Concentration-dependent patterning by an ectopic expression domain of the Drosophila gap gene knirps

Development ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 124 (7) ◽  
pp. 1343-1354 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Kosman ◽  
S. Small
Keyword(s):  
Target Genes ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Asymmetric Distribution ◽  
Protein Diffusion ◽  
Expression Domain ◽  
Gap Gene ◽  
Pair Rule Gene ◽  
Transgenic Lines ◽  
Pair Rule

The asymmetric distribution of the gap gene knirps (kni) in discrete expression domains is critical for striped patterns of pair-rule gene expression in the Drosophila embryo. To test whether these domains function as sources of morphogenetic activity, the stripe 2 enhancer of the pair-rule gene even-skipped (eve) was used to express kni in an ectopic position. Manipulating the stripe 2-kni expression constructs and examining transgenic lines with different insertion sites led to the establishment of a series of independent lines that displayed consistently different levels and developmental profiles of expression. Individual lines showed specific disruptions in pair-rule patterning that were correlated with the level and timing of ectopic expression. These results suggest that the ectopic domain acts as a source for morphogenetic activity that specifies regions in the embryo where pair-rule genes can be activated or repressed. Evidence is presented that the level and timing of expression, as well as protein diffusion, are important for determining the specific responses of target genes.

scholarly journals Gap gene properties of the pair-rule gene runt during Drosophila segmentation

Development ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 120 (6) ◽  
pp. 1671-1683 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Tsai ◽  
J.P. Gergen
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Normal Component ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Antagonistic Effect ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Gap Gene ◽  
New Family ◽  
Pair Rule Gene ◽  
Pair Rule

The Drosophila Runt protein is a member of a new family of transcriptional regulators that have important roles in processes extending from pattern formation in insect embryos to leukemogenesis in humans. We used ectopic expression to investigate runt's function in the pathway of Drosophila segmentation. Transient over-expression of runt under the control of a Drosophila heat-shock promoter caused stripe-specific defects in the expression patterns of the pair-rule genes hairy and even-skipped but had a more uniform effect on the secondary pair-rule gene fushi tarazu. Surprisingly, the expression of the gap segmentation genes, which are upstream of runt in the segmentation hierarchy was also altered in hs/runt embryos. A subset of these effects were interpreted as due to an antagonistic effect of runt on transcriptional activation by the maternal morphogen bicoid. In support of this, expression of synthetic reporter gene constructs containing oligomerized binding sites for the Bicoid protein was reduced in hs/runt embryos. Finally, genetic experiments demonstrated that regulation of gap gene expression by runt is a normal component of the regulatory program that generates the segmented body pattern of the Drosophila embryo.

Two distinct mechanisms for differential positioning of gene expression borders involving the Drosophila gap protein giant

Development ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 125 (19) ◽  
pp. 3765-3774 ◽  
Author(s):  
X. Wu ◽  
R. Vakani ◽  
S. Small
Keyword(s):  
Target Genes ◽  
Early Embryo ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Anterior Border ◽  
Gap Gene ◽  
Gap Genes ◽  
Pair Rule Gene ◽  
Differential Positioning ◽  
Pair Rule

We have combined genetic experiments and a targeted misexpression approach to examine the role of the gap gene giant (gt) in patterning anterior regions of the Drosophila embryo. Our results suggest that gt functions in the repression of three target genes, the gap genes Kruppel (Kr) and hunchback (hb), and the pair-rule gene even-skipped (eve). The anterior border of Kr, which lies 4–5 nucleus diameters posterior to nuclei that express gt mRNA, is set by a threshold repression mechanism involving very low levels of gt protein. In contrast, gt activity is required, but not sufficient for formation of the anterior border of eve stripe 2, which lies adjacent to nuclei that express gt mRNA. We propose that gt's role in forming this border is to potentiate repressive interaction(s) mediated by other factor(s) that are also localized to anterior regions of the early embryo. Finally, gt is required for repression of zygotic hb expression in more anterior regions of the embryo. The differential responses of these target genes to gt repression are critical for the correct positioning and maintenance of segmentation stripes, and normal anterior development.

