Can peripartum cardiomyopathy be caused by chemotherapy and radiation of breast cancer?

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (1-2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Kyvernitakis ◽  
Ioannis Kyvernitakis ◽  
Alexander Yang ◽  
Ute-Susann Albert ◽  
Stephan Schmidt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Treatment ◽  
Left Breast ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Peripartum Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Surgical Interventions ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Cardiac Intensive Care

AbstractTo report on a pregnant woman with peripartum cardiomyopathy 7 years after combination chemotherapy with doxorubicine and radiation of cancer of the left breast.A 35-year old primigravida who was treated 7 years earlier with cancer of the left breast (ympT1c, ypN0, cM0), according to a neoadjuvant study protocol (GeparTrio), was transferred to our unit due to HELLP syndome at 35+5 weeks. Symptoms of cardiopulmonary decompensation occurred shortly after cesarean delivery of a healthy newborn. The patient was admitted to cardiac intensive care and treated with oxygen, diuretics and ACE inhibitors. Maternal left ventricular ejection fraction recovered within a few weeks without any surgical interventions and remained stable within 1 year of follow-up.The association between radical primary treatment of the left breast and life-threatening cardiac disease could possibly be provoked by pregnancy.

scholarly journals Long-term Outcomes in Peripartum Cardiomyopathy

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madeline K Mahowald ◽  
Nivedita Basu ◽  
Latha Subramaniam ◽  
Ryan Scott ◽  
Melinda B. Davis
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Subsequent Pregnancy ◽  
Peripartum Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Ventricular Assist ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Background: Prior studies of Peripartum Cardiomyopathy (PPCM) are limited by short-term follow-up. Contemporary long-term outcomes and change in myocardial function over time are poorly characterized. Methods and Results: This retrospective cohort study included women with PPCM at the University of Michigan (2000-2011), with follow-up on March 31, 2017. Subsequent pregnancies were excluded. Recovery was sustained left ventricular Ejection Fraction (EF) ≥55%. Major Adverse Events (MAE) included death, cardiac transplantation, left ventricular assist device, or inotrope-dependence. A total of 59 women were included (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 29.5 [6.8]; 28.8% Black), with a mean follow-up of 6.3 years. Recovery occurred in 22 women (37%); of these, 8 women (36%) had delayed recovery (>12 months). All cause mortality was 20% (12/59) with median survival 4.2 years; of these, 9 women (75%) died after the first year (range 2 - 10 years). MAE occurred in 19 women (32%); of these, 11 women (42%) had MAE >12 months from time of diagnosis (range 2-20 years). Deterioration in EF by >10% from the time of diagnosis occurred in 16 women (27%). This group had worse long-term outcomes, including lower final EF (mean 25 vs 42%, p=0.010), less recovery (12 vs 46%, p=0.016), and higher rates of death (38 vs 14%, p=0.046) and MAE (56 vs 23%, p=0.016). Conclusion: Women with PPCM have long-term risks of mortality, MAE, and subsequent decline in EF, even in the absence of a subsequent pregnancy. Deterioration in EF is associated with adverse events; thus, long-term management is important.

Abstract 5916: Delayed Mortality in Peripartum Cardiomyopathy Indicates Need for Long-Term Follow-Up

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kranti Gollapudi ◽  
Olaf Forster ◽  
Elena Libhaber ◽  
Kemi Tibazarwa ◽  
Winnie Tshani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Subsequent Pregnancy ◽  
Peripartum Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
The Poor ◽  
Delayed Mortality

Introduction: Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is a rare form of cardiomyopathy occurring in women between one month antepartum and five months postpartum. It has been shown to carry a substantial risk of mortality within the first six months after diagnosis but few studies have outlined prospective long-term morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to assess long-term clinical outcome and mortality over a two-year period. Methods: Eighty consecutive women with PPCM were enrolled at diagnosis at a single center in a prospective study over a period of two years. Patients were started on standard heart failure therapy and detailed assessments, including echocardiography, were made at six-month intervals for twenty four months in surviving cases. Results: At baseline, the mean age of this cohort was 29.7 ± 6.4 years and 30 of 80 (38%) were in their first pregnancy. Overall, 71 (89%) patients presented in NYHA functional class III–IV at baseline and mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 29.7% ± 8.7%. During the two-year study period, 4 patients were lost to follow-up, 9 moved to remote areas, and 8 had a subsequent pregnancy, predisposing them to additional myocardial risk. In the remaining cases, mean LVEF was 45.1 ± 11.3, 46.3 ± 13.0 and 50.4 ± 13.5 at six, twelve, and twenty four months, respectively. Within two years, 22 women had died (28%), confirming the poor prognostic implications of PPCM. However, the majority of fatal events occurred between six and twenty four months (15 of 22; 68%). At six months, 7 of 80 (9%) patients had died. During extended follow-up, a further 15 of 69 (22%) died despite apparent recovery of left ventricular function. Conclusion: First, our findings emphasize the poor prognosis of PPCM. Furthermore, the fatality rate was higher than expected over a two-year period. The delayed mortality beyond six months observed in our study suggests the need for long-term clinical follow-up in women with PPCM.

