INNOVA: Interval or neoadjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer—A phase II randomized study comparing interval versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in magnetic resonance imaging-defined high-risk rectal cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 91-91
Author(s):  
Ramakrishnan Ayloor Seshadri ◽  
Trivadi S. Ganesan ◽  
Manikandan Dhanushkodi ◽  
Arunkumar M N ◽  
Shirley Sundersingh
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Clinical Trial Registry ◽  
Grade 3

91 Background: Total neoadjuvant treatment is a promising option in rectal cancer. We aim to compare neoadjuvant versus interval chemotherapy in high risk rectal cancer to identify the optimal sequencing of treatment. Methods: Using a Simon two-stage design, newly diagnosed MRI defined high risk rectal cancer patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive three 21 day cycles of chemotherapy with Capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 and Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 either before (Arm A-neoadjuvant) or after (Arm B-interval) chemoradiation followed by surgery. Primary end point was the pathological complete response (pCR) following surgery. A heirarchial model was used to assess the primary and secondary end points (toxicity and compliance) and compare the two regimens. (Clinical Trial Registry of India No. CTRI/2015/01/005385). Results: In this single centre study conducted between November 2015 and February 2020, 42 patients were randomised in the first stage. A pCR was seen in 4 patients in Arm A and 6 in Arm B. Hence another 52 patients were randomised in the second stage of which an additional 3 and 2 patients had a pCR leading to an overall pCR of 7 and 8 patients (15.5% vs 17% and 18.4% vs 19.5% in the intent-to-treat and per-protocol populations in Arm A and B respectively. This exceeded the minimum predetermined number of 5 pCR needed to qualify for further evaluation for each arm. Grade ≥3 toxicity was observed in 2.2% of 132 cycles and 4.6% of 129 cycles of chemotherapy delivered in 45 and 43 patients in Arm A and B respectively while 11/43 (25.5%) and 10/47 (21.2%) patients experienced grade ≥3 toxicity during chemoradiation. Treatment break of > 7 days was seen in 23.2% and 29.7% of patients in Arm A and B respectively while 93.3% in Arm A and 100% of patients in Arm B completed all 3 planned cycles of pre-operative chemotherapy. A non-significant trend towards greater pathological downstaging was seen in Arm B than in Arm A (ypT1-2 39% vs 26.3%; p = 0.1 and ypN0 68.3% vs 57.9%; p = 0.5 respectively). Conclusions: In this phase two study, both neoadjuvant and interval chemotherapy emerged eligible for further evaluation against the standard of care in a future phase III study. Although we could not pick one winner based on pCR, toxicity or compliance, the greater downstaging observed with interval chemotherapy suggests it could play a greater role in an organ preservation approach. Clinical trial information:CTRI/2015/01/005385, UTN no: U111111650578.

scholarly journals Total neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer with high risk factors in Slovenia

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 465-472
Author(s):  
Mojca Tuta ◽  
Nina Boc ◽  
Erik Brecelj ◽  
Mirko Omejc ◽  
Franc Anderluh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Distant Recurrence ◽  
High Risk Factors ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background In the light of a high rate of distant recurrence and poor compliance of adjuvant chemotherapy in high risk rectal cancer patients the total neoadjuvant treatment was logical approach to gaining acceptance. We aimed to evaluate toxicity and efficiency of this treatment in patients with rectal cancer and high risk factors for local or distant recurrence. Patients and methods Patients with rectal cancer stage II and III and with at least one high risk factor: T4, presence of extramural vein invasion (EMVI), positive extramesorectal lymph nodes or mesorectal fascia (MRF) involvement were treated with four cycles of induction CAPOX/FOLFOX, followed by capecitabine-based radiochemotherapy (CRT) and two consolidation cycles of CAPOX/FOLFOX before the operation. Surgery was scheduled 8–10 weeks after completition of CRT. Results From November 2016 to July 2018 66 patients were evaluable. All patients had stage III disease, 24 (36.4%) had T4 tumors, in 46 (69.7%) EMVI was present and in 47 (71.2%) MRF was involved. After induction chemotherapy, which was completed by 61 (92.4%) of patients, radiologic downstaging of T, N, stage, absence of EMVI or MRF involvement was observed in 42.4%, 62.1%, 36.4%, 69.7% and 68.2%, respectively. All patients completed radiation and 54 (81.8%) patients received both cycles of consolidation chemotherapy. Grade 3 adverse events of neoadjuvant treatment was observed in 4 (6%) patients. Five patients rejected surgery, 3 of them with radiologic complete clinical remissions. One patient did not have definitive surgery of primary tumor due to unexpected cardiac arrest few days after sigmoid colostomy formation. Among 60 operated patients pathological complete response rate was 23.3%, the rate of near complete response was 20% and in 96.7% radical resection was achieved. Pathological T, N and stage downstaging was 65%, 96.7% and 83.4%, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 perioperative complications were anastomotic leakage in 3, pelvic abscess in 1 and paralytic ileus in 2 patients. The rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) in patients irradiated with 3D conformal technique was 12.1% while with IMRT and VMAT it was 37% (p < 0.05). Hypofractionation with larger dose per fraction and simultaneous integrated boost used in the latest two was the only factor associated with pCR. ConclusionsTotal neoadjuvant treatment of high risk rectal cancer is well tolerated and highly effective with excellent tumor and node regression rate and with low toxicity rate. Longer follow up will show if this strategy will improve distant disease control and survival.

