scholarly journals Association Between Marital Status and Racial Disparities in Esophageal Cancer Care

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. e498-e506
Author(s):  
Alan Paniagua Cruz ◽  
Karlie L. Haug ◽  
Lili Zhao ◽  
Rishindra M. Reddy
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Marital Status ◽  
Racial Disparities ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact ◽  
White Patients

PURPOSE: This study was designed to examine the impact of marital status on racial disparities in esophageal cancer care. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of data collected from the state cancer registry maintained by the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services. We identified patients with an esophageal cancer diagnosis between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2013. χ2 test and logistics regression were used to analyze 6,809 patients who met our eligibility criteria. Statistical significance was defined as P ≤ .05. RESULTS: Approximately 88.4% of our patients were White and 11.6% were Black. A significantly higher number of White patients were married when compared with Blacks (62.9% v 31.8%, respectively; P < .0001). There was no significant difference in cancer staging between the 2 groups ( P = .0671). Married Blacks had similar rates of esophagectomy, chemotherapy, and radiation as married Whites. Both single groups had lower rates of esophagectomy and chemotherapy than married Whites, but single Blacks were the least likely to undergo esophagectomy. Single patients were more likely to refuse treatment. CONCLUSION: Marital status differs significantly in Black and White patients with esophageal cancer and may help explain racial disparities in cancer care. Further research is needed to explore reasons for care underutilization in single patients and whether these differences translate into clinical outcomes.

The impact of marital status on racial disparities in esophageal cancer care.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4056-4056
Author(s):  
Alan Paniagua Cruz ◽  
Karlie L. Haug ◽  
Lili Zhao ◽  
Priya Wadhera ◽  
Rishinda Reddy
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
African American ◽  
Marital Status ◽  
Racial Disparities ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Surgery Rates ◽  
The Impact

4056 Background: It is well known that racial disparities exist in cancer treatment and outcomes. The present study examined the impact of marital status as a surrogate for social support on esophageal cancer (EsC) care. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of data collected from a state cancer registry. We included individuals with an EsC diagnosis between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2013. A Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test was used to analyze categorical variables and two-sample t-tests to compare continuous variables. Results: 8754 patients (Caucasian (C) or African American (AA) only) were included, with 88.4% C and 11.6% AA. Staging at diagnosis in C and AA patients revealed that 30.6% vs 28.6% had localized disease, followed by 33.8% vs 32.0% with regional, and 35.6% vs 40.0% with metastatic, respectively (p = .0155). Rates of chemotherapy (53.6% vs 53.5%) and radiation therapy (54.1% vs 56.2%) administration were found to be similar between C and AA patients. In contrast, surgery rates were significantly different between the two groups, with 29.7% of C undergoing surgical resection in comparison to only 12.0% of AA patients (p < .0001). When evaluating marital status, 63.3% of C were married, compared to 33.4% of AA patients (p < .0001). In the AA group, 20.1% of married patients underwent surgery in contrast to only 7.6% of single AAs (p < .0001). Similarly, in the C group, married patients underwent surgery at a rate of 34.5%, while single patients went to surgery at a rate of 22.2% (p < .0001). Surgery contraindication (CI) rates were found to be similar across all groups (5.6% married Cs, 5.2% married AAs, 6.6% single Cs, and 6.5% single AAs) along with surgery refusal rates (1.56% single Cs vs 2.68% married Cs (p = .052), and 1.04% single AAs vs 2.81% married AAs (p = .210)). Conclusions: African American patients receive chemotherapy and radiotherapy at comparable rates to Caucasian patients, but the rates of surgery are significantly lower. Being married was associated with an almost three-fold increase in surgery rates for AA patients, and cause a significant increase in Caucasians too.

scholarly journals Does Social Support Affect the Health of the Elderly in Rural China? A Meta-Analysis Approach

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (18) ◽  
pp. 3471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natuya Zhuori ◽  
Yu Cai ◽  
Yan Yan ◽  
Yu Cui ◽  
Minjuan Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Social Support ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Rural China ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Relevant Literature ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Meta Regression ◽  
The Impact

