Chemo4MetPanc: A phase II study with combination chemotherapy (gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel), chemokine (C-X-C) motif receptor 4 inhibitor (motixafortide), and immune checkpoint blockade (cemiplimab) in metastatic treatment naïve pancreas adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS454-TPS454
Author(s):  
Ilenia Pellicciotta ◽  
Emily Linda Alouani ◽  
Alexander Raufi ◽  
Samuel M Pan ◽  
Jianhua Hu ◽  
...  

TPS454 Background: Pancreas adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive cancer projected to be the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States by 2030 for which improved treatment options are desperately needed. Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) for PDAC has failed as monotherapy in early phase clinical trials likely due to a highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. The CXCR4/CXCL12 axis is a key immune evasion mechanism thought to deter CD8+ T-cells (CTLs) from infiltrating the tumor. We performed a large seven arm survival and biopsy/necropsy study in KPC mice (KrasLSL.G12D/+;p53R172H/+;Pdx1Cretg/+) where we demonstrate that addition of gemcitabine to CXCR4 inhibition in combination with ICB, enhanced tumor stabilization and neoplastic cell death, and improved survival by 50 percent. Multiplex immunofluorescence indicated an increased CTL to regulatory T-cell ratio and clustering of CTLs around neoplastic cells. Presented here is a trial-in progress that will evaluate combination of a CXCR4 inhibitor, ICB, and chemotherapy in treatment naïve patients with PDAC. Methods: This is a multicenter, single arm, open-label phase 2 study of combination motixafortide 1.25mg/kg SC monotherapy for 5 days during priming followed by twice weekly, cemiplimab 350mg IV once every 21 days, gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 IV with nab-paclitaxel 125mg/m2 IV on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. Patients with histologically confirmed metastatic PDAC who have not received prior therapy will be enrolled. The primary endpoint is overall response rate by 16 weeks. A response rate greater than 45% by 16 weeks is considered promising, whereas a response rate of less than 23% is considered not promising. We will use a Simon optimal 2-stage design, where we will enroll 10 patients in the first stage. If 3 or more patients meet the endpoint in the first stage, the study will be expanded to a total of 40 patients. If a total of 14 or more patients achieve CR or PR by 16 weeks, the agent will be considered promising and worthy of further study. Secondary endpoints include safety, mPFS, disease control rate (DCR), and mOS. Correlative aims include analyses of pre- and on-treatment biopsies with quantitative multiplex immunofluorescence, RNA-sequencing, and generation of patient derived organoids for association with clinical benefit and to determine mechanisms of action/resistance. An interim analysis will be performed at the conclusion of the stage I portion of the study. Clinical trial information: NCT04543071.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yantao Xu ◽  
Zixi Jiang ◽  
Xinwei Kuang ◽  
Xiang Chen ◽  
Hong Liu

BACKGROUND Melanoma is one of the most life-threatening skin cancers and immune checkpoint blockers (ICB) are widely used in the treatment of melanoma because of their remarkable efficacy. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of ICB in melanoma for the past decades, while exploring the research trends and public interests of immune checkpoint blockade in melanoma. METHODS We summarized the articles embodied in web of science core collection about immune checkpoint blockers in melanoma each year from 1950 to 2020. R package Bibliometrix was used to data extraction and the visualization of the distribution of publication years and top 10 core authors. The keywords citation burst analysis and co-citation network are performed by CiteSpace. Gunn map online world map was used to evaluate the distribution of countries and regions. Ranking was performed using the Standard Competition Ranking method. Except for these, the results of co-authorship analysis, co-occurrence are analyzed and visualized by VOSviewer. RESULTS After removing duplication, totally 9169 documents were included. Distribution of annual publications shows that the number of publications rose sharply from 2015 onwards, to a peak in 2020 or is yet to come. Spatial distribution indicated that there is a large gap between the amount of document published in other countries and the United States. The co-authorship analysis results clustered all 149 top published institution into 8 clusters, each approximately indicated one country, suggested that the international cooperation among various institutions should be strengthened, while the core author extraction indicate the publication peak change of authors. Keyword analysis unraveled the keywords clustering and top citation burst. Co-citation analysis of references analysis the reference from 2010 to 2020, unravel the citation number and centrality of top article. CONCLUSIONS This study revealed the trends in research interest and public interest of immune checkpoint blockade in melanoma, which may pave the way for further research.


2018 ◽  
Vol 71 (11) ◽  
pp. 1023-1027 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elan Hahn ◽  
Stanley K Liu ◽  
Danny Vesprini ◽  
Bin Xu ◽  
Michelle R Downes

Tumour-induced immunosuppression plays a role in the development and progression of cancer. Of interest is the interaction between programmed death-1 and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) which can be targeted through immune checkpoint blockade; however, there are limited data surrounding the composition of the immune milieu in prostate cancer. We preliminarily assessed 21 radical prostatectomies in therapy-naïve patients for immune markers and PD-L1 expression. The immune infiltrates were higher in adenocarcinoma than benign prostate (lymphocytes p<0.001, macrophages p=0.010) with 5% of cases being PD-L1 high (≥5% expression). Increased peritumoural CD68 and CD163 expression correlated with lower grade group (GG) (p=0.024 and p=0.014, respectively) with a trend towards increased CD68 expression in lower stage cases (p=0.086). There was also increased CD45 expression in lower GGs (p=0.063). We found the immune infiltrate in acinar prostate cancer to be extremely heterogeneous with an overall immunophenotype unlikely to respond to immune checkpoint blockade.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1959
Author(s):  
Sabine Semrau ◽  
Antoniu-Oreste Gostian ◽  
Maximilian Traxdorf ◽  
Markus Eckstein ◽  
Sandra Rutzner ◽  
...  