Dynamic changes in the functions of Odd-skipped during early Drosophila embryogenesis

Development ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 125 (23) ◽  
pp. 4851-4861 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Saulier-Le Drean ◽  
A. Nasiadka ◽  
J. Dong ◽  
H.M. Krause
Keyword(s):  
Target Gene ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Gene Products ◽  
Dynamic Changes ◽  
Stage Of Development ◽  
Segment Polarity ◽  
Pair Rule Gene ◽  
Candidate Target ◽  
Pair Rule

Although many of the genes that pattern the segmented body plan of the Drosophila embryo are known, there remains much to learn in terms of how these genes and their products interact with one another. Like many of these gene products, the protein encoded by the pair-rule gene odd-skipped (Odd) is a DNA-binding transcription factor. Genetic experiments have suggested several candidate target genes for Odd, all of which appear to be negatively regulated. Here we use pulses of ectopic Odd expression to test the response of these and other segmentation genes. The results are complex, indicating that Odd is capable of repressing some genes wherever and whenever Odd is expressed, while the ability to repress others is temporally or spatially restricted. Moreover, one target gene, fushi tarazu, is both repressed and activated by Odd, the outcome depending upon the stage of development. These results indicate that the activity of Odd is highly dependent upon the presence of cofactors and/or overriding inhibitors. Based on these results, and the segmental phenotypes generated by ectopic Odd, we suggest a number of new roles for Odd in the patterning of embryonic segments. These include gap-, pair-rule- and segment polarity-type functions.

scholarly journals Integration of the head and trunk segmentation systems controls cephalic furrow formation in Drosophila

Development ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 124 (19) ◽  
pp. 3747-3754 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Vincent ◽  
J.T. Blankenship ◽  
E. Wieschaus
Keyword(s):  
Initial Step ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Germ Band ◽  
Molecular Analyses ◽  
Single Row ◽  
Gap Gene ◽  
Pair Rule Gene ◽  
Integrated Regulation ◽  
Morphogenetic Fields ◽  
Pair Rule

Genetic and molecular analyses of patterning of the Drosophila embryo have shown that the process of segmentation of the head is fundamentally different from the process of segmentation of the trunk. The cephalic furrow (CF), one of the first morphological manifestations of the patterning process, forms at the juxtaposition of these two patterning systems. We report here that the initial step in CF formation is a change in shape and apical positioning of a single row of cells. The anteroposterior position of these initiator cells may be defined by the overlapping expression of the head gap gene buttonhead (btd) and the primary pair-rule gene even-skipped (eve). Re-examination of the btd and eve phenotypes in live embryos indicated that both genes are required for CF formation. Further, Eve expression in initiator cells was found to be dependent upon btd activity. The control of eve expression by btd in these cells is the first indication of a new level of integrated regulation that interfaces the head and trunk segmentation systems. In conjunction with previous data on the btd and eve embryonic phenotypes, our results suggest that interaction between these two genes both controls initiation of a specific morphogenetic movement that separates two morphogenetic fields and contributes to patterning the hinge region that demarcates the procephalon from the segmented germ band.

scholarly journals Mis-regulating segmentation gene expression in Drosophila

Development ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 111 (4) ◽  
pp. 1121-1135 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.M. Parkhurst ◽  
D. Ish-Horowicz
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Fusion Gene ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Gene Promoter ◽  
Normal Function ◽  
Gap Gene ◽  
Pair Rule Gene ◽  
Segmentation Gene Expression ◽  
Regulated Gene Expression ◽  
Pair Rule

We have used the hunchback (hb) gap-gene promoter to drive ectopic expression of the pair-rule genes fushi tarazu (ftz), even-skipped (eve) and hairy (h). Unexpectedly, flies transformed with such constructs are viable, despite spatial and temporal mis-regulation of pair-rule expression caused by the fusion genes. We show that fusion gene expression is transcriptionally regulated, such that ectopic expression is suppressed when pattern is established, and present evidence indicating that interstripe hb-ftz expression is repressed by eve. These results are considered in terms of redundant control of pair-rule gene striping. We also discuss the potential dangers of using mis-regulated gene expression to analyse normal function.