EXPERT-C: A randomized phase II European multicenter trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (capecitabine/oxaliplatin) and chemoradiation (CRT) with or without cetuximab followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) in patients with MRI-defined high-risk rectal cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 360-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Dewdney ◽  
D. Cunningham ◽  
J. Tabernero ◽  
B. Glimelius ◽  
A. Cervantes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Rectal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Braf Mutations ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

360 Background: We previously demonstrated the feasibility of administering neoadjuvant chemotherapy before CRT and TME in patients with MRI selected poor prognosis rectal cancer (Chua Y J et al Lancet Oncol 2010). This trial evaluates the addition of the anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab to this treatment strategy. KRAS and BRAF mutations have been established as predictive for lack of response to anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed, MRI defined high risk rectal adenocarcinoma were randomised to receive 4 cycles of capecitabine 1,700mg/m2 with oxaliplatin 130mg/m2 (CAPOX) followed by CRT, 45Gy/25# + 5.4Gy/3# boost with concurrent continuous capecitabine 1,650mg/m2/day, TME and 4 cycles of adjuvant CAPOX (EXPERT) or the same regimen with the addition of cetuximab (400mg/m2 loading dose week 1, followed by 250mg/m2/week) (EXPERT-C). The primary endpoint is complete response (CR) (defined as pathological complete response or radiological complete response in patients who decline surgery) in KRAS and BRAF wild type tumours. Secondary endpoints include radiological response to CRT, CR in both KRAS wild type and mutant patients, R0 resection rates, progression free and overall survival and safety. Results: Between 2005-2008, 165 eligible patients were recruited from 15 centres (EXPERT n=81, EXPERT-C n=84). 99% of patients had performance status 0-1, 98% had ≥ T3 disease, 56% had an involved or threatened circumferential resection margin and 72% had evidence of extramural venous invasion determined by MRI. The current median follow up is 30 months. 72/81 (89%) and 79/84 (94%) of patients completed neoadjuvant CRT and 72/81 (89%) and 77/84 (92%) patients underwent curative-intent surgery on the EXPERT and EXPERT-C arms respectively. Two patients declined surgery. Conclusions: The primary and secondary endpoints will be analyzed in October 2010 and will be presented at the meeting. [Table: see text]

Neoadjuvant trastuzumab (H), pertuzumab (P), and chemotherapy versus trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and P in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC): Final outcome results from the phase III KRISTINE study.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 500-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara A. Hurvitz ◽  
Miguel Martin ◽  
Kyung Hae Jung ◽  
Chiun-Sheng Huang ◽  
Nadia Harbeck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Study ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Treatment Discontinuation ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Post Surgery ◽  
Grade 3

500 Background: KRISTINE compared neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus dual HER2- blockade (HP) with T-DM1 plus P (T-DM1+P), a targeted regimen that omits standard chemotherapy. T-DM1+P resulted in a lower pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, but a more favorable safety profile. Here we present the final outcomes from KRISTINE. Methods: KRISTINE (NCT02131064) was a randomized study of T-DM1+P versus docetaxel, carboplatin, and H plus P (TCHP). Patients with HER2-positive stage II–III BC received 6 cycles of neoadjuvant T-DM1+P or TCHP q3w. Patients receiving T-DM1+P continued adjuvant T-DM1+P; patients receiving TCHP received adjuvant HP, for 12 cycles in each arm. Patients in the T-DM1+P arm without pCR were encouraged to receive standard adjuvant chemotherapy before adjuvant T-DM1+P. Secondary endpoints, analyzed with descriptive statistics, included event-free survival (EFS; all events pre- and post-surgery), invasive disease-free survival (IDFS; invasive events post-surgery), overall survival and safety. Results: At median follow-up of 37 months, EFS favored TCHP (HR = 2.61 [95% CI: 1.36–4.98]), due to more locoregional progression events in the T-DM1+P arm before surgery (6.7% vs 0; Table). pCR was associated with reduced risk of an IDFS event (HR = 0.24 [95% CI: 0.09– 0.60]) regardless of treatment arm. There were 5 deaths (2.3%) in the TCHP arm and 6 (2.7%) in the T-DM1+P arm. There were more grade ≥3 AEs with TCHP but a higher rate of AEs leading to treatment discontinuation with T-DM1+P. Conclusions: EFS numerically favors TCHP due to locoregional progression events with T-DM1+P prior to surgery. T-DM1+P was associated with fewer grade ≥3 AEs but increased treatment discontinuation. Clinical trial information: NCT02131064. [Table: see text]

