Safety and efficacy of VIP152, a CDK9 inhibitor, in patients with double-hit lymphoma (DHL).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7538-7538
Author(s):  
Victor Moreno ◽  
Raul Cordoba ◽  
Daniel Morillo ◽  
Jennifer Robinson Diamond ◽  
Ahmed M. Hamdy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Event ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Neutrophil Count ◽  
Lymphocyte Count ◽  
Biomarker Analysis ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Tumor Pain ◽  
Cdk9 Inhibitor

7538 Background: PTEFb/CDK9-mediated transcription of short-lived anti-apoptotic survival proteins and oncogenes like MCL-1 and MYC plays a critical role in a variety of cancers. VIP152 (formerly BAY 1251152), a potent and highly selective CDK9 inhibitor, has been evaluated in a Phase 1 dose-escalation study in patients with advanced cancer. The maximum tolerated dose was 30 mg once weekly administered in consecutive 21-day cycles, based on neutropenia as the dose-limiting toxicity (JCO 2018;36:2507; NCT02635672). DHL is defined as dual rearrangement of the MYC gene and either the BCL2 or BCL6 genes; the resulting overexpression of MYC and BCL2/BCL6 make it particularly difficult to treat. Patients with DHL have a poor prognosis and no standard of care. Considering the impact of CDK9 inhibition on MYC, an exploratory cohort of patients with DHL was added to the study. Methods: Patients with refractory or relapsed DHL were eligible. VIP152 was administered once weekly as a 30-minute IV infusion on Days 1, 8 and 15 of a 21-day cycle. Tumor response was assessed according to the revised Cheson criteria (2007). Results: To date a total of 7 patients have been enrolled and were evaluable at the time of data cutoff (24NOV2020). The patients were mostly men (6/7 pts, 86%) with a median (range) age of 70 (58-84) years. All patients received ≥2 prior therapies, including 2 patients with bone marrow transplant. Three of 7 patients (29%) had ≥3 prior therapies. The median time on treatment was 22 days (range 8-1361 days). The most common adverse events of any grade were: constipation, fatigue, nausea (each 3/7 pts, 43%) and abdominal pain, diarrhea, lymphocyte count decrease, neutrophil count decrease, skin infection, tumor pain, and vomiting (each 2/7 pts, 29%). Most were Grade 1 and Grade 2. The Grade 3 adverse events were fatigue, lymphocyte count decrease, neutrophil count decrease (each 1/7 pts, 14%) and tumor pain (2/7 pts, 29%). One Grade 4 lymphocyte count decrease was reported. Two patients had a serious adverse event (Grade 3 syncope and Grade 3 tumor pain). Two patients had dosing held for an adverse event; however, no patient withdrew from treatment due to any adverse events. One death occurred due to disease progression. Pharmacodynamic biomarker analysis showed significant reduction of MYC, PCNA, and MCL-1 mRNA in all patients across multiple timepoints. Antitumor activity consisted of 2 complete metabolic responses in 7 patients (29%) based on investigator-assessed FDG-PET scans. Due to the COVID pandemic, the patients withdrew consent after 3.7 and 2.3 years, respectively, of treatment. Both patients were in complete metabolic response. Conclusions: VIP152 had a manageable safety profile, on-target pharmacodynamic activity and signs of durable monotherapy antitumor activity in patients with DHL. These encouraging results warrant further evaluation of VIP152 in patients with MYC-driven lymphoma and solid tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT02635672.

287 Safety and antitumor activity of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO-1) inhibitor KHK2455 in combination with anti-CCR4 monoclonal antibody mogamulizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A313-A314
Author(s):  
Solmaz Sahebjam ◽  
Jameel Muzaffar ◽  
Timothy Yap ◽  
David Hong ◽  
Olivier Rixe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Dependent

