TACTICS: Final overall survival (OS) data from a randomized, open label, multicenter, phase II trial of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) therapy in combination with sorafenib as compared with TACE alone in patients (pts) with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

270 Background: To date many trials have been conducted to compare the efficacy and toxicity between TACE plus molecular targeted agents and TACE alone; all of them failed to show its clinical benefit in terms of progression free survival (PFS) or OS. In TACTICS trial (NCT01217034) TACE plus sorafenib significantly improved PFS over TACE alone in patients with unresectable HCC. ( Gut 2020;69:1374-1376). Here we will report a final OS analysis from TACTICS trial with predefined mature OS events. Methods: Patients with unresectable HCC were randomized to TACE plus sorafenib (n=80) or TACE alone (n=76). Patients in the combination group received sorafenib 400 mg once daily for 2–3 weeks before TACE, followed by 800 mg twice daily during on-demand conventional TACE sessions until time to untreatable (unTACEable) progression (TTUP), defined as untreatable tumor progression, transient deterioration to Child-Pugh C or appearance of vascular invasion/extrahepatic spread. Co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), which is defined as TTUP, or time to any cause of death and OS. Multiplicity was adjusted by gatekeeping hierarchical testing. Results: At the cut-off date of July 31, 2020, 131 OS events were observed. Median OS was 36.2 mo with TACE plus sorafenib vs 30.8 mo with TACE alone (HR, 0.861 [95%CI, 0.607, 1.223]; P=0.40). ΔOS was 5.4 mo. Updated PFS was 22.8 mo with TACE plus sorafenib vs 13.5 mo with TACE alone (HR, 0.661[95%CI, 0.466, 0.938]; P=0.02). Post-trial treatments with active procedures/agents were observed in 47 (58.8%) in TACE plus sorafenib and in 58 (76.3%) with TACE alone. Anticancer procedures in TACE alone group include resection/ablation in 14, transarterial therapy in 53 and radiation in 7. Anticancer medications in TACE alone include targeted agents in 40 (29 sorafenib, 5 regorafenib, 3 lenvatinib, 3 ramucirumab), other systemic chemotherapy in 5 and immunotherapy in 5. Safety was consistent with the primary analysis, with no new signals identified. Conclusion: In TACTICS, TACE plus sorafenib did not show OS benefit as compared with TACE alone although significantly better PFS was consistently observed. OS in TACE plus sorafenib in TACTICS trial showed the longest OS (36.2 mo) with the longest ΔOS (5.4 mo) as compared with the previous 5 TACE combination trials. The major reason for negative OS result was speculated that many post-trial active treatments were performed in control arm (76.3%), which implies that OS endpoint in TACE combination trial may not be feasible anymore in current era of sequential therapy with many active locoregional and systemic treatments. Clinical trial information: NCT01217034.

Download Full-text

Radiotherapy in nodal oligorecurrent prostate cancer

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie ◽

10.1007/s00066-021-01778-1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Michael Pinkawa ◽

Daniel M. Aebersold ◽

Dirk Böhmer ◽

Michael Flentje ◽

Pirus Ghadjar ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prostate Cancer ◽

Literature Review ◽

Survival Rates ◽

Local Treatment ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Nodal Metastasis ◽

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy ◽

Current Standard ◽

Free Survival ◽

Systemic Treatments

Abstract Objective The current article encompasses a literature review and recommendations for radiotherapy in nodal oligorecurrent prostate cancer. Materials and methods A literature review focused on studies comparing metastasis-directed stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) vs. external elective nodal radiotherapy (ENRT) and studies analyzing recurrence patterns after local nodal treatment was performed. The DEGRO Prostate Cancer Expert Panel discussed the results and developed treatment recommendations. Results Metastasis-directed radiotherapy results in high local control (often > 90% within a follow-up of 1–2 years) and can be used to improve progression-free survival or defer androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) according to prospective randomized phase II data. Distant progression after involved-node SABR only occurs within a few months in the majority of patients. ENRT improves metastases-free survival rates with increased toxicity in comparison to SABR according to retrospective comparative studies. The majority of nodal recurrences after initial local treatment of pelvic nodal metastasis are detected within the true pelvis and common iliac vessels. Conclusion ENRT with or without a boost should be preferred to SABR in pelvic nodal recurrences. In oligometastatic prostate cancer with distant (extrapelvic) nodal recurrences, SABR alone can be performed in selected cases. Application of additional systemic treatments should be based on current guidelines, with ADT as first-line treatment for hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Only in carefully selected patients can radiotherapy be initially used without additional ADT outside of the current standard recommendations. Results of (randomized) prospective studies are needed for definitive recommendations.