Influence of denosumab on disseminated tumor cells (DTC) in the bone marrow of breast cancer (BC) patients with neoadjuvant treatment: A GeparX translational substudy.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 580-580
Author(s):  
Pauline Wimberger ◽  
Jens U. Blohmer ◽  
Petra Krabisch ◽  
Theresa Link ◽  
Marianne Just ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Disseminated Tumor Cells ◽  
Primary Diagnosis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Specific Analysis ◽  
First Time

580 Background: DTCs in the bone marrow are observed in up to 30% at primary diagnosis of BC and their presence is an independent prognostic factor for reduced survival. It was shown that antiresorptive therapy eradicates DTCs and improves prognosis in DTC-positive BC patients (pts). In the GeparX phase III prospective randomized trial, denosumab (a monoclonal IgG2-anti-RANKL-antibody) was investigated as add-on treatment to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with two different nab-paclitaxel schedules in early high-risk primary BC. In a translational substudy, we analyzed for the first time the influence of short-term denosumab treatment (24 weeks) on the presence of DTCs. Methods: A total of 167 pts from the GeparX trial were analyzed for DTCs at baseline by immunocytochemistry using the pan-cytokeratin antibody A45-B/B3. Initially DTC-positive pts were re-analyzed for DTCs after NACT±Denosumab. Results: Overall, 60/167 pts (35.9%) treated with NACT±Denosumab had a pathological complete response (pCR; 55.4% in TNBC, 43.3% in HER2+, 15.3% in HR+/HER2-). At baseline, 43/167 pts (25.7%) were DTC-positive and 41 of those were available for re-analysis of DTCs after NACT±Denosumab. DTC eradication was observed in 77.8% after NACT+Denosumab and in 69.6% after NACT alone (p = 0.726). Due to the limited number of pts eligible for DTC-re-analysis after NACT, a subtype specific analysis for the effect of denosumab was not possible. There was no significant association between pCR and i) the presence of DTCs at baseline (37.1% DTC-negative vs 32.6% positive, p = 0.71) or ii) the eradication of DTCs after NACT±Denosumab (36.7% vs 27.3%, p = 0.72). Notably, in TNBC, we observed a tendency that DTC-positivity at baseline or DTC-persistence after NACT could be associated with reduced pCR rate (40.0% in DTC-positive vs. 66.7% in DTC-negative pts, p = 0.16; 25% in DTC-persistent pts vs. 50% in DTC-eradicated pts, p = 0.59). Conclusions: Denosumab in addition to NACT does not improve pCR, but the suspected effect of denosumab on DTC eradication should be further analyzed in TNBC. Key words: GeparX trial, denosumab, disseminated tumor cells, bone marrow, neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Funding: GeparX and DTC substudy were financially supported by Amgen and Celgene. Clinical trial information: NCT02682693 .

Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy without Radiation for Rectal Cancer

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 275-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takuya Matsumoto ◽  
Suguru Hasegawa ◽  
Masazumi Zaima ◽  
Naoya Inoue ◽  
Yoshiharu Sakai
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Pathological Complete Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Grade 3

Aim: The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy without radiation (NAC) in the treatment of rectal cancer remains unclear. This retrospective study was aimed at determining the pathological complete response rate and short-term outcomes of NAC in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Patients and Methods: We collected data on 159 consecutive patients treated for rectal cancer (cT3/cT4a, cN+, and cM0 status) at five tertiary referral hospitals between 2005 and 2010. Pathological complete response (pCR) and safety were assessed as the main outcomes in 124 eligible patients comprising 15 who received NAC (NAC group) and 109 who received no neoadjuvant chemotherapy (non-NAC group). Results: In the NAC group, 2 patients (13.3%) achieved a pCR (95% confidence interval: 1.7-40.5%) and 3 patients (20%) experienced grade 3/4 adverse events. No significant differences were found between the NAC and non-NAC groups in terms of short-term outcomes, including R0 proportion (100 vs. 96.3%, p = 0.45) and postoperative grade 3/4 complications (13.3 vs. 18.4%, p = 0.63). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy without radiation appears to be safe, without worsening short-term outcomes, in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. A further study is needed to verify these findings in larger samples.

