University Preparation As the Stage of Formation of Social Maturity of Students with Health Limitations and Without Health Limitations

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 28-33
Author(s):  
Наталья Дьякова ◽  
Natalya Dyakova ◽  
Ольга Козырева ◽  
Ol'ga Kozyreva ◽  
Л. Сырвачева ◽  
...  

The pedagogical and psychological literature on the studied problem is analyzed, the conceptual fi eld of research, the structure and content of the social maturity of students is defi ned; The diff erences and peculiarities of the social maturity of students with and without health limitations, both in terms of the integral indicator, and for individual components related to the phenomenon of “socio-psychological maturity” were revealed experimentally.

Author(s):  
Evgeny L. Dotsenko

A definition of the social-psychological maturity of the person is proposed in the article. The definition was specified by means of collating with other concepts, comprising an attribution of “maturity”: psychological maturity, person's maturity and social maturity. Accordingly, the phenomena corresponded to each of the 4 types of maturity were outlined. The processes through which the social-psychological maturity is came into being and grow up were described. It was principally shown how the personality questionnaire can be used to measure the social-psychological maturity, basing on genetic relation between person's maturity and social-psychological maturity.


Author(s):  
Oleh Dzoba ◽  
Nataliia Stavnycha

Summary the article has analyzed the existing scientific and methodological approaches to assessing the level of social security of the state. It was revealed that they differ because: scientists include various components that form social security; they use various indicators and calculation methods; have various aspects of both generalization and practical direction. It was revealed that most often the components of social security include: safety of life, health, social protection and aspects of social and labor relations. The methods that are most often used in calculating the level of social security were considered. It was proved that in assessment, the selection of indicators that pose a threat, is the difficult task. It was revealed that there is no legally approved methodology for assessing the social security of the state. The use of various social security assessment methodologies was analyzed. Emphasis was placed on the selection of indicators used in these techniques. It was concluded that for assessing the social security of the state, an integral indicator is used most often. At the same time, scientists prefer their own set of indicators. The author’s definition of «social security» was presented, which allowed the formation of four components of the state’s social security (life, poverty, health and education). It was established that the choice of indicators for assessing the social security of the state should cover a retrospective period and should be based on both reporting and calculated data. A hierarchical model of an integral indicator of state social security was proposed. There was defined a set of indicators for each of proposed component. The following algorithm has been proposed for assessing the integral indicator of state social security: the formation of the components of social security and the definition of indicative indicators for each of the components; formation of a database; determination of an integral indicator; determining the influence of each component on the change in the integral indicator; interpretation of indicators; determining the sustainability of hazardous trends.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1977 ◽  
Vol 60 (5) ◽  
pp. 770-771
Author(s):  
Penny Axelrod ◽  
Jerome S. Haller

We are concerned with the findings and implications of the article by Huessy and Cohen (Pediatrics 57:4, January 1976). The authors designated students in their study as "hyperkinetic" based on a questionnaire completed by teachers. It assessed the "social maturity, neuromuscular development, academic performance, and general attitude and behavior." They validate their use of this questionnaire by citing its high correlation (.77) with a research instrument used by Conners.1 Conners finds, however, that his rating instrument measures primarily aggressive, disturbing behavior and is only "somewhat correlated with another factor which measures hyperactivity."


Author(s):  
Ekaterina V. Lisova

The article is devoted to the level of social development of Russian regions. It is noted that at present the social component plays a leading role in the research of various authors. It is proposed to use the indicators published in the statistical collection "Regions of Russia. Socio-economic indicators", as well as regional housing and utilities tariffs for assessing the level of social development. A method for determining the integral indicator of social development has been developed, and a computer program has been created to determine its numerical values based on indicators of housing conditions of the population. The calculated generalized indicators for the regions of the Central Federal District are given. Conclusions are drawn about the possibility of using the obtained data to assess and predict the level of social regional development.


1942 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
KATHRYN ERROLL MAXFIELD ◽  
HARRIETT ANDERSON FJELD

1986 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 635-639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom Altepeter ◽  
Eileen M. Moscato ◽  
Jack A. Cummings

A study comparing the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales with the original Vineland Social Maturity Scale was conducted with a sample of 37 hearing-impaired children. A brief discussion of the literature showed a current lack of instrumentation for assessing adaptive behavior of such children. Correlations of scores on the two scales were significant and positive. Comparisons of mean standard scores indicated that the Social Maturity Scale yielded significantly higher standard scores than the Adaptive Behavior Scales.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document