To determine whether a single dose of double immune checkpoint blockade (induction chemoimmunotherapy (ICIT)) adds benefit to induction single-cycle platinum doublet (induction chemotherapy (IC)) in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), patients treated with cisplatin 30 mg/m2 d1-3 and docetaxel 75 mg/m2 d1 combined with durvalumab 1500 mg fixed dose d5 and tremelimumab 75 mg fixed dose d5 (ICIT) within the CheckRad-CD8 trial were compared with a retrospective cohort receiving the same chemotherapy (IC) without immunotherapy. The endpoint of this analysis was the complete response rate (CR). A total of 53 patients were treated with ICIT and 104 patients with IC only. CR rates were 60.3% for ICIT and 40.3% for IC (p = 0.018). In the total population (n = 157), the most important predictor to achieve a CR was treatment type (OR: 2.21 for ICIT vs. IC; p = 0.038, multivariate analysis). The most diverse effects in CR rates between ICIT and IC were observed in younger (age ≤ 60) patients with HPV-positive OPSCCs (82% vs. 33%, p = 0.176), while there was no difference in older patients without HPV-positive OPSCCs (53% vs. 48%). The analysis provides initial evidence that ICIT could result in higher CR rates than IC. Young patients with HPV-positive OPSCCs may have the greatest benefit from additional immune checkpoint inhibitors.


Author(s):  
Andrew L. Schmidt ◽  
Alexandra L. Tabakin ◽  
Eric A. Singer ◽  
Toni K. Choueiri ◽  
Rana R. McKay

Systemic therapy for first-line metastatic renal cell carcinoma has evolved toward immune checkpoint blockade combinations incorporating a PD-1/L1 inhibitor along with CTLA-4 inhibition or VEGF-targeted therapy. The new treatment paradigm that integrates immunotherapy for treatment-naïve advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma creates a new therapeutic challenge for clinicians including the optimal way to integrate multidisciplinary care involving surgery, radiotherapy, and application of contemporaneous systemic treatment in subsequent lines of therapy following discontinuation of combination therapy. We outline the available data for the multidisciplinary management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma, systemic therapy options in the post–immune checkpoint blockade setting, and novel therapies in development for advanced renal cell carcinoma. We provide practical considerations to assist clinicians in treatment choice and map future directions for progress.


Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (37) ◽  
pp. e22153
Author(s):  
Yanyun Shen ◽  
Yunfeng Chen ◽  
Duoqin Wang ◽  
Zhidong Zhu

Nanomaterials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 661
Author(s):  
Chiara Cremolini ◽  
Emanuela Vitale ◽  
Raffaella Rastaldo ◽  
Claudia Giachino

Immune checkpoint receptor signaling pathways constitute a prominent class of “immune synapse,” a cell-to-cell connection that represses T-lymphocyte effector functions. As a possible evolutionary countermeasure against autoimmunity, this strategy is aimed at lowering potential injury to uninfected cells in infected tissues and at minimizing systemic inflammation. Nevertheless, tumors can make use of these strategies to escape immune recognition, and consequently, such mechanisms represent chances for immunotherapy intervention. Recent years have witnessed the advance of pharmaceutical nanotechnology, or nanomedicine, as a possible strategy to ameliorate immunotherapy technical weaknesses thanks to its intrinsic biophysical properties and multifunctional modifying capability. To improve the long-lasting response rate of checkpoint blockade therapy, nanotechnology has been employed at first for the delivery of single checkpoint inhibitors. Further, while therapy via single immune checkpoint blockade determines resistance and a restricted period of response, strong interest has been raised to efficiently deliver immunomodulators targeting different inhibitory pathways or both inhibitory and costimulatory pathways. In this review, the partially explored promise in implementation of nanotechnology to improve the success of immune checkpoint therapy and solve the limitations of single immune checkpoint inhibitors is debated. We first present the fundamental elements of the immune checkpoint pathways and then outline recent promising results of immune checkpoint blockade therapy in combination with nanotechnology delivery systems.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deeksha G Lahori ◽  
Pegah Varamini

In recent years, cancer immunotherapy has evolved as an exciting novel strategy for researchers and clinicians worldwide. Immunotherapeutic agents such as immune checkpoint blockers have changed the standard-of-care treatment provided for many tumors. Unfortunately, only a small proportion of patients respond effectively to these checkpoint inhibitors. Moreover, the immunosuppressive pathways for cancer are probably too complicated to achieve optimal outcome with immune checkpoint inhibitors alone. Combining current therapeutic options and immunotherapy-based approaches is being explored as an effective strategy to treat cancer. The use of nanotechnology-based platforms for delivery of immunotherapeutic agents or combination therapy could offer a major advantage over conventional anticancer treatment options. This review highlights the potential role of different nanotechnology-based strategies in improving the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade therapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document