As the trend of aging in rural China has intensified, research on the factors affecting the health of the elderly in rural areas has become a hot issue. However, the conclusions of existing studies are inconsistent and even contradictory, making it difficult to form constructive policies with practical value. To explore the reasons for the inconsistent conclusions drawn by relevant research, in this paper we constructed a meta-regression database based on 65 pieces of relevant literature published in the past 25 years. For more valid samples to reduce publication bias, we also set the statistical significance of social support to the health of the elderly in rural areas as a dependent variable. Finally, combined with multi-dimensional social support and its implications for the health of the elderly, meta-regression analysis was carried out on the results of 171 empirical studies. The results show that (1) subjective support rather than objective support can have a significant impact on the health of the elderly in rural areas, and there is no significant difference between other dimensions of social support and objective support; (2) the health status of the elderly in rural areas in samples involving western regions is more sensitive to social support than that in samples not involving the western regions; (3) among the elderly in rural areas, social support for the older male elderly is more likely to improve their health than that for the younger female elderly; and (4) besides this, both data sources and econometric models greatly affect the heterogeneity of the effect of social support on the health of the elderly in rural areas, but neither the published year nor the journal is significant. Finally, relevant policies and follow-up studies on the impact of social support on the health of the elderly in rural areas are discussed.

Impact of Hybrid Operating Rooms on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes Following Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair

2021 ◽  
pp. 152660282199672
Author(s):  
Giovanni Tinelli ◽  
Marie Bonnet ◽  
Adrien Hertault ◽  
Simona Sica ◽  
Gian Luca Di Tanna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Operating Room ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Study Patient ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Purpose: Evaluate the impact of hybrid operating room (HOR) guidance on the long-term clinical outcomes following fenestrated and branched endovascular repair (F-BEVAR) for complex aortic aneurysms. Materials and Methods: Prospectively collected registry data were retrospectively analyzed to compare the procedural, short- and long-term outcomes of consecutive F-BEVAR performed from January 2010 to December 2014 under standard mobile C-arm versus hybrid room guidance in a high-volume aortic center. Results: A total of 262 consecutive patients, including 133 patients treated with a mobile C-arm equipped operating room and 129 with a HOR guidance, were enrolled in this study. Patient radiation exposure and contrast media volume were significantly reduced in the HOR group. Short-term clinical outcomes were improved despite higher case complexity in the HOR group, with no statistical significance. At a median follow-up of 63.3 months (Q1 33.4, Q3 75.9) in the C-arm group, and 44.9 months (Q1 25.1, Q3 53.5, p=0.53) in the HOR group, there was no statistically significant difference in terms of target vessel occlusion and limb occlusion. When the endograft involved 3 or more fenestrations and/or branches (complex F-BEVAR), graft instability (36% vs 25%, p=0.035), reintervention on target vessels (20% vs 11%, p=0.019) and total reintervention rates (24% vs 15%, p=0.032) were significantly reduced in the HOR group. The multivariable Cox regression analysis did not show statistically significant differences for long-term death and aortic-related death between the 2 groups. Conclusion: Our study suggests that better long-term clinical outcomes could be observed when performing complex F-BEVAR in the latest generation HOR.

617 Who Benefits the Most from Burn Camps?

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S162-S163
Author(s):  
Jennifer B Radics-Johnson ◽  
Daniel W Chacon ◽  
Li Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
P Value ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Self Evaluation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Return Home ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction Burn camps provide a unique environment and activities for children that have experienced a burn-injury. Positive outcomes from attending burn camp include increased self-esteem, decreased feelings of isolation and a greater sense of self-confidence. In a 3-year retrospective review of camper evaluations from one of the largest and longest running week-long burn camps in the nation for ages 5–17, we aimed to assess if a child’s gender, age, TBSA or ethnicity affected the impact that burn camp had on a child. Methods A 3-year retrospective review of a Burn Camp’s camper evaluation forms was conducted for campers that attended burn camp between 2017–2019. Camp rosters were reviewed to determine the camper gender, age, TBSA and ethnicity. Camper self-evaluation forms completed at the end of each camp session were reviewed to record camper responses to questions regarding their opinions on the impact camp had on them as well as how camp will impact their lives once they return home. Categorical variables were summarized as frequency and percentage, and continuous variables were described as median and range. To check the relationship between two categorical variables, Chi-square test was used. To compare the continuous variable among groups, Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA was used. Statistical significance was declared based on a p value&lt; 0.5. Results Within 2017–2019, there were 413 camper records. Participants’ demographic characteristics are summarized in Table 1. There were 208 males (50.3%) and 205 females (49.6%). The median age of campers were 11.86, 12.44 and 12.45 for 2017–2019, with the range from 5.16 years to 17.96 years. The median TBSA were 20, 20 and 18 for 2017–2019, with the range from 0.08 to 90. Collectively there were 47.7% Hispanic (n= 197); 24.2% Whites (n=100); 13.1% Black (n= 54); 4.6% Asian (n=19) and 7.7% Other (n=32). There were 395 camper self-evaluation forms submitted. Results of three questions there we were interested in are summarized collectively in Table 2. 57% of campers responded, “Yes, Definitely” to the question “After going to this event, will you feel more comfortable being around your classmates or friends?” 54% responded, “ Yes, Definitely” to the question “Do you feel more confidents in sharing your burn story with others when returning home?” and 51% responded “Yes, Definitely” to “Did you learn anything that will help you when you return home?” Conclusions In analyzing the camper responses, there was no statistically significant difference in responses comparing gender, age, TBSA or ethnicity.