Download Full-text

Sorafenib-Regorafenib Sequential Therapy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Institute Experience

Digestive Diseases ◽

10.1159/000480257 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 35 (6) ◽

pp. 611-617 ◽

Cited By ~ 9

Author(s):

Kazuomi Ueshima ◽

Naoshi Nishida ◽

Masatoshi Kudo

Keyword(s):

Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽

Objective Response ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Sequential Therapy ◽

Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽

Open Label ◽

Effective Treatment Option ◽

Sorafenib Treatment ◽

Advanced Hcc ◽

Grade 3

Objectives: Previously, no therapeutic agent has been known to improve the overall survival compared with placebo in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), who have progressed after sorafenib. In this patient population, regorafenib was first demonstrated to confer a survival benefit in the RESORCE trial, and subsequently it was approved as a second-line treatment for patients with advanced HCC. An open-label expanded access program (EAP) of regorafenib was implemented for compassionate use. We investigated the efficacy and safety of regorafenib based on our experience of the RESORCE trial and the EAP. Methods: Data from 5 patients from the RESORCE trial and 6 from the EAP were analyzed retrospectively. All patients had tolerated prior sorafenib and were progressing during sorafenib treatment. Results: The median progression-free survival was 9.2 months (95% CI 2.3-16.1). One patient achieved a partial response and 7 achieved stable disease. The objective response rate was 9.1%, and the disease control rate was 72.7%. No treatment-associated mortalities were observed. Grade 3 hypophosphatemia was observed in 2 patients, grade 2 anorexia was observed in 5 patients, and grade 3 neutropenia was observed in 2 patients. Grade 2 and grade 3 thrombocytopenia were observed in 2 and 3 patients, respectively. All treatment-related adverse events were improved by reduction or interruption of regorafenib. Five patients showed decreased serum albumin levels. Conclusion: Sorafenib and regorafenib sequential therapy presents a safe and effective treatment option for patients with advanced HCC.

Download Full-text

Obinutuzumab short-duration infusion (SDI) in previously untreated advanced follicular lymphoma: Results from the end of induction analysis of the phase IV GAZELLE study.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.7545 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 7545-7545

Author(s):

Miguel Angel A. Canales Albendea ◽

Thomas A. Buchholz ◽

Koji Izutsu ◽

Takayuki Ishikawa ◽

Laura Maria Fogliatto ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Follicular Lymphoma ◽

Stage Iv ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Response Assessment ◽

