Parathyroid Hormone (1–84) and Treatment of Osteoporosis

2005 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 1511-1516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah P Shrader ◽  
Kelly R Ragucci
Keyword(s):  
Parathyroid Hormone ◽  
Subcutaneous Injection ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Osteoporosis Treatment ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Treatment Of Osteoporosis ◽  
Medline Search ◽  
Dosing Strategies

OBJECTIVE: To present the chemistry, pharmacology, and pharmacokinetics of parathyroid hormone (PTH) (1-84%) and review the available clinical trials that evaluate its efficacy and safety; clinical applicability of this agent and its relationship to other Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved medications for treatment of osteoporosis are also discussed. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search (1996–December 2004%) was completed, along with a review of information obtained from the manufacturer, NPS Pharmaceuticals. Key search terms included parathyroid hormone, PTH (1–84%), and ALX 111. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Studies were selected based on their relevance and availability. Pertinent information, including objectives, design, demographics, outcomes, adverse events, dosing strategies, and therapeutic controversies, was extracted. DATA SYNTHESIS: PTH (1-84%) is being developed for treatment of osteoporosis. Recent studies have shown that, when administered intermittently as a subcutaneous injection, PTH (1-84%) produces an increase in bone mineral density and prevents vertebral fractures. The fact that this agent contains the C-terminal region of PTH may differentiate it from PTH (1-34%), teriparatide, which is approved by the FDA for treatment of osteoporosis. Further trials are necessary to determine the role of PTH (1-84%) in combination with other treatments for osteoporosis and/or the order in which PTH (1-84%) is given with these other agents. There are currently no comparative trials with other osteoporosis treatment modalities. CONCLUSIONS: PTH (1-84%), when given intermittently as a subcutaneous injection, appears to be a safe and efficacious treatment option for osteoporosis. Further trials are needed to determine its specific place in therapy compared with other treatment options.

Pathophysiology and First-Line Treatment of Osteoarthritis

2002 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 679-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse H Hogue ◽  
Tracey L Mersfelder
Keyword(s):  
Data Extraction ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Primary Treatment ◽  
Data Sources ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Comparable Efficacy ◽  
Antiinflammatory Drugs ◽  
Medline Search ◽  
Cox 2 ◽  
Cox 2 Inhibitors

OBJECTIVE: To review the pathophysiology of osteoarthritis (OA) and the various treatment modalities, focusing specifically on acetaminophen (APAP), nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors as the primary treatment options. DATA SOURCES: Primary literature and tertiary references were identified by a MEDLINE search (1966–March 2001) and through other secondary sources. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: After evaluating the articles and references identified from the data sources, all the information that was judged relevant by the reviewers was included in the review article. DATA SYNTHESIS: OA is the most common joint disorder worldwide. Current research suggests that factors such as inflammation and changes in subchondral bone may play a larger role in the pathophysiology than previously thought. With this research and the development of COX-2 inhibitors, selecting the medication of choice for OA has become difficult. CONCLUSIONS: More research needs to be done before the pathophysiology of OA can be clearly determined. In the meantime, treatment should be based on clinical data and patient response. Studies have shown that APAP and NSAIDs have comparable efficacy, as do traditional NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors. APAP is associated with fewer toxicities than are the traditional NSAIDs. Due to their mechanism of action, the new COX-2 inhibitors should result in fewer adverse effects compared with traditional NSAIDs, but evidence from clinical trials has not been conclusive. Therefore, APAP should still be considered the drug of choice for OA.

Treatment of Female Sexual Dysfunction

2003 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 546-555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly R Ragucci ◽  
Nicole S Culhane
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Dysfunction ◽  
Female Sexual Dysfunction ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Individual Characteristics ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Medline Search ◽  
Sexual Pain ◽  
Arousal Disorder