BackgroundIDO-1 inhibitors have shown antitumor activity in combination with immunotherapeutic agents in multiple cancers. KHK2455 is a novel and selective oral IDO-1 inhibitor. KHK2455 inhibits IDO-1 apo-enzyme, with long-lasting and potent activity. Mogamulizumab is an anti-C-C chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4) monoclonal antibody that has shown synergy with KHK2455 in preclinical models. Mogamulizumab is approved in the US and EU for treatment of mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome.MethodsIn this first-in-human study, patients with advanced solid tumors received escalating oral doses of KHK2455 alone (0.3, 1, 3, 10, 30 and 100 mg once daily) for 4 weeks (Cycle 0), followed by combination with 1 mg/kg weekly of IV mogamulizumab for 4 weeks (Cycle 1), and then on Days 1 and 15 (from Cycle 2 onward) in a standard 3+3 Phase I design. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and IDO activity (kynurenine [Kyn] and tryptophan [Trp] levels and ex vivo Kyn production) were evaluated.ResultsThirty-six patients were enrolled across all cohorts. One patient with lower esophageal cancer in the 100 mg cohort exhibited dose-limiting toxicity (Grade 3 gastrointestinal necrosis). The most frequent (≥10%) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are presented in table 1. Overall numbers of TEAEs, ≥Grade 3 TEAEs, and serious TEAEs related to KHK2455 and mogamulizumab are presented in table 2. Serious KHK2455-related TEAEs included gastrointestinal necrosis (KHK2455 monotherapy), and nausea and drug eruption (combination therapy). In addition, five drug-related TEAEs in combination therapy led to discontinuation; there were no fatal outcomes related to either study drug. Plasma KHK2455 concentrations reached steady state by Day 8 (Cycle 0) and increased dose-dependently. Potent dose-dependent inhibition of IDO activity was demonstrated by plasma Kyn concentration and Kyn/Trp ratio (median inhibition 70.5% and 70.8%, respectively, at 100 mg dose on Day 15, compared to baseline) and ex vivo Kyn production (>95% inhibition at ≥10 mg KHK2455), confirming target modulation. Six of 26 evaluable patients from all dosing groups achieved durable disease stabilization (≥6 months, RECIST 1.1), and one patient with bevacizumab-resistant glioblastoma demonstrated confirmed partial response (43.5% tumor reduction over a 2-year observation period). Median overall survival was 13.4 months, with 30% of subjects surviving for 2 years or longer (figure 1).Abstract 287 Table 1Study 2455-001: Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (≥10% by Preferred Term)Abstract 287 Table 2Abstract 287 Figure 1Study 2455-001: Overall SurvivalConclusionsKHK2455 in combination with mogamulizumab was well-tolerated and manageable at all doses tested, suppressed Kyn production in a dose-dependent and sustained manner, and demonstrated signals of antitumor activity. These data support the continued development of this combination.AcknowledgementsMedical writing assistance was provided by Susan E. Johnson, PhD, S.E. Johnson Consulting, LLC, New Hope, PA, USA.Trial RegistrationNCT02867007 (www.clinicaltrials.gov)Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by Ethics Committees at all participating study institutions.

scholarly journals The Irish National Adverse Event Study-2 (INAES-2): longitudinal trends in adverse event rates in the Irish healthcare system

2021 ◽  
pp. bmjqs-2020-011122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Warren Connolly ◽  
Natasha Rafter ◽  
Ronan M Conroy ◽  
Cornelia Stuart ◽  
Anne Hickey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Event ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Published Data ◽  
National Programmes ◽  
Event Rates ◽  
Hospital Associated Infections ◽  
Design And Methods ◽  
The Impact

