Hyperuricemia as risk factor for coronary heart disease incidence and mortality in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Federica Braga ◽  
Sara Pasqualetti ◽  
Simona Ferraro ◽  
Mauro Panteghini
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
General Population ◽  
Disease Incidence ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Adult Women ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Incidence And Mortality ◽  
Meta Analyses

AbstractPrevious meta-analyses reported no significant or weak association between hyperuricemia (HU) and coronary heart disease (CHD). We updated the literature search, systematically reviewing retrieved papers. The peer-reviewed literature published from 1965 to December 2014 was searched using Medline and Embase. We included prospective cohort studies involving adults (sample size ≥100) with no cardiovascular disease (CVD) and a follow-up of at least 1 year. Studies were excluded if they considered as outcome the CVD incidence/mortality without separately reporting data on CHD, did not adjusted for major confounders and if the 95% confidence interval (CI) for risk ratio (RR) was not available. Relative risk or hazard ratio estimates, with the corresponding CIs, were obtained. For CHD incidence 12 populations were included (457,915 subjects [53.7% males]). For CHD mortality seven populations were included (237,433 subjects [66.3% males]). The overall combined RR were 1.206 (CI 1.066–1.364, p=0.003) for CHD incidence and 1.209 (CI 1.003–1.457, p=0.047) for CHD mortality, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed a marginal (incidence) and not significant (mortality) association between HU and CHD in men, but an increased risk for CHD incidence and mortality in hyperuricemic women (RR 1.446, CI 1.323–1.581, p<0.0001, and RR 1.830, CI 1.066–3.139, p=0.028, respectively). The risk markedly increases for urate concentrations >7.0 mg/dL. HU appears to increase the risk of CHD events in the general population, mainly in adult women. This finding requires, however, further investigation.

scholarly journals Association between prediabetes and risk of all cause mortality and cardiovascular disease: updated meta-analysis

BMJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. m2297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyan Cai ◽  
Yunlong Zhang ◽  
Meijun Li ◽  
Jason HY Wu ◽  
Linlin Mai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
General Population ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Absolute Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Objective To evaluate the associations between prediabetes and the risk of all cause mortality and incident cardiovascular disease in the general population and in patients with a history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Design Updated meta-analysis. Data sources Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar) up to 25 April 2020. Review methods Prospective cohort studies or post hoc analysis of clinical trials were included for analysis if they reported adjusted relative risks, odds ratios, or hazard ratios of all cause mortality or cardiovascular disease for prediabetes compared with normoglycaemia. Data were extracted independently by two investigators. Random effects models were used to calculate the relative risks and 95% confidence intervals. The primary outcomes were all cause mortality and composite cardiovascular disease. The secondary outcomes were the risk of coronary heart disease and stroke. Results A total of 129 studies were included, involving 10 069 955 individuals for analysis. In the general population, prediabetes was associated with an increased risk of all cause mortality (relative risk 1.13, 95% confidence interval 1.10 to 1.17), composite cardiovascular disease (1.15, 1.11 to 1.18), coronary heart disease (1.16, 1.11 to 1.21), and stroke (1.14, 1.08 to 1.20) in a median follow-up time of 9.8 years. Compared with normoglycaemia, the absolute risk difference in prediabetes for all cause mortality, composite cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease, and stroke was 7.36 (95% confidence interval 9.59 to 12.51), 8.75 (6.41 to 10.49), 6.59 (4.53 to 8.65), and 3.68 (2.10 to 5.26) per 10 000 person years, respectively. Impaired glucose tolerance carried a higher risk of all cause mortality, coronary heart disease, and stroke than impaired fasting glucose. In patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, prediabetes was associated with an increased risk of all cause mortality (relative risk 1.36, 95% confidence interval 1.21 to 1.54), composite cardiovascular disease (1.37, 1.23 to 1.53), and coronary heart disease (1.15, 1.02 to 1.29) in a median follow-up time of 3.2 years, but no difference was seen for the risk of stroke (1.05, 0.81 to 1.36). Compared with normoglycaemia, in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, the absolute risk difference in prediabetes for all cause mortality, composite cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease, and stroke was 66.19 (95% confidence interval 38.60 to 99.25), 189.77 (117.97 to 271.84), 40.62 (5.42 to 78.53), and 8.54 (32.43 to 61.45) per 10 000 person years, respectively. No significant heterogeneity was found for the risk of all outcomes seen for the different definitions of prediabetes in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (all P>0.10). Conclusions Results indicated that prediabetes was associated with an increased risk of all cause mortality and cardiovascular disease in the general population and in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Screening and appropriate management of prediabetes might contribute to primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

scholarly journals Joint association between education and polygenic risk score for incident coronary heart disease events: a longitudinal population-based study of 26 203 men and women

2021 ◽  
pp. jech-2020-214358
Author(s):  
Pekka Martikainen ◽  
Kaarina Korhonen ◽  
Aline Jelenkovic ◽  
Hannu Lahtinen ◽  
Aki Havulinna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Polygenic Risk Score ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Region Of Residence

