scholarly journals O PROBLEMA DA INFLAÇÃO DE DIREITOS: CAUSAS E RISCOS

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 277-305
Author(s):  
André Gualtieri

RESUMOEste artigo aborda a inflação de direitos como resultado do surgimento do conceito de autonomia individual na modernidade. Por meio de pesquisa bibliográfica e utilizando-se do método indutivo, o artigo analisa o processo inflacionário pelo qual o direito moderno vem passando. São identificados dois sentidos do conceito de inflação de direitos e se propõe que, no Brasil, ele seja compreendido como um processo de incessante proliferação de direitos e de judicialização de vidas. O princípio da proporcionalidade exerce um papel importante nesse processo. O trabalho aponta as razões pelas quais a inflação de direitos seria um problema e os riscos que ela traz para o Direito enquanto sistema, para os direitos fundamentais e para o princípio da dignidade da pessoa humana.PALAVRAS-CHAVE: inflação de direitos; autonomia individual; sistema; direitos fundamentais; dignidade da pessoa humana.ABSTRACT This article addresses the inflation of rights as a result of the emergence of the concept of individual autonomy in modern times. Through bibliographic research and using the inductive method, the article analyzes the inflationary process that modern law has been going through. Two meanings of the concept of inflation of rights are identified and it is proposed that, in Brazil, it be understood as a process of incessant proliferation of rights and judicialization of lives. The principle of proportionality plays an important role in this process. The work points out the reasons why inflation of rights would be a problem and the risks it brings to law as a system, to fundamental rights and to the principle of human dignity.KEYWORDS: rights inflation; individual autonomy; system; fundamental rights; dignity of human person.    

Author(s):  
Ana Cristina Bacega De Bastiani ◽  
Mayara Pellenz

CIDADANIA TRANSNACIONAL:A INTEGRAÇÃO JURÍDICA NA SOCIEDADE GLOBALIZADA TRANSNATIONAL CITIZENSHIP:LEGAL INTEGRATION IN THE GLOBALIZED SOCIETY Ana Cristina Bacega De Bastiani*Mayara Pellenz** RESUMO: A presente pesquisa objetiva estudar um novo modelo de Cidadania, diferente do tradicional conceito utilizado para designar o vínculo entre Estado e Cidadão. A Cidadania, nos moldes como se encontra hoje, é um conceito que precisa ser revisitado, considerando caráter transnacional que é característico dos novos tempos. Atualmente, o significado da palavra desvela novas características, e sofre transformações no tempo e no espaço adquirindo novos contornos à luz dos direitos fundamentais e efetivando-se em espaços onde o processo democrático é estabelecido. Por meio de pesquisa bibliográfica e do método dedutivo, chama-se atenção ao tema, para compreender a configuração atual da Cidadania e de que forma ela precisa ser redimensionada, para alcançar os cidadãos inseridos em uma sociedade de características transnacionais, de forma a viabilizar a integração jurídica e social. É preciso esclarecimentos neste sentido, pois, além do vínculo com o Estado, a categoria é um importante mecanismo de inclusão de cidadãos, que precisa manter sua força para de fomentar vínculos de pertença, de responsabilidade, de reconhecimento e de integração. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Cidadania transnacional. Transnacionalidade. Estado. Globalização. Democracia. ABSTRACT: This research aims to study a new model of Citizenship, different from the traditional concept used do designate the bond between State and Citizen. The citizenship, in models such as the ones found nowadays, is a concept that needs to be reevaluated, considering the transnational nature that is peculiar from modern times. Currently, the meaning of the word reveals new characteristics and suffers transformations in space and time acquiring new shapes in light of the fundamental rights and becoming effective in spaces where the democratic process is established. Through bibliographic research and inductive method, we draw the attention to such subject, to comprehend the current setup of the Citizenship and to comprehend in what way it needs to be remodeled, in order to reach the citizens included in a society with transnational characteristics, in favor of enabling the legal and social integration. It needs clarification on this regard because, more than a bond to the State, it is also an important mechanism of citizen inclusion, which needs to maintain its power to promote belonging, accountability, recognition, and integration bonds. KEYWORDS: Transnational Citizenship. Transnationality. State. Globalization. Democracy. * Mestranda do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito da Faculdade Meridional, especialista em Direito Processual Civil pela Faculdade Anhanguera de Passo Fundo e advogada.** Mestranda do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito da Faculdade Meridional, especialista em Direito Penal e Direito Processual Penal pela Faculdade Meridional e advogada.


