Grasshopper hunchback expression reveals conserved and novel aspects of axis formation and segmentation

Development ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 128 (18) ◽  
pp. 3459-3472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nipam H. Patel ◽  
David C. Hayward ◽  
Sabbi Lall ◽  
Nicole R. Pirkl ◽  
Daniel DiPietro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Axis Formation ◽  
Embryonic Cells ◽  
Embryonic Patterning ◽  
Axial Patterning ◽  
Gap Gene ◽  
Segment Polarity ◽  
Pair Rule Gene ◽  
Set Up ◽  
Pair Rule

While the expression patterns of segment polarity genes such as engrailed have been shown to be similar in Drosophila melanogaster and Schistocerca americana (grasshopper), the expression patterns of pair-rule genes such as even-skipped are not conserved between these species. This might suggest that the factors upstream of pair-rule gene expression are not conserved across insect species. We find that, despite this, many aspects of the expression of the Drosophila gap gene hunchback are shared with its orthologs in the grasshoppers S. americana and L. migratoria. We have analyzed both mRNA and protein expression during development, and find that the grasshopper hunchback orthologs appear to have a conserved role in early axial patterning of the germ anlagen and in the specification of gnathal and thoracic primordia. In addition, distinct stepped expression levels of hunchback in the gnathal/thoracic domains suggest that grasshopper hunchback may act in a concentration-dependent fashion (as in Drosophila), although morphogenetic activity is not set up by diffusion to form a smooth gradient. Axial patterning functions appear to be performed entirely by zygotic hunchback, a fundamental difference from Drosophila in which maternal and zygotic hunchback play redundant roles. In grasshoppers, maternal hunchback activity is provided uniformly to the embryo as protein and, we suggest, serves a distinct role in distinguishing embryonic from extra-embryonic cells along the anteroposterior axis from the outset of development – a distinction made in Drosophila along the dorsoventral axis later in development. Later hunchback expression in the abdominal segments is conserved, as are patterns in the nervous system, and in both Drosophila and grasshopper, hunchback is expressed in a subset of extra-embryonic cells. Thus, while the expected domains of hunchback expression are conserved in Schistocerca, we have found surprising and fundamental differences in axial patterning, and have identified a previously unreported domain of expression in Drosophila that suggests conservation of a function in extra-embryonic patterning.

Dose-dependent regulation of pair-rule stripes by gap proteins and the initiation of segment polarity

Development ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 110 (3) ◽  
pp. 759-767 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Warrior ◽  
M. Levine
Keyword(s):  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Gene Products ◽  
Embryonic Cells ◽  
Periodic Patterns ◽  
Threshold Response ◽  
Gap Gene ◽  
Relative Placement ◽  
Segment Polarity ◽  
Pair Rule Gene ◽  
Pair Rule

A key step in Drosophila segmentation is the establishment of periodic patterns of pair-rule gene expression in response to gap gene products. From an examination of the distribution of gap and pair-rule proteins in various mutants, we conclude that the on/off periodicity of pair-rule stripes depends on both the exact concentrations and combinations of gap proteins expressed in different embryonic cells. It has been suggested that the distribution of gap gene products depends on cross-regulatory interactions among these genes. Here we provide evidence that autoregulation also plays an important role in this process since there is a reduction in the levels of Kruppel (Kr) RNA and protein in a Kr null mutant. Once initiated by the gap genes each pair-rule stripe is bell shaped and has ill-defined margins. By the end of the fourteenth nuclear division cycle, the stripes of the pair-rule gene even-skipped (eve) sharpen and polarize, a process that is essential for the precisely localized expression of segment polarity genes. This sharpening process appears to depend on a threshold response of the eve promoter to the combinatorial action of eve and a second pair-rule gene hairy. The eve and hairy expression patterns overlap but are out of register and the cells of maximal overlap form the anterior margin of the polarized eve stripe. We propose that the relative placement of the eve and hairy stripes may be an important factor in the initiation of segment polarity.