ObjectivesTo quantify the prevalence and nature of adverse events in acute Irish hospitals in 2015 and to assess the impact of the National Clinical Programmes and the National Clinical Guidelines on the prevalence of adverse events by comparing these results with the previously published data from 2009.Design and methodsA retrospective chart review of 1605 admissions to eight Irish hospitals in 2015, using identical methods to those used in 2009.ResultsThe percentage of admissions associated with one or more adverse events was unchanged (p=0.48) at 14% (95% CI=10.4% to 18.4%) in 2015 compared with 12.2% (95% CI=9.5% to 15.5%) in 2009. Similarly, the prevalence of preventable adverse events was unchanged (p=0.3) at 7.4% (95% CI=5.3% to 10.5%) in 2015 compared with 9.1% (95% CI=6.9% to 11.9%) in 2009. The incidence densities of preventable adverse events were 5.6 adverse events per 100 admissions (95% CI=3.4 to 8.0) in 2015 and 7.7 adverse events per 100 admissions (95% CI=5.8 to 9.6) in 2009 (p=0.23). However, the percentage of preventable adverse events due to hospital-associated infections decreased to 22.2% (95% CI=15.2% to 31.1%) in 2015 from 33.1% (95% CI=25.6% to 41.6%) in 2009 (p=0.01).ConclusionAdverse event rates remained stable between 2009 and 2015. The percentage of preventable adverse events related to hospital-associated infection decreased, which may represent a positive impact of the related national programmes and guidelines.

scholarly journals Safety and efficacy of rifabutin among HIV/TB-coinfected children on lopinavir/ritonavir-based ART

2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (9) ◽  
pp. 2707-2715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Holly E Rawizza ◽  
Kristin M Darin ◽  
Regina Oladokun ◽  
Biobele Brown ◽  
Babatunde Ogunbosi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Absolute Neutrophil Count ◽  
Neutrophil Count ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Severe Neutropenia ◽  
Laboratory Monitoring ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Cell Percentage ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Cd4 Cell

Abstract Background TB is the leading cause of death among HIV-infected children, yet treatment options for those who require PI-based ART are suboptimal. Rifabutin is the preferred rifamycin for adults on PI-based ART; only one study has evaluated its use among children on PIs and two of six children developed treatment-limiting neutropenia. Methods Since 2009, rifabutin has been available for HIV/TB-coinfected children requiring PI-based ART in the Harvard/APIN programme in Nigeria. We retrospectively analysed laboratory and clinical toxicities at baseline and during rifabutin therapy, and examined HIV/TB outcomes. Results Between 2009 and 2015, 48 children received rifabutin-containing TB therapy with PI (lopinavir/ritonavir)-based ART: 50% were female with a median (IQR) baseline age of 1.7 (0.9–5.0) years and a median (IQR) CD4+ cell percentage of 15% (9%–25%); 52% were ART experienced. Eighty-five percent completed the 6 month rifabutin course with resolution of TB symptoms and 79% were retained in care at 12 months. Adverse events (grade 1–4) were more common at baseline (27%) than during rifabutin treatment (15%) (P = 0.006). Absolute neutrophil count was lower during rifabutin compared with baseline (median = 1762 versus 2976 cells/mm3, respectively), but only one instance (2%) of grade 3 neutropenia occurred during rifabutin treatment. Conclusions With clinical and laboratory monitoring, our data suggest that rifabutin is a safe option for TB therapy among children on PI-based ART. By contrast with the only other study of this combination in children, severe neutropenia was rare. Furthermore, outcomes from this cohort suggest that rifabutin is effective, and a novel option for children who require PI-based ART. Additional study of rifabutin plus PIs in children is urgently needed.