scholarly journals Profile of gestational dyspnoea with focus on peripartum cardiomyopathy

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meenu M. Tergestina ◽  
Legha R.
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Peripartum Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Peripartum Period ◽  
Major Adverse Events

Background: Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is even today an incompletely understood and rare disease affecting pregnant women. There have been few studies from south India, especially Kerala on PPCM.Methods: Women who were referred from Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology from May 2010 to April 2016 for evaluation of dyspnoea during pregnancy or within 5 months of delivery were included in the study. They were screened and women with history suggestive of heart failure during peripartum period were evaluated in detail and followed up.Results: 8760 pregnant and peripartum women presented with dyspnoea out of which 20 patients were diagnosed with PPCM. The incidence of PPCM was 1 per 2190 pregnancies. The mean left ventricular end-diastolic dimension was 58±9 mm, the mean end-systolic dimension 45±6 mm and mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LV EF) 31.45±3.73%  at diagnosis. Major adverse events (MAE) occurred in 4 patients. Low baseline ejection fraction (LV EF < 30%) significantly correlated with greater incidence of adverse events.Conclusions: The majority of pregnancy related dyspnoea is benign. Echocardiography can reliably diagnose potentially life threatening conditions and should be performed early. Echocardiography aids in both diagnosis and prognostication in PPCM. Low ejection fraction at baseline (LVEF < 30%) significantly correlates with greater incidence of major adverse events in patients with PPCM.

Peak Oxygen Consumption and Resting Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Changes After Cardiomyoplasty at 6-Month Follow-up

Circulation ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 92 (9) ◽  
pp. 216-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edimar Alcides Bocchi ◽  
Guilherme Veiga Guimarães ◽  
Luiz Felipe P. Moreira ◽  
Fernando Bacal ◽  
Alvaro Vilela de Moraes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oxygen Consumption ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Peak Oxygen Consumption ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

scholarly journals Biomarkers-based personalized follow-up in chronic heart failure improves patient’s outcomes and reduces care associate cost

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Leon-Justel ◽  
Jose I. Morgado Garcia-Polavieja ◽  
Ana Isabel Alvarez-Rios ◽  
Francisco Jose Caro Fernandez ◽  
Pedro Agustin Pajaro Merino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Heart failure (HF) is a major and growing medical and economic problem, with high prevalence and incidence rates worldwide. Cardiac Biomarker is emerging as a novel tool for improving management of patients with HF with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods This is a before and after interventional study, that assesses the impact of a personalized follow-up procedure for HF on patient’s outcomes and care associated cost, based on a clinical model of risk stratification and personalized management according to that risk. A total of 192 patients were enrolled and studied before the intervention and again after the intervention. The primary objective was the rate of readmissions, due to a HF. Secondary outcome compared the rate of ED visits and quality of life improvement assessed by the number of patients who had reduced NYHA score. A cost-analysis was also performed on these data. Results Admission rates significantly decreased by 19.8% after the intervention (from 30.2 to 10.4), the total hospital admissions were reduced by 32 (from 78 to 46) and the total length of stay was reduced by 7 days (from 15 to 9 days). The rate of ED visits was reduced by 44% (from 64 to 20). Thirty-one percent of patients had an improved functional class score after the intervention, whereas only 7.8% got worse. The overall cost saving associated with the intervention was € 72,769 per patient (from € 201,189 to € 128,420) and €139,717.65 for the whole group over 1 year. Conclusions A personalized follow-up of HF patients led to important outcome benefits and resulted in cost savings, mainly due to the reduction of patient hospitalization readmissions and a significant reduction of care-associated costs, suggesting that greater attention should be given to this high-risk cohort to minimize the risk of hospitalization readmissions.