The zygotic control of Drosophila pair-rule gene expression. II. Spatial repression by gap and pair-rule gene products

Development ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 107 (3) ◽  
pp. 673-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.B. Carroll ◽  
S.H. Vavra
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Control Mechanisms ◽  
Gap Gene ◽  
Gap Genes ◽  
Gene Mutant ◽  
Pair Rule Gene ◽  
Regulatory Effects ◽  
Pair Rule ◽  
Zygotic Control

We examined gene expression patterns in certain single and double pair-rule mutant embryos to determine which of the largely repressive pair-rule gene interactions are most likely to be direct and which interactions are probably indirect. From these studies we conclude that: (i) hairy+ and even-skipped (eve+) regulate the fushi tarazu (ftz) gene; (ii) eve+ and runt+ regulate the hairy gene; (iii) runt+ regulates the eve gene; but, (iv) runt does not regulate the ftz gene pattern, and hairy does not regulate the eve gene pattern. These pair-rule interactions are not sufficient, however, to explain the periodicity of the hairy and eve patterns, so we examined specific gap gene mutant combinations to uncover their regulatory effects on these two genes. Our surprising observation is that the hairy and eve genes are expressed in embryos where the three key gap genes hunchback (hb), Kruppel (Kr), and knirps (kni) have been removed, indicating that these gap genes are not essential to activate the pair-rule genes. In fact, we show that in the absence of either hb+ or kni+, or both gap genes, the Kr+ product represses hairy expression. These results suggest that gap genes repress hairy expression in the interstripe regions, rather than activate hairy expression in the stripes. The molecular basis of pair-rule gene regulation by gap genes must involve some dual control mechanisms such that combinations of gap genes affect pair-rule transcription in a different manner than a single gap gene.

scholarly journals Gap gene properties of the pair-rule gene runt during Drosophila segmentation

Development ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 120 (6) ◽  
pp. 1671-1683 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Tsai ◽  
J.P. Gergen
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Normal Component ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Antagonistic Effect ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Gap Gene ◽  
New Family ◽  
Pair Rule Gene ◽  
Pair Rule

The Drosophila Runt protein is a member of a new family of transcriptional regulators that have important roles in processes extending from pattern formation in insect embryos to leukemogenesis in humans. We used ectopic expression to investigate runt's function in the pathway of Drosophila segmentation. Transient over-expression of runt under the control of a Drosophila heat-shock promoter caused stripe-specific defects in the expression patterns of the pair-rule genes hairy and even-skipped but had a more uniform effect on the secondary pair-rule gene fushi tarazu. Surprisingly, the expression of the gap segmentation genes, which are upstream of runt in the segmentation hierarchy was also altered in hs/runt embryos. A subset of these effects were interpreted as due to an antagonistic effect of runt on transcriptional activation by the maternal morphogen bicoid. In support of this, expression of synthetic reporter gene constructs containing oligomerized binding sites for the Bicoid protein was reduced in hs/runt embryos. Finally, genetic experiments demonstrated that regulation of gap gene expression by runt is a normal component of the regulatory program that generates the segmented body pattern of the Drosophila embryo.

Transcriptional regulation of cytoskeletal functions and segmentation by a novel maternal pair-rule gene, lilliputian

Development ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 128 (5) ◽  
pp. 801-813 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.H. Tang ◽  
T.P. Neufeld ◽  
G.M. Rubin ◽  
H.A. Muller
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Control ◽  
Fragile X ◽  
Transcriptional Regulator ◽  
Regulator Gene ◽  
Embryonic Patterning ◽  
Fushi Tarazu ◽  
Fragile X Mental Retardation ◽  
Pair Rule Gene ◽  
Mutant Phenotypes ◽  
Pair Rule

