Inductive patterning of the embryonic brain in Drosophila

Development ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 129 (9) ◽  
pp. 2121-2128
Author(s):  
Damon T. Page

In vertebrates (deuterostomes), brain patterning depends on signals from adjacent tissues. For example, holoprosencephaly, the most common brain anomaly in humans, results from defects in signaling between the embryonic prechordal plate (consisting of the dorsal foregut endoderm and mesoderm) and the brain. I have examined whether a similar mechanism of brain development occurs in the protostome Drosophila, and find that the foregut and mesoderm act to pattern the fly embryonic brain. When the foregut and mesoderm of Drosophila are ablated, brain patterning is disrupted. The loss of Hedgehog expressed in the foregut appears to mediate this effect, as it does in vertebrates. One mechanism whereby these defects occur is a disruption of normal apoptosis in the brain. These data argue that the last common ancestor of protostomes and deuterostomes had a prototype of the brains present in modern animals, and also suggest that the foregut and mesoderm contributed to the patterning of this ‘proto-brain’. They also argue that the foreguts of protostomes and deuterostomes, which have traditionally been assigned to different germ layers, are actually homologous.

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 370-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Arbib ◽  
Francisco Aboitiz ◽  
Judith M. Burkart ◽  
Michael Corballis ◽  
Gino Coudé ◽  
...  

Abstract We present a new road map for research on “How the Brain Got Language” that adopts an EvoDevoSocio perspective and highlights comparative neuroprimatology – the comparative study of brain, behavior and communication in extant monkeys and great apes – as providing a key grounding for hypotheses on the last common ancestor of humans and monkeys (LCA-m) and chimpanzees (LCA-c) and the processes which guided the evolution LCA-m → LCA-c → protohumans → H. sapiens. Such research constrains and is constrained by analysis of the subsequent, primarily cultural, evolution of H. sapiens which yielded cultures involving the rich use of language.


2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 7-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Arbib

Abstract Computational modeling of the macaque brain grounds hypotheses on the brain of LCA-m (the last common ancestor of monkey and human). Elaborations thereof provide a brain model for LCA-c (c for chimpanzee). The Mirror System Hypothesis charts further steps via imitation and pantomime to protosign and protolanguage on the path to a "language-ready brain" in Homo sapiens, with the path to speech being indirect. The material poses new challenges for both experimentation and modeling.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Fumiaki Sugahara ◽  
Yasunori Murakami ◽  
Juan Pascual-Anaya ◽  
Shigeru Kuratani

The vertebrate head and brain are characterized by highly complex morphological patterns. The forebrain, the most anterior division of the brain, is subdivided into the diencephalon, hypothalamus, and telencephalon from the neuromeric subdivision into prosomeres. Importantly, the telencephalon contains the cerebral cortex, which plays a key role in higher order cognitive functions in humans. To elucidate the evolution of the forebrain regionalization, comparative analyses of the brain development between extant jawed and jawless vertebrates are crucial. Cyclostomes – lampreys and hagfishes – are the only extant jawless vertebrates, and diverged from jawed vertebrates (gnathostomes) over 500 million years ago. Previous developmental studies on the cyclostome brain were conducted mainly in lampreys because hagfish embryos were rarely available. Although still scarce, the recent availability of hagfish embryos has propelled comparative studies of brain development and gene expression. By integrating findings with those of cyclostomes and fossil jawless vertebrates, we can depict the morphology, developmental mechanism, and even the evolutionary path of the brain of the last common ancestor of vertebrates. In this review, we summarize the development of the forebrain in cyclostomes and suggest what evolutionary changes each cyclostome lineage underwent during brain evolution. In addition, together with recent advances in the head morphology in fossil vertebrates revealed by CT scanning technology, we discuss how the evolution of craniofacial morphology and the changes of the developmental mechanism of the forebrain towards crown gnathostomes are causally related.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Adrianus Veenstra