Complete Response ◽

Primary Analysis ◽

Open Label ◽

Secondary Endpoints ◽

To Receive ◽

Phase Iv

7545 Background: Obinutuzumab (G)-chemotherapy (chemo) has demonstrated improved progression-free survival compared with rituximab (R)-chemo in previously untreated advanced follicular lymphoma (FL). G is currently administered by IV infusion over ̃3–4 hours. A shorter duration of infusion in Cycle (C) 2 and subsequent cycles, as is standard practice with R, could improve convenience for patients (pts) and efficiency for infusion facilities. We report the primary analysis of the prospective, open-label, multicenter, single-arm, Phase IV, GAZELLE study (NCT03817853), which evaluated the safety of G administered as a 90-minute (min) SDI from C2 onwards in pts with FL. Methods: Pts with previously untreated FL received G (1000mg) intravenously on Day (D) 1, 8, and 15 of C1, and on D1 thereafter, plus chemo (bendamustine, CHOP, or CVP) for 6–8 cycles. In C1, pts received G at the standard infusion rate. Pts without a Grade (Gr) ≥3 infusion-related reaction (IRR) in C1 were eligible to receive G as a 90-min SDI from C2. Pts with a Gr 3 IRR in C1 received the standard G infusion in C2, and were eligible for G SDI in subsequent cycles if no Gr ≥3 IRRs occurred. Pts with a second Gr 3/4 IRR discontinued G. At the end of induction (EOI), responding pts received maintenance G (1000mg) as SDI for 2 years or until disease progression (PD). The primary endpoint was incidence of Gr ≥3 IRRs during C2. IRRs were defined as any event occurring ≤24 hours from infusion judged to be related to treatment. Secondary endpoints included adverse events (AEs) and investigator-assessed overall response rate at EOI. Results: As of December 3, 2020, 113 pts had received study treatment. Median age was 62.0 years, 50.4% were male, 61.9% had stage IV FL, and 45.1% were classified as high-risk FLIPI. Of the 110 pts who were eligible for G SDI from C2, no pt experienced a Gr ≥3 IRR with SDI in C2 (Table). One pt experienced a Gr 3 IRR with SDI in C5, presenting hypertension. All other IRRs with SDI were Gr 1/2. No Gr 4/5 IRRs were reported. Other AEs were similar to those observed in previous studies. At the clinical cut-off date, 104 pts had a CT imaging-based response assessment at EOI and 9 pts had no response assessment; 76/113 (67.3%) had a complete response, 22 (19.5%) had a partial response, and six (5.8%) had PD. Conclusions: In GAZELLE, G SDI in C2 and beyond appeared to be safe. No Gr 3 IRRs were observed in C2 and only one Gr 3 IRR was reported in subsequent cycles. The safety profile of G SDI was comparable with the established profile of G in advanced FL. Clinical trial information: NCT03817853. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

A Phase 2, Randomized, Open-Label Study of Irosustat Versus Megestrol Acetate in Advanced Endometrial Cancer

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer ◽

10.1097/igc.0000000000000862 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 27 (2) ◽

pp. 258-266 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Patricia Pautier ◽

Ignace Vergote ◽

Florence Joly ◽

Bohuslav Melichar ◽

Elzbieta Kutarska ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Endometrial Cancer ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Confidence Interval ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Megestrol Acetate ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Open Label ◽

Free Survival ◽

Recurrent Endometrial Cancer

ObjectiveAdvanced/metastatic or recurrent endometrial cancer has a poor prognosis. Malignant endometrial tissue has high steroid sulphatase (STS) activity. The aim of this study was to evaluate STS as a therapeutic target in patients with endometrial cancer.MethodsThis was a phase 2, multicenter, international, open-label, randomized (1:1), 2-arm study of the STS inhibitor oral irosustat 40 mg/d versus oral megestrol acetate 160 mg/d in women with advanced/metastatic or recurrent estrogen receptor–positive endometrial cancer. The primary end point was the proportion of patients without progression or death 6 months after start of treatment. Secondary end points included progression-free survival, time to progression, overall survival, and safety.ResultsSeventy-one patients were treated (36 with irosustat, 35 with megestrol acetate). The study was prematurely stopped after futility analysis. Overall, 36.1% and 54.1% of patients receiving irosustat or megestrol acetate had not progressed or died at 6 months, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between irosustat and megestrol acetate in response and overall survival rates. Irosustat patients had a median progression-free survival of 16 weeks (90% confidence interval, 9.0–31.4) versus 40 weeks (90% confidence interval, 16.3–64.0) in megestrol acetate patients. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 20 (55.6%) and 13 (37.1%) patients receiving irosustat or megestrol, respectively. Most adverse events in both groups were grade 1 or 2.ConclusionsAlthough irosustat monotherapy did not attain a level of activity sufficient for further development in patients with advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer, this study confirms the activity of hormonal treatment (megestrol acetate) for this indication.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of First-Third generation EGFR inhibitor combined with chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced lung adenocarcinoma in a real-world setting

10.21203/rs.3.rs-1106177/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Ming-Wei Chen Ming-Wei Chen ◽

An-Tai He . ◽

Yi Pei .