OBJECTIVE: To review the pathophysiology and psychology of female sexual dysfunction (FSD) and describe potential prevention and treatment strategies for the disorder. DATA SOURCES: Articles identified from a MEDLINE search (1966–June 2002) using the term female sexual dysfunction. Additional references were obtained from cross referencing retrieved articles. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: After evaluating various review articles, clinical trials, and investigational studies, all information that was deemed relevant by the reviewers was included. DATA SYNTHESIS: FSD is a multicausal and multidimensional problem combining biological, psychological, and interpersonal factors. The American Foundation for Urological Disease classifies FSD into 4 broad categories: sexual desire disorders, arousal disorder, orgasmic disorder, and sexual pain disorders. Depending on specific individual characteristics and category of disorder, a variety of potential treatments are available. Pharmacists can play a role in identifying and managing medication-related adverse effects that may be exacerbating FSD and educating women on treatment modalities. CONCLUSIONS: FSD is a complicated disorder that is often difficult to identify, classify, and treat appropriately. Pharmacists should have an understanding of the potential causes of FSD and the treatment options available so that they may make appropriate recommendations and counsel women effectively.

Treatment Options for Rheumatoid Arthritis: Celecoxib, Leflunomide, Etanercept, and Infliximab

2000 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 743-760 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brigitte T Luong ◽  
Barbara S Chong ◽  
Dionne M Lowder
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
English Language ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs ◽  
Antiinflammatory Drugs ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Medline Search ◽  
Pertinent Data

OBJECTIVE: To review new pharmacologic agents approved for use in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search (1966–January 2000) was conducted to identify English-language literature available on the pharmacotherapy of RA, focusing on celecoxib, leflunomide, etanercept, and infliximab. These articles, relevant abstracts, and data provided by the manufacturers were used to collect pertinent data. STUDY SELECTION: All controlled and uncontrolled trials were reviewed. DATA EXTRACTION: Agents were reviewed with regard to mechanism of action, efficacy, drug interactions, pharmacokinetics, dosing, precautions/contraindications, adverse effects, and cost. DATA SYNTHESIS: Traditional pharmacologic treatments for RA have been limited by toxicity, loss of efficacy, or both. Increasing discoveries into the mechanisms of inflammation in RA have led to the development of new agents in hopes of addressing these limitations. With the development of celecoxib, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, the potential exists to minimize the gastrotoxicity associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Leflunomide has been shown to be equal to or less efficacious than methotrexate, and may be beneficial as a second-line disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD). The biologic response modifiers, etanercept and infliximab, are alternatives that have shown benefit alone or in combination with methotrexate. However, they should be reserved for patients who fail to respond to DMARD therapy. Further studies should be conducted to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of these agents as well as their role in combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Celecoxib, leflunomide, etanercept, and infliximab are the newest agents approved for RA. Clinical trials have shown that these agents are beneficial in the treatment of RA; however, long-term safety and efficacy data are lacking.

scholarly journals The use of PTH in the treatment of osteoporosis

2010 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victória Z. Cochenski Borba ◽  
Nádila Cecyn Pietszkowski Mañas
Keyword(s):  
Parathyroid Hormone ◽  
Bone Density ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Biochemical Markers ◽  
Osteoporosis Treatment ◽  
Antiresorptive Therapy ◽  
Treatment Of Osteoporosis ◽  
Antiresorptive Agents ◽  
Anabolic Treatment

Anabolic drugs have recently widened therapeutic options in osteoporosis treatment, as they influence processes associated with bone formation to a greater extent and earlier than bone reabsortion. They positively affect a number of skeletal properties besides bone density, as intermittent administration of parathyroid hormone (PTH) results in an increase in the number and activity of osteoblasts leading to an increase in bone mass and improvement in skeletal architecture at both the trabecular and cortical bone. Human recombinant parathyroid hormone (hrPTH 1-84) and human recombinant PTH peptide 1-34 (teriparatide) belong to this group. The objective of this paper is to review PTH actions, benefits and adverse effects, action on biochemical markers, combination therapy with antiresorptive agents, impact of antiresorptive therapy prior to anabolic treatment, sequential treatment, and effect on glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

Risedronate for the Prevention of Fractures in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

2002 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 664-670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer M Sickels ◽  
Chi-Sing Nip
Keyword(s):  
Postmenopausal Osteoporosis ◽  
Bone Fragility ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Osteoporosis Therapy ◽  
Treatment Of Osteoporosis ◽  
Medline Search ◽  
Secondary Sources ◽  
Nonvertebral Fractures ◽  
Search Terms ◽  
Increased Risk