A Pilot Study of Genasense® (Oblimersen Sodium, Bcl-2 Antisense Oligonucleotide), Fludarabine and Rituximab in Previously Treated and Untreated Subjects with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4827-4827 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asher Alban Chanan-Khan ◽  
Blanche Mavromatis ◽  
Kanti R. Rai ◽  
Philomena Casey ◽  
Steven Novick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Lymphocyte Count ◽  
Alkylating Agents ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Tumor Lysis Syndrome ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Reduced Dose ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Bcl-2 is an anti-apoptotic protein closely linked to chemotherapy resistance and inferior survival in patients (pts) with CLL. Genasense(GNS) enhances apoptosis induced by fludarabine (F), dexamethasone, and rituximab (R) in vitro, and has limited single-agent activity in heavily pre-treated CLL pts. Down-regulation of Bcl-2 may further sensitize CLL cells to apoptosis induced by F and R without exposing subjects to the toxicity of alkylating agents. CLL and NHL pts occasionally exhibit a “cytokine release syndrome” (spiking fever, back pain, and occasional hypotension) with GNS treatment. We hypothesized that a “step dosing” approach with GNS, similar to that sometimes used for R, could ameliorate these effects and allow safe and effective combination of this agent with F and R. We are currently evaluating this combination in pts with either previously untreated (UT) or relapsed, previously treated (PT) CLL who require systemic treatment. Eligibility includes: plts ≥ 50,000/mm3; serum Cr ≤ 1.5 mg/dL; adequate organ function; negative Coombs; no history of autoimmune hemolytic anemia. In cycle 1, GNS is given by continuous intravenous infusion at 1.5 mg/kg/d days 1 to 7. R is given on a dose-escalating schema (day 4, 125 mg/m2; day 6, 250 mg/m2). F (25 mg/m2/d) is given on days 6 to 8. In subsequent 28-day cycles (up to 6), the dose of GNS is escalated to 3 mg/kg/d days 1 to7 days, with R 375 mg/m2 on day 5 and F days 5 to7. To date, 20 pts have been enrolled (17 PT and 3 UT). Characteristics included: median age, 62 yrs (range 39 to 82 yrs); Rai stage III (2 pts) and IV (6 pts). Prior to administration of either F or R, single-agent GNS treatment at the initial reduced dose in Cycle 1 resulted in a median decrease in lymphocytes of 15% (among all patients regardless of decline in lymphocyte count) (Baseline: 48.3 cells x 103/ml; day 4: 40.1 cells x 103/ml). For the 13 pts who experienced a decline in lymphocyte count in cycle 1 prior to F and R, the median percentage change was 17%, with 4 pts having a > 25% decrease. Three PT pts discontinued from study treatment prior to completing 6 cycles, 2 due to disease progression, and 1 with Grade 3 thrombocytopenia that was unresolved after 4 weeks. Among the 20 pts treated to date (9 ongoing), the most common grade 3 or higher adverse events have been neutropenia, pyrexia and thrombocytopenia. Serious adverse events have been noted in only 6 of 20 pts (all PT pts) and have included 2 pts with fever (1 neutropenic), 2 R infusion reactions, 1 lymph node abscess and 1 tumor lysis syndrome (with sepsis). Conclusions: 20 pts have been treated with combination GNS, F and R. Single-agent activity with GNS has been observed at a reduced dose of 1.5 mg/kg/d in cycle 1. The “step dosing” approach appears to be a well-tolerated, alternative approach to the administration of GNS. Further details of safety and efficacy will be presented.

A Phase I Study of Ruxolitinib Plus Nilotinib in Chronic Phase CML Patients with Molecular Evidence of Disease

