Real-world safety data and differentiation of second-line (2L) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) based regimens among patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 390-390
Author(s):  
George P. Kim ◽  
Paul Cockrum ◽  
Aleksander Chudnovsky ◽  
Andy Surinach ◽  
Zev A. Wainberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Real World ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Health Database ◽  
Liposomal Irinotecan ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Cost Implications

390 Background: Chemotherapy related adverse events (AEs) can impact the treatment of patients, reducing quality of life and leading to dose delays and treatment discontinuation. This study examined the proportion of patients (pts) with mPDAC treated with 5-FU-based regimens in the 2L setting who experienced AEs during treatment. Methods: Data were extracted for pts diagnosed with mPDAC who initiated 2L treatment between January 2016 and July 2020 from the Flatiron Health electronic health database. Pts included in the study were treated with FOLFIRINOX (FFX), FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, or a regimen containing liposomal irinotecan. The occurrence of grade 3 (G3) and grade 4 (G4) neutropenia, G3/G4 elevated alanine transaminase (ALT) and anemia where transfusion was indicated were determined using lab results and the grading criteria from the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03. The occurrence of diarrhea, fatigue, nausea and vomiting (N/V), and neuropathy were identified from structured diagnosis records through ICD-10-CM codes. Duration of therapy (DOT) was assessed for each regimen. Descriptive statistics for AEs and DOT were reported. Results: Of the 804 pts included in the study, 28.4% (n=228) received FFX, 39.8% (n=320) received regimens containing liposomal irinotecan, 24.8% (n=199) received FOLFOX, and 7.1% (n=57) received FOLFIRI. The median DOT (IQR) was 86 days (d) (43 – 206), 79d (41 – 169), 72d (43 – 166), and 84d (46 – 148) for pts who received FFX, liposomal irinotecan, FOLFOX, and FOLFIRI, respectively. G3/G4 neutropenia (<1000/mm3) presented in 28.1% (n=64) of pts treated with FFX, 11.9% (n=38) of pts treated with liposomal irinotecan, 17.1% (n=34) of pts treated with FOLFOX, and 36.8% (n=21) of pts treated with FOLFIRI. NV occurred in 14.9% (n=34), 13.1% (n=42), 12.6% (n=25), and 10.5% (n=6), respectively. The full AE results are summarized in the table. Conclusions: In this assessment of often dose-limiting AEs among pts with mPDAC treated in 2L, pts who received liposomal irinotecan had the lowest proportion of neutropenia. No clear pattern was noted for N/V, neuropathy, fatigue, anemia, and elevated ALT. Further research is necessary to determine the real-world cost implications of AEs in this patient population. [Table: see text]

Real-world safety and medication use of second-line (2L) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)–based regimens among patients (pts) with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16248-e16248
Author(s):  
George P. Kim ◽  
Paul Cockrum ◽  
Andy Surinach ◽  
Shu Wang ◽  
Zev A. Wainberg
Keyword(s):  
Medication Use ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Full Study ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Health Database ◽  
Liposomal Irinotecan ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Stimulating Factor

e16248 Background: Chemotherapy-related adverse events (AEs) can negatively impact the treatment of pts. Managing and preventing these toxicities often require additional medications. This study examined the proportion of pts with mPDAC treated with 5-FU–based regimens in 2L who experienced AEs during treatment, and the proportion who received medication to manage those AEs. Methods: Data were extracted for pts diagnosed with mPDAC who initiated 2L treatment Jan 2016 to Aug 2020 from the Flatiron Health database. Pts included were treated with FOLFIRINOX (FFX), FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, or liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI). The occurrence of grade 3 (G3) and grade 4 (G4) neutropenia and G3/G4 thrombocytopenia were determined using lab results and the grading criteria from the CTCAE v4.03. The occurrence of diarrhea and nausea/vomiting (N/V) were identified via ICD-10-CM codes. The use of atropine and granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) during treatment was assessed. Duration of therapy (DOT) was assessed for each regimen. Descriptive statistics for AEs, medication use, and DOT were reported. Results: Of the 825 eligible pts, 29.0% (n=239) received FFX, 40.2% (n=332) received regimens containing nal-IRI, 24.0% (n=198) received FOLFOX, and 6.8% (n=56) received FOLFIRI. The median DOT (IQR) was 15.1 weeks (wks) (7.1 – 30.1), 12.9 wks (6.0 – 24.8), 11 wks (6.4 – 24.0), and 12.7 wks (8.3 – 24.6) for pts who received FFX, nal-IRI, FOLFOX, and FOLFIRI, respectively. G3/G4 thrombocytopenia (<50,000/mm3) presented in 9.6%, 2.4%, 8.1%, and 14.3% of pts treated with FFX, nal-IRI, FOLFOX, and FOLFIRI, respectively. G3/G4 neutropenia (<1000/mm3) presented in 22.6%, 12.3%, 14.6%, and 19.6% of pts treated with FFX, nal-IRI, FOLFOX, and FOLFIRI, respectively. The median (Q1-Q3) cumulative dose of the G-CSF pegfilgrastim was 18mg (12 – 45), 18mg (12 – 48), 24mg (12 – 36), and 30mg (13 – 48) for pts treated with FFX, nal-IRI, FOLFOX, and FOLFIRI, respectively. Atropine use was higher in pts treated with FFX and FOLFIRI (90.8% and 94.6%, respectively) than for pts treated with nal-IRI (75.6%). The full study results are reported in the table. Conclusions: In this study of AEs among pts with mPDAC treated in 2L, pts who received liposomal irinotecan had the lowest proportion of thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. Diarrhea was similar across the cohorts despite the high proportion of use in atropine for pts treated with FFX and FOLFIRI.[Table: see text]