Keyword(s):

Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽

Survival Time ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Egfr Mutations ◽

Combination Group ◽

First Line ◽

Free Survival ◽

Mean Survival Time ◽

First Line Therapy ◽

To Receive

Abstract BackgroundTo explore the optimal treatment strategy for patients who harbor sensitive EGFR mutations, a head-to-head study was performed to compare chemotherapy and gefitinib-erlotinip, osimertinib treatment in combination or with either agent alone as first-line therapy, in terms of efficacy and safety.MethodsA total of 200 untreated patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma who harbored sensitive EGFR mutations were randomly assigned to receive gefitinib-erlotinip combined with pemetrexed and carboplatin group, gefitinib-erlotinip osimertinib combined with pemetrexed and carboplatin group, pemetrexed plus carboplatin alone group, or gefitinib-erlotinip alone group, osimertinib alone group.ResultsThe progression-free survival (PFS) of patients in the gefitinib-erlotinip combination group Mean Survival Time PFS 22.00 month,95%CI[16.29,27.70] and osimertinib gefitinib-erlotinip combination group Mean Survival Time PFS 40.00 month,95%CI[28.12,51.87]was longer than that of patients in the chemotherapy alone group PFS10,81 months, 95% CI,[ 8.99–12.64],gefitinib-erlotinip alone group PFS14.00 month.95%CI[11.98-20.01], osimertinib alone group PFS 26.66 month 95%CI[24.77-29.22].The gefitinib-erlotinip osimertinib combinational resulted in longer overall survival (OS) than chemotherapy alone (HR = 0.46, p = 0.016) or gefitinib-erlotinip alone (HR = 0.36, p = 0.01). osimertinib alone (HR = 0.26, p = 0.01).ConclusionsOur finding suggested that treatment with pemetrexed plus carboplatin combined with gefitinib-erlotinip and pemetrexed plus carboplatin combined with gefitinib-erlotinip osimertinib group could provide better survival benefits for patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring sensitive EGFR mutations.

Download Full-text

Safety and tolerability of asunercept plus standard radiotherapy/temozolomide in Asian patients with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma: a phase I study

Scientific Reports ◽

10.1038/s41598-021-02527-1 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Kuo-Chen Wei ◽

Peng-Wei Hsu ◽

Hong-Chieh Tsai ◽

Ya-Jui Lin ◽

Ko-Ting Chen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase I ◽

Phase I Study ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Multicenter Trial ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Open Label ◽

Free Survival ◽

Asian Patients ◽

Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma ◽

Secondary Endpoints

AbstractAsunercept (company code APG101 [Apogenix AG]; company code CAN008 [CANbridge Pharmaceuticals]) is a novel glycosylated fusion protein that has shown promising effectiveness in glioblastoma. This Phase I study was initiated to evaluate the tolerability and safety of asunercept in combination with standard radiotherapy and temozolomide (RT/TMZ) in Asian patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. This was the Phase I portion of a Phase I/II open label, multicenter trial of asunercept plus standard RT/TMZ. Adults with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma received surgical resection followed by standard RT/TMZ plus asunercept 200 mg/week (Cohort 1) or 400 mg/week (Cohort 2) by 30-min IV infusion. The primary endpoint was the safety and tolerability of asunercept during concurrent asunercept and RT/TMZ; dose-limiting toxicities were observed for each dose. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics (PK) and 6-month progression-free survival (PFS6). All patients (Cohort 1, n = 3; Cohort 2, n = 7) completed ≥ 7 weeks of asunercept treatment. No DLTs were experienced. Only one possibly treatment-related treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE), Grade 1 gingival swelling, was observed. No Grade > 3 TEAEs were reported and no TEAE led to treatment discontinuation. Systemic asunercept exposure increased proportionally with dose and showed low inter-patient variability. The PFS6 rate was 33.3% and 57.1% for patients in Cohort 1 and 2, respectively. Patients in Cohort 2 maintained a PFS rate of 57.1% at Month 12. Adding asunercept to standard RT/TMZ was safe and well tolerated in patients with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma and 400 mg/week resulted in encouraging efficacy.Trial registration NCT02853565, August 3, 2016.

Download Full-text

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd; DS-8201) in patients (pts) with HER2-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Final results from a phase 2, multicenter, open-label study (DESTINY-CRC01).