2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-148
Author(s):  
Ana Paula Baptista Marques ◽  

This scientific article analyzes fundamental rights and guarantees that regulate social, political and legal aspects of Brazilian citizens lives. In particular, this paper explores constitutional principles that guarantee workplace diversity – specifically, a right stemming from the dignity of the human person. In this sense, this study initially questions whether stopping and frisking employees is an abuse of the employer's directive power and, therefore, violates an employee’s contract. In order to better illustrate this context, this paper also analyzes the successive and significant technological advances of the twenty first century, which, with the advent of machines, have been used to monitor employees, in order to prevent them from being stopped and frisked – a practice which can be significantly embarrassing for the employee. Finally, this research draws a parallel between the current progress of automation in the workplace and the arrival of artificial intelligence in the labor market as a strong ally for progress within business spaces. In order to reach our conclusions, this study utilized the inductive method with the use of comprehensive scientific observations.


Author(s):  
Varinder Singh ◽  
Shikha Dhiman

The framers of Indian Constitution were very much cognizant about the significance of human nobility and worthiness and hence they incorporated the “right to life and personal liberty” in the Constitution of India. Right to life is considered as one of the primordial fundamental rights. There is no doubt that Indian Judiciary has lived up to the expectations of the Constitution framers, both in interpreting and implementing Article 21 initially, but there are still a few complications left as to the viability of Article 21 in modern times. Looking at the wider arena of right to life, it can be articulated that broader connotation of “right to life” aims at achieving the norms of “privacy” as well.


Author(s):  
Celso Maran de Oliveira

Access to potable water is absolutely essential to the maintenance of life, as well as to provide regular exercise of other human rights. The lack of access to water in sufficient quantity or access to non-potable water may cause serious and irreparable damage to people. This paper investigates the evolution of international and national recognition of this fundamental human right, whether implicit or explicit. This was accomplished by the study of international human rights treaties, bibliographic information on water resources and their corresponding legal systems, national and international. The results suggest that sustainable access to drinking water is a fundamental human right in the context of international relations and the State. Further, even without explicitly stating this right in the Constitution of 1988, Brazil has incorporated the main international provisions on the subject, but this right must be acknowledged according to the principles of non-typical fundamental rights and the dignity of the human person. This right should be universally guaranteed by the Government in sufficient quantity and quality, regardless of the economic resources of individuals.


2020 ◽  
pp. 86-99
Author(s):  
María Del Rosario Huerta Lara

RESUMEN: En México, el ejercicio de los derechos fundamentales de las personas con discapacidad tiene como primera traba, la vigencia de un régimen jurídico gobernado por la exclusión, la marginalidad y la vulnerabilidad, en menoscabo de la autonomía de las personas que padecen algún tipo de discapacidad física o mental.Contra sensu, la Convención de Naciones Unidas sobre los Derechos de las Personas con Discapacidad formula una amplia tutela basada en el reconocimiento irreductible de la persona humana. Cuando se trata de discapacidades del orden mental, la Convención ha propuesto un modelo social cuyo contenido tuitivo no se limita al reconocimiento de la personalidad jurídica sino que se extiende a la capacidad jurídica y procesal, contrapuesta al modelo médico acogidos en la mayoría de las legislaciones del orden jurídico nacional.Este trabajo plantea una redimensión de la problemática considerando a las personas con discapacidad como sujetos de derechos plenos, basados en el principio de la equidad jurídica y sustantiva, por lo que se propone la armonización del Derecho Civil mexicano a los principios de la Convención sobre los Derechos de las Personas con Discapacidad, lo que significaría una amplia reforma en el ámbito estatal.Palabras clave: Juicio, personalidad y capacidad jurídica de personas con discapacidad.ABSTRACT: In México, the exercise of the fundamental rights of disabled people has a as a first obstacle, the validity of a juridical regime ruled by exclusion, marginalization and vulnerability which associated with the lessening of the autonomy of people with some type of physical or mental disability.The Convention of the United Nations, upon the Rights of disabled people, formulates contra sensu a broad responsibility based upon the irreductible recognition of the human person. Regarding mental disabling, the Convention has proposed a social model whose responsibility is not limited to the recognition of the juridical personality, but extends to the juridical and procesal capacity oposite to the medical model aproved in most federal and state legislations.This essay poses a redimentioning of the issue considering disabled people as individuals with full rights based on the principal of juridical and sustantive equity. Considering all the afore mentioned, this essay proposes the armonization of the mexican civil rights with the principles of the Convention on the rights of disabled people, which means a brosd reform within the state.Keywords: Trial, personality and juridical capacity of disabled people.