The Role of Nanoliposomal Irinotecan Plus Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid as Second-Line Treatment Option in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Se Jun Park ◽  
Hyunho Kim ◽  
Kabsoo Shin ◽  
Tae Ho Hong ◽  
Ja Hee Suh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Real World ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Nanoliposomal Irinotecan ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract BackgroundAccording to the NAPOLI-1 trial, nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) showed improved overall survival compared to fluorouracil alone for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who previously treated gemcitabine-based therapy. In that trial, Asian patients had frequent dose modification due to hematological toxicity. There has been limited information on the clinical benefit and toxicity of this regimen in a real-world setting. Herein, we assessed real-world experience of nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine failure.MethodsWe conducted a single institution retrospective analysis of response, survival and safety in patients who had been treated with nal-IRI with 5-FU/LV. Patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy received nal-IRI (80mg/m2) with 5-FU/LV every 2 weeks. ResultsFifty-one patients received nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV between January 2015 and December 2020. The median age was 67 years, and males were 58.8%. A total of 40 (78.4%) and 11 (21.6%) patients had received one and two lines of prior chemotherapy before enrollment, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 2.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-3.7) and median overall survival was 7.0 months (95% CI 6.0-7.9). Chemotherapy doses were reduced or delayed in 33 (64.7%) patients during the first 6 weeks and median relative dose intensity was 0.87. Thirty-six (70.6%) patients experienced any grade 3 or 4 adverse events. Most common grade 3 or 4 adverse event was neutropenia (58.8%) and most non-hematologic adverse events were under grade 2. Since the start of first-line chemotherapy, median overall survival was 16.3 months (95% CI 14.1-18.4).ConclusionsNal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV seems to be effective, with manageable toxicities, after gemcitabine-based treatment in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Trial registration Retrospectively registered

scholarly journals Real-world outcomes associated with liposomal irinotecan dose reductions in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
George P Kim ◽  
Andy Surinach ◽  
Frank A Corvino ◽  
Paul Cockrum ◽  
Bruce Belanger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Real World ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Health Database ◽  
Liposomal Irinotecan ◽  
Irinotecan Dose ◽  
Dose Reductions

Aim: This study sought to understand the association between liposomal irinotecan dose reductions (DRs) and clinical outcomes among patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Materials & methods: A retrospective study of adult patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treated with liposomal irinotecan in the Flatiron Health database was conducted to assess treatment and clinical outcomes. Results: DRs occurred in 28.4% of the 320 patients in the study. Patients with DRs had longer overall survival (7.7 [95% CI: 6.2–10.2]) vs 3.6 [3.2–4.1] months) and time to discontinuation (4.2 [3.0–4.9] vs 1.4 [1.0–1.5] months) than patients without DRs. Results were consistent in a validation analysis requiring three cycles of treatment. Conclusion: Liposomal irinotecan DRs were associated with improved clinical outcomes compared with patients without DRs.

scholarly journals Real-world comparative effectiveness of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus FOLFIRINOX in advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 175883591985036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Gabriela Chiorean ◽  
Winson Y. Cheung ◽  
Guido Giordano ◽  
George Kim ◽  
Salah-Eddin Al-Batran
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Grade 3