scholarly journals MIDA mortality risk score in patients undergoing percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral repair

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Kavsur ◽  
C Iliadis ◽  
C Metze ◽  
M Spieker ◽  
V Tiyerili ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Mitral Valve Repair ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
Patient Selection ◽  
Mortality Risk ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Valve Repair ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Abstract Background Recent studies indicate that careful patient selection is key for the percutaneous edge-to-edge repair via MitraClip procedure. The MIDA Score represents a useful tool for patient selection and is validated in patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR). Aim We here assessed the potential benefit of the MIDA Score for patients with functional or degenerative MR undergoing edge-to-edge mitral valve repair via the MitraClip procedure. Methods In the present study, we retrospectively included 520 patients from three Heart Centers undergoing MitraClip implantation for MR. All parameters of the MIDA Score were available in these patients, consisting of the 7 variables age, symptoms, atrial fibrillation, left atrial diameter, right ventricular systolic pressure, left-ventricular end-systolic diameter, left ventricular ejection fraction. According to the median MIDA-Score of 9 points, patients were stratified in to a high and a low MIDA Score group and association with all-cause mortality was evaluated. Moreover, MR was assessed in echocardiographic controls in 370 patients at discharge, 279 patients at 3-months and 222 patients at 12 months after MitraClip implantation. Results During 2-years follow-up after MitraClip implantation, 69 of 291 (24%) patients with a high MIDA Score and 25 of 229 (11%) patients with a low MIDA Score died. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log rank test showed inferior rates of death in patients with a low score (p&lt;0.001) and multivariate cox regression revealed an odds ratio of 0.54 (0.31–0.95; p=0.032) regarding 2-year survival in this group. Moreover, one point increase in the MIDA Score was associated with a 1.18-fold increase in the risk for mortality (1.02–1.36; p=0.025). Comparing patients with a high MIDA Score and patients with a low score, post-procedural residual moderate/severe MR tended to be more frequent in patients with a high MIDA Score at discharge (53% vs 43%; p=0.061), 3-months (50% vs 40%; p=0.091) and significantly at 12-months follow-up (52% vs 37%; p=0.029). Conclusion The MIDA Mortality Risk Score remained its predictive ability in patients with degenerative or function MR undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair. Moreover, a high MIDA score was associated with a higher frequency of post-procedural residual moderate/severe MR, indicating a lower effectiveness of this procedure in these patients. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Natural Progression of Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis with Preserved Ejection Fraction

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 273-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antony Leslie Innasimuthu ◽  
Sanjay Kumar ◽  
Jason Lazar ◽  
William E. Katz
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Mild Stenosis ◽  
Natural Progression

Because the natural progression of low-gradient aortic stenosis (LGAS) has not been well defined, we performed a retrospective study of 116 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis who had undergone follow-up echocardiography at a median interval of 698 days (range, 371–1,020 d). All patients had preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (&gt;0.50) during and after follow-up. At baseline, patients were classified by aortic valve area (AVA) as having mild stenosis (≥1.5 cm2), moderate stenosis (≥1 to &lt;1.5 cm2), or severe stenosis (&lt;1 cm2). Severe aortic stenosis was further classified by mean gradient (LGAS, mean &lt;40 mmHg; high-gradient aortic stenosis [HGAS], mean ≥40 mmHg). We compared baseline and follow-up values among 4 groups: patients with mild stenosis, moderate stenosis, LGAS, and HGAS. At baseline, 30 patients had mild stenosis, 54 had moderate stenosis, 24 had LGAS, and 8 had HGAS. Compared with the moderate group, the LGAS group had lower AVA but similar mean gradient. Yet the actuarial curves for progressing to HGAS were significantly different: 25% of patients in LGAS reached HGAS status significantly earlier than did 25% of patients in the moderate-AS group (713 vs 881 d; P=0.035). Because LGAS has a high propensity to progress to HGAS, we propose that low-gradient aortic stenosis patients be closely monitored as a distinct subgroup that warrants more frequent echocardiographic follow-up.

scholarly journals The relationship between diastolic blood pressure and the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation: the Fushimi AF registry