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1892-1892 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kendra L. Sweet ◽  
Lori Hazlehurst ◽  
Eva Sahakian ◽  
John J. Powers ◽  
Lisa Nodzon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Transcript Levels ◽  
Future Studies ◽  
Fatigue Severity ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are the standard treatment for CP-CML. A subset of patients have profound molecular responses with BCR-ABL transcripts no longer detectable using RT-PCR (MR4.5). The ENESTnd trial compared nilotinib versus imatinib as frontline therapy in CML, and reported an increase in the cumulative incidence of MR4.5 of approximately 11% per year for the first five years in nilotinib treated patients. Discontinuation of TKIs is successful in 40-50% of patients who have a durable MR4.5. The phosphorylation of STAT3-Y705 via the JAK-STAT signaling pathway provides a protective microenvironment for the leukemic stem cells (LSC) and is a well described mechanism of resistance to TKIs. The residual LSCs likely contribute to relapse after TKI discontinuation. Data suggests that by simultaneously blocking JAK2 and TYK2, pSTAT3 is inhibited, thereby eliminating the protective environment in the bone marrow, and sensitizing the LSCs to TKIs. Ruxolitinib is a JAK2 and TYK2 inhibitor. Here we used ruxolitinib in combination with nilotinib in CP-CML patients to establish the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of ruxolitinib, and obtain preliminary data about the impact of this combination on BCR-ABL transcript levels. Methods: This phase I, dose-escalation study used ruxolitinib plus nilotinib in CP-CML. All subjects were taking nilotinib prior to enrollment. Eligible subjects had a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), yet had detectable BCR-ABL transcripts by RT-PCR at enrollment. We used a 3+3 design with 3 cohorts. The nilotinib dose remained unchanged, and the three doses of ruxolitinib were 5mg BID, 10mg BID and 15mg BID. Two additional subjects were treated at the MTD. Subjects remained on combination therapy for six months, at which point ruxolitinib was discontinued. RT-PCR was used to measure BCR-ABL transcript levels in the peripheral blood and/or bone marrow at baseline and every 3 months. The primary endpoint was the MTD of ruxolitinib. Secondary endpoints included toxicity assessment, incidence of MR4.5 at six months, change in fatigue severity scores and impact of ruxolitinib on pSTAT3/5 inhibition assessed with a plasma inhibitory assay (PIA) Descriptive statistics were used for baseline demographics, toxicity, MR4.5 and pSTAT3 levels. Subjects completed the fatigue severity index (FSI) questionnaire at baseline and every 3 months. A paired samples t-test was used to measure the difference in fatigue severity over time. Results: A total of 11 patients were enrolled between April 2013 and March 2016. Median age was 41 (25-63). 73% (n=8) were male. 36% (n=4) had received one TKI prior to nilotinib. The nilotinib dose was 300mg (n=8) or 400mg BID (n=3). Median time from diagnosis to enrollment was 11 months (6-135). Each cohort enrolled 3 subjects, and two additional subjects were treated at the MTD. There were no dose limiting toxicities; therefore the MTD/RP2D of ruxolitinib was 15mg PO BID. There were no grade 3/4 adverse events in any cohort, and no clinically significant cytopenias. Grade 1/2 transaminitis occurred in 1 subject in cohorts 1 and 2. No dose reductions were needed. At data cutoff, 9 subjects have completed six months on trial, and 2 remain active. Of those nine, 3 (33%) had ≥1-log reduction in BCR-ABL transcripts from baseline and 4 (44%) achieved MR4.5. One subject in cohort 1 progressed after three months and a kinase domain mutation analysis found a T315I mutation. FSI data available on seven subjects showed a non-significant decline in average fatigue severity from baseline (mean 2.78, SD 1.79) to follow-up (mean 1.86, SD 1.21), p=0.29. Results from the plasma inhibitory assay and updated results of all 11 subjects will be presented at the meeting after all subjects will have completed the trial. Conclusion: Our data suggest that ruxolitinib is safe and tolerable at 15mg PO BID when combined with nilotinib in CP-CML, and with no grade 3/4 adverse events reported, this should be considered the RP2D for future studies. The incidence of MR4.5 after six months was 44% which surpasses that of historical controls, although the sample size is small and a larger study is needed to confirm these results. The combination leads to an improvement in fatigue severity that did not reach statistical significance. This data serves as justification for future studies using ruxolitinib in combination with TKIs to determine the true impact on eradication of MRD in CP-CML. Disclosures Sweet: Karyopharm: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Nodzon:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Pinilla-Ibarz:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Phase 2 study of cemiplimab, a human monoclonal anti-PD-1, in patients (pts) with metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (mCSCC; Group 1): 12-month follow-up.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9526-9526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander David Guminski ◽  
Annette May Ling Lim ◽  
Nikhil I. Khushalani ◽  
Chrysalyne D. Schmults ◽  
Leonel Fernando Hernandez-Aya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Phase 2 Study ◽  
Grade 3