Background: No clinical trial has directly compared nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine (nab-P/G) with FOLFIRINOX (fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin/irinotecan) in metastatic or advanced pancreatic cancer (mPC or aPC). We conducted a systematic review of real-world studies comparing these regimens in the first-line setting. Methods: Embase and MEDLINE databases through 22 January 2019, and Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium 2019 abstracts were searched for real-world, retrospective studies comparing first-line nab-P/G versus FOLFIRINOX in mPC or aPC that met specific parameters. Studies with radiotherapy were excluded. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Results: Of 818 records initially identified, 35 were duplicates and 749 did not meet the eligibility criteria, mostly because they were either not comparative ( n = 356) or not first line ( n = 245). The remaining 34 studies (21 mPC; 13 aPC) assessed >6915 patients who received nab-P/G or FOLFIRINOX. In the studies identified, the median overall survival (OS) reached 14.4 and 15.9 months with nab-P/G and FOLFIRINOX, respectively, and median progression-free survival reached 8.5 and 11.7 months, respectively. Safety data were reported in 14 studies (2205 patients), including 8 single-institutional studies. In most single-institutional studies that reported safety data, rates were higher with FOLFIRINOX versus nab-P/G for grade 3/4 neutropenia (five of six studies) and febrile neutropenia (all three studies), while rates of grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy were higher with nab-P/G in four of seven studies. Conclusions: Although FOLFIRINOX was associated with slightly longer median OS in more studies, the differences, when available, were not statistically significant. Therefore, a randomized, controlled trial is warranted. Toxicity profile differences represent key considerations for treatment decisions.

PALOMAGE, a French real-world cohort of elderly women beyond age 70 with advanced breast cancer receiving palbociclib: Baseline characteristics and safety evaluation.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1012-1012
Author(s):  
Philippe Caillet ◽  
Marina Pulido ◽  
Etienne Brain ◽  
Claire Falandry ◽  
Isabelle Desmoulins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Systemic Treatment ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Grade 3

1012 Background: Advanced breast cancer (ABC) is common in older patients, resulting from the high incidence of breast cancer beyond age 70. This population is often limited in clinical trials. Endocrine therapy (ET) combined with a CDK4/6 inhibitor is the standard of care in ABC overexpressing hormonal receptors (HR+). Data specific to older patients are scarce in the literature, deserving further research. Methods: PALOMAGE is an ongoing French prospective study evaluating palbociclib (PAL) + ET in real life setting in women aged ≥70 with HR+ HER2- ABC, split in 2 cohorts: ET sensitive patients with no prior systemic treatment for ABC (cohort A), and ET resistant patients and/or with prior systemic treatment for ABC (cohort B). Data collected include clinical characteristics, quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 and ELD14) and geriatric description [G8 and Geriatric-COre DatasEt (G-CODE)]. This analysis reports on baseline characteristics and safety data for the whole population. Results: From 10/2018 to 10/2020, 400 and 407 patients were included in cohort A and B, respectively. The median age was 79 years (69-98), 15.1% with an age > 85. ECOG performance status (PS) was ≥2 in 17.9% patients, 68.3% had a G8 score ≤14 suggesting frailty, 32.1% had bone only metastasis, and 44% had visceral disease. 35.8% of patients in cohort B had no prior treatment for ABC. Safety data were available for 787 patients. The median follow-up was 6.7 months (IC95% = 6.1-7.6). At start of treatment, full dose of PAL (125 mg) was used in 76% of the patients: 62.6%, 68.7% and 71.6% of patients aged ≥ 80, those with ECOG PS ≥2 and those with a G8 score ≤14, respectively. In the safety population, 70% had ≥1 adverse event (AE), including 43.1% grade 3/4 AE, and 22.9% ≥ 1 serious AE. Most frequent AE reported were neutropenia (43.2%), anemia (17.5%), asthenia (16.3%) and thrombocytopenia (13.6%). Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 32.3% of patients, with febrile neutropenia in 1.1%. Grade 3/4 AE PAL-related were reported in 40.1%, 31.4% of patients aged < 80, ≥80, respectively. Regarding PAL, 23.4% of patients had a dose reduction and 41.8% had a temporary or permanent discontinuation due to AE. Safety data were similar in both cohorts. Geriatric data and impact on safety will be presented. Conclusions: PALOMAGE is a unique large real-world cohort focusing on older patients treated with PAL in France. These preliminary data do not suggest any new safety signal, matching data derived from PALOMA trials. The occurrence of less grade3/4 AE related to PAL in patients aged 80 and beyond might reflect the 30% decrease of PAL dose upfront. Effectiveness analyses are eagerly awaited. Clinical trial information: EUPAS23012 .

