Abstract
Introduction
Uncontrolled blood pressure and poor glycaemic control may lead to increased morbidity and mortality (1). A systematic review of 40 studies reported beneficial effects of interventions conducted in community pharmacies in the management of diabetes and cardiovascular diseases (2).
Aim
To evaluate the impact of a tailored intervention on clinical outcomes in the management of hypertensive and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients in community pharmacies in a pilot implementation study.
Methods
The study (April to July 2019) utilized a mixed-method design. This included a cross-sectional survey among 133 consented community pharmacists and 390 T2DM and/or hypertensive patients at the pharmacies. Thirty-one item (pharmacists) and 29-item (patients) semi-structured questionnaires were used to gather information on their perception of pharmacists’ roles in the management of T2DM and/or hypertension. Barriers to implement identified roles by the pharmacists were documented. Thereafter, a prospective before- and after-intervention study was conducted in four consented pharmacies to address the barriers. Two pharmacists per pharmacy and 34 consented T2DM and/or hypertensive adult patients who had been on medications for ≥3 months participated. Pharmacists were provided with 2-hr one-on-one training on the management of T2DM and hypertension based on standard guidelines pre-intervention and at 4 weeks. Components of the pharmacist’s intervention included patient’s education, medication counselling , lifestyle modifications and self-care use of point of care devices. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), fasting blood glucose (FBG) and body mass index (BMI) of all patients were measured at baseline, 4- and 8-week post-intervention. Weekly patient follow-up visits to the pharmacies were mandatory. Telephone calls and referral were incorporated, when necessary. Failure to show up for two consecutive visits disqualified patients from completing the study. Descriptive statistics (to summarise data), and paired t-test to compare mean differences in the measured parameters at α=0.05.
Results
Hypertensive and/or T2DM patients (374) and 71 pharmacists participated in the survey. The patients expected pharmacists to provide medication counselling (81;27.1%), education (47;12.6%), follow-up (18;4.8%), health outcomes monitoring (17;4.5%), and collaboration with physicians (12;3.2%). Sixty-nine (97.2%) pharmacists agreed that patients’ follow-up, patient counselling (71;100.0%), therapeutic plan design to achieve goals (67;94.4%) and collaboration with physicians (61;85.9%) were important. Barriers to providing adequate counsel to these patients were time constraints (23;32.4%), unconducive environment (7;9.9%) and patient’s impatience (33;46.5%). For the intervention component, 16 of the 34 patients enrolled were lost to follow-up (one hospitalized, seven failed two consecutive visits, and eight lost to referral). Effects of the tailored intervention on the parameters are in Table 1.
Conclusion
The patients’ and pharmacists’ perceived roles of the pharmacist in the management of hypertension and T2DM were in tandem. The 8-week tailored pharmacists’ intervention resulted in better control of blood pressure but increased FBG. This pilot study is limited by the small sample size of patients and pharmacists, as well as the lack of appropriate comparator. Future large-scale multi-site study with relevant comparator is required for a far-reaching conclusion on the impact of the tailored pharmacist intervention in the management of diabetes and hypertension.
References
1. Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure; National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: The JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289:2560–72.
2. Evans CD, Watson E, Eurich DT, Taylor JG, Yakiwchuk EM, Shevchuk YM, et al. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease interventions by community pharmacists: a systematic review. Ann Pharmacother. 2011;45(5):615–28.
Optimising retention success: a research team’s experience of following-up participants recruited to a pilot trial through community pharmacies in England