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate current scientific literature regarding the efficacy of risedronate in the prevention of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. DATA SOURCES: Primary research articles were identified by MEDLINE search (1966–May 2001) and through secondary sources. Key search terms were risedronate, postmenopausal osteoporosis, and fractures. DATA SYNTHESIS: Osteoporosis results in a reduction of bone mineral density, increased bone fragility, and increased risk of fractures. The goal of osteoporosis therapy is not only to increase bone mass, but also to reduce the rate of fractures. Risedronate is the newest bisphosphonate to be approved for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. An evaluation of clinical trials using risedronate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis was performed to determine its efficacy at decreasing fracture rates. CONCLUSIONS: Risedronate is an effective and safe option for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Risedronate significantly decreases the risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in women who have had ≥1 fractures in the past. More studies are warranted to evaluate the efficacy of risedronate in women without preexisting vertebral fractures.

Current Treatment Recommendations for Leishmaniasis

1992 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 1452-1455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey T. Moss ◽  
James P. Wilson
Keyword(s):  
English Language ◽  
Clinical Presentation ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Medical Personnel ◽  
Current Treatment ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Management Options ◽  
Governmental Institutions

OBJECTIVE: To review the epidemiology, clinical presentation, risk factors for transmission, and pathogenesis of leishmaniasis, as well as current treatment options for this disease. DATA SOURCES/DATA SELECTION: We reviewed unclassified medical-threat briefing material, subject-matter reviews, and case reports from the world's infectious disease literature. We concentrated on literature pertaining to the pathogenesis and management of leishmaniasis indigenous to Southwest Asia. DATA EXTRACTION: Data from subject reviews published in the English language were evaluated. Case reports and clinical trials provided supplemental data on evolving theories and management options. DATA SYNTHESIS: The clinical presentation of leishmaniasis is highly variable. Management relies heavily upon the use of parenteral antimonial drugs. Although these agents are effective in most cases, toxicity and the emergence of resistance limit the usefulness of standard therapies. Alternative treatment modalities include heat, surgical curettage, ketoconazole, metronidazole, pentamidine, rifampin, amphotericin B, aminoglycosides, allopurinol, and immunotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Although the number of reported cases of leishmaniasis in the US has generally been low, there is a possibility that more cases may be reported in the future because of the large number of military personnel returning to this country from endemic areas. Medical personnel, particularly those working in governmental institutions, should be familiar with the pathogenesis of this unusual infection as well as potential treatment options.

scholarly journals Emergency Management of Paraphimosis

2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 253-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ch Chung
Keyword(s):  
Case Reports ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Invasive Treatment ◽  
Manual Search ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Library Network ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Objective To review the treatment modalities available for paraphimosis, with special emphasis on those applicable to the emergency department. Data source Relevant medical literature was searched through MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Database. Manual search was performed in books on Urology, General Surgery and Emergency Medicine available in the Hospital Library. Further information was obtained through the Internet at < www.infoseek.com >. References cited in articles were also retrieved. Study selection Key words for the literature, Internet and textbook search were ‘paraphimosis’ and ‘treatment’. All available years of study were reviewed. Data extraction Relevant full text articles were obtained through the hospital library network. Original articles, review papers, medical practice, case reports, and relevant book chapters were reviewed. Data synthesis There were no prospective, randomised, controlled studies available. The majority were case series and expert experience or opinions only. Currently, a multitude of non-invasive and invasive treatment options are available, including manual reduction, help of non-crushing tissue forceps, puncture technique and dorsal slit. Conclusion All treatment methods are within the capability of the emergency physician. Hospitalization should rarely be required, unless there are serious complications.

scholarly journals Physical approach for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis

2010 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Paula Rebucci Lirani-Galvão ◽  
Marise Lazaretti-Castro
Keyword(s):  
Pharmacological Treatment ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Management Options ◽  
Pharmacological Management ◽  
Treatment Of Osteoporosis ◽  
Specific Strength ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Coordination Training

Osteoporosis and its consequent fractures are a major problem in public health. To complement the conventional pharmacological treatment for this metabolic disease, non-pharmacological treatment options have been developed in the last decades. Several studies demonstrate that physical exercise programs including impact exercises, specific strength training, balance and coordination training may maintain or increase spine and hip bone mineral density as well as decrease the frequency of falls among osteoporotic and osteopenic patients. Furthermore, some physical agents such as vibratory platforms, low intensity electrical stimulation, laser therapy and ultrasound show positive effects on osteoporotic tissue as well. Consequently, while planning treatment for an osteoporotic patient, non-pharmacological management options should be considered and integrated to the conventional treatment in order to maximize its effects and improve the quality of life of these patients.