Improved quality of reporting safety data of medication in paediatric randomised controlled trials

2021 ◽  
pp. archdischild-2020-321197
Author(s):  
Taco Jan Prins ◽  
Corine Rollema ◽  
Eric van Roon ◽  
Tjalling de Vries
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trials ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Drug Event ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Quality Of Reporting ◽  
Event Reporting ◽  
The Past ◽  
Randomised Controlled

ObjectiveEvaluating the reporting of safety data of medication in paediatric randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in 2017–2018 compared with our earlier study.DesignLiterature search with a systemic appraisal of adverse drug event reporting.Main outcome measuresQuality of reporting of safety data using Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) and Ioannidis scores in paediatric drug RCTs. The CONSORT score consists of nine recommendations of the CONSORT Group issued to improve the quality of reporting adverse events. The Ioannidis score is based on these advices. We considered a CONSORT score of at least 6 and an Ioannidis score of at least 3 as sufficient.ResultsWe reviewed 100 RCTs published in 2017 and 2018. Ninety-four (94%) articles mentioned adverse events compared with 78% in the earlier study. Fifty-seven per cent used a standardised method for reporting adverse events compared with 34% in our earlier study. In 26 of the articles, the expected adverse events were defined, and 27 articles had a preset standardised scale for adverse events. Of these, 62 articles (62%) had a CONSORT score of 6 or higher compared with 18% in 2010. In the present study, 67% had an Ioannidis score of 3 or higher, whereas in the earlier study this was 29%. Both differences are statistically significant (p<0.05).ConclusionsReporting safety data in paediatric RCTs has improved over the past 10 years. However, there is still room for improvement and for further improvement. Authors and editors should give more attention to methods for collecting, reporting and presenting safety data of RCTs in studies and manuscripts.

Estimating costs of adverse events (AEs) and healthcare resource use (HRU) in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/r DLBCL) receiving tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) and axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel): A summary of real-world evidence.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19551-e19551
Author(s):  
Hongbo Yang ◽  
Cynthia Zhengyun Qi ◽  
Anand Dalal ◽  
Vamsi Bollu ◽  
Jie Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
The United States ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Cost Burden ◽  
Real World Evidence ◽  
Car T ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Cost Implications ◽  
The Cost

e19551 Background: The AE rates and HRU reported in multiple real-world evidence (RWE) studies of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies tisa-cel and axi-cel in r/r DLBCL have differed from those in their clinical trials. However, the cost implications from these findings are not well understood in existing literature. This study summarizes information from these RWE studies of tisa-cel and axi-cel and quantifies the associated costs. Methods: A literature review was conducted to identify RWE studies reporting AE rates and HRU of tisa-cel and axi-cel in the United States (US). AE rates and HRU were summarized and the associated costs were estimated using a micro-costing approach. Costs of AE management included hospitalization and pharmacy costs, such as intensive care unit (ICU) stays, inpatient admissions, and medications for the treatment of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity events (NE). HRU costs included hospitalization, ICU stays, and outpatient visit costs. Unit costs were from public health databases that are representative of US healthcare system and from literature. Costs were inflated to 2020 US dollars. A range was reported to present evidence if inputs are available from multiple studies. Results were summarized for tisa-cel and axi-cel separately. Results: Four publications were identified: Jaglowski 2019, Pasquini 2019, Riedell 2019, and Jacobson 2020. Across studies, grade 3+ CRS and NE occurred in 1%-4% and 0%-5% of tisa-cel-treated patients and 7%-16% and 20%-35% of axi-cel-treated patients, respectively. Tocilizumab usage was reported in 14%-20% of tisa-cel- and 62%-71% of axi-cel-treated patients. CAR-T infusion was inpatient for 36% of tisa-cel- and 92%-100% of axi-cel-treated patients. The median hospitalization days was 2 for tisa-cel and 15-16 for axi-cel. ICU transfer was observed for 7% and 28%-38% of tisa-cel- and axi-cel-treated patients, respectively, with median stays of 4 and 5 days, respectively. The median number of outpatient visits within 28 days after infusion was 6 for tisa-cel and 4 for axi-cel. The total estimated costs for managing AEs per patient were $843-$1,962 for tisa-cel and $5,979-$10,878 for axi-cel. The total estimated HRU costs per patient were $3,321 for tisa-cel and $32,394-33,166 for axi-cel. Conclusions: RWE studies suggest that patients with r/r DLBCL receiving tisa-cel had numerically lower AE rates, HRU, and cost burden than those receiving axi-cel in the US. The additional cost burden for axi-cel was primarily driven by the incremental ICU and hospitalization care due to a higher proportion of inpatient infusion among patients receiving axi-cel. Further research is warranted to compare the costs associated with the two CAR-Ts in r/r DLBCL.

