MORTALITY RATE REDUCTION IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS AFTER APPLICATION OF INTENSIVE CARE UNIT ADMISSION GUIDELINE

CHEST Journal ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 136 (4) ◽  
pp. 14S
Author(s):  
Pongdhep Theerawit
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Intensive Care Unit Admission ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Rate Reduction

Outcomes of Critically Ill Gynecological Cancer Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Unit

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvio A. Ñamendys-Silva ◽  
María O. González-Herrera ◽  
Julia Texcocano-Becerra ◽  
Angel Herrera-Gómez
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Gynecological Cancer ◽  
Apache Ii ◽  
Apache Ii Score

Purpose: To assess the characteristics of critically ill patients with gynecological cancer, and to evaluate their prognosis. Methods: Fifty-two critically ill patients with gynecological cancer admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) were included. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to identify factors associated with hospital mortality. Results: Thirty-five patients (67.3%) had carcinoma of the cervix uteri and 11 (21.2%) had ovarian cancer. The mortality rate in the ICU was 17.3% (9 of 52) and hospital mortality rate were 23%(12 of 52). In the multivariate analysis, independent prognostic factors for hospital mortality were vasopressor use (odds ratio [OR] = 8.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.05-36; P = .03) and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score (OR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.01-2.09; P = .048). Conclusions: The independent prognostic factors for hospital mortality were the need for vasopressors and the APACHE II score.

scholarly journals Factors contributing to delay intensive care unit admission of critically ill patients from the adult emergency Department in Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Teklie ◽  
Hywet Engida ◽  
Birhanu Melaku ◽  
Abdata Workina
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Intensive Care Unit Admission ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Transfer Time ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression ◽  
Icu Admission ◽  
Specialized Hospital

Abstract Background The transfer time for critically ill patients from the emergency department (ED) to the Intensive care unit (ICU) must be minimal; however, some factors prolong the transfer time, which may delay intensive care treatment and adversely affect the patient’s outcome. Purpose To identify factors affecting intensive care unit admission of critically ill patients from the emergency department. Patients and methods A cross-sectional study design was conducted from January 13 to April 12, 2020, at the emergency department of Tikur Anbesa Specialized Hospital. All critically ill patients who need intensive care unit admission during the study period were included in the study. A pretested structured questionnaire was adapted from similar studies. The data were collected by chart review and observation. Then checked data were entered into Epi-data version 4.1 and cleaned data was exported to SPSS Version 25 for analysis. Descriptive statistics, bivariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze the data. Result From the total of 102 critically ill patients who need ICU admission 84.3% of them had prolonged lengths of ED stay. The median length of ED stay was 13.5 h with an IQR of 7–25.5 h. The most common reasons for delayed ICU admission were shortage of ICU beds 56 (65.1%) and delays in radiological examination results 13(15.1%). On multivariate logistic regression p < 0.05 male gender (AOR = 0.175, 95% CI: (0.044, 0.693)) and shortage of ICU bed (AOR = 0.022, 95% CI: (0.002, 0.201)) were found to have a significant association with delayed intensive care unit admission. Conclusion there was a delay in ICU admission of critically ill patients from the ED. Shortage of ICU bed and delay in radiological investigation results were the reasons for the prolonged ED stay.

scholarly journals Insulin therapy for hyperglycemia in critically ill patients

2016 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 250
Author(s):  
Julianti Julianti ◽  
Silvia Triratna ◽  
Aditiawati Aditiawati ◽  
Irfanuddin Irfanuddin
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Blood Glucose ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Insulin Therapy ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Organ Dysfunction ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Therapy Group ◽  
Control Group

Background Hyperglycemia in critically ill patients is associated with higher mortality. Insulin therapy may improve outcomes, not only by preventing deleterious effects of hyperglycemia, but by improving the molecular dynamics in organ dysfunction.Objectives To assess the effects of insulin therapy on critically ill patients in an intensive care unit (ICU) setting and the risk of hypoglycemia.Methods An open-label, clinical trial was conducted in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) of Dr. Moh. Hoesin Hospital, Palembang, from November 2011 to March 2012. Subjects were consecutively assigned to receive either regular insulin at a dose of 0.05 U/kg/h if the blood glucose level reached >200 mg%, or standard therapy (control group). Blood glucose levels were measured hourly until they reached 80-110 mg%. Dose adjustments were made when the blood glucose level reached 145 mg%, by reducing the insulin dose to 0.025 U/kg/h. Outcomes of therapy were measured by Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction (PELOD) score improvement, mortality rate and the occurrence of hypoglycemia.Results Forty subjects were enrolled in this study, with 20 subjects assigned to the insulin therapy group and 20 subjects to the standard therapy group. Two subjects, one from each group, were not included in the final analysis due to their deaths within 24 hours. There was no significant difference in distribution of PELOD scores before intervention between the groups (OR=0.5; 95%CI 0.1 to 1.9, P=0.32). However, after intervention, the PELOD scores was significantly lower in insulin therapy group compared to control group (OR 0.2; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.8, P=0.02). In the insulin group after intervention, fewer subjects had scores >20.5 and more subjects had scores ≤20.5, indicated a lower risk of organ dysfunction. There was also a significantly lower mortality rate in the insulin group compared to the control group (OR 0.2; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.8, P=0.02). None of the subjects suffered hypoglycemia.Conclusion Insulin is beneficial in improving organ dysfunction and decreasing mortality for critically ill patients.