Targeting gene expression to the head: the Drosophila orthodenticle gene is a direct target of the Bicoid morphogen

Development ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 125 (21) ◽  
pp. 4185-4193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Q. Gao ◽  
R. Finkelstein
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Regulatory Element ◽  
Regulatory Region ◽  
Repeated Sequence ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Sequence Motif ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Gap Gene

The Bicoid (Bcd) morphogen establishes the head and thorax of the Drosophila embryo. Bcd activates the transcription of identified target genes in the thoracic segments, but its mechanism of action in the head remains poorly understood. It has been proposed that Bcd directly activates the cephalic gap genes, which are the first zygotic genes to be expressed in the head primordium. It has also been suggested that the affinity of Bcd-binding sites in the promoters of Bcd target genes determines the posterior extent of their expression (the Gene X model). However, both these hypotheses remain untested. Here, we show that a small regulatory region upstream of the cephalic gap gene orthodenticle (otd) is sufficient to recapitulate early otd expression in the head primordium. This region contains two control elements, each capable of driving otd-like expression. The first element has consensus Bcd target sites that bind Bcd in vitro and are necessary for head-specific expression. As predicted by the Gene X model, this element has a relatively low affinity for Bcd. Surprisingly, the second regulatory element has no Bcd sites. Instead, it contains a repeated sequence motif similar to a regulatory element found in the promoters of otd-related genes in vertebrates. Our study is the first demonstration that a cephalic gap gene is directly regulated by Bcd. However, it also shows that zygotic gene expression can be targeted to the head primordium without direct Bcd regulation.

scholarly journals Odd-paired controls frequency doubling in Drosophila segmentation by altering the pair-rule gene regulatory network

eLife ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Clark ◽  
Michael Akam
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Regulatory Network ◽  
Regulatory Network ◽  
Frequency Doubling ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Anteroposterior Patterning ◽  
Regulatory Interactions ◽  
Pair Rule Gene ◽  
Gene Regulatory ◽  
Pair Rule

The Drosophila embryo transiently exhibits a double-segment periodicity, defined by the expression of seven 'pair-rule' genes, each in a pattern of seven stripes. At gastrulation, interactions between the pair-rule genes lead to frequency doubling and the patterning of 14 parasegment boundaries. In contrast to earlier stages of Drosophila anteroposterior patterning, this transition is not well understood. By carefully analysing the spatiotemporal dynamics of pair-rule gene expression, we demonstrate that frequency-doubling is precipitated by multiple coordinated changes to the network of regulatory interactions between the pair-rule genes. We identify the broadly expressed but temporally patterned transcription factor, Odd-paired (Opa/Zic), as the cause of these changes, and show that the patterning of the even-numbered parasegment boundaries relies on Opa-dependent regulatory interactions. Our findings indicate that the pair-rule gene regulatory network has a temporally modulated topology, permitting the pair-rule genes to play stage-specific patterning roles.

Positioning adjacent pair-rule stripes in the posterior Drosophila embryo

Development ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 120 (10) ◽  
pp. 2945-2955 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.A. Langeland ◽  
S.F. Attai ◽  
K. Vorwerk ◽  
S.B. Carroll
Keyword(s):  
Binding Sites ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Regulatory Sequences ◽  
Posterior Border ◽  
Adjacent Pair ◽  
Gap Gene ◽  
Competitive Mechanism ◽  
Pair Rule ◽  
Drosophila Embryos ◽  
Do So

We present a genetic and molecular analysis of two hairy (h) pair-rule stripes in order to determine how gradients of gap proteins position adjacent stripes of gene expression in the posterior of Drosophila embryos. We have delimited regulatory sequences critical for the expression of h stripes 5 and 6 to 302 bp and 526 bp fragments, respectively, and assayed the expression of stripe-specific reporter constructs in several gap mutant backgrounds. We demonstrate that posterior stripe boundaries are established by gap protein repressors unique to each stripe: h stripe 5 is repressed by the giant (gt) protein on its posterior border and h stripe 6 is repressed by the hunchback (hb) protein on its posterior border. Interestingly, Kruppel (Kr) limits the anterior expression limits of both stripes and is the only gap gene to do so, indicating that stripes 5 and 6 may be coordinately positioned by the Kr repressor. In contrast to these very similar cases of spatial repression, stripes 5 and 6 appear to be activated by different mechanisms. Stripe 6 is critically dependent upon knirps (kni) for activation, while stripe 5 likely requires a combination of activating proteins (gap and non-gap). To begin a mechanistic understanding of stripe formation, we locate binding sites for the Kr protein in both stripe enhancers. The stripe 6 enhancer contains higher affinity Kr-binding sites than the stripe 5 enhancer, which may allow for the two stripes to be repressed at different Kr protein concentration thresholds. We also demonstrate that the kni activator binds to the stripe 6 enhancer and present evidence for a competitive mechanism of Kr repression of stripe 6.