9526 Background: Primary analysis (Oct 2017) of cemiplimab (REGN2810) in pts with mCSCC in a Phase 2 study demonstrated substantial antitumor activity, durable responses, and acceptable safety profile. We now report 12-month follow-up data from these pts (NCT02760498; data cutoff date: Sep 20, 2018). Methods: Pts with mCSCC received cemiplimab 3 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks (Q2W). Tumor measurements were performed Q8W. The primary objective was to evaluate objective response rate (ORR; complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]) according to independent central review (per RECIST 1.1 for scans; modified WHO criteria for photos). Results: 59 pts (median age: 71 years) were enrolled. Median duration of follow-up was 16.5 months (range: 1.1–26.6). ORR by central review was 49.2% (95% CI: 35.9–62.5; 10 CRs and 19 PRs [4 CRs and 25 PRs by investigator-assessment (INV)]). Median duration of response (DOR) has not been reached. The longest DOR at data cut-off was 21.6 months and was still ongoing. Observed DOR exceeded 12 months in 22/29 pts (75.9%) with response. Durable disease control rate (stable disease or response for ≥16 weeks) was 62.7% (95% CI: 49.1–75.0). Median observed time to response was 1.9 months (range: 1.7–9.1). Median progression-free survival was 18.4 months (95% CI: 7.3–not evaluable); median overall survival has not been reached. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (all grades, Grade ≥3) were diarrhea (28.8%, 1.7%), fatigue (25.4%, 1.7%), and nausea (23.7%, 0%). By INV, grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events occurred in 13.6% of pts. Conclusions: This analysis demonstrates substantial antitumor activity and increasing DOR with cemiplimab 3 mg/kg Q2W in pts with mCSCC. There were no new safety signals. These data strongly support the recent FDA approval of cemiplimab-rwlc for pts with mCSCC or locally advanced CSCC who are not candidates for curative surgery or curative radiation. Clinical trial information: NCT02760498.

Predictors of immune-related adverse events associated with checkpoint inhibitors.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15159-e15159
Author(s):  
Alhareth Alsayed ◽  
Ashish Manne ◽  
Daisy E Escobar ◽  
Gaurav Sharma ◽  
Pranitha Prodduturvar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Lymphocyte Count ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Hematological Parameters ◽  
White Blood Count ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Fisher Exact Test ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Grade 3

e15159 Background: Immune-related adverse events (irAE) remain a significant challenge with the expansion of checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) indications. Unlike previous studies published, we investigated risk factors for irAE development, including lymphocytes and neutrophils counts in lung cancer and melanoma treated with all available ICIs in current clinical practice. Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted at the University of South Alabama Mitchell Cancer Institute. Between 2015-2019. A total of 160 patients with a diagnosis of melanoma (N = 54) or lung cancer (N = 106) who received at least two doses of ICI including ipilimumab (15%), nivolumab (32%), pembrolizumab (35%), dual nivolumab/ipilimumab (5%), durvalumab (9%) and atezolizumab (4%). The patient's baseline characteristics were extracted with irAE (grade 3/4) details and survival outcomes. Descriptive statistics were used, Fisher exact test to compare categorical variables, and Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables using JMP software. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 64 years (range 17-93), with 51% females. Race distribution with 76% Caucasians and 26% African Americans. Around 30% of the cohort was treated for recurrence, and 39% did receive prior systemic chemotherapy. Median overall survival (OS) was 13.5 months (m) for melanoma and 16 m for lung cancer with CI 95% [16-24] and [15-23], respectively. Twenty-nine (29%) percent of the cohort (N = 46) had grade 3/4 irAEs. Median of baseline hematological parameters including total white blood count (WBC), absolute neutrophil count (ANC), absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), ANC to ALC ratio, and platelet to ALC ratio of these patients were not statistically different from the cohort without grade 3/4 irAEs. Interestingly, if a patient has baseline ALC < 1K/μL, the risk of irAE recurrence is low when ICI is re-initiated, p = .0143 (after symptomatic recovery from irAEs). Conclusions: Irrespective of ICI used, baseline lymphocyte count, and its relation to other blood counts have no clear impact on irAE. Larger cohorts or prospective studies are needed to make stronger conclusions about the relationship between the immune system and the occurrence of irAEs

Clinical and information governance proposes; human fallibility disposes

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Renaud
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Event ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Education And Training ◽  
Clinical Governance ◽  
Complex Nature ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Information Governance ◽  
Governance Tools ◽  
The Impact ◽  
And Training