Evolving oncology provider perspectives on care delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18609-e18609
Author(s):  
Divya Ahuja Parikh ◽  
Meera Vimala Ragavan ◽  
Sandy Srinivas ◽  
Sarah Garrigues ◽  
Eben Lloyd Rosenthal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Care ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
The United States ◽  
Advanced Practice ◽  
Curative Surgery ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Provider Perspectives ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

e18609 Background: The COVID-19 pandemic prompted rapid changes in cancer care delivery. We sought to examine oncology provider perspectives on clinical decisions and care delivery during the pandemic and to compare provider views early versus late in the pandemic. Methods: We invited oncology providers, including attendings, trainees and advanced practice providers, to complete a cross-sectional online survey using a variety of outreach methods including social media (Twitter), email contacts, word of mouth and provider list-serves. We surveyed providers at two time points during the pandemic when the number of COVID-19 cases was rising in the United States, early (March 2020) and late (January 2021). The survey responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Chi-squared tests to evaluate differences in early versus late provider responses. Results: A total of 132 providers completed the survey and most were white (n = 73/132, 55%) and younger than 49 years (n = 88/132, 67%). Respondents were attendings in medical, surgical or radiation oncology (n = 61/132, 46%), advanced practice providers (n = 48/132, 36%) and oncology fellows (n = 16/132, 12%) who predominantly practiced in an academic medical center (n = 120/132, 91%). The majority of providers agreed patients with cancer are at higher risk than other patients to be affected by COVID-19 (n = 121/132, 92%). However, there was a significant difference in the proportion of early versus late providers who thought delays in cancer care were needed. Early in the pandemic, providers were more likely to recommend delays in curative surgery or radiation for early-stage cancer (p < 0.001), delays in adjuvant chemotherapy after curative surgery (p = 0.002), or delays in surveillance imaging for metastatic cancer (p < 0.001). The majority of providers early in the pandemic responded that “reducing risk of a complication from a COVID-19 infection to patients with cancer” was the primary reason for recommending delays in care (n = 52/76, 68%). Late in the pandemic, however, providers were more likely to agree that “any practice change would have a negative impact on patient outcomes” (p = 0.003). At both time points, the majority of providers agreed with the need for other care delivery changes, including screening patients for infectious symptoms (n = 128/132, 98%) and the use of telemedicine (n = 114/132, 86%) during the pandemic. Conclusions: We found significant differences in provider perspectives of delays in cancer care early versus late in the pandemic which reflects the swiftly evolving oncology practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. Future studies are needed to determine the impact of changes in treatment and care delivery on outcomes for patients with cancer.

Effect of an antiracism intervention on disparities in time to lung cancer surgery.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 101-101
Author(s):  
Jacob Newton Stein ◽  
Samuel Cykert ◽  
Christina Yongue ◽  
Eugenia Eng ◽  
Isabella Kathryn Wood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Racial Disparities ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Lung Cancer Surgery ◽  
Cancer Surgery ◽  
Early Stage Lung Cancer ◽  
Black Patients ◽  
White Patients