Background: Insulin is evolutionarily related to the insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) and like the latter stimulates a receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) that transfers the extracellular hormonal signal into an intracellular response. Other hormones related to insulin, such as relaxin, do not use an RTK, but a G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR). This is unusual since evolutionarily related hormones typically either use the same or paralogous receptors. In arthropods three different IGF-related peptides likely evolved from a gene triplication, as in several species genes coding these three peptides are located next to one another on the same chromosomal fragment. Of these three hormones one, an IGF-like hormone, acts through an RTK, while the other two use a GPCR. This suggests that the ancestral IGF-like peptide may have used both types of receptors. These arthropod insulin-like peptides have homologs in vertebrates, which suggests that the initial gene triplication was perhaps already present in the last common ancestor of deuterostomes and protostomes. It would be interesting to know whether this is indeed so and to establish how insulin and other insulin-like peptides might be related to this trio of IGF-related hormones. Methodology: Genes coding insulin and related peptides as well as their putative receptors were identified in genomes and transcriptomes from echinoderms and hemichordates. Results: A similar triplet of genes coding insulin-like peptides is also found in some hemichordates and echinoderms. Two of the three ambulacrarian peptides are orthologs of arthropod IGF and Drosophila insulin-like peptide 7 (dilp7), while the third one looks like an ortholog of the arthropod peptide gonadulin. In echinoderms two novel insulin-like peptides emerged, gonad stimulating substance (GSS) and multinsulin, likely from gene duplications of the IGF and dilp7-like genes respectively. However, no novel receptors for insulin-like peptides evolved. If IGF were to act through both a GPCR and an RTK it would suggest that GSS acts on only one of the two receptors, possibly the RTK. The evolution of GSS from IGF may represent a pattern, where IGF gene duplications lead to novel genes coding shorter peptides that have lost their ability to activate a GPCR. It is likely this is how insulin and the insect neuroendocrine insulin-like peptides evolved independently from IGF. Conclusion: The local gene triplication previously described from arthropods that yielded three genes coding IGF-related peptides was already present in the last common ancestor of protostomes and deuterostomes. It seems plausible that insulin and other insulin-like peptides, such as those produced by neuroendocrine cells in the brain of insects and echinoderm GSS evolved independently from IGF and thus are not true orthologs, but the result of convergent evolution.


This paper is a study of the structure of the braincase in two closely related Mesozoic mammals: Triconodon mordax and Trioracodon ferox . They belong to the order Triconodonta, subfamily Triconodontinae, and are from the English Upper Jurassic (Purbeck). One specimen of each species was available showing cranial structure, both from the collection in the British Museum. By chemical methods, both petrosals and the sphenoid of the specimen of Triconodon and both petrosals of the specimen of Trioracodon were prepared. The material shows that the Triconodonta had a braincase of an essentially reptilian pattern. There was a persistent cavum epiptericum lying outside the ossified lateral wall (formed by the petrosal) of the braincase. The alisphenoid, forming the lateral boundary of the cavum epiptericum, formed no part of the braincase wall in this region. This was also true of the Rhaetic Morganucodon , and may have been true of all pre-Cretaceous mammals. In basic construction the braincase of these mammals differs from that of an advanced therapsid only in the narrower cavum epiptericum in the former. This difference is due to the relatively larger size of the brain in the mammal. To convert a braincase constructed in this way into that of a modern mammal either the alisphenoid would have to be lost—leading to the condition found in the monotremes—or the lateral wall of the neurocranum would have to fail to ossify—thus incorporating the cavum epiptericum in the cranial cavity in the manner typical of marsupials and placentals. Although on these grounds alone the monotreme stock need not have separated from that which gave rise to the marsupials and placentals until early in the Cretaceous, other considerations suggest that the last common ancestor lived in Triassic times at the reptilian grade of organization. There seems, however, less reason than formerly to consider Morganucodon an ancestral monotreme. Finally, a reconsideration of all the evidence shows that there was no acceleration of evolutionary rates at the time the Mammalia came into existence.


2018 ◽  
Vol 217 (10) ◽  
pp. 3464-3479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenlong Xia ◽  
Libo Su ◽  
Jianwei Jiao

In mammals, a constant body temperature is an important basis for maintaining life activities. Here, we show that when pregnant mice are subjected to cold stress, the expression of RBM3, a cold-induced protein, is increased in the embryonic brain. When RBM3 is knocked down or knocked out in cold stress, embryonic brain development is more seriously affected, exhibiting abnormal neuronal differentiation. By detecting the change in mRNA expression during maternal cold stress, we demonstrate that Yap and its downstream molecules are altered at the RNA level. By analyzing RNA-binding motif of RBM3, we find that there are seven binding sites in 3′UTR region of Yap1 mRNA. Mechanistically, RBM3 binds to Yap1-3′UTR, regulates its stability, and affects the expression of YAP1. RBM3 and YAP1 overexpression can partially rescue the brain development defect caused by RBM3 knockout in cold stress. Collectively, our data demonstrate that cold temperature affects brain development, and RBM3 acts as a key protective regulator in cold stress.