scholarly journals Intensive care unit admission protocol controlled by intensivists can reduce transfer delays from the emergency department in critically ill patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 84-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Eun Kim ◽  
Seul Lee ◽  
Jinwoo Jeong ◽  
Dong Hyun Lee ◽  
Jin-Heon Jeong
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Intensive Care Unit Admission ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Unit Length ◽  
Intensive Care Unit Length ◽  
Before And After

Background: Delayed transfer of patients from the emergency department to the intensive care unit is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Critically ill patients with delayed admission to the intensive care unit had higher in-hospital mortality and increased hospital length of stay. Objectives: We investigated the effects of an intensive care unit admission protocol controlled by intensivists on the emergency department length of stay among critically ill patients. Methods: We designed the intensive care unit admission protocol to reduce the emergency department length of stay in critically ill patients. Full-time intensivists determined intensive care unit admission priorities based on the severity of illness. Data were gathered from patients who were admitted from the emergency department to the intensive care unit between 1 April 2016 and 30 November 2016. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data and compared the emergency department length of stay between patients admitted from the emergency department to the intensive care unit before and after intervention. Results: We included 292 patients, 120 and 172 were admitted before and after application of the intensive care unit admission protocol, respectively. The demographic characteristics did not differ significantly between the groups. After intervention, the overall emergency department length of stay decreased significantly from 1045.5 (425.3–1665.3) min to 392.0 (279.3–686.8) min (p < 0.001). Intensive care unit length of stay also significantly decreased from 6.0 (4.0–11.8) days to 5.0 (3.0–10.0) days (p = 0.015). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that introduction of the intensive care unit admission protocol controlled by intensivists successfully decreased the emergency department length of stay and intensive care unit length of stay among critically ill patients at our institution.

scholarly journals Invasive Blood Pressure Measurement and In-hospital Mortality in Critically Ill Patients With Hypertension

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Zhou ◽  
Liang-Ying Lin ◽  
Xiao-Ai Liu ◽  
Ye-Sheng Ling ◽  
Yuan-Yuan Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Invasive Blood Pressure

Background: Invasive blood pressure (IBP) measurement is common in the intensive care unit, although its association with in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with hypertension is poorly understood.Methods and Results: A total of 11,732 critically ill patients with hypertension from the eICU-Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD) were enrolled. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether they received IBP. The primary outcome in this study was in-hospital mortality. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighing (IPTW) models were used to balance the confounding covariates. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between IBP measurement and hospital mortality. The IBP group had a higher in-hospital mortality rate than the no IBP group in the primary cohort [238 (8.7%) vs. 581 (6.5%), p &lt; 0.001]. In the PSM cohort, the IBP group had a lower in-hospital mortality rate than the no IBP group [187 (8.0%) vs. 241 (10.3%), p = 0.006]. IBP measurement was associated with lower in-hospital mortality in the PSM cohort (odds ratio, 0.73, 95% confidence interval, 0.59–0.92) and in the IPTW cohort (odds ratio, 0.81, 95% confidence interval, 0.67–0.99). Sensitivity analyses showed similar results in the subgroups with high body mass index and no sepsis.Conclusions: In conclusion, IBP measurement was associated with lower in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with hypertension, highlighting the importance of IBP measurement in the intensive care unit.

scholarly journals Anemia and Blood Transfusions in Critically Ill Patients

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Kamran Athar ◽  
Nitin Puri ◽  
David R. Gerber
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Blood Cell ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Blood Transfusions ◽  
The Past ◽  
Growing Body ◽  
The Impact

Anemia is common in critically ill patients. As a consequence packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusions are frequent in the critically ill. Over the past two decades a growing body of literature has emerged, linking PRBC transfusion to infections, immunosuppression, organ dysfunction, and a higher mortality rate. However, despite growing evidence that risk of PRBC transfusion outweighs its benefit, significant numbers of critically ill patients still receive PRBC transfusion during their intensive care unit (ICU) stay. In this paper, we summarize the current literature concerning the impact of anemia on outcomes in critically ill patients and the potential complications of PRBC transfusions.

Types and outcomes of cytopenia in critically ill patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 627-637
Author(s):  
Zahra Bagheri ◽  
Zohreh Labbani-Motlagh ◽  
Mahtabalsadat Mirjalili ◽  
Iman Karimzadeh ◽  
Hossein Khalili
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Intensive Care Unit Stay ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Common Type ◽  
Common Complication ◽  
Different Types

Cytopenia is common complication in critically ill patients. Aim: Incidence and pattern of different types of cytopenia as well as its impact on mortality and length of stay in critically ill patients were evaluated. Methods: Critically ill patients with any kind of cytopenia for more than 2 days were evaluated. Results: Anemia was the most common type of cytopenia in the patients (99.14%), followed by lymphocytopenia (32.17%), thrombocytopenia (27.82%), and leukopenia (19.13%). Mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with anemia (p < 0.0001), thrombocytopenia (p < 0.0001), leukopenia (p < 0.0001), neutropenia (p = 0.004), lymphopenia (p = 0.002) and pancytopenia (p < 0.0001). Higher duration of anemia, lymphopenia and thrombocytopenia were associated with longer intensive care unit stay (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: Among all assessed variables, incidence of thrombocytopenia could independently predict the mortality.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document