Prophylaxis of neutropenia with mecapegfilgrastim in patients with non-myeloid malignancies in a real-world setting.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e24072-e24072
Author(s):  
Jun Ma ◽  
Huiqiang Huang ◽  
Peifen Fu ◽  
Nong Xu ◽  
Chenyu Mao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Real World ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Secondary Prophylaxis ◽  
Chemotherapy Cycle ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Continuous Administration ◽  
Real World Setting ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Long Acting

e24072 Background: The prophylaxis of neutropenia has been evolving from short acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) to long acting G-CSFs. The safety and effectiveness of long acting G-CSF in a real-world setting were still lacking. Methods: We performed a multi-center, non-interventional, real-world study to explore the tolerability and effectiveness of mecapegfilgrastim. Different prophylactic strategy (primary or secondary prophylaxis) were compared. The effect of mecapegfilgrastim by means of continuous administration was also explored. Results: This study included 638 patients who had complete the study from May 2019 to November 15, 2020. About half of the participants were breast cancer patients. The mean age of the patients were 56 years. The most frequently reported adverse event possibly related to study drug was white blood cell increase (6.2 %). No unexpected adverse events were reported. Overall, thirty-six (5.6 %) patients experienced grade ≥ 3 neutropenia in chemotherapy cycle one. The patients in the primary and secondary prophylaxis subgroups had incidence of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia of 4.3 % and 9.2 % in chemotherapy cycle one respectively. There was a decreasing trend of neutropenia from cycle one to cycle four when mecapegfilgrastim were administrated continuously. Conclusions: The mecapegfilgrastim was well tolerable and no unexpected adverse events were observed in real-world setting. Primary prophylaxis using mecapegfilgrastim had lower incidence of neutropenia than secondary usage.

scholarly journals Sorafenib treatment by Child–Pugh score in Latin American patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (31) ◽  
pp. 2511-2520
Author(s):  
Laura L de Guevara ◽  
Lucy Dagher ◽  
Vanessa MV Arruda ◽  
Keiko Nakajima ◽  
Masatoshi Kudo
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Latin American ◽  
Treatment Option ◽  
Real World ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Treatment Duration ◽  
Sorafenib Treatment ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Grade 3

Aim: To evaluate sorafenib treatment in Latin American patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in the real-world GIDEON study. Patients & methods: Sorafenib administration, safety and efficacy were analyzed by Child–Pugh status. Results: Of 90 evaluable patients (37% Child–Pugh A, 46% Child–Pugh B and 3% Child–Pugh C at study entry), 97% started sorafenib at 800 mg/day. Patients with Child–Pugh B7 had the longest median treatment duration of sorafenib (33.1 weeks). Sorafenib-related adverse events occurred in 58% of patients with Child–Pugh A (21% grade 3/4) and 46% with Child–Pugh B (7% grade 3/4). Conclusion: Sorafenib had a similar safety profile across patients with Child–Pugh A and B and is a treatment option for both groups.

scholarly journals Real-world adverse events with niraparib 200 mg/day maintenance therapy in ovarian cancer: a retrospective study

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (36) ◽  
pp. 4197-4206
Author(s):  
Jack R Gallagher ◽  
Kylee Jean Heap ◽  
Susan Carroll ◽  
Karin Travers ◽  
Brooke Harrow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Real World ◽  
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Medical Record Data ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Record Data ◽  
Grade 3

Aim: To assess real-world occurrence of common clinical trial-reported adverse events (AE) among patients with recurrent ovarian cancer initiating niraparib 200 mg/day. Materials & methods: This retrospective observational study used physician-extracted anonymized medical record data of eligible patients initiating niraparib 200 mg/day after platinum-based chemotherapy. Results: Of 153 patients, 57 (37%) experienced ≥1 of the three most common all-grade AEs within 3 months after niraparib initiation: nausea (16%; grade 3/4: 2%), thrombocytopenia (14%; grade 3/4: 3%) and fatigue (24%; grade 3/4: 3%). In the ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial, these respective AEs occurred in 74, 61 and 59% of patients. Conclusion: Incidence of common clinical trial-reported AEs was lower among patients initiating niraparib 200 mg/day in real-world practice versus patients initiating niraparib 300 mg/day in ENGOT-OV16/NOVA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document