy ◽  
Mark W. Kieran ◽  
Susan N. Chi ◽  
Kenneth J. Cohen ◽  
Tobey MacDonald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Phase 2 Trial ◽  
Correlative Studies ◽  
Grade 3

10030 Background: Diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPG) and high-grade astrocytomas (HGA) have dismal prognoses. We previously demonstrated in a phase 1 study that cetuximab and irinotecan was a safe and tolerable regimen. Consequently, we initiated this 2-strata phase 2 trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of weekly cetuximab given with involved field external beam radiation therapy followed by 10 cycles of cetuximab and irinotecan for DIPG and HGA as determined by the 1-year progression-free survival. Methods: Eligible patients aged 3-21 years with newly diagnosed HGA or DIPG were enrolled to parallel strata. All patients received radiation therapy (5940 cGy) with concurrent cetuximab at 250mg/m2 IV weekly for 6 weeks. Following radiation, patients received cetuximab (250mg/m2 IV) weekly and irinotecan (16mg/m2/day IV) daily x 5 for two weeks every 21 days for 30 weeks. Tumor, serum, and CSF samples were collected for correlative studies. Sera collected at the onset of rash were analyzed for inflammatory and immune-related cytokines. Results: Forty-eight patients (27 DIPG, 21 HGA) were enrolled and 45 were treated (median age 8 years; range: 3–19). Toxicities were manageable; the most common adverse events were fatigue, gastrointestinal complaints, neutropenia, rash, headache, electrolyte abnormalities, elevated ALT/AST, and fever. Grade 3-4 events in ≥10% of patients were hypokalemia and lymphopenia. 4 patients experienced cetuximab-related hypersensitivity reactions (2 grade 3 reactions). The median PFS was 9.5 months (95% CI: 7.0-12.2) for HGA and 7.8 months (7.0-8.6) for DIPG with a 1-year PFS±SE of 24±10% and 25%±10% respectively. The median OS for HGA was 17.7 months (95% CI: 14.1-18.0) and 11.5 months (8.8-14.2) for DIPG. Biological correlative studies will be presented. Conclusions: Cetuximab and radiation therapy followed by cetuximab and irinotecan is well tolerated in children. Based on the 1-year PFS, this regimen may deserve further investigation in patients with DIPG. Biological correlative studies will delineate the mechanisms of the rash and possible implications for EGFR-targeted therapeutics in such patients. Clinical trial information: NCT01012609.

Absolute lymphocyte count in patients with glioblastoma treated with temozolomide chemoradiation.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13564-e13564
Author(s):  
Anas Saeed Bamashmos ◽  
Assad Ali ◽  
Addison Barnett ◽  
Soumya Sagar ◽  
Lisa A. Rybicki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Lymphocyte Count ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Absolute Lymphocyte Count ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Start Date ◽  
Grade 3

e13564 Background: Standard glioblastoma (GBM) management includes radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and steroids; all of which can result in immunosuppression and a low absolute lymphocyte count (ALC). Previous literature identified an association between low CD4 and worse progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). There remains a lack of research addressing predictors of immunosuppression in patients with GBM. The primary objective of this study is to identify the degree of immunosuppression, measured by ALC, in GBM patients receiving concurrent temozolomide chemoradiation (CRT). Secondary objectives include associations between ALC, PFS, and OS, and whether there are any predictors of immunosuppression in patients with GBM. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 231 newly diagnosed GBM patients who underwent surgery followed by standard of care CRT. We also analyzed the association between ALC and age, sex, MGMT methylation status, and extent of surgical resection. ALC was collected at the time of surgery, CRT start date, and two, four, six, and ten weeks post-CRT start date. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) protocol version 5.0 was then used to grade low ALC as grade 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4. Results: Of the 231 patients analyzed, 139 were males, 74 underwent gross total resection of the tumor, 129 patients were less than 65 years, and 79 (42.5%) were MGMT methylated. 37 patients had grade 3-4 low ALC. In a univariate analysis, grade 3-4 low ALC at 4 weeks (±14 days) post-CRT start was associated with higher mortality (HR 1.54, P = 0.028) but had no significant association with PFS (HR 1.22, P = 0.29). Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for grade 3-4 low ALC and its association with survival. None of the risk factors that we tested such as age, gender, type of surgery, or molecular markers including MGMT, IDH, or EGFR were associated with low ALC. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that patients with ALC grade 3 or 4 at 4 weeks (±14 days) of CRT had a significantly higher mortality (HR 1.54, P = 0.028) but had no significant association with PFS (HR 1.22, P = 0.29).

scholarly journals Phase 1 study of pomalidomide and dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory primary CNS or vitreoretinal lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (21) ◽  
pp. 2240-2248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han W. Tun ◽  
Patrick B. Johnston ◽  
Lisa M. DeAngelis ◽  
Pamela J. Atherton ◽  
Levi D. Pederson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Central Nervous System Lymphoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Collaborative Group ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Vitreoretinal Lymphoma ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract The combination of pomalidomide (POM) and dexamethasone (DEX) was evaluated for relapsed/refractory primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL) to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of POM as the primary objective, and overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety profile as secondary objectives. A cohorts-of-3 study design was used with a dose-escalation schedule consisting of POM (3, 5, 7, or 10 mg) orally daily for 21 days every 28 days and DEX 40 mg orally every week. After 2 cycles, POM was continued alone until disease progression, intolerance, or subject withdrawal. Following MTD determination, the MTD cohort was expanded. Twenty-five of 29 patients with the median of 3 prior treatments were eligible for assessment as per international PCNSL collaborative group criteria. The MTD of POM was 5 mg daily for 21 days every 28 days. Whole-study ORR was 48% (12 of 25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 27.8%, 68.7%) with 6 complete response (CR), 2 complete response, unconfirmed (CRu), and 4 partial response (PR). MTD cohort ORR was 50% (8 of 16; 95% CI, 24.7%, 75.4%) with 5 CR, 1 CRu, and 2 PR. Median PFS was 5.3 months (whole study) and 9 months (for responders). One patient had pseudoprogression. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia (21%), anemia (8%), and thrombocytopenia (8%). Grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities included lung infection (12%), sepsis (4%), fatigue (8%), syncope (4%), dyspnea (4%), hypoxia (4%), respiratory failure (8%), and rash (4%). POM/DEX treatment is feasible with significant therapeutic activity against relapsed/refractory PCNSL and PVRL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01722305.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document