Purpose – There is a strong drive within the UK's National Health Service (NHS) towards ensuring quality and reducing adverse events. This incorporates clinical governance, which applies to clinical activities, and information governance, which applies to preserving the confidentiality, availability and integrity of patient information. The purpose of this paper is to consider why humans make errors, how the current governance tools can minimise the incidence of such errors and the causatives that can increase the likelihood of an error. Errors sometimes lead to adverse events, which have to be reported. The latest adverse event reports from NHS Scotland, recently published on the BBC website, were analysed to identify major themes that emerged from the recommendations made by the investigative teams. These themes are then discussed in terms of how the current clinical governance tools should be applied to further reduce the incidence of adverse events. A revised clinical governance diagram that more clearly depicts the cross-cutting nature of the themes that emerged from the analysis is proposed. Finally some opportunities for future research are identified. Design/methodology/approach – Qualitative analysis of adverse incidence reports in order to identify causatives. Used the insights delivered by this analysis in order to propose a change to Scally and Donaldson's clinical governance diagram. Findings – A clear reliance on education and training by adverse event review teams was found, which suggests that they do not really understand what causes error, and they do not acknowledge the impact of the situation on the actors. Also – a tendency to define processes to cover all eventualities, even though some situations cannot be encoded as processes. The main insight is that there are a number of cross-cutting concerns which means that the original clinical governance diagram would benefit from a level of integration which is not currently present. Research limitations/implications – The analysed reports were severely redacted which meant that nuances of the situation could have been missed by the researcher. However, the recommendations were never redacted so the researcher focused on these. Practical implications – The paper, in general, highlights the need for a more nuanced approach to clinical governance and less reliance on education and training as the universal panacea. Social implications – Over reliance on education and training puts the blame on the person, and does not acknowledge the causatives in the situation. Acknowledging the more complex nature of the problem makes adverse events less blame-worthy and more likely to lead to real learning and effective mitigation. Originality/value – The author is not aware of anyone else having analysed these reports.

scholarly journals Impact of Early Switching to Nilotinib As Second Line TKI in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Were Intolerant to, Suboptimal to and Failed Imatinib: The Thai Multi-Centered Study