BackgroundGenetic vulnerability to coronary heart disease (CHD) is well established, but little is known whether these effects are mediated or modified by equally well-established social determinants of CHD. We estimate the joint associations of the polygenetic risk score (PRS) for CHD and education on CHD events.MethodsThe data are from the 1992, 1997, 2002, 2007 and 2012 surveys of the population-based FINRISK Study including measures of social, behavioural and metabolic factors and genome-wide genotypes (N=26 203). Follow-up of fatal and non-fatal incident CHD events (N=2063) was based on nationwide registers.ResultsAllowing for age, sex, study year, region of residence, study batch and principal components, those in the highest quartile of PRS for CHD had strongly increased risk of CHD events compared with the lowest quartile (HR=2.26; 95% CI: 1.97 to 2.59); associations were also observed for low education (HR=1.58; 95% CI: 1.32 to 1.89). These effects were largely independent of each other. Adjustment for baseline smoking, alcohol use, body mass index, igh-density lipoprotein (HDL) and total cholesterol, blood pressure and diabetes attenuated the PRS associations by 10% and the education associations by 50%. We do not find strong evidence of interactions between PRS and education.ConclusionsPRS and education predict CHD events, and these associations are independent of each other. Both can improve CHD prediction beyond behavioural risks. The results imply that observational studies that do not have information on genetic risk factors for CHD do not provide confounded estimates for the association between education and CHD.

Abstract P127: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Risk for Coronary Heart Disease: A Meta-analytic Review

Circulation ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 127 (suppl_12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald Edmondson ◽  
Ian M Kronish ◽  
Jonathan A Shaffer ◽  
Louise Falzon ◽  
Matthew M Burg
Keyword(s):  
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ◽  
Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Posttraumatic Stress ◽  
Stress Disorder ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Forest Plot ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Analytic Review

Context: Recent evidence suggests that posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) may be associated with increased risk for coronary heart disease (CHD). Objective: To determine the association of PTSD to incident CHD using systematic review and meta-analysis. Data Sources: Articles were identified by searching Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, Cochrane Library, PILOTS database, and through manual search of reference lists. Study Selection: Prospective cohort studies that assessed PTSD in participants free of CHD and assessed subsequent CHD or cardiac-specific mortality. Data Extraction: We extracted estimates of the association of PTSD to incident CHD, as well as study characteristics. Odds ratios were converted to hazard ratios (HR), and a random-effects model was used to pool results. Data Synthesis: Five studies met our inclusion criteria (N= 401,712); 4 of these included depression as a covariate. The pooled HR for the magnitude of the relationship between PTSD and CHD was 1.53 (95% CI, 1.27-1.84) before adjustment for depression. The pooled HR estimate for the 4 depression-adjusted estimates (N= 362,388) was 1.22 (95% CI, 1.05-1.42). Conclusion: PTSD is independently associated with increased risk for incident CHD, even after adjusting for depression and other covariates. Figure 1. Forest plot of association of PTSD to incident MI or cardiac mortality Note: The area of each square is proportional to the study’s weight in the meta-analysis, and each line represents the confidence interval around the estimate. The diamond represents the aggregate estimate, and its lateral points indicate confidence intervals for this estimate.

Abstract P234: Diabetes as Risk Factor for Coronary Heart Disease in Women Compared with Men

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 129 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanne A Peters ◽  
Rachel R Huxley ◽  
Mark Woodward
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Sex Difference ◽  
Prolonged Exposure ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Excess Risk ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Increased Risk

Introduction: A previous pooled analysis suggested that women with diabetes are at substantially increased risk of fatal coronary heart disease (CHD) compared with affected men. Additional findings from larger and more contemporary studies have since published on the sex-specific associations between diabetes and incident CHD. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis so as to provide the most reliable evidence of any sex difference in the effect of diabetes on subsequent risk of CHD. Methods: PubMed MEDLINE was systematically searched for prospective population-based cohort studies published between on January 1, 1966 and February 13, 2013. Eligible studies had to have reported sex-specific estimates of the relative risk (RR) for incident CHD associated with diabetes, and its associated variability. Random effects meta-analyses with inverse variance weighting were used to obtain sex-specific RRs and their ratio (RRR). Results: Data from 64 cohorts including 858,507 individuals and 28,203 incident CHD events were included. The RR for incident CHD associated with diabetes compared with no diabetes was 2.83 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.37, 3.38) in women and 2.11 (95% CI: 1.79, 2.50) in men. The multiple-adjusted RRR for incident CHD was 44% greater in women with diabetes than it was in men with diabetes (95% CI: 27; 63) with no significant heterogeneity between studies (I2=20%). Conclusions: Women with diabetes have more than a 40% greater risk of incident CHD compared with men with diabetes. Sex disparities in pharmacotherapy are unlikely to explain the excess risk in women. Instead, a greater deterioration in cardiovascular risk profile combined with more prolonged exposure to adverse levels of cardiovascular risk factors among pre-diabetic women compared with their male equivalents may be responsible for the excess risk of diabetes-related CHD in women. Future studies are warranted elucidate the mechanisms responsible for the substantial sex-difference in diabetes-related risk of CHD.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document