scholarly journals Rapid Diagnostics for Blood Cultures: Supporting Decisions for Antimicrobial Therapy and Value-Based Care

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 686-697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna M Wolk ◽  
J Kristie Johnson

Abstract Bacteremia and sepsis are critically important syndromes with high mortality, morbidity, and associated costs. Bloodstream infections and sepsis are among the top causes of mortality in the US, with >600 deaths each day. Most septic patients can be found in emergency medicine departments or critical care units, settings in which rapid administration of targeted antibiotic therapy can reduce mortality. Unfortunately, routine blood cultures are not rapid enough to aid in the decision of therapeutic intervention at the onset of bacteremia. As a result, empiric, broad-spectrum treatment is common—a costly approach that may fail to target the correct microbe effectively, may inadvertently harm patients via antimicrobial toxicity, and may contribute to the evolution of drug-resistant microbes. To overcome these challenges, laboratorians must understand the complexity of diagnosing and treating septic patients, focus on creating algorithms that rapidly support decisions for targeted antibiotic therapy, and synergize with existing emergency department and critical care clinical practices put forth in the Surviving Sepsis Guidelines.

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S116-S117
Author(s):  
Connor Deri ◽  
Whitney Nesbitt ◽  
George Nelson ◽  
Jessica Keefe

Abstract Background Bloodstream infections are a leading cause of mortality amongst hospitalized patients. Optimizing time to pathogen identification and receipt of appropriate antibiotic therapy significantly decreases mortality, morbidity, and length of hospitalization. Rapid diagnostic tests, such as Verigene, assist in the early identification of bacteria and resistance determinants from positive blood cultures; however, Verigene assays are limited to the detection of 13 gram-positive and 9 gram-negative bacteria. Methods The purpose of this study was to describe gram-negative and gram-positive aerobic bacteria identified from positive blood cultures with no Verigene target detected and to use the susceptibilities to create an antibiogram to assist in empiric antibiotic selection. A total of 2325 positive blood cultures resulted between January 2017 and October 2018 underwent Verigene testing. Results Of the 2325 isolates, 383 (16.5%), had no Verigene organism or resistance mechanism detected. Of these, there were 239 (62.4%) gram-positive isolates, 141 (36.8%) gram-negative isolates, and 3 yeast isolates with 96 unique organisms. Seventy-six (19.8%) of the organisms identified by standard culture, but not Verigene testing, are included on Verigene panel. We analyzed nine common antibiotics active against gram-negative organisms to determine percent susceptibilities against the isolated aerobic pathogens: amikacin (92.1%), cefepime (93.5%), ceftazidime (94.0%), ceftriaxone (79.7%), ciprofloxacin (88.5%), gentamicin (91.9%), levofloxacin (86.9%), piperacillin–tazobactam (83.8%), and tobramycin (85.5%). Additionally, four antibiotics active against gram-positive organisms were analyzed for gram-positive susceptibilities: cefotaxime (91.8%), ceftriaxone (98.1%), levofloxacin (82.5%), and vancomycin (91.8%). Conclusion The results of this study provide clinicians with antibiotic susceptibilities against organisms that were not identified through Verigene to better guide timely and appropriate antibiotic therapy against gram-negative and gram-positive aerobic bacteria. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 2763-2765
Author(s):  
Sobia Latif ◽  
Kousar Perveen ◽  
Hajra Sarwar ◽  
Sadia Khan

In health care setting nursing practices depends on knowledge. Knowledgeable nurses express their expertise in critical care units. Specialty in critical care units required respiratory knowledge regarding physical assessment. Furthermore nursing profession has been viewed central point for client care. The rapid changes in healthcare setting that increased demand of trained, experienced nurses in health care setting. The knowledge about anatomy and physiology regarding respiratory assessment necessary in the field of auscultating expertise like respiratory system that gives the chance of early diagnosis, assess the clients need and client health problem to implement the nursing process. Study Design: Descriptive Cross Sectional Study design was applied. Settings: Data was collected through convenient sampling method from ICU department of tertiary Hospital Lahore. Study Participants: 36 female nurses within the age range 24 to 39 years were included in this research. Results: The knowledge of ICU Nurses regarding anatomy of respiratory above 50% but knowledge regarding physical assessment less than 50%. Furthermore less knowledge among nurses about respiratory physical assessment in clinical practices. Keywords: Physical Assessment, Nurses application, Respiratory Knowledge, Practices


2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 1147-1157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Oberhettinger ◽  
Jan Zieger ◽  
Ingo Autenrieth ◽  
Matthias Marschal ◽  
Silke Peter