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4267-4267
Author(s):  
Pongtep Viboonjuntra ◽  
Arnuparp Lekhakula ◽  
Kanchana Chansung ◽  
Chittima Sirijerachai ◽  
Pimjai Niparuck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction : To date, the ELN recommendation and NCCN guidelines are the principle mile stones to follow up the treatment response and to make the decision of TKIs switching. However, in real life practice, many factors influence changing the real switching date from the date had an indication. This study aims to analyze the impact of early switching to second line TKI, nilotinib, in real life practice, for the CML patients who failed, had sub-optimal response or were intolerant to imatinib. Methods : This prospective study was conducted through 7 medical centers in Thailand between 1st of September 2009 and 31st of August 2011. Adult CML patients of age ≥ 18 years old, in chronic and accelerated phase, who had failure, suboptimal response or intolerance to imatinib, based on ELN 2009 guideline, were included and were eligible with nilotinib 400 mg twice daily. Prospective data collection for 24 months of each patient was performed. The main objective was to identify the impact of early switching to nilotinib on major molecular response (MMR). The other objectives were to observe the efficacy of nilotinib including overall survival, progression free survival and the safety. The survival results were presented as Kaplan-Meier survival curves. For the comparison of the treatment groups, the Kaplan-Meier estimator with the corresponding log-rank test for equality of survivor functions across treatment group was applied. Results : The final 108 cases were analysed. The median age was 47 (17-79) years with the proportion of male to female of 1.4:1 respectively. The median duration of the prior imatinib treatment was 18 months (2-142 months). The median duration between the date of indication and the date of real switching was 3.1 months (0-62.8 months) with 50% changing less than 3 months, 26.9% between 3 months and 12 months, and 23.1% changing longer than 12 months. The indication of switching included 63.6% failure to imatinib, 29% intolerance to imatinib and 7.4% suboptimal to imatinib. On the nilotinib switching, 70.4% completed 24 months follow-up, and 29.6% discontinued treatment mostly because of unsatisfactory results or adverse events. Evaluation was made every 3 months based on 2009 ELN recommendation. At 3 months, 57%, 20%, and 8% of the patients achieved CHR, CCyR and MMR, respectively. Those who did not achieve CHR at 3 months never achieved MMR, while 86 % of those who achieved CCyR at 3 months achieved MMR. All CML achieving MMR at 3 months had sustained MMR throughout the study period (24 months). Imatinib suboptimal response had better outcome than imatinib failure and imatinib intolerance groups. A preliminary analysis of BCR-ABL mutation was performed on 90 cases, and mutations were found on 21 cases. Two of them were T315I which were excluded from the study. The cases with mutation had poorer response to treatment than those without mutation. There was one case with initial G250E mutation developing T315I mutation after treatment with nilotinib. At 24 months, one case progressed to accelerated phase and 3 cases progressed to blastic transformation. The 2-year overall survival and 2-year progression-free survival and were 98.9% and 96.9% (figure 1 and 2), respectively. The interquatile analysis was done to identify the groups of cumulative MMR according to the duration between the date of indication and the date of real switching to nilotinib. The patients who switched to nilotinib within 12 months after date of indication could have a greater chance to achieved MMR than those who switched treatment later than 12 months (p(log-rank) = 0.002) (figure 3). Skin rash, musculoskeletal pain, and infection were the three most common non-hematologic adverse events, However, most of them were grade 1-2, except for 4 cases with grade 3-4 infections. Grade 3-4 hematologic adverse events included thrombocytopenia (12%), neutropenia (11%), anemia (5%) and leucopenia (4%), and most of them were manageable. Although biochemical abnormalities were commonly found, most of them were mild. Conclusions : Nilotinib, as a second line treatment showed excellent efficacy and tolerability. Indication for nilotinib treatment, initial mutation status and depth of response at 3 months after treatment can predict outcomes of the patients. However, the patients will have a greater chance to achieve MMR if they switched to nilotinib within 12 months after the date of indication for changing. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Difference in adverse-event profiles between mTOR inhibitors, temsirolimus, and everolimus for advanced renal cell carcinoma.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 461-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro Nozawa ◽  
Takashi Kikuchi ◽  
Mitsutoshi Nishimoto ◽  
Yasuyuki Kobayashi ◽  
Hirotsugu Uemura
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Event ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Mtor Inhibitors ◽  
Two Agents ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Grade 3

461 Background: Everolimus and temsirolimus have proven their efficacy and are used for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). They both are rapamycin derivatives and are categorized as mTOR inhibitors. There have been few reports that examined the difference between these two agents regarding adverse events. Our objective was to investigate the difference in the safety of both agents on the basis of our clinical experience. Methods: We identified patients with mRCC who had been treated with everolimus or temsirolimus at our hospital. Treatment duration, relative dose intensity, laboratory data, and adverse events during treatment with each agent were evaluated. Results: A total of 55 patients were evaluable. 43 of those had been treated with everolimus, 22 with temsirolimus, and 10 with both agents. There was no significant difference in age and gender between the two treatment groups. Median treatment durations of the everolimus and temsirolimus groups were 2.4 months and 1.8 months, respectively. Relative dose intensities of the everolimus and temsirolimus groups were 71.6 % and 75.4 %, respectively. Anemia, hyperglycemia, stomatitis, and interstitial lung disease (ILD) were detected with higher frequency in the everolimus group. In the everolimus group, 31 % of patients developed any grade of ILD including 15 % of grade 3, whereas ILD was reported in only one patient treated with temsirolimus with no grade 3 or higher. Frequencies of adverse events of grade 3 or higher were 49 % in the everolimus group and 26 % in the temsirolimus group. Conclusions: Adverse-event profiles of everolimus and temsirolimus may differ from each other. Respiratory disorders may occur more frequently and severely in patients treated with everolimus than temsirolimus. These findings suggest the difference in the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and treatment regimen of these two agents may result in different adverse events even though they target the same molecule.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document