scholarly journals Neoadjuvant Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin Before Concurrent Capecitabine and Radiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancers: Experience of a Cancer Hospital in Pakistan

2021 ◽  
pp. 790-796
Author(s):  
Muhammad Atif Mansha ◽  
Asmara Waheed ◽  
Tabinda Sadaf ◽  
Asma Rashid ◽  
Nabia Irfan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Circumferential Resection Margin ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Resection Margin ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE To report the toxicity and pathologic response rates after adding neoadjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) followed by concurrent radiation and capecitabine (CAPRT) and surgery in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed medical records of 301 patients between January 2007 and December 2014. Patients were treated with four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy comprising CAPOX, followed by radiotherapy at doses of 45-54 Gy in 25-30 fractions with concurrent capecitabine. A response assessment scan was performed at 4-6 weeks postradiation followed by surgical evaluation at 6-8 weeks. Pathologic tumor and nodal response rates as well as circumferential resection margin were assessed on surgical specimens. RESULTS The median age of the patients was 43 years (range, 16-78). Overall, 227 (75.4%) patients were able to complete four cycles of CAPOX. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was well-tolerated with no serious adverse effects. The most common toxicity was diarrhea (grade 2, n = 108; 35.8%; grade 3, n = 57; 18.9%; grade 4, n = 25; 8.3%) followed by neuropathy (grade 2, n = 132; 43.8%; grade 3, n = 54; 17.9%) and oral mucositis (grade 2, n = 108; 35.8%; grade 3, n = 47; 15.6%; grade 4, n = 9; 2.99%). A total of 229 (76.1%) patients underwent surgery. Pathologic complete response was seen in 52 (22.7%; 95% CI, 13 to 28), whereas 200 (87.3%; 95% CI, 82 to 99) patients had a negative circumferential resection margin on pathology. CONCLUSION Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with CAPOX before CAPRT and planned total mesorectal excision surgery result in good tumor regression and substantial pathologic complete response rates with acceptable toxicity. With growing interest in organ preservation in rectal cancer, the strategy of completing all chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy before planned surgery offers a favorable paradigm. However, further randomized clinical trials are needed to support this evidence.

Nomogram including pretherapeutic parameters for prediction of early response after neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer: Results from a prospective randomized study.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 716-716
Author(s):  
Jianwei Zhang ◽  
Yue Cai ◽  
Huabin Hu ◽  
Ping Lan ◽  
Lei Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
External Validation ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Predictive Performance ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Early Response ◽  
Preoperative Treatment ◽  
Internal Validation

716 Background: To establish a clinical nomogram with pretherapeutic parameters for predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) and tumor downstaging after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with rectal cancer. Methods: From Jan 2011 to Feb 2015, complete data was available for 309 patients with rectal cancer who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy alone enrolled in FOWARC study. All pre-treatment clinical parameters were collected to build a nomogram for pCR and tumor down-staging. The model was subjected to bootstrap internal validation. The predictive performance of the model was assessed with concordance index (c-index) and calibration. Results: Of the 309 patients, 55 (17.8%) had achieved pCR, 138 (44.7%) patients were classified as good down-staging with ypTNM stage 0-I. Basing on the multivariate logistic regression and clinical consideration, 5 factors were identified to be the independent predictors for pCR and good downstaging, respectively (Table 1). The predictive nomograms were developed (fig 1 and 2) to predict the probability of pCR and good down-staging with a C-index of 0.802 (95% CI: 0.736-0.867) and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.672-0.784). Calibration plots showed good performance on internal validation. Conclusions: The nomograms provide individual prediction of response to different preoperative treatment for patients with rectal cancer. This model may help physician in patient selection for optimized treatment. Further external validation is warranted. [Table: see text]

A randomised phase III trial comparing two dose-dense, dose-intensified approaches (EPC and PM(Cb)) for neoadjuvant treatment of patients with high-risk early breast cancer (GeparOcto).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 518-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Schneeweiss ◽  
Volker Moebus ◽  
Hans Tesch ◽  
Claus Hanusch ◽  
Carsten Denkert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Early Stage Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Luminal B

