Efficacy of a clinical risk prediction tool to prioritize outreach for high-risk cancer patients.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13524-e13524
Author(s):  
Megan Croyle ◽  
Nathan Handley ◽  
Michael Li ◽  
Adam F Binder ◽  
Valerie Pracilio Csik
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Case Group ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

e13524 Background: Acute care utilization (ACU), including emergency department visits and hospitalizations, is common in patients with cancer. Prospectively identifying patients’ risk status may enable interventions to reduce ACU. We developed a REDUCE score (Reducing ED Utilization in the Cancer Experience for active oncology patients (defined as patients with an active cancer diagnosis in the last 12 months who had a Medical Oncology encounter in a 180-day period) to prospectively determine risk of ACU. The intended intervention was outreach to all high-risk patients. We evaluated the high risk group over an 11-month period (February through December 2020) to better characterize those who received outreach. Methods: Analysis of high-risk patients was conducted using a case-control method over two periods: February through June 2020 (Period 1) and July through December 2020 (Period 2) to account for a change in the type of outreach deployed. High risk was defined as REDUCE ≥2. High risk scores were stratified by those with REDUCE =2 and those with REDUCE >2. Control Group 1 consisted of high-risk patients with REDUCE =2 who did not receive outreach, and Control Group 2 included high-risk patients with REDUCE >2 who did not receive outreach. Case Group 1 consisted of high-risk patients with REDUCE =2 who had outreach, and Case Group 2 included patients with REDUCE >2 who had outreach. Average ACU per patient was compared across all groups over both periods. Descriptive statistics were applied. Results: Results are described in table 1. Average ACU per patient was higher in Periods 1 and 2 for both Case Groups, compared to both Control Groups. Over time, there was a trend in decreased ACU in the intervention group with stable to increasing ACU in the control groups. The proportion of patients who received outreach across both periods decreased in Case Group 1, but increased in Case Group 2. Conclusions: These findings suggest that patients who received outreach were at a higher risk of ACU. Further investigation revealed that there was not consistent prioritization of patients with the highest risk scores within the high-risk group for outreach. In addition to the REDUCE , ongoing efforts incorporate clinical judgment of the outreach team in assessing additional clinical risk factors to determine an intervention, which is meaningful. The REDUCE tool may provide value as an initial screening mechanism. Average ACU per patient by study group.[Table: see text]

scholarly journals Appropriate secondary prevention and clinical outcomes after acute myocardial infarction according to atherothrombotic risk stratification: The FAST-MI 2010 registry

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 411-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Tea ◽  
Marc Bonaca ◽  
Chekrallah Chamandi ◽  
Marie-Christine Iliou ◽  
Thibaut Lhermusier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
St Elevation ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Background Full secondary prevention medication regimen is often under-prescribed after acute myocardial infarction. Design The purpose of this study was to analyse the relationship between prescription of appropriate secondary prevention treatment at discharge and long-term clinical outcomes according to risk level defined by the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Risk Score for Secondary Prevention (TRS-2P) after acute myocardial infarction. Methods We used data from the 2010 French Registry of Acute ST-Elevation or non-ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction (FAST-MI) registry, including 4169 consecutive acute myocardial infarction patients admitted to cardiac intensive care units in France. Level of risk was stratified in three groups using the TRS-2P score: group 1 (low-risk; TRS-2P=0/1); group 2 (intermediate-risk; TRS-2P=2); and group 3 (high-risk; TRS-2P≥3). Appropriate secondary prevention treatment was defined according to the latest guidelines (dual antiplatelet therapy and moderate/high dose statins for all; new-P2Y12 inhibitors, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin-receptor-blockers and beta-blockers as indicated). Results Prevalence of groups 1, 2 and 3 was 46%, 25% and 29% respectively. Appropriate secondary prevention treatment at discharge was used in 39.5%, 37% and 28% of each group, respectively. After multivariate adjustment, evidence-based treatments at discharge were associated with lower rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (death, re-myocardial infarction or stroke) at five years especially in high-risk patients: hazard ratio = 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.59–1.12, p = 0.21) in group 1, 0.74 (0.54–1.01; p = 0.06) in group 2, and 0.64 (0.52–0.79, p < 0.001) in group 3. Conclusions Use of appropriate secondary prevention treatment at discharge was inversely correlated with patient risk. The increased hazard related to lack of prescription of recommended medications was much larger in high-risk patients. Specific efforts should be directed at better prescription of recommended treatment, particularly in high-risk patients.

scholarly journals Does pre-emptive onlay mesh reinforcement of midline laparotomies reduce incidence of incisional hernia in high–risk patients?