Development ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 121 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Boyan ◽  
S. Therianos ◽  
J.L. Williams ◽  
H. Reichert

Axogenesis in the embryonic brain was studied at the single cell level in the grasshopper Schistocerca gregaria. A small set of individually identifiable pioneer neurons establishes a primary axon scaffold during early embryogenesis. At the beginning of scaffold formation, pioneering axons navigate along and between glial borders that surround clusters of proliferating neuroblasts. In each brain hemisphere, an axonal outgrowth cascade involving a series of pioneer neurons establishes a pathway from the optic ganglia to the brain midline. At the midline the primary preoral commissural interconnection in the embryonic brain is pioneered by a pair of midline-derived pioneer neurons. A second preoral commissural connection is pioneered by two pairs of pars intercerebralis pioneer neurons. Descending tracts are pioneered by the progeny of identified neuroblasts in the pars intercerebralis, deutocerebrum and tritocerebrum; the postoral tritocerebral commissure is pioneered by a pair of tritocerebral neurons. All of the pioneering brain neurons express the cell adhesion molecule fasciclin I during initial axon outgrowth and fasciculation. Once established, the primary axon scaffold of the brain is used for fasciculation by subsequently differentiating neurons and, by the 40% stage of embryogenesis, axonal projections that characterize the mature brain become evident. The single cell analysis of grasshopper brain development presented here sets the stage for manipulative cell biological experiments and provides the basis for comparative molecular genetic studies of embryonic brain development in Drosophila.


Development ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 125 (9) ◽  
pp. 1703-1710 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Leuzinger ◽  
F. Hirth ◽  
D. Gerlich ◽  
D. Acampora ◽  
A. Simeone ◽  
...  

Members of the orthodenticle gene family are essential for embryonic brain development in animals as diverse as insects and mammals. In Drosophila, mutational inactivation of the orthodenticle gene results in deletions in anterior parts of the embryonic brain and in defects in the ventral nerve cord. In the mouse, targeted elimination of the homologous Otx2 or Otx1 genes causes defects in forebrain and/or midbrain development. To determine the morphogenetic properties and the extent of evolutionary conservation of the orthodenticle gene family in embryonic brain development, genetic rescue experiments were carried out in Drosophila. Ubiquitous overexpression of the orthodenticle gene rescues both the brain defects and the ventral nerve cord defects in orthodenticle mutant embryos; morphology and nervous system-specific gene expression are restored. Two different time windows exist for the rescue of the brain versus the ventral nerve cord. Ubiquitous overexpression of the human OTX1 or OTX2 genes also rescues the brain and ventral nerve cord phenotypes in orthodenticle mutant embryos; in the brain, the efficiency of morphological rescue is lower than that obtained with overexpression of orthodenticle. Overexpression of either orthodenticle or the human OTX gene homologs in the wild-type embryo results in ectopic neural structures. The rescue of highly complex brain structures in Drosophila by either fly or human orthodenticle gene homologs indicates that these genes are interchangeable between vertebrates and invertebrates and provides further evidence for an evolutionarily conserved role of the orthodenticle gene family in brain development.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Evy van Berlo ◽  
Alejandra P. Díaz-Loyo ◽  
Oscar E. Juárez-Mora ◽  
Mariska E. Kret ◽  
Jorg J. M. Massen

AbstractYawning is highly contagious, yet both its proximate mechanism(s) and its ultimate causation remain poorly understood. Scholars have suggested a link between contagious yawning (CY) and sociality due to its appearance in mostly social species. Nevertheless, as findings are inconsistent, CY’s function and evolution remains heavily debated. One way to understand the evolution of CY is by studying it in hominids. Although CY has been found in chimpanzees and bonobos, but is absent in gorillas, data on orangutans are missing despite them being the least social hominid. Orangutans are thus interesting for understanding CY’s phylogeny. Here, we experimentally tested whether orangutans yawn contagiously in response to videos of conspecifics yawning. Furthermore, we investigated whether CY was affected by familiarity with the yawning individual (i.e. a familiar or unfamiliar conspecific and a 3D orangutan avatar). In 700 trials across 8 individuals, we found that orangutans are more likely to yawn in response to yawn videos compared to control videos of conspecifics, but not to yawn videos of the avatar. Interestingly, CY occurred regardless of whether a conspecific was familiar or unfamiliar. We conclude that CY was likely already present in the last common ancestor of humans and great apes, though more converging evidence is needed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document