Transcriptional control during early Drosophila development is governed by maternal and zygotic factors. We have identified a novel maternal transcriptional regulator gene, lilliputian (lilli), which contains an HMG1 (AT-hook) motif and a domain with similarity to the human fragile X mental retardation FMR2 protein and the AF4 proto-oncoprotein. Embryos lacking maternal lilli expression show specific defects in the establishment of a functional cytoskeleton during cellularization, and exhibit a pair-rule segmentation phenotype. These mutant phenotypes correlate with markedly reduced expression of the early zygotic genes serendipity alpha, fushi tarazu and huckebein, which are essential for cellularization and embryonic patterning. In addition, loss of lilli in adult photoreceptor and bristle cells results in a significant decrease in cell size. Our results indicate that lilli represents a novel pair-rule gene that acts in cytoskeleton regulation, segmentation and morphogenesis.

Dynamic changes in the functions of Odd-skipped during early Drosophila embryogenesis

Development ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 125 (23) ◽  
pp. 4851-4861 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Saulier-Le Drean ◽  
A. Nasiadka ◽  
J. Dong ◽  
H.M. Krause
Keyword(s):  
Target Gene ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Gene Products ◽  
Dynamic Changes ◽  
Stage Of Development ◽  
Segment Polarity ◽  
Pair Rule Gene ◽  
Candidate Target ◽  
Pair Rule

Although many of the genes that pattern the segmented body plan of the Drosophila embryo are known, there remains much to learn in terms of how these genes and their products interact with one another. Like many of these gene products, the protein encoded by the pair-rule gene odd-skipped (Odd) is a DNA-binding transcription factor. Genetic experiments have suggested several candidate target genes for Odd, all of which appear to be negatively regulated. Here we use pulses of ectopic Odd expression to test the response of these and other segmentation genes. The results are complex, indicating that Odd is capable of repressing some genes wherever and whenever Odd is expressed, while the ability to repress others is temporally or spatially restricted. Moreover, one target gene, fushi tarazu, is both repressed and activated by Odd, the outcome depending upon the stage of development. These results indicate that the activity of Odd is highly dependent upon the presence of cofactors and/or overriding inhibitors. Based on these results, and the segmental phenotypes generated by ectopic Odd, we suggest a number of new roles for Odd in the patterning of embryonic segments. These include gap-, pair-rule- and segment polarity-type functions.

Drosophila hairy pair-rule gene regulates embryonic patterning outside its apparent stripe domains

Development ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 118 (1) ◽  
pp. 255-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Lardelli ◽  
D. Ish-Horowicz
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Transcriptional Regulators ◽  
Early Embryo ◽  
Embryonic Patterning ◽  
Gene Deletions ◽  
Head Development ◽  
Pair Rule Gene ◽  
Blastoderm Stage ◽  
Embryonic Viability ◽  
Pair Rule

The hairy (h) segmentation gene of Drosophila regulates segmental patterning of the early embryo, and is expressed in a set of anteroposterior stripes during the blastoderm stage. We have used a set of h gene deletions to study the h promoter and the developmental requirements for individual h stripes. The results confirm upstream regulation of h striping but indicate that expression in the anterodorsal head domain depends on sequences downstream of the two transcription initiation sites. Surprisingly, the two anterior-most h domains appear to be dispensable for head development and embryonic viability. One partial promoter deletion expresses ectopic h, leading to misexpression of other segmentation genes and embryonic pattern defects. We demonstrate that h affects patterning outside its apparent stripe domains, supporting a model in which primary pair-rule genes act as concentration-dependent transcriptional regulators, i.e. as local morphogens.