518 Background: The sequential use of intense does-dense (idd) epirubicin, paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide (EPC) and weekly paclitaxel/liposomal doxorubicin (+/- carboplatin (Cb) in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) (PM(Cb)) are considered highly efficient regimens for high-risk early stage breast cancer (BC). Methods: GeparOcto (NCT02125344) patients (pts) received 18 weeks (wks) either EPC (3x E 150mg/m² q2w followed by 3x P225 mg/m² q2w followed by 3x C 2000mg/m² q2) or PM(Cb) (12x P 80mg/m² plus M 20 mg/m² q1w, plus Cb AUC 1.5 q1w in TNBC). For HER2+ BC trastuzumab 6 (8) mg/kg q3w and pertuzumab 420 (840) mg q3w cycles were given concomitantly with P and C. Pts with histologically confirmed, cT1c - cT4a-d BC and central receptor assessment were included. Pts with HER2+ or TNBC were eligible irrespective of nodal status, luminal B-like tumours only if pN+. Primary objective compared pathologic complete response (pCR) rates (ypT0/is ypN0). Sample size calculations assumed a pCR rate of 50% for EPC and 60% for PM(Cb), requiring 950 pts to show superiority of PM(Cb). Secondary objectives compared pCR rates within the stratified subgroups (BC subtype, HER2+ vs HER2- HR+ vs HER2- HR-), amongst others. Results: 961 pts were recruited between 12/2014 and 05/2016, 945 started treatment. Median age was 48 years, 4% T3, 2% T4d, 46% N+, 82% ductal invasive, 66% G3 tumors; 40% were HER2+, 43% TNBC. 347 pts reported SAEs (176 EPC/171 PM(Cb)) and 2 pts died. 35 pneumonias (2 EPC vs 33 PM(Cb)) and 18 pneumonitis (3 EPC vs 15 PM(Cb)) were reported. 16.4% pts with EPC and 33.8% with PM(Cb) discontinued treatment (p<0.001), mainly due to AEs (47 EPC vs 113 PM(Cb)). Mean treatment duration was 17 wks with EPC and 16 wks with PM(Cb). pCR rate was 48.3% with EPC and 47.6% with PM(Cb)(OR 0.97 (95%CI 0.75-1.25), p=0.876). pCR rate in TNBC was 48.5% with EPC and 51.7% with PM(Cb); in HER2+ 62.0% vs 57.4% and in Luminal B 14.1% vs 14.6%. Conclusions: In high-risk early stage breast cancer pts pCR rates of idd EPC compared to weekly PM(Cb) were not significantly different. PM(Cb) appeared to be less feasible. Clinical trial information: NCT02125344.

INNOVA: A phase II randomized study comparing INterval versus NeOadjuVAnt chemotherapy in magnetic resonance imaging-defined high risk rectal cancer.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS879-TPS879
Author(s):  
Ramakrishnan Ayloor Seshadri ◽  
Trivadi S. Ganesan ◽  
Arunkumar M N ◽  
Shirley Sundersingh
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Pathological Complete Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation ◽  
Rectal Cancers

TPS879 Background: Patients with rectal cancers treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy are not exposed to systemic doses of chemotherapy until very late in the treatment schedule. Preoperative chemotherapy, either in the neoadjuvant or interval setting can lead to early treatment of micrometastasis, improve the tumor response and possibly the overall survival. Phase II studies of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer have shown good response to chemotherapy with no tumor progression and good compliance. A phase II study evaluating the effect of giving chemotherapy in the interval waiting period between chemoradiation and surgery has shown acceptable toxicity and high pathological complete response rates. Methods: This single centre, randomized, open label, phase II trial compares the safety and efficacy of two pre-operative regimens in locally advanced MRI defined high-risk rectal cancers. Based on the Simon optimal two-stage design, 94 patients will be randomised to either Arm A [3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) followed by chemoradiation (50.4 Gy with capecitabine) and then surgery] or Arm B [neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by 3 cycles of interval chemotherapy and then surgery]. Patients in both arms receive 3 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. The primary end-point is the pathological complete response rate. Secondary end-points include frequency and severity of adverse events, RO resection rates, tumor regression grading and compliance to treatment. The inclusion criteria: age 18 to 70 years; ECOG performance status 0-2; non-metastatic, locally advanced rectal cancer with any one of the following features on high-resolution thin slice MRI: any T3/T4 tumor in the lower rectum, T3c/T3d/T4 tumor in the mid rectum, N2 disease, threatened mesorectal fascia, or extramural vascular invasion. Patients are randomly assigned to one of the two intervention arms in a 1:1 ratio. Prespecified activity goal for the first stage of accrual was met; second stage accrual began in July 2017. Clinical trial information: CTRI/2015/01/005385.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document