Author(s):  
Jef Ausloos

This book critically investigates the role of data subject rights in countering information and power asymmetries online. It aims at dissecting ‘data subject empowerment’ in the information society through the lens of the right to erasure (‘right to be forgotten’) in Article 17 of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). In doing so, it provides an extensive analysis of the interaction between the GDPR and the fundamental right to data protection in Article 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (Charter), how data subject rights affect fair balancing of fundamental rights, and what the practical challenges are to effective data subject rights. The book starts with exploring the data-driven asymmetries that characterize individuals’ relationship with tech giants. These commercial entities increasingly anticipate and govern how people interact with each other and the world around them, affecting core values such as individual autonomy, dignity, and freedom. The book explores how data protection law, and data subject rights in particular, enable resisting, breaking down or at the very least critically engaging with these asymmetric relationships. It concludes that despite substantial legal and practical hurdles, the GDPR’s right to erasure does play a meaningful role in furthering the fundamental right to data protection (Art 8 Charter) in the face of power asymmetries online.


2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (4 (1)) ◽  
pp. 55-73
Author(s):  
Joanna Ryszka

The principle of proportionality in the EU legal order applies, among others, to actions taken by Member States in the situation where they are willing to use, permitted by the EU law, derogation from its provisions, in particular – in the area of internal market freedoms. Derogation from those freedoms will not be justified if it is not absolutely necessary. National regulations must therefore be proportionate to the objective that these restrictions are to protect. With respect to the free movement of persons, as an example of these goals, the protection of fundamental rights could be mentioned. It is vitally important for the realization of an internal market due to the existence of interesting interactions occurring between them and specific ways of applying the principle of proportionality when they collide with each other.


Law and World ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 51-59

The paper addresses the basic rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution of Georgia, in particular, issues related to personal data. The development of information technology has had a significant impact on the dangers of illegal processing of personal data. The European Court of Human Rights considers the inviolability of private life as a precondition for human autonomy, independent development and protection of human dignity. According to the norms of international law, the right to respect for private life is recognized as one of the most important and fundamental rights, the protection of which is indicated by the legislation of Georgia. The aim of the paper is to analyze the legislation and practice of police law in the field of protection of the right to privacy and to offer relevant recommendations, taking into account the standards set by European and national courts. Human rights legislation must ensure the protection of all human beings against the abuse of state power. Interference with rights must be based on the principle of proportionality. The use of policing should not pose an excessive threat of fundamental human rights violations. Interference with a particular right must be done under principle of proportionality to achieve a certain public good. In clarifying the issue of alleged violation of the right, special attention should be paid to the severity and probability of the expected threat to legal good. The Constitution of Georgia, EU and Council of Europe data protection standards, national legislation, as well as the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and the National Constitutional Court are analyzed around the topic. In addition, the reports of the State Inspector, the Public Defender and the relevant scientific literature are used to study the above issues.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela Staliano ◽  
Marcos Mondardo

The volume “Violence against women: interdisciplinary dialogues” brings together academic texts, by scholars who are interested in the theme, and professionals to publicize the work they develop at Casa da Mulher Brasileira, located in the capital of the state of Mato Grosso do Sul. violence against women is a social phenomenon that covers all cultures and social classes, considered a matter of human rights and public health. In Brazil, the struggle for women's rights began with the struggles of feminist movements, which resulted in the creation of the first Specialized Police Station for Assistance to Women. Years later Law No. 11,340 (Maria da Penha Law) was created, assuring all Brazilian women to enjoy their fundamental rights to the human person and attributing to the public authorities the guarantee of these rights. Violence in the border region needs to be seen as a complex phenomenon crossed by legislation, historical, geographical, political and cultural aspects. Dealing specifically with violence against women, Latin American women who live in a Brazilian border region, in addition to structural machismo, experience the socioeconomic vulnerability marked by drug trafficking, facilitated acquisition of firearms and the late legislative recognition of the crime of femicide, which contribute to the perpetuation of the practice of intentional lethal crimes against these women.


2021 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-233
Author(s):  
Alexandra Troitskaya

Abstract This paper addresses the boundaries on restrictions of human rights imposed by the proportionality principle, examines the elements of the structure of this principle, and attempts to present the meaning of its elements consistently in terms of the potential for the protection of fundamental rights that are subject to restrictions. The main criticisms of some proportionality tests are considered, as well as ways to minimize the risks associated with the use of proportionality. These theoretical considerations are placed in the context of the jurisprudence of the Russian Constitutional Court, to demonstrate that the Court, instead of consistently applying proportionality tests, often draws generalized conclusions regarding the proportionality (or disproportionality) of restrictions and therefore tends to heighten some of the risks of applying the principle. One can observe some positive changes in the application of the principle, and in further requests for this. Conclusions are formulated concerning the improvement of the Court’s activities in terms of a more consistent and structured implementation of the principle of proportionality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document