Efficiency of the activity of the highest official of the subject of the russian federation: criteria of the assessment

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-97
Author(s):  
Денисова ◽  
Olga Denisova

In the article the author analyzes the process of efficiency assessment of the activity of the highest official of the subject of the Russian Federation. The attention is focused on inadequacy of application of exclusively quantitative indices. Based on the analysis of expansion practice of assessment criteria of efficiency, the need of public participation in rating process is shown. In this context the activity of Fund of development of civil society is examined as the center which created the clear and acceptable system of rating indicators of effi-ciency of the highest officials.

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 122-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. A. Zakharchuk ◽  
A. A. Nekrasov ◽  
A. F. Pasynkov

The research is devoted to the modern enhancement of budget allocation effciency at the municipal level. Internationally, it is referred to as participatory budgeting. The subject of the research is the world and Russian experience of participatory budgeting and the effectiveness of such initiatives. The research objective is to determine the correlation between the international experience of public participation in the budget allocation and the program of initiative budgeting in the Russian Federation; based on this, to develop recommendations for improving the effciency of budget expenditures. The theoretical basis and the relationship between the concepts of “participatory budgeting” used to denote public participation abroad, and the “proactive budgeting” adopted in Russia have been considered. More than 30 international studies of participatory budgeting over the past 15 years have been analyzed. The aspects and effectiveness of the approaches have been highlighted. The best international and Russian experiences of participatory (initiative) budgeting, their characteristics and commitment to results have been identifed. As a result, the authors have presented a basic scheme to organize the participatory budgeting process, highlighting the stages, activities and criteria for the effectiveness of programs implemented within this approach. The initiative budgeting perspectives in Russia have been shown on the example of Yekaterinburg. Some recommendations have been given to enhance the implementation effciency. Among them are: infrastructural differences between the territories, expanding fnancial independence of municipalities in terms of initiative budgeting, building a system of representatives of local communities. It has been concluded that the initiative budgeting in the Russian Federation differs notably in its form from the international initiatives. The main difference is the requirement to the population and business to co-fnance projects. Some measures have been proposed to move gradually from the Russian participatory budgeting to the international standards, including: developing a methodology for project effciency evaluation, providing tax incentives, extensive use of information technology, and introducing the annual schedule of meetings and polls.


Author(s):  
Marina Vyacheslavovna Chudinovskikh

The relevance of this research is defined by the growing share of unreported employment and the need for elaboration of tax mechanisms, which would promote legalization of income that is currently not being taxed. The subject of this research is the taxation experiment on self-employed citizens. The goal lies characterization of the key vectors of taxation experiment on self-employed citizens, as well as development of proposals for assessing its efficiency. The author systematizes the norms the Taxation Code of the Russian Federation, federal and regional tax legislation, taxation statistics data, as well as outlines the changes to the experiment due to COVID -19 pandemic. The article provides an overview of the theoretical views of Russian scholars on the advantages and disadvantages of self-employment tax. it is proven that the current stage of the experiment can be considered successful based on substantial increase in the number of taxpayers and the volume of tax revenue. The scientific novelty consists in the development of approaches towards assessing the efficiency of taxation of self-employed citizens. The author proposes indicators that can be used for assessing efficiency of the experiment until 2028:  volume of tax revenue, number of taxpayers, number of tax disputes, tax arrears, amount of accrued dues, changes in tax revenue for other types of taxes that would replace self-employment tax.


2020 ◽  
pp. 42-48
Author(s):  
Violetta Sergeevna Neznanova

The subject of this article is the process of interaction between the government and civil society. The goal is to prove that a promising legal framework for the development of dialogue between the government and civil society exists not only in Russia overall, but in separate regions as well. The author achieves the set goal by analyzing the evolution of civil society in Russia and understanding peculiarities of the process of interaction between the government and civil society in Saint Petersburg. The article leans on the data provided by the center “Strategy”, Civic Chamber of the Russian Federation, Civic Chamber of Saint Petersburg , “Center for the Development of Nonprofit Organizations”, etc. The scientific novelty consists in determination of peculiarities influencing the process of interaction between the government and civil society in Saint Petersburg. The main conclusion lies in the statement that Saint Petersburg has a decent legal and social framework for further advancement of interaction between the government and civil society: presence of normative legal base for regulating such interaction; presence of a relatively large number of registered nonprofit organizations in Saint Petersburg; active work of a number of nonprofit organizations reflected in mass media; existence of community boards on the territory of Saint Petersburg. Overall, Saint Petersburg offers all conditions for effective interaction between the government and civil society.


2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 53-58
Author(s):  
Jacek Zalesny ◽  
◽  
M.Ya. Shtirlova ◽  
V.V. Goncharov ◽  
◽  
...  

This article is devoted to the study of the Institute of the presidential Commissioner for children's rights to determine its role and place in the implementation of such an important institution of civil society as public control. At the same time, the paper substantiates the importance and significance of public control in the system of legal guarantees that ensure the implementation, compliance and protection of such important constitutional principles as democracy and public participation in the management of public affairs. The study resolves the dilemma regarding the attribution of the institution of the Commissioner for children's rights under the President of the Russian Federation to objects or subjects of public control: it is proved that despite the presence of a number of features of this public authority that are common with subjects of public control, it is not a subject, but an object of public control. The article uses a number of methods of scientific research, in particular, analysis, synthesis, classification, formal-logical, comparative-legal, historical-legal, etc.


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-132
Author(s):  
Роман Маркунин ◽  
Roman Markunin

The article deals with the legal regulation of legal responsibility of deputies in the current Russian law. The current understanding of the free parliamentary mandate and the results of its anchoring in legislation. Particular attention is paid to recent changes in the law, which led to a significant revision of the duties and responsibilities of the people’s representatives. Further ways of improving the institute of responsibility and proposes concrete solutions to the existing problems in the sphere of regulation of the responsibility of the Council of Senators of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation are analyzed. In particular, it proposed to consolidate the right to a public authority of the subject of the Russian Federation to terminate the powers of the Federation Council of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation senator on the grounds of loss of confidence. We study the question of the implementation of legal policy aimed at building a legal state and civil society. The conclusion about the need to rethink the position of deputy and senator and establish in law a specific list of grounds for the loss of the aforementioned subjects of their status is made.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. L. Sidorenko

The paper focuses on the definition of the legal status of the cryptocurrency in the framework of the current Russian legislation. The subject of the research is the principal scientific and practical approaches to determining the object of civil rights and the object of acquisitive crimes in terms of their adaptability to cryptocurrencies. The purposes of the work were the search for a universal algorithm for resolving civil disputes related to the turnover of the crypto currency, and the qualification of the virtual currency theft (fraud). By using historical, comparative legal and dialectical methods as well as the content analysis method parallels between cryptocurrencies and individual objects of civil rights (a thing, property rights, other property) were drawn, and a number of options for qualifying the actions related to the non-repayable withdrawal of the cryptocurrency were proposed. Finally, the paper analyzes the draft laws prepared by the RF Ministry of Finance and the Central Bank of the Russian Federation and presents the author’s vision of the prospects for legalizing the cryptocurrency as an object of civil rights.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 133-139
Author(s):  
E. A. GRIBENNIKOVA ◽  

The article considers the issue of interaction between the state and civil society, analyzes the main approaches and models of such interaction. The author notes the important consolidating role played by public and public Advisory Councils under state authorities in Russian society.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document