Dose-dependent regulation of pair-rule stripes by gap proteins and the initiation of segment polarity

Development ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 110 (3) ◽  
pp. 759-767 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Warrior ◽  
M. Levine
Keyword(s):  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Gene Products ◽  
Embryonic Cells ◽  
Periodic Patterns ◽  
Threshold Response ◽  
Gap Gene ◽  
Relative Placement ◽  
Segment Polarity ◽  
Pair Rule Gene ◽  
Pair Rule

A key step in Drosophila segmentation is the establishment of periodic patterns of pair-rule gene expression in response to gap gene products. From an examination of the distribution of gap and pair-rule proteins in various mutants, we conclude that the on/off periodicity of pair-rule stripes depends on both the exact concentrations and combinations of gap proteins expressed in different embryonic cells. It has been suggested that the distribution of gap gene products depends on cross-regulatory interactions among these genes. Here we provide evidence that autoregulation also plays an important role in this process since there is a reduction in the levels of Kruppel (Kr) RNA and protein in a Kr null mutant. Once initiated by the gap genes each pair-rule stripe is bell shaped and has ill-defined margins. By the end of the fourteenth nuclear division cycle, the stripes of the pair-rule gene even-skipped (eve) sharpen and polarize, a process that is essential for the precisely localized expression of segment polarity genes. This sharpening process appears to depend on a threshold response of the eve promoter to the combinatorial action of eve and a second pair-rule gene hairy. The eve and hairy expression patterns overlap but are out of register and the cells of maximal overlap form the anterior margin of the polarized eve stripe. We propose that the relative placement of the eve and hairy stripes may be an important factor in the initiation of segment polarity.

Grasshopper hunchback expression reveals conserved and novel aspects of axis formation and segmentation

Development ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 128 (18) ◽  
pp. 3459-3472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nipam H. Patel ◽  
David C. Hayward ◽  
Sabbi Lall ◽  
Nicole R. Pirkl ◽  
Daniel DiPietro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Axis Formation ◽  
Embryonic Cells ◽  
Embryonic Patterning ◽  
Axial Patterning ◽  
Gap Gene ◽  
Segment Polarity ◽  
Pair Rule Gene ◽  
Set Up ◽  
Pair Rule

While the expression patterns of segment polarity genes such as engrailed have been shown to be similar in Drosophila melanogaster and Schistocerca americana (grasshopper), the expression patterns of pair-rule genes such as even-skipped are not conserved between these species. This might suggest that the factors upstream of pair-rule gene expression are not conserved across insect species. We find that, despite this, many aspects of the expression of the Drosophila gap gene hunchback are shared with its orthologs in the grasshoppers S. americana and L. migratoria. We have analyzed both mRNA and protein expression during development, and find that the grasshopper hunchback orthologs appear to have a conserved role in early axial patterning of the germ anlagen and in the specification of gnathal and thoracic primordia. In addition, distinct stepped expression levels of hunchback in the gnathal/thoracic domains suggest that grasshopper hunchback may act in a concentration-dependent fashion (as in Drosophila), although morphogenetic activity is not set up by diffusion to form a smooth gradient. Axial patterning functions appear to be performed entirely by zygotic hunchback, a fundamental difference from Drosophila in which maternal and zygotic hunchback play redundant roles. In grasshoppers, maternal hunchback activity is provided uniformly to the embryo as protein and, we suggest, serves a distinct role in distinguishing embryonic from extra-embryonic cells along the anteroposterior axis from the outset of development – a distinction made in Drosophila along the dorsoventral axis later in development. Later hunchback expression in the abdominal segments is conserved, as are patterns in the nervous system, and in both Drosophila and grasshopper, hunchback is expressed in a subset of extra-embryonic cells. Thus, while the expected domains of hunchback expression are conserved in Schistocerca, we have found surprising and fundamental differences in axial patterning, and have identified a previously unreported domain of expression in Drosophila that suggests conservation of a function in extra-embryonic patterning.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document