101 Background: Racial disparities are well described in the management of early-stage lung cancer, with Black patients less likely to receive potentially curative surgery than non-Hispanic Whites. A multi-site pragmatic trial entitled Accountability for Cancer Care through Undoing Racism and Equity (ACCURE), designed in collaboration with community partners, eliminated racial disparities in lung cancer surgery through a multi-component intervention. The study involved real-time electronic health record (EHR) monitoring to identify patients not receiving recommended care, a nurse navigator who reviewed and addressed EHR alerts daily, and race-specific feedback provided to clinical teams. Timeliness of cancer care is an important quality metric. Delays can lead to disease progression, upstaging, and worse survival, and Black patients are more likely to experience longer wait times to lung cancer surgery. Yet interventions to reduce racial disparities in timely delivery of lung cancer surgery have not been well studied. We evaluated the effect of ACCURE on timely receipt of lung cancer surgery. Methods: We analyzed data of a retrospective cohort at five cancer centers gathered prior to the ACCURE intervention and compared results with prospective data collected during the intervention. We calculated mean time from clinical suspicion of lung cancer to surgery and evaluated the proportion of patients who received surgery within 60 days stratified by race. We performed a t-test to compare mean days to surgery and chi2 for the delivery of surgery within 60 days. Results: 1320 patients underwent surgery in the retrospective arm, 160 were Black. 254 patients received surgery in the intervention arm, 85 were Black. Results are summarized in Table. Mean time to surgery in the retrospective cohort was 41.8 days, compared with 25.5 days in the intervention cohort (p<0.01). In the retrospective cohort, 68.8% of Black patients received surgery within 60 days versus 78.9% of White patients (p<0.01). In the intervention, the difference between Blacks and Whites with respect to surgery within 60 days was no longer significant (89.41% of Black patients vs 94.67% of White patients, p=0.12). Conclusions: Racial disparities exist in the delivery of timely lung cancer surgery. The ACCURE intervention improved time to surgery and timeliness of surgery for Black and White patients with early-stage lung cancer. A combination of real-time EHR monitoring, nurse navigation, and race-based feedback markedly reduced racial disparities in timely lung cancer care. [Table: see text]

State Recreational Marijuana Laws and Dispensaries: Chronic School Absenteeism in Washington State

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maxim Gakh ◽  
Courtney Coughenour ◽  
Brooke Kleven ◽  
Brian Labus
Keyword(s):  
Social Factors ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Washington State ◽  
School Absenteeism ◽  
Chronic Absenteeism ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Recreational Marijuana

Objective: Whereas states continue to experiment with liberalized marijuana laws, how these laws impact health, education, and social factors is not yet fully understood. In this study, we examined whether chronic school absenteeism rates changed in Washington State in the presence of recreational marijuana dispensaries pursuant to implementation of the state’s recreational marijuana laws. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis using school district chronic absenteeism rates before and after the presence of recreational dispensaries. Results: The results of the independent samples t-test showed no statistically significant difference in chronic absenteeism rates among districts with or without recreational marijuana dispensaries. Conclusions: The finding of no statistical significance for chronic absenteeism in districts with and without recreational dispensaries – a pattern that largely persisted among at-risk groups – supports that the presence of recreational marijuana dispensaries seems neither to exacerbate nor improve chronic school absenteeism rates. This finding is important for policymakers, practitioners, and researchers trying to understand the changing marijuana legal landscape.

scholarly journals The effects of a single session of lumbar spinal manipulative therapy in terms of physical performance test symmetry in asymptomatic athletes: a single-blinded, randomised controlled study.

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. e000389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno A P Alvarenga ◽  
Ricardo Fujikawa ◽  
Filipa João ◽  
Jerusa P R Lara ◽  
António P Veloso
Keyword(s):  
Musculoskeletal Disorders ◽  
Physical Performance ◽  
Performance Test ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Spinal Manipulative Therapy ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Manipulative Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Background and aimMusculoskeletal disorders in athletes, including spinal biomechanical dysfunctions, are believed to negatively influence symmetry. Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is recognised as a safe and effective treatment for musculoskeletal disorders, but there is little evidence about whether it can be beneficial in symmetry. Therefore, this study aimed to measure the effects of lumbar SMT in symmetry.MethodsForty asymptomatic athletes participated in the study. The randomisation procedure was performed according to the following group allocation: group 1 (SMT) and group 2 (SHAM). Each participant completed a physical activity questionnaire, and also underwent clinical and physical evaluation for inclusion according to eligibility criteria. Statistical significance (P<0.05) between groups and types of therapy were calculated by physical performance tests symmetry (static position, squat and counter movement jump (CMJ), pre- and post-SMT and SHAM. There were 14 trials of three symmetry tests for each participant, for a total of 560 trials.ResultsLumbar SMT produced immediate effects in symmetry in the static position; however, the same effects were not found in squat and CMJ on symmetry 1. Therefore, our results showed a significant difference in pre- (mean 16.3%) and post-lumbar SMT (mean 3.7%) in static symmetry. However, symmetry 2 showed no statistical significant differences for any of the tests and intervention groups. No statistically significant effects in symmetry pre- to post-SHAM were found in any of the tests.ConclusionsStatistically significant differences were found in lumbar SMT, but only for static symmetry. These findings suggest that SMT was effective in producing immediate effects in symmetry in the static position, but none in dynamic tests. Future studies could address our study's limitations.Clinical trials register numberNCT03361592.