Decoding positional information: regulation of the pair-rule gene hairy

Development ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 110 (4) ◽  
pp. 1223-1231 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.R. Howard ◽  
G. Struhl
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Positional Information ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Regulatory Factors ◽  
Cis Acting ◽  
Pair Rule Gene ◽  
Necessary And Sufficient ◽  
Pair Rule

In the series of local gene activations that occur during early Drosophila development, the striped expression patterns of the pair-rule genes provide the first indication of segmental periodicity. The experiments that we report here address the question of how these patterns arise, by studying the regulation of one of these genes, hairy. We show that each of the seven stripes of hairy expression is controlled by a distinct subset of cis-acting regulatory elements, some mediating transcriptional activation and others transcriptional repression. In general, elements necessary and sufficient for triggering a particular stripe response are clustered on the DNA and appear to overlap or be interspersed with elements involved in at least one other stripe response. Our results extend previous findings suggesting that periodic hairy expression arises by a decoding process in which each stripe is triggered by particular combinations or concentrations of regulatory factors. These regulatory factors are likely to include the products of the gap class of segmentation genes that are required for activating or positioning particular subsets of hairy stripes and are expressed with overlapping distributions during early embryogenesis.

Concentration-dependent patterning by an ectopic expression domain of the Drosophila gap gene knirps

Development ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 124 (7) ◽  
pp. 1343-1354 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Kosman ◽  
S. Small
Keyword(s):  
Target Genes ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Asymmetric Distribution ◽  
Protein Diffusion ◽  
Expression Domain ◽  
Gap Gene ◽  
Pair Rule Gene ◽  
Transgenic Lines ◽  
Pair Rule

The asymmetric distribution of the gap gene knirps (kni) in discrete expression domains is critical for striped patterns of pair-rule gene expression in the Drosophila embryo. To test whether these domains function as sources of morphogenetic activity, the stripe 2 enhancer of the pair-rule gene even-skipped (eve) was used to express kni in an ectopic position. Manipulating the stripe 2-kni expression constructs and examining transgenic lines with different insertion sites led to the establishment of a series of independent lines that displayed consistently different levels and developmental profiles of expression. Individual lines showed specific disruptions in pair-rule patterning that were correlated with the level and timing of ectopic expression. These results suggest that the ectopic domain acts as a source for morphogenetic activity that specifies regions in the embryo where pair-rule genes can be activated or repressed. Evidence is presented that the level and timing of expression, as well as protein diffusion, are important for determining the specific responses of target genes.

Polyembryonic development: insect pattern formation in a cellularized environment

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (3) ◽  
pp. 795-804 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Grbic ◽  
L.M. Nagy ◽  
S.B. Carroll ◽  
M. Strand
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Regulatory Proteins ◽  
Homeotic Genes ◽  
Axial Patterning ◽  
Copidosoma Floridanum ◽  
Segment Polarity ◽  
Segment Polarity Gene ◽  
Pair Rule ◽  
Egg Polarity ◽  
Polarity Gene

THe polyembryonic wasp Copidosoma floridanum produces up to 2000 individuals from a single egg. During the production of individual embryos the original anteroposterior axis of the egg is lost and axial patterning must subsequently be reestablished within each embryo. The mechanism by which this occurs is unknown. In most insects, egg polarity is established during oogenesis and early development takes place in a syncytium. In Drosophila melanogaster, the syncytium is considered essential for establishing the morphogenetic gradients that initiate segmental patterning. However, we found that development of C. floridanum occurs almost exclusively in a cellularized environment. To determine whether the D. melanogaster patterning cascade is conserved in the absence of a syncytium, we analyzed the expression of Even-skipped, Engrailed and Ultrabithorax/Abdominal-A during polyembryonic development. Here we show that in spite of the absence of a syncytium, the elements of the D. melanogaster segmentation hierarchy are conserved. The segment-polarity gene Engrailed and the homeotic genes Ultrabithorax/Abdominal-A are expressed in a conserved pattern relative to D. melanogaster. However, we detect an alteration in the expression of the Even-skipped antigen. Even-skipped is initially expressed in segmentally reiterated stripes and not in the pair-rule pattern as it is in D. melanogaster. We also observe that the expression of these regulatory proteins does not occur during the early proliferative phases of polyembryony. Our results indicate that a syncytium is not required for segmental patterning in this insect.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document