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.3505 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 3505-3505

Author(s):

Takayuki Yoshino ◽

Maria Di Bartolomeo ◽

Kanwal Pratap Singh Raghav ◽

Toshiki Masuishi ◽

Fotios Loupakis ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Safety Profile ◽

Topoisomerase I ◽

Objective Response ◽

Safety Data ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Drug Discontinuation ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Antibody Drug Conjugate ◽

Primary Analysis ◽

Open Label

3505 Background: T-DXd is an antibody–drug conjugate of a humanized anti-HER2 antibody bound to a topoisomerase I inhibitor by a cleavable linker. The primary analysis of DESTINY-CRC01 (DS8201-A-J203; NCT03384940), a phase 2, open-label, multicenter study of T-DXd in pts with HER2-expressing mCRC showed promising antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile (cohort A median follow-up [FU], 27.1 weeks; Siena S, ASCO 2020). We present updated longer-term efficacy and safety data. Methods: Pts had centrally confirmed HER2-expressing, RAS wild-type mCRC that progressed after ≥2 prior regimens. 6.4 mg/kg of T-DXd was administered every 3 weeks (Q3W) in 3 cohorts (A: HER2 IHC3+ or IHC2+/ISH+; B: IHC2+/ISH−; C: IHC1+). The primary end point was confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by independent central review in cohort A. Secondary end points were disease control rate (DCR; CR + PR + SD), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: At data cutoff (Dec 28, 2020), 86 pts (A, 53; B, 15; C, 18) received T-DXd. Median age was 58.5 y (range, 27-79), 53.5% were male, and 90.7% had left colon or rectum cancer. Median prior regimens for metastatic disease was 4 (range, 2-11). All pts had prior irinotecan; 30.2% in cohort A had prior anti-HER2 therapy. Median (m) treatment duration (all pts) was 3.0 mo (95% CI, 2.1-4.1; cohort A, 5.1 mo [95% CI, 3.9-7.6]). In cohort A (median FU, 62.4 weeks), confirmed ORR was 45.3% (24/53 pts; 95% CI, 31.6-59.6), DCR was 83.0% (44/53 pts; 95% CI, 70.2-91.9), mDOR was 7.0 mo (95% CI, 5.8-9.5), mPFS was 6.9 mo (95% CI, 4.1-8.7) with 37 (69.8%) PFS events, and mOS was 15.5 mo (95% CI, 8.8-20.8) with 36 (67.9%) OS events. These results are consistent with the primary analysis. Confirmed ORR was 43.8% (7/16 pts; 95% CI, 19.8-70.1) in pts with prior anti-HER2 therapy, 57.5% (23/40 pts; 95% CI, 40.9-73.0) in pts with IHC3+ status, and 7.7% (1/13 pts; 95% CI, 0.2-36.0) in pts with IHC2+/ISH+ status. In cohorts B and C, mPFS was 2.1 mo (95% CI, 1.4-4.1) and 1.4 mo (95% CI, 1.3-2.1); mOS was 7.3 mo (95% CI, 3.0-NE) and 7.7 mo (95% CI, 2.2-13.9), respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of grade (G) ≥3 occurred in 65.1% of pts (56/86); the most common TEAEs were hematologic and gastrointestinal. TEAEs leading to drug discontinuation occurred in 13 pts (15.1%). 8 pts (9.3%) had interstitial lung disease (ILD) adjudicated by an independent committee as related to T-DXd (4 G2; 1 G3; 3 G5). Conclusions: T-DXd at 6.4 mg/kg Q3W showed promising activity and durability with longer-term FU in this pt population. The safety profile was consistent with prior results; ILD continues to be recognized as an important identified risk that requires careful monitoring and intervention as needed. These results support continued exploration of T-DXd in pts with HER2-overexpressing mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT03384940.

Download Full-text

Biweekly Raltitrexed in Combination with Irinotecan (RIR) as Second-Line Therapy for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Non-Randomized, Open-Label Phase II Trial.

10.21203/rs.3.rs-80934/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Ke Cheng ◽

Yu-Wen Zhou ◽

Ye Chen ◽

Zhi-Ping Li ◽

Meng Qiu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Overall Response Rate ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Second Line ◽