scholarly journals Impact of health disparities on treatment for single-suture craniosynostosis in an era of multimodal care

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. E13
Author(s):  
Caitlin Hoffman ◽  
Alyssa B. Valenti ◽  
Eseosa Odigie ◽  
Kwanza Warren ◽  
Ishani D. Premaratne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Open Surgery ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Insurance Status ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Race Ethnicity ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Type Of Surgery ◽  
Surgical Group

Craniosynostosis is the premature fusion of the skull. There are two forms of treatment: open surgery and minimally invasive endoscope-assisted suturectomy. Candidates for endoscopic treatment are less than 6 months of age. The techniques are equally effective; however, endoscopic surgery is associated with less blood loss, minimal tissue disruption, shorter operative time, and shorter hospitalization. In this study, the authors aimed to evaluate the impact of race/ethnicity and insurance status on age of presentation/surgery in children with craniosynostosis to highlight potential disparities in healthcare access. Charts were reviewed for children with craniosynostosis at two tertiary care hospitals in New York City from January 1, 2014, to August 31, 2020. Clinical and demographic data were collected, including variables pertaining to family socioeconomic status, home address/zip code, insurance status (no insurance, Medicaid, or private), race/ethnicity, age and date of presentation for initial consultation, type of surgery performed, and details of hospitalization. Children with unknown race/ethnicity and those with syndromic craniosynostosis were excluded. The data were analyzed via t-tests and chi-square tests for statistical significance (p < 0.05). A total of 121 children were identified; 62 surgeries were performed open and 59 endoscopically. The mean age at initial presentation of the cohort was 6.68 months, and on the day of surgery it was 8.45 months. Age at presentation for the open surgery cohort compared with the endoscopic cohort achieved statistical significance at 11.33 months (SD 12.41) for the open cohort and 1.86 months (SD 1.1473) for the endoscopic cohort (p < 0.0001). Age on the day of surgery for the open cohort versus the endoscopic cohort demonstrated statistical significance at 14.19 months (SD 15.05) and 2.58 months (SD 1.030), respectively. A statistically significant difference between the two groups was noted with regard to insurance status (p = 0.0044); the open surgical group comprised more patients without insurance and with Medicaid compared with the endoscopic group. The racial composition of the two groups reached statistical significance when comparing proportions of White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, and other (p = 0.000815), with significantly more Black and Hispanic patients treated in the open surgical group. The results demonstrate a relationship between race and lack of insurance or Medicaid status, and type of surgery received; Black and Hispanic children and children with Medicaid were more likely to present later and undergo open surgery.

scholarly journals Composition of raw milk from conventional and organic dairy farming

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denis Kucevic ◽  
Snezana Trivunovic ◽  
Vladan Bogdanovic ◽  
Ksenija Cobanovic ◽  
Dobrila Jankovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Raw Milk ◽  
Farming System ◽  
Dairy Farming ◽  
Milk Samples ◽  
High Statistical Significance ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Organic Dairy ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Impact

Possible differences between composition of raw milk due to dairy farming system (organic vs conventional) as well as seasonal variations were investigated. The samples were analysed during one year. A total of 6.782 samples of raw milk were collected (4.496 from organic farming). Dairy farms were located in the northern part of Republic of Serbia (Province of Vojvodina). The principle of analysis of raw milk samples was in accordance with the methodology by midinfrared spectrometry and flow cytometry. The fixed effect of system of farming and season (winter, spring, summer and fall) have shown a high statistical significance (P < 0.01) on all examined milk parameters except fat, total solids and somatic cell count, where the impact was slightly lower (P < 0.05). Significant difference wasn't found in number of bacterial colonies (P > 0.05). Composition of milk is also affected by a number of other factors, therefore it is recommended to involve factors such as nutrition of dairy cows, breed and farm management.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document