scholarly journals Effects of anti-osteoporosis therapy on plasma aldosterone and renin

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 147032032092887
Author(s):  
Qingfen Hu ◽  
Kangla Liao ◽  
Longwei Zhang ◽  
Xiaoyu Shu ◽  
Zhixin Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parathyroid Hormone ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Postmenopausal Osteoporosis ◽  
Plasma Renin ◽  
Osteoporosis Treatment ◽  
Plasma Aldosterone ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Osteoporosis Therapy ◽  
Plasma Aldosterone Concentration ◽  
T Score

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effect of anti-osteoporosis therapy on plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC), plasma renin concentration (PRC) and the aldosterone/renin ratio (ARR) in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Methods: In 60 patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis, bone mineral density (BMD), PAC and PRC were measured before and after treatment with alendronate (70 mg/week, n=22) or recombinant human parathyroid hormone (20 μg/day, n=35) for 48 weeks. Results: PAC was negatively correlated with the T-score of lumbar spine BMD and femoral neck BMD (lumbar r=−0.386, p<0.01; femoral neck r=−0.262, p<0.05). With the improvement in lumbar BMD after anti-osteoporosis treatment (T-score −3.4±0.5 vs. –3.1 ±0.4, p<0.0001), PAC decreased from 182.8±53.2 to 143.7±68.6 pg/mL ( p<0.0001), PRC increased from 7.8±11.6 to 39.2±50.0 μIU/mL ( p<0.0001) and the ARR decreased from 74.8±75.2 to 13.1±17.1 pg/μIU ( p<0.0001). At baseline, 58% (35/60) of the patients had an ARR >37 pg/μIU, and the proportion decreased to 8% (5/57) after treatment. Conclusion: Treatment with alendronate or parathyroid hormone causes decreased PAC and increased PRC, resulting in a decreased ARR in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Treatment of Osteoporosis/Osteopenia in Pediatric Leukemia and Lymphoma

2009 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 714-720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele L Bryant ◽  
Mary A Worthington ◽  
Kerry Parsons
Keyword(s):  
Bone Mineral Density ◽  
Vitamin D ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Cancer Therapy ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Primary Efficacy ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Treatment Of Osteoporosis

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of various treatment options for osteopenia and osteoporosis secondary to cancer treatment in pediatric patients undergoing cancer therapy. Data Sources: A systematic search of PubMed (1949–November 2008) and international Pharmaceutical Abstracts (to November 2008) was conducted using the following search terms: osteoporosis, osteopenia, pediatrics, cancer, neoplasms, chemotherapy, bisphosphonates, calcium, vitamin D, calcitonin, and physical therapy. Study Selection and Data Extraction: All prospective studies that evaluated various osteoporosis treatment options in pediatric patients undergoing chemotherapy were included. Results from studies evaluating bisphosphonates and other treatments in children with osteoporosis due to other causes were also included if important safety and efficacy data were provided. Most commonly reported primary efficacy endpoints included comparisons of bone density parameters measured before and after treatment. Data Synthesis: Four clinical studies and 2 case reports describing treatment with bisphosphonates, specifically alendronate and Pamidronate, for osteoporosis or osteopenia in pediatric cancer patients were identified. Results from the trials showed that these medications were efficacious in reducing bone mineral density loss during cancer therapy and were well tolerated in this special population. Primary efficacy endpoints included improvements in Z-scores measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans. The most commonly reported adverse effects included hypocalcemia, mild stomach upset, and infusion-related hyperpyrexia. Four additional clinical trials involving the treatment of osteoporosis or osteopenia in children and adolescents who developed bone degeneration after chronic steroid therapy are also included. In these trials, treatment options such as calcitonin, and calcium and vitamin D supplementation were also shown to be beneficial. Conclusions: The clinical trials published to date are limited to only a few conducted in small populations of patients diagnosed with lymphoblastic leukemia or non–Hodgkin's lymphoma. However, alendronate and Pamidronate both appeared to be effective options in improving bone mineral density scores with minimal adverse effects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document