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Ikeda ◽  
M Iguchi ◽  
H Ogawa ◽  
Y Aono ◽  
K Doi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Diastolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Hypertension is one of the major risk factors of cardiovascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, relationship between diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and cardiovascular events in AF patients remains unclear. Methods The Fushimi AF Registry is a community-based prospective survey of AF patients in Japan. Follow-up data were available in 4,466 patients, and 4,429 patients with available data of DBP were examined. We divided the patients into three groups; G1 (DBP&lt;70 mmHg, n=1,946), G2 (70≤DBP&lt;80, n=1,321) and G3 (80≤DBP, n=1,162), and compared the clinical background and outcomes between groups. Results The proportion of female was grater in G1 group, and the patients in G1 group were older and had higher prevalence of heart failure (HF), diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic kidney disease (CKD). Prescription of beta blockers was higher in G1 group, but that of renin-angiotensin system-inhibitors and calcium channel blocker was comparable. During the median follow-up of 1,589 days, in Kaplan-Meier analysis, the incidence rates of cardiovascular events (composite of cardiac death, ischemic stroke and systemic embolism, major bleeding and HF hospitalization during follow up) were higher in G1 group and G3 group than G2 group (Figure 1). When we divided the patients based on the systolic blood pressure (SBP) at baseline (≥130 mmHg or &lt;130 mmHg), the incidence of rates of cardiovascular events were comparable among groups. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis including female gender, age (≥75 years), higher SBP (≥130 mmHg), DM, pre-existing HF, CKD, low left ventricular ejection fraction (&lt;40%) and DBP (G1, G2, G3) revealed that DBP was an independent determinant of cardiovascular events (G1 group vs. G2 group; hazard ratio (HR): 1.40, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.19–1.64, G3 group vs. G2 group; HR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.01–1.49). When we examined the impact of DBP according to 10 mmHg increment, patients with very low DBP (&lt;60 mmHg) (HR: 1.50,95% CI:1.24–1.80) and very high DBP (≥90 mmHg) (HR: 1.51,95% CI:1.15–1.98) had higher incidence of cardiovascular events than patients with DBP of 70–79 mmHg (Figure 2). However, when we examined the impact of SBP according to 20 mmHg increment, SBP at baseline was not associated with the incidence of cardiovascular events (Figure 3). Conclusion In Japanese patients with AF, DBP exhibited J curve association with higher incidence of cardiovascular events. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Clinical characteristics, one-year change in ejection fraction and long-term outcomes in patients with heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction: a multicentre prospective observational study in Catalonia (Spain)

BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. e018719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nuria Farré ◽  
Josep Lupon ◽  
Eulàlia Roig ◽  
Jose Gonzalez-Costello ◽  
Joan Vila ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
End Point ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Baseline Characteristics

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to analyse baseline characteristics and outcome of patients with heart failure and mid-range left ventricular ejection fraction (HFmrEF, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 40%–49%) and the effect of 1-year change in LVEF in this group.SettingMulticentre prospective observational study of ambulatory patients with HF followed up at four university hospitals with dedicated HF units.ParticipantsFourteen per cent (n=504) of the 3580 patients included had HFmrEF.InterventionsBaseline characteristics, 1-year LVEF and outcomes were collected. All-cause death, HF hospitalisation and the composite end-point were the primary outcomes.ResultsMedian follow-up was 3.66 (1.69–6.04) years. All-cause death, HF hospitalisation and the composite end-point were 47%, 35% and 59%, respectively. Outcomes were worse in HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (LVEF>50%), without differences between HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (LVEF<40%) and HFmrEF (all-cause mortality 52.6% vs 45.8% and 43.8%, respectively, P=0.001). After multivariable Cox regression analyses, no differences in all-cause death and the composite end-point were seen between the three groups. HF hospitalisation and cardiovascular death were not statistically different between patients with HFmrEF and HFrEF. At 1-year follow-up, 62% of patients with HFmrEF had LVEF measured: 24% had LVEF<40%, 43% maintained LVEF 40%–49% and 33% had LVEF>50%. While change in LVEF as continuous variable was not associated with better outcomes, those patients who evolved from HFmrEF to HFpEF did have a better outcome. Those who remained in the HFmrEF and HFrEF groups had higher all-cause mortality after adjustment for age, sex and baseline LVEF (HR 1.96 (95% CI 1.08 to 3.54, P=0.027) and HR 2.01 (95% CI 1.04 to 3.86, P=0.037), respectively).ConclusionsPatients with HFmrEF have a clinical profile in-between HFpEF and HFrEF, without differences in all-cause mortality and the composite end-point between the three groups. At 1 year, patients with HFmrEF exhibited the greatest variability in LVEF and this change was associated with survival.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document