Abstract Fast identification of pathogens directly from positive blood cultures is of highest importance to supply an adequate therapy of bloodstream infections (BSI). There are several platforms providing molecular-based identification, detection of antimicrobial resistance genes, or even a full antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). Two of such test systems allowing rapid diagnostics were assessed in this study: The Biofire FilmArray® and the Genmark ePlex®, both fully automated test system with a minimum of hands-on time. Overall 137 BSI episodes were included in our study and compared to conventional culture–based reference methods. The FilmArray® is using one catridge including a panel for the most common bacterial and fungal BSI pathogens as well as selected resistance markers. The ePlex® offers three different cartridges for detection of Gram-positives, Gram-negatives, and fungi resulting in a broader panel including also rare pathogens, putative contaminants, and more genetic resistance markers. The FilmArray® and ePlex® were evaluated for all 137 BSI episodes with FilmArray® detecting 119 and ePlex® detecting 128 of these. For targets on the respective panel of the system, the FilmArray® generated a sensitivity of 98.9% with 100% specificity on Gram-positive isolates. The ePlex® system generated a sensitivity of 94.7% and a specificity of 90.7% on Gram-positive isolates. In each case, the two systems performed with 100% sensitivity and specificity for the detection of Gram-negative specimens covered by each panel. In summary, both evaluated test systems showed a satisfying overall performance for fast pathogen identification and are beneficial tools for accelerating blood culture diagnostics of sepsis patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (10) ◽  
pp. 3063-3068 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benoît Pilmis ◽  
Michael Thy ◽  
Julien Diep ◽  
Sophie Krob ◽  
Claire Périllaud ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundIn a previous study, we demonstrated that rapid antibiotic susceptibility tests (ASTs) can be performed directly on blood culture samples tested on Mueller–Hinton Rapid agar (MHR-SIR) with a time delay of 6–8 h.ObjectivesUsing this rapid disc diffusion method, we analysed the clinical impact associated with rapid reporting of results in our hospital setting.MethodsAll patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs) related to Enterobacteriaceae or Staphylococcus aureus were prospectively included in the study. The rapid ASTs were performed by incubation of positive blood cultures on MHR-SIR for 6–8 h by direct inoculation according to BSAC recommendations.ResultsOne hundred and sixty-seven patients with BSIs were included as MHR-guided adaptation therapy cases. Eighty percent had Enterobacteriaceae-related BSIs, of which 12 (9%) were ESBL producers and 20% were S. aureus-related BSIs. A urinary or intra-abdominal infection was observed in 44.3% and 19.8%, respectively, of Enterobacteriaceae-related infections. The most frequent sources of infections for S. aureus BSIs were cutaneous and endovascular, in 43% and 23% of cases, respectively. Forty-four percent of the patients benefited from therapeutic modification according to the results of the MHR-SIR AST. Thus, empirical antibiotic therapy was modified by using antibiotic therapy that had too wide a spectrum or was unsuitable in 26% and 18% of cases, respectively. Compared with the 24 h required for the reference method, the median length of time to provision of susceptibility test results by MHR-SIR was 7 h.ConclusionsThis study showed a significant time saving (17 h) on the appropriateness of antibiotic prescription and demonstrated a significant impact regarding the choice and reduction of the spectrum of antibiotic therapy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S140-S140
Author(s):  
Pedro Gonzalez ◽  
Urania Rappo ◽  
Jennifer McGregor ◽  
Lisa DiPompo-Day ◽  
Matthew W McCarthy

Abstract Background Dalbavancin, a long-acting lipoglycopeptide approved by the US FDA and EMA for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) has potent activity against Gram-positive pathogens including MRSA. A total of 39 of 39 patients with baseline S aureus bacteremia from previous studies who received dalbavancin (1500 mg or 1000 mg followed by 500 mg 1 week later) had clearance of bacteremia (100%). We describe the clinical features and efficacy of dalbavancin in patients with bacteremia or endocarditis from a retrospective registry study of dalbavancin. Methods Dalvance Utilization Registry Investigating Value and Efficacy (DRIVE) was a phase 4 observational, multicenter, retrospective cohort study of the real-world use of dalbavancin in adults across the US. Data collected between 03/25/2017 and 11/27/2018 included patient, disease, and pathogen characteristics, antibiotic use, clinical outcome, and safety. Clinical outcome was assessed by chart review from last dalbavancin dose through 60 days. Success was defined as presumed or documented clinical or microbiological cure with no need for rescue IV antibiotic therapy. Failure was defined as presumed or documented clinical or microbiologic failure, or the need for rescue IV antibiotic therapy, or death. Outcome was indeterminate if there were insufficient data to determine status at 60 days. Results Of 1092 evaluable patients treated with dalbavancin for any indication, 32 had baseline bloodstream pathogen data and Gram-positive bacteremia (Figure). 29 of 32 patients were previously treated with antibiotics (91%) with a median duration of 8.5 days. The 3 patients with endocarditis were among those most heavily pretreated (9, 4, and 4 prior IV antibiotics each). Clinical success was achieved in 30/32 (94%); outcome was indeterminate in 2/32 (6%). Most common dalbavancin regimens were 1500 mg x 1 (50%) or 1500 mg weekly x 2 (13%). Negative blood cultures for baseline pathogen prior to dalbavancin were documented in 53% of patients. There were no adverse events assessed as related to dalbavancin. Conclusion Dalbavancin use in Gram-positive bacteremia appears well tolerated and effective in the real-world setting. Disclosures Pedro Gonzalez, MD, MT, AbbVie (Employee) Urania Rappo, MD, MS, PharmD, Allergan (before its acquisition by AbbVie) (Employee) Jennifer McGregor, RPh, AbbVie (Employee) Lisa DiPompo-Day, n/a, AbbVie (Employee) Matthew W. McCarthy, MD, Allergan (prior to its acquisition by AbbVie) (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Rashid Nadeem ◽  
Ashraf M. Elhoufi ◽  
Lamiaa Salama ◽  
Mayada Mahmoud ◽  
Islam Bon ◽  
...  