Open Label ◽

Second Line Therapy ◽

Free Survival ◽

Common Grade ◽

Open Label Phase ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background Irinotecan-based doublet chemotherapy strategy was standard second-line backbone treatment for patients with oxaliplatin‑refractory metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC). The aim of this study was to evaluate tolerability and efficacy of raltitrexed combined with irinotecan biweekly administered as the second-line therapy for mCRC patients.Methods The study was a single-center, non-randomized, open-label phase II trial. Patients with mCRC after failure with first-line treatment of oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine or its derivatives were enrolled. Irinotecan (180 mg/m2) and raltitrexed (2.5 mg/m2) were given intravenously on day 1. Cycles were repeated every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, and the secondary endpoints included overall response rate, disease control rate, overall survival and treatment related adverse events. Results Between December 2012 and October 2016, 35 patients were enrolled. 33 and 35 patients were assessed for response and safety, respectively. The overall response rate (ORR) was 8.6 %, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 71.4%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.5 months (95% CI 3.8–5.2). The median overall survival was 12.0 months (95% CI 8.5–15.5). Four patients received conversion therapy to no evidence of disease (NED), and 2 patients were still alive with beyond 24 months survival. The most common grade 3/4 hematological adverse events were leukopenia (8.6%), neutropenia (5.7%). The most common grade 3/4 nonhematological adverse events were anorexia (14.3%), vomiting (14.3%), nausea (11.4%) and fatigue (8.6%). Two patients discontinued the protocol treatment because of treatment-related gastrointestinal adverse events. No one died from treatment-related events. The incidence and severity of toxicity was irrelevant to UGT1A1 status.Conclusions The combination of irinotecan with raltitrexed is an active, convenient and acceptable toxic regimen for second-line treatment for mCRC patients, which needs further study as a chemotherapy backbone to be combined with targeted agents in mCRC.Trial registration No. ChiCTR-ONC-12002767. The study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry at 29 Octorber 2012, http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx.

Download Full-text

Randomized, Multicenter, Phase II Trial of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin With or Without Veliparib in Patients With Pancreas Adenocarcinoma and a Germline BRCA/PALB2 Mutation

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.19.02931 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (13) ◽

pp. 1378-1388 ◽

Cited By ~ 33

Author(s):

Eileen M. O’Reilly ◽

Jonathan W. Lee ◽

Mark Zalupski ◽

Marinela Capanu ◽

Jennifer Park ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase Ii ◽

Group Performance ◽

Phase Ii Trial ◽

Performance Status ◽

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

High Response Rate ◽

Open Label ◽

Free Survival ◽

Palb2 Mutation

PURPOSE Five percent to 9% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) develop in patients with a germline BRCA1/2 or PALB2 (g BRCA/PALB2+) mutation. Phase IB data from a trial that used cisplatin, gemcitabine, and veliparib treatment demonstrated a high response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR), and overall survival (OS) in this population. We designed an open-label, randomized, multicenter, two-arm phase II trial to investigate cisplatin and gemcitabine with or without veliparib in g BRCA/PALB2+ PDAC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients had untreated g BRCA/PALB2+ PDAC with measurable stage III to IV disease and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1. Treatment for patients in arm A consisted of cisplatin 25 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 600 mg/m2 intravenously on days 3 and 10; treatment for patients in arm B was the same as that for patients in arm A, and arm A also received veliparib 80 mg orally twice per day on days 1 to 12 cycled every 3 weeks. The primary end point was RRs of arm A and arm B evaluated separately using a Simon two-stage design. Secondary end points were progression-free survival, DCR, OS, safety, and correlative analyses. RESULTS Fifty patients were evaluated by modified intention-to-treat analysis. The RR for arm A was 74.1% and 65.2% for arm B ( P = .55); both arms exceeded the prespecified activity threshold. DCR was 100% for arm A and 78.3% for arm B ( P = .02). Median progression-free survival was 10.1 months for arm A (95% CI, 6.7 to 11.5 months) and 9.7 months for arm B (95% CI, 4.2 to 13.6 months; P = .73). Median OS for arm A was 15.5 months (95% CI, 12.2 to 24.3 months) and 16.4 months for arm B (95% CI, 11.7 to 23.4 months; P = .6). Two-year OS rate for the entire cohort was 30.6% (95% CI, 17.8% to 44.4%), and 3-year OS rate was 17.8% (95% CI, 8.1% to 30.7%). Grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicities for arm A versus arm B were 13 (48%) versus seven (30%) for neutropenia, 15 (55%) versus two (9%) for thrombocytopenia, and 14 (52%) versus eight (35%) for anemia. CONCLUSION Cisplatin and gemcitabine is an effective regimen in advanced g BRCA/PALB2+ PDAC. Concurrent veliparib did not improve RR. These data establish cisplatin and gemcitabine as a standard approach in g BRCA/ PALB2+ PDAC.

Download Full-text