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. 2300
Author(s):  
Hosam F. Abdelhameed ◽  
Samir A. Abdelmageed
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Chronic Wound ◽  
Midline Laparotomy ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Wound Pain ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Onlay Mesh ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Background: One of the major morbidity after abdominal surgery is incisional hernia. In high risk patients its incidence reaches 11-20% despite various optimal closure techniques for midline laparotomy. Our aim is to evaluate the efficacy of onlay mesh placement in reducing the incidence of incisional hernia in those high risk patients.Methods: A total of 65 high risk patients suspected to develop post-operative incisional hernia underwent midline abdominal laparotomies. Patients were divided into two groups; group1 (30 patients) for whom the incision was closed by conventional method and group2 (35 patients) for whom the incision was closed with reinforcement by onlay polypropylene mesh. The primary end point was the occurrence of incisional hernia while the secondary end point was post-operative complications including subcutaneous seroma, chronic wound pain, and surgical site infection (SSI). Patients were followed up for two years.Results: The base line characteristics of the two groups were similar. The incidence of incisional hernia is significantly reduced 1/35 (2.8%) in group 2 while it was 6/30 (20%) in group 1. As regard seroma and chronic wound pain they increased in (group2) 6/35 (17.14%) and 5/35(14.28%) respectively compared to (group 1) which was 4/30 (13.33%) and 2/30 (6.66%). SSI occurred in 1/35 (2.85%) in group 2 and in 1/30 (3.33%) in group 1.Conclusions: Prophylactic onlay mesh reinforcement of the midline laparotomy for high risk patients can be used safely and markedly reduces the incidence of incisional hernia with little morbidity.

Outcome of Adult AML at First Relapse Following a Risk-Oriented Strategy: An Update of the Northern Italy Leukemia Group (NILG) Experience

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 4385-4385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Cavattoni ◽  
Enrico Morello ◽  
Elena Oldani ◽  
Tamara Intermesoli ◽  
Ernesta Audisio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Category ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
First Relapse ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Standard Risk ◽  
Group 1

Abstract INTRODUCTION The impact on post-relapse survival of selected prognostic factors and salvage therapy (finalized to perform an allo-SCT) was retrospectively analyzed in 172 patients (patients) with relapsed non-APL AML, who had been initially treated with standard induction and risk-adapatiented consolidation. The aim was to identify factors associated with a better outcome at first relapse. METHODS All 172 patients were at first recurrence following consolidation of CR1 with high-dose Ara-C (HiDAC) multicycle therapy supported by blood stem cells (standard risk, as defined by mixed clinical-cytogenetic criteria) or allo-SCT in case of high-risk prognostic profile. Median age at relapse was 55 y (range 21–70). CR1 duration was &lt;6 months in 50 patients (29%), ranging from 0.6 to 52,7 mo (median 9,1). High risk patients were 128/172 (74%) and 43/172 patients (25%) had an unfavourable cytogenetics (CG). One hundred-eleven patients (64%) received HiDAC and 24 (14%) an allo-SCT according to study design. RESULTS 140 patients (81%) received salvage treatment. The remaining 32 patients (19%) received palliation and all of them died. The median OS was 17.1 mo, with a 2yOS of 34%. Favorable prognostic factors identified by univariate analisys were: favourable or intermediate CG (p=0,007), standard risk category according to first line protocol (p=0.004), availibility of a HLA matched donor (p= 0.048), achievement of an early CR1(p=0,000), HiDAC as first line therapy(p=0,000), alloHSCT perfomed at relapse (p=0,000) and a DFS from CR1&gt;12 mo (p=0,000). In multivariate analysis favourable or intermediate CG and DFS &gt;12 mo were confirmed as independent prognostic factors (p=0,036 and p=0,001 respectively). Among the 140 patients, 50 received an allo-SCT following relapse (36%, group 1), and the remaining 90 (64%, group 2) received high dose chemotherapy alone (85), autologous SCT (2), or DLI (3, in case of previous alloSCT). Both groups were comparable regarding age &gt;55 y, prior allo-SCT and risk class at diagnosis. After salvage therapy, 44 patients(88%) in the group 1 achieved CR2, compared to 26 patients (29%) in the group 2. The median duration of CR2 was 9 mo (range 2–64) and 3 mo (range 1–34) in group 1 and 2 respectively. NRM was 17/140: 12 patients (24%) in the allo-SCT group and 5 (6%) in group 2. The 2yOS was 57% and 23% respectively (p=0,000). Moreover, among 50 alloSCT patients, survival was affected by risk category at diagnosis: 2yOS of 19 (38%) standard risk patients was 83% compared to 42% in 31 high risk patients (62%) (p=0.01). This risk stratification has no impact on OS in the group 2. CONCLUSIONS DFS &gt; 12 mo and standard risk category at diagnosis, according to NILG protocol, are the most important independent positive prognostic factors impacting OS of AML relapsed patients. The availibility of a HLA matched donor and a subsequent intensification with alloSCT may offer substantial salvage rates and its outcome is affected by the risk stratification at diagnosis. Nevertheless, high risk patients could benefit from alloSCT, reaching an 2yOS of 42%.

AS-265: Incidence After the Use of Clopidogrel 150 mg + Aspirin 81 mg in Group 1 Versus Clopidogrel 75 mg + Aspirin 81 mg in Group 2 After Drug-Eluting Stenting for 1 Month in High-Risk Patients

2009 ◽  
Vol 103 (9) ◽  
pp. 112B
Author(s):  
Saad Mohammed Alkasab ◽  
Menwar M. Alanazi ◽  
Mohammad Alshehri ◽  
Rida Nourallah ◽  
Yahya Alhebaishi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Drug Eluting ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

scholarly journals Results of neuroblastoma treatment in Lithuania: a single centre experience

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Austėja Juškaitė ◽  
Indrė Tamulienė ◽  
Jelena Rascon
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Age At Diagnosis ◽  
Mycn Amplification ◽  
Disease Group ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Background. Neuroblastoma (NB) is the most common extracranial solid tumour in children. This is a very rare disease with heterogeneous biology varying from complete spontaneous regression to a highly aggressive tumour responsible for 15% of malignancy-related death in early childhood. Analyses of survival rates in Europe have shown a considerable difference between Northern/Western and Eastern European countries. Treatment results of NB in Lithuania have never been analyzed. Aim. To assess the survival rate of children with NB according to initial spread of the disease, age at diagnosis, the MYCN amplification, risk group, and treatment period. Patients and methods. A retrospective single-centre analysis of patients’ records was performed. Children diagnosed and treated for NB between 2000 and 2015 at the Centre of Paediatric Oncology and Haematology of the Children’s Hospital, Affiliate of Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos were included. The patients were divided into three groups according to the spread of the disease: group 1 – patients with local NB older than 12 years of age; group 2 – stage IV patients, also called the M stage; group 3 – infants with stages 4S and MS. The patients were stratified into three risk groups – low, intermediate and high risk. Estimates of five-year overall survival (OS5y) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method comparing survival probability according to spread of the disease, age at diagnosis, the MYCN amplification, risk group and treatment period (2000–2007 vs 2008–2015). Results. Overall 60 children (31 girls and 29 boys) with NB were included. The median age at diagnosis was 1.87 years (ranged from 4 days to 15 years). Seventy-eight percent of cases were found to be differentiated or undifferentiated NB, 22% – ganglioneuroblastoma. The local form of the disease was predominant: 57% (34/60) of patients were allocated to the group 1, 37% (22/60) with initial metastatic disease were assigned to group 2, and infants with 4S or MS stage comprising 7% (4/60) allocated to group 3, respectively. The probability of OS5y for the entire cohort was 71% with the median follow-up of 8.8 ± 4.8 years. The probability of OS5y for local disease (group 1) was significantly higher compared to metastatic disease (group 2) (94% vs. 34%, p = 0.001, respectively) as well as for infants compared to children older than 12 months at the time of diagnosis (90% vs 60%, p = 0.009, respectively). The MYCN gene amplification had a negative influence on OS5y, with 78% of MYCN-negative patients surviving in comparison to 40% of MYCN-positive patients who did not survive (p = 0.153). The high-risk patients had significantly worse OS5y than children with intermediated or low risk (35% vs. 82% vs. 100%, respectively, p = 0.001). Comparison of OS5y between two treatment periods in the entire patient population revealed a non-significant increase in survival from 66% in the 2000–2007 period to 82% in the 2008–2015 period (p = 0.291), mostly due to a dramatic improvement achieved for high-risk patients whose survival rate increased from 9% in the 2000–2007 period to 70% in the 2008–2015 period (p = 0.009). Conclusions. There was a slight predominance of low-risk patients, probably due to a higher number of infants. A better probability of OS5y was confirmed in infants with local disease and in MYCN-negative patients. The OS5y for children treated for NB at our institution over 16 years increased from 66% in the 2000–2007 period to 82% in the 2008–2015 period with the most significant improvement achieved for high risk patients. The current survival rate of children treated for NB at our institution is in line with the reported numbers in Northern and Western European countries.

Abstract 3264: Remarkable Differences in calculating the Cardiovascular Risk according the Framingham-, Procam- and ESC Risk-Scores. First Results of the DETECT Study

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sigmund Silber ◽  
Barbara M Richartz ◽  
Frauke Jarre ◽  
David Pittrow ◽  
Jens Klotsche ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
The Individual

The identification of high-risk patients is of utmost importance for an intensive and effective primary prevention program. Currently, three different scores are used to identify high-risk patients: In the USA, the Framingham risk score, in Germany the Procam risk score and in Europe the European Society of Cardiology ESC) recommended ESC risk score. There is, however, little knowledge how these three risk scores compare to each other in the same population. Therefore we calculated the individual risk of 7519 pats with no known cardiovascular disease according to these three scoring systems. In the DETECT study, 55 518 patients in 3188 primary care offices were enrolled. A representative subgroup of 7,519 randomly chosen patients participated in a cohort sub-study. According to the Framingham-Procam- and ESC-Score, the individual 10-year-risk was determined and patients were _ategorized into groups of high, medium or low risk. The mean 10-year cardiovascular risk is estimated by the PROCAM score at 4.4%, with the ESC score at 8.8% and with the Framingham-Score at 11.5%. The number of patients assigned to a group differs most for the high risk group (please see table ). Unexpectedly, major discrepancies were observed in the same pats, if the Framingham, Procam- or ESC score was used, especially in the identification of high-risk pats. Follow-up will show, which of these risk scores will best predict the actual occurrence of cardiovascular events. Results:

scholarly journals Daratumumab Single Agent and Daratumumab Plus Pomalidomide and Dexametasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Real Life Retrospective Evaluation

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4516-4516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Branca ◽  
Amy Buros ◽  
Donghoon Yoon ◽  
Larry J Suva ◽  
Niels Weinhold ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Adverse Event ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Background. In the last twenty years, the outcome of multiple myeloma (MM) has markedly improved. Daratumumab is the first anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (mAb) recently approved for the treatment of relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). In this study we have evaluated the efficacy of daratumumab single agent and daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone in low and high risk RRMM patients. Design and Methods. From November 2015 to March 2016, 25 and 39 RRMM patients were treated with therapy using daratumumab single agent (Group 1: median age 67, range 40-83) and daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone respectively (Group 2: median age 71, range 45-87). In both groups, patients received daratumumab IV 16 mg/kg once a week (weeks 1-8), followed by every other week (weeks 9-24) and then once a month until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. In Group 2 pomalidomide was administered at dosages from 1 mg to 4 mg daily according to tolerability for 21 days every 28 days, along with dexamethasone 40 mg weekly. The median time form the time of diagnosis was 7.1 years and 5.5 years in Group 1 and Group 2 respectively. In both groups, patients had received a median of 4 prior treatments. In Group 1, 80% of the patients had disease refractory to the last therapy received, 68% had disease double refractory to IMiDs and PIs, and 28% (7 patients) had GEP high risk signature. In Group 2, 78% of the patients had disease refractory to last therapy, 84% had double refractory disease and 37% (14 patients) had high GEP risk signature. Results. In the single agent group, the overall response rate (ORR) was 28%: CR 4% (1 patient), 4% VGPR (1 patient), PR 20% (5 patients). With a median follow up of 3.5 months, 48% of patients were still on treatment and 52% had discontinued treatment for disease progression. The ORR according to last GEP70 was 40% and 0% in the low risk and high risk patients respectively. All high risk patients had discontinued treatment for disease progression within the second month of treatment. In the second group, the ORR was 41%: CR 5% (2 patients), 3% VGPR (1 patient), and 33% PR (13 patients). After a median follow up of 4 months, 77% (30 patients) of patients were still on treatment, 20% (8 patients) discontinued treatment for disease progression and 3% (1 patient) of patients had discontinued treatment for adverse event grade 4. The ORR was 50% (4% CR, 4% VGPR, and 42% PR) in low risk patients and 21% (7% CR and 14% PR) in high risk patients. Infusion-related reactions were mild (54% of patients had an event of any grade, and 4% and 2% had an adverse event of grade 3 in Group 1 and Group 2 respectively). The most common non hematological adverse event of grade 3 or 4 was pneumonia (4% and 8% in Group 1 and Group 2 respectively). PFS of Group 1 and 2 are shown in Figure 1. Conclusion. Daratumumab single agent had a favorable safety profile and encouraging efficacy in patients with heavily pretreated and refractory myeloma, and the combination of daratumumab with pomalidomide and dexamethasone was well tolerated and improved the outcome in low risk patients, even in double refractory disease. Encouraging results have been observed as well in patients with high risk GEP 70 signature. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Davies: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Morgan:Univ of AR for Medical Sciences: Employment; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Meyers: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding.

Outcome of carotid endarterectomy under local anaesthesia with respect to the patients’ risk profile

VASA ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksic ◽  
Luebke ◽  
Brunkwall
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Carotid Endarterectomy ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Local Anaesthesia ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Hostile Neck ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Angioplasty And Stenting

Background: In the present study the perioperative complication rate is compared between high- and low-risk patients when carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is routinely performed under local anaesthesia (LA). Patients and methods: From January 2000 through June 2008 1220 consecutive patients underwent CEA under LA. High-risk patients fulfilled at least one of the following characteristics: ASA 4 classification, “hostile neck”, recurrent ICA stenosis, contralateral ICA occlusion, age ≥ 80 years. The combined complication rate comprised any new neurological deficit (TIA or stroke), myocardial infarction or death within 30 days after CEA, which was compared between patient groups. Results: Overall 309 patients (25%) were attributed to the high-risk group, which differed significantly regarding sex distribution (more males: 70% vs. 63%, p = 0,011), neurological presentation (more asymptomatic: 72% vs. 62%, p = 0,001) and shunt necessity (33% vs. 14%, p < 0,001). In 32 patients 17 TIAs and 15 strokes were observed. In 3 patients a myocardial infarction occurred. Death occurred in one patient following a stroke and in another patient following myocardial infarction, leading to a combined complication rate of 2,9% (35/1220). In the multivariate analysis only previous neurological symptomatology (OR 2,85, 95% CI 1,38-5,91) and intraoperative shunting (OR 5,57, 95% CI 2,69-11,55) were identified as independent risk factors for an increased combined complication rate. Conclusions: With the routine use of LA, CEA was not associated with worse outcome in high-risk patients. Considering the data reported in the literature, it does not appear justified to refer high-risk patients principally to carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) when LA can be chosen to perform CEA.

scholarly journals Audio-guided self-hypnosis for reduction of claustrophobia during MR imaging: results of an observational 2-group study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriane E. Napp ◽  
Torsten Diekhoff ◽  
Olf Stoiber ◽  
Judith Enders ◽  
Gerd Diederichs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Mr Imaging ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Waiting Room ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Imaging Results ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
And Coping

Abstract Objectives To evaluate the influence of audio-guided self-hypnosis on claustrophobia in a high-risk cohort undergoing magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Methods In this prospective observational 2-group study, 55 patients (69% female, mean age 53.6 ± 13.9) used self-hypnosis directly before imaging. Claustrophobia included premature termination, sedation, and coping actions. The claustrophobia questionnaire (CLQ) was completed before self-hypnosis and after MR imaging. Results were compared to a control cohort of 89 patients examined on the same open MR scanner using logistic regression for multivariate analysis. Furthermore, patients were asked about their preferences for future imaging. Results There was significantly fewer claustrophobia in the self-hypnosis group (16%; 9/55), compared with the control group (43%; 38/89; odds ratio .14; p = .001). Self-hypnosis patients also needed less sedation (2% vs 16%; 1/55 vs 14/89; odds ratio .1; p = .008) and non-sedation coping actions (13% vs 28%; 7/55 vs 25/89; odds ratio .3; p = .02). Self-hypnosis did not influence the CLQ results measured before and after MR imaging (p = .79). Self-hypnosis reduced the frequency of claustrophobia in the subgroup of patients above an established CLQ cut-off of .33 from 47% (37/78) to 18% (9/49; p = .002). In the subgroup below the CLQ cut-off of 0.33, there were no significant differences (0% vs 9%, 0/6 vs 1/11; p = 1.0). Most patients (67%; 35/52) preferred self-hypnosis for future MR examinations. Conclusions Self-hypnosis reduced claustrophobia in high-risk patients undergoing imaging in an open MR scanner and might reduce the need for sedation and non-sedation coping actions. Key Points • Forty percent of the patients at high risk for claustrophobia may also experience a claustrophobic event in an open MR scanner. • Self-hypnosis while listening to an audio in the waiting room before the examination may reduce claustrophobic events in over 50% of patients with high risk for claustrophobia. • Self-hypnosis may also reduce the need for sedation and other time-consuming non-sedation coping actions and is preferred by high-risk patients for future examinations.

Abstract 2471: Contemporary Results of Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement in High-Risk Patients in the Context of Emerging Percutaneous Approaches

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Voisine ◽  
Siamak Mohammadi ◽  
Josep Rodés-Cabau ◽  
Patrick Mathieu ◽  
Jean Perron ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Perioperative Mortality ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Related Mortality ◽  
Parsonnet Score

Percutaneous aortic valve replacement (AVR) is emerging as an alternative therapeutic approach for high-risk surgical patients, but criteria for patient selection are not clearly established. We sought to evaluate the perioperative and mid-term outcomes in a contemporary cohort of high-risk patients undergoing isolated AVR. Between 1997 and 2006, 855 consecutive patients underwent isolated AVR at our institution. High-risk patients (n=162, 19%) were defined by a preoperative Parsonnet score ≥ 30 or Euroscore ≥ 9. The remaining 693 patients (81%) composed the control group for comparison of perioperative mortality and mid-term freedom from all-cause and cardiac-related mortality. Mean follow up was 2.9±2.1 years. Perioperative mortality was 8.6% in the high-risk and 2.9% in the control group (p=0.0007), lower than that predicted by both scores (p<0.05). Freedom from all-cause mortality at 1 and 5 years were 94% and 82% for the control group and 87% and 65% for high-risk patients (p<0.0001). Freedom from cardiac-related mortality was also higher in the control (96% at 1 year, 91% at 5 years) than the high-risk (89% and 82%, p=0.0003) group. When considering patients who survived the 3-month perioperative period (537 in control, 114 in high-risk group), freedom from all-cause mortality was still higher in the former group at 1 and 5 years (99% vs 99% and 85% vs 75%, respectively, p=0.005), but freedom from cardiac-related mortality was not different (99% vs 100% and 94% vs 92%, respectively, p=0.3). By multivariate analysis, chronic renal failure, emergent procedures and reoperations were identified as independent predictors of mortality in high-risk patients. Contemporary perioperative mortality for isolated AVR in high-risk patients is lower than predicted by the Parsonnet score and Euroscore. Five-year survival in these patients is acceptable, and survivors of the operation experience the same cardiac-related survival benefit as those with standard perioperative risk. The perioperative survival benefit of percutaneous approaches for high-risk patients undergoing AVR remains to be demonstrated and, if present, should be weighed against mid-term outcome benefits of conventional surgical AVR.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document