Introduction: Bloodstream infections are one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity. Time to positive blood culture may be reflective of the severity of infection. We aim to study the impact of time to positivity (TTP) of blood culture upon clinical outcome. Methods: Data from blood cultures for 17 months duration reviewed. Outcome measures included in-hospital mortality and length of stay in ICU (LOSICU). TTP was determined for each sample. Demographics (age, gender, BMI, and nationality), APACHE-2 score for severity of illness, comorbid conditions, and other confounding factors were recorded. Results: One hundred and one patients with 346 positive blood cultures with mean age of 62 and mean APACHE-2 score of 18.9 + 9.7 (mean +SD) with overall observed mortality of 61%. Median TTP was 20.2 h with quartiles cutoff Q1 = 15.3, Q2 = 20.2, Q3 = 28, and range 8–104 h. Only APACHE-2 scores predict LOSICU. TTP is not a significant predictor for mortality or LOSICU. Discussion: Data on TTP of blood cultures have a complex interaction with clinical outcomes. Conclusion: TTP of blood cultures does not predict mortality or length of stay in ICU.


2005 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beth Martin ◽  
Lars Mathisen

• Background Although controversial, physical restraints are commonly used in adult critical care units in the United States to prevent treatment interference and self-inflicted harm. Use of physical restraints in Norwegian hospitals is very limited. In the United States, an experimental design for research on use of restraints has not seemed feasible. However, international research provides an opportunity to compare and contrast practices.• Objectives To describe the relationship between patients’ characteristics, environment, and use of physical restraints in the United States and Norway.• Methods Observations of patients and chart data were collected from 2 intensive care units (n = 50 patients) in Norway and 3 (n = 50 patients) in the United States. Sedation was measured by using the Sedation-Agitation Scale. The Nine Equivalents of Nursing Manpower Use Score was used to indicate patients’ acuity level.• Results Restraints were in use in 39 of 100 observations in the United States and not at all in Norway (P = .001). Categories of patients were balanced. In the Norwegian sample, the median Nine Equivalents of Nursing Manpower Use Score was higher (37 vs 27 points, P < .001), patients were more sedated (P < .001), and nurse-to-patient ratios were higher (1.05:1 vs 0.65:1, P < .001). Seven incidents of unplanned device removal were reported in the US sample.• Conclusions Critical care units with similar technology and characteristics of patients vary between nations in restraint practices, levels of sedation, and nurse-to-patient ratios. Restraint-free care was, in this sample, safe in terms of treatment interference.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily L Heil ◽  
Jacqueline T Bork ◽  
Lilian M Abbo ◽  
Tamar F Barlam ◽  
Sara E Cosgrove ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Guidance on the recommended durations of antibiotic therapy, the use of oral antibiotic therapy, and the need for repeat blood cultures remain incomplete for gram-negative bloodstream infections. We convened a panel of infectious diseases specialists to develop a consensus definition of uncomplicated gram-negative bloodstream infections to assist clinicians with management decisions. Methods Panelists, who were all blinded to the identity of other members of the panel, used a modified Delphi technique to develop a list of statements describing preferred management approaches for uncomplicated gram-negative bloodstream infections. Panelists provided level of agreement and feedback on consensus statements generated and refined them from the first round of open-ended questions through 3 subsequent rounds. Results Thirteen infectious diseases specialists (7 physicians and 6 pharmacists) from across the United States participated in the consensus process. A definition of uncomplicated gram-negative bloodstream infection was developed. Considerations cited by panelists in determining if a bloodstream infection was uncomplicated included host immune status, response to therapy, organism identified, source of the bacteremia, and source control measures. For patients meeting this definition, panelists largely agreed that a duration of therapy of ~7 days, transitioning to oral antibiotic therapy, and forgoing repeat blood cultures, was reasonable. Conclusions In the absence of professional guidelines for the management of uncomplicated gram-negative bloodstream infections, the consensus statements developed by a panel of infectious diseases specialists can provide guidance to practitioners for a common clinical scenario.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary A. Hooshmand ◽  
Christine Susana Toledo ◽  
Ramin Moghaddas ◽